Clinical Profiles of Children and Adolescents With Induced Laryngeal Obstruction (ILO) and Exercise Induced Laryngeal Obstruction (EILO).

PURPOSE: To compare clinical profiles of pediatric patients with Induced Laryngeal Obstruction (ILO), Exercise Induced Laryngeal Obstruction (EILO), and EILO with non-exertion related secondary triggers (EILO+). METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort design was employed. Four-hundred and twenty-three patients <18 years of age were identified from the electronic medical record of a large children's hospital. All patients underwent evaluations with a laryngologist and speech-language pathologist and were diagnosed with EILO/ILO. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on dyspnea triggers reported in initial evaluations. Groups consisted of patients with EILO (N = 281), ILO (N = 30), and EILO+ (N = 112). Patient demographics, EILO/ILO symptoms, endoscopy findings, medical comorbidities, medical history, and EILO/ILO treatment information were extracted and compared across EILO/ILO subtypes. RESULTS: Patients with EILO experienced higher rates of hyperventilation (P < .001), sore throat (P = .023), and chest pain (P = .003). Patients with ILO were significantly younger in age (P = .017) and presented with increased rates of nighttime symptoms (P < .001), globus sensation (P = .008), self-reported reflux symptoms (P = .023), and history of gastrointestinal conditions (P = .034). Patients with EILO+ were more likely to be female (P = .037) and presented with higher prevalence of anxiety (P = .003), ADHD (P = .004), chest tightness (P = .030), and cough (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with EILO, ILO, and EILO+ present with overlapping but unique clinical profiles. A prospective study is warranted to determine the etiology of these differences and clarify how the efficacy of EILO, ILO, and EILO+ treatment can be maximized. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Therapy Outcomes for Teenage Athletes With Exercise-Induced Laryngeal Obstruction.

PURPOSE: This study examined treatment outcomes of speech-language pathology intervention addressing exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO) symptoms in teenage athletes. METHOD: A prospective cohort design was utilized; teenagers diagnosed with EILO completed questionnaires during initial EILO evaluations, posttherapy, 3-month posttherapy, and 6-month posttherapy. Questionnaires examined the frequency of breathing problems, the use of the techniques taught in therapy, and the use of inhaler. Patients completed the Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) inventory at all time points. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients completed baseline questionnaires. Of these, 38 were surveyed posttherapy, 32 at 3-month posttherapy, and 27 at 6-month posttherapy. Patients reported more frequent and complete activity participation immediately posttherapy (p = .017) as well as reduced inhaler use (p = .036). Patients also reported a significant reduction in the frequency of breathing problems 6-month posttherapy (p = .015). Baseline PedsQL physical and psychosocial scores were below normative range and were not impacted by therapy. Baseline physical PedsQL score significantly predicted frequency of breathing difficulty 6-month posttherapy (p = .04), as better baseline scores were associated with fewer residual symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Therapy with a speech-language pathologist for EILO allowed for more frequent physical activity following therapy completion and decreased dyspnea symptoms 6-month posttherapy. Therapy was associated with a decrease in inhaler use. PedsQL scores indicated mildly poor health-related quality of life even after EILO symptoms improved. Findings support therapy as an effective treatment for EILO in teenage athletes and suggest that dyspnea symptoms may continue to improve following discharge as patients continue using therapy techniques.