Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Urogynecol J ; 35(4): 921-923, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38308690

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Intravesical mesh is an uncommon complication following synthetic midurethral sling placement. Management options have included endoscopic techniques such as laser ablation or surgical excision. We present our technique for robotic-assisted excision of intravesical mesh following a retropubic midurethral sling. METHODS: The patient is a 66-year-old woman with a remote history of laser ablation of intraurethral mesh after midurethral sling, and persistent symptomatic intravesical mesh with associated stone at the bladder neck and right bladder wall. Robotic excision of the intravesical mesh and stone was performed by entering the space of Retzius, carrying the dissection along the right arm of the retropubic sling, performing two cystotomies to free and remove the mesh, and finally closing the cystotomies in two layers. RESULTS: The patient was discharged on postoperative day 1. A cystogram prior to catheter removal showed no extravasation and a competent bladder neck. She reported no new stress incontinence and had improvement in overactive bladder symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic excision of intravesical mesh after synthetic midurethral sling was safely performed in this patient who had multiple areas of intravesical mesh. Management aspects reported here may be helpful for complex presentations of intravesical mesh.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Slings Suburetrais , Telas Cirúrgicas , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Remoção de Dispositivo/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Slings Suburetrais/efeitos adversos , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos , Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Cálculos da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Cálculos da Bexiga Urinária/etiologia , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/cirurgia
2.
Urogynecology (Phila) ; 30(1): 35-41, 2024 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37493281

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Improving opioid stewardship is important, given the common use of opioids and resultant adverse events. Evidence-based prescribing recommendations for surgeons may help reduce opioid prescribing after specific procedures. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess longitudinal prescribing patterns for patients undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the 2 years before and after implementing evidence-based opioid prescribing recommendations. STUDY DESIGN: In December 2017, a 3-tiered opioid prescribing recommendation was created based on prospective data on postoperative opioid use after pelvic organ prolapse surgery. For this follow-up study, prescribing patterns, including quantity of opioids prescribed (in oral morphine equivalents [OMEs]) and refill rates, were retrospectively compared for patients undergoing prolapse surgery before (November 2015-November 2017; n = 238) and after (December 2017-December 2019; n = 361) recommendation implementation. Univariate analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon rank sum and χ2 tests. Cochran-Armitage trend tests and interrupted time-series analysis tested for significance in the change in OMEs prescribed before versus after recommendation implementation. RESULTS: After recommendation implementation, the quantity of postoperative opioids prescribed decreased from median 225 mg OME (interquartile range, 225, 300 mg OME) to 71.3 mg OME (interquartile range, 0, 112.5 mg OME; P < 0.0001). Decreases also occurred within each subgroup of prolapse surgery: native tissue vaginal repair ( P < 0.0001), robotic sacrocolpopexy ( P < 0.0001), open sacrocolpopexy ( P < 0.0001), and colpocleisis ( P < 0.003). The proportion of patients discharged following prolapse surgery without opioids increased (4.2% vs 36.6%; P < 0.0001), and the rate of opioid refills increased (2.1% vs 6.0%; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: With 2 years of postimplementation follow-up, the use of procedure-specific, tiered opioid prescribing recommendations at our institution was associated with a significant, sustained reduction in opioids prescribed. This study further supports using evidence-based recommendations for opioid prescribing.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Feminino , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , Seguimentos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Morfina
3.
Can J Urol ; 29(3): 11175-11181, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35691040

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Bladder spasm are common complications following cystoscopic urologic procedures. This study aims to determine the incidence and risk factors for bladder spasm after ambulatory cystoscopic urologic procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of adult patients who underwent urologic procedures in our ambulatory center from May 1st, 2018 through December 30th, 2020, were reviewed. Bladder spasm was identified from the administration of antispasmodic therapy (e.g. oxybutynin) during anesthesia recovery. Multivariable analyses were performed to assess the association between bladder spasm and clinical factors. RESULTS: Included were 2,671 patients, of which 917 (34.3%) developed postoperative bladder spasm, yielding an incidence of 343 (95%CI 325-361) per 1,000 procedures. Risk factors associated with bladder spasm were younger adult age (< 60 years), longer (> 45 minutes) and more complex procedures. Compared to cystoscopy the risk of spasm following transurethral resection of the bladder tumor was OR 4.35 (95%CI 3.22, 5.87) and for transurethral resection of the prostate OR 3.25 (95% CI 2.24, 4.71). Spasm prophylaxis with belladonna and opium suppositories (B&O) was used in 1,158 patients and 384 (33.2%) developed spasms. The use of B&O was not associated with reduction of bladder spasm, OR 0.91 (95%CI 0.75, 1.1, p = 0.318). Postoperative outcomes did not differ between patients who did or did not develop spasms. CONCLUSION: Bladder spasms are common following ambulatory urologic procedures, more so with more extensive procedures. Prophylaxis with B&O was not significantly associated with a lower rate of bladder spasms.


Assuntos
Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Urologia , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Espasmo/epidemiologia , Espasmo/etiologia , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/efeitos adversos , Bexiga Urinária , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA