Maternal effect genes as risk factors for congenital heart defects.

Maternal effect genes (MEGs) encode factors (e.g., RNA) in the oocyte that control embryonic development prior to activation of the embryonic genome. Over 80 mammalian MEGs have been identified, including several that have been associated with phenotypes in humans. Maternal variation in MEGs is associated with a range of adverse outcomes, which, in humans, include hydatidiform moles, zygotic cleavage failure, and offspring with multi-locus imprinting disorders. In addition, data from both animal models and humans suggest that the MEGs may be associated with structural birth defects such as congenital heart defects (CHDs). To further investigate the association between MEGs and CHDs, we conducted gene-level and gene-set analyses of known mammalian MEGs (n = 82) and two common groups of CHDs: conotruncal heart defects and left ventricular outflow tract defects. We identified 14 candidate CHD-related MEGs. These 14 MEGs include three (CDC20, KHDC3L, and TRIP13) of the 11 known human MEGs, as well as one (DNMT3A) of the eight MEGs that have been associated with structural birth defects in animal models. Our analyses add to the growing evidence that MEGs are associated with structural birth defects, in particular CHDs. Given the large proportion of individuals with structural birth defects for whom etiology of their condition is unknown, further investigations of MEGs as potential risk factors for structural birth defects are strongly warranted.

Genome-Wide Association Studies of Conotruncal Heart Defects with Normally Related Great Vessels in the United States.

Conotruncal defects with normally related great vessels (CTD-NRGVs) occur in both patients with and without 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS), but it is unclear to what extent the genetically complex etiologies of these heart defects may overlap across these two groups, potentially involving variation within and/or outside of the 22q11.2 region. To explore this potential overlap, we conducted genome-wide SNP-level, gene-level, and gene set analyses using common variants, separately in each of five cohorts, including two with 22q11.2DS (N = 1472 total cases) and three without 22q11.2DS (N = 935 total cases). Results from the SNP-level analyses were combined in meta-analyses, and summary statistics from these analyses were also used in gene and gene set analyses. Across all these analyses, no association was significant after correction for multiple comparisons. However, several SNPs, genes, and gene sets with suggestive evidence of association were identified. For common inherited variants, we did not identify strong evidence for shared genomic mechanisms for CTD-NRGVs across individuals with and without 22q11.2 deletions. Nevertheless, several of our top gene-level and gene set results have been linked to cardiogenesis and may represent candidates for future work.

Birth defects that co-occur with non-syndromic gastroschisis and omphalocele.

Gastroschisis and omphalocele are the two most common abdominal wall birth defects, and epidemiologic characteristics and frequency of occurrence as part of a syndromic condition suggest distinct etiologies between the two defects. We assessed complex patterns of defect co-occurrence with these defects separately using the Texas Birth Defects Registry. We used co-occurring defect analysis (CODA) to compute adjusted observed-to-expected (O/E) ratios for all observed birth defect patterns. There were 2,998 non-syndromic (i.e., no documented syndrome diagnosis identified) cases with gastroschisis and 789 (26%) of these had additional co-occurring defects. There were 720 non-syndromic cases with omphalocele, and 404 (56%) had additional co-occurring defects. Among the top 30 adjusted O/E ratios for gastroschisis, most of the co-occurring defects were related to the gastrointestinal system, though cardiovascular and kidney anomalies were also present. Several of the top 30 combinations co-occurring with omphalocele appeared suggestive of OEIS (omphalocele, exstrophy of cloaca, imperforate anus, spinal defects) complex. After the exclusion of additional cases with features suggestive of OEIS in a post-hoc sensitivity analysis, the top combinations involving defects associated with OEIS (e.g., spina bifida) were no longer present. The remaining top combinations involving omphalocele included cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and urogenital defects. In summary, we identified complex patterns of defects that co-occurred more frequently than expected with gastroschisis and omphalocele using a novel software platform. Better understanding differences in the patterns between gastroschisis and omphalocele could lead to additional etiologic insights.