Association of Bariatric Surgery with Risk of Incident Obesity-Associated Malignancies: a Multi-center Population-Based Study.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity has a known association with certain types of malignancy, and we aimed to determine whether bariatric surgery has a protective effect against de novo obesity-associated cancer development in adult patients. METHODS: We performed a multi-center retrospective cohort studying utilizing TriNetX national database. Patients were identified utilizing ICD-10-CM coding, and propensity score matching was performed. We compared patients with obesity who underwent bariatric surgery to patients with obesity who did not undergo bariatric surgery. RESULTS: We initially identified 60,285 patients in the bariatric surgery group and 1,570,440 patients in nonsurgical control group. After propensity score matching, we included 55,789 patients in each patient cohort. The cumulative incidence of de novo obesity-associated cancers at 10 years was 4.0% (2206 patients) in the bariatric surgery group and 8.9% (4,960 patients) in the nonsurgical control group (HR 0.482 [95% CI 0.459-0.507]). The bariatric surgery group had lower incidence proportions for de novo breast cancer (HR 0.753 [CI 0.678-0.836]), colon cancer (HR 0.638 [CI 0.541-0.752]), liver cancer (HR 0.370 [CI 0.345-0.396]), ovarian cancer (HR 0.654 [CI 0.531-0.806]), and endometrial cancer (HR 0.448 [CI 0.362-0.556]) when compared to the nonsurgical control group. CONCLUSION: We noted that bariatric surgery is associated with a significantly lower cumulative incidence of de novo obesity-associated cancer compared to a nonsurgical matched control group. Incidence proportions of de novo breast, colon, liver, ovarian, and endometrial cancer were significantly lower in adult patients with obesity in the bariatric surgery group compared to the nonsurgical group.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Peripheral Vascular Disease Admissions Using a Nationally Representative Sample.

Our study aimed to identify clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with race and ethnicity in patients admitted with peripheral vascular disease (PVD) across the United States. We queried the National Inpatient Sample database from 2015 to 2019 and identified 622,820 patients admitted with PVD. Patients across 3 major race and ethnic categories were compared in terms of baseline characteristics, inpatient outcomes, and resource utilization. Black and Hispanic patients were more likely to be younger and of the lowest median income but incur higher total hospital costs. Black race predicted higher rates of acute kidney injury, need for blood transfusion, and need for vasopressor but lower rates of circulatory shock, and mortality. Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to undergo limb-salvaging procedures and more likely to undergo amputation than White patients. In conclusion, our findings indicate that Black and Hispanic patients experience health disparities in resource utilization and inpatient outcomes for PVD admissions.

Endoscopic balloon dilation management for benign duodenal stenosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Benign duodenal stenosis (BDS) is most commonly caused by peptic ulcer disease (PUD). Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is the recommended initial management despite limited supporting literature. Our study investigated the etiologic spectrum of BDS and its response to endoscopic dilation. METHODS: We performed a cohort study of a prospectively maintained database of BDS at our large tertiary academic center between 2002 and 2018. All patients who underwent EBD were analyzed. Dilation was performed using through-the-scope balloons. Technical and clinical successes of initial and repeat EBD were compared. Descriptive statistics, univariate, and multivariate analysis were performed. RESULTS: The study included 86 patients with 54.7% female gender. Etiologies included 39 patients with PUD (45.3%), 19 patients with Crohn's disease (22.1%), 23 patients had idiopathic etiologies (26.7%), and 5 patients were listed as other etiologies (5.8%). Proximal stricture location (1st part of duodenum) occurred in 66% of females, whereas distal duodenal involvement was seen in 63.6% of males (p value 0.007). Usage of PPI was associated with 3.6 times higher clinical success rate (p value 0.04). Technical (97.4%) and clinical (77.8%) successes for index dilations in PUD were not significantly better than those of non-PUD patients (p values 0.99, 0.52). CONCLUSION: EBD has both a high technical and clinical success for BDS regardless of etiology and should be considered over initial surgical intervention due to low risk profile. Males tend to have more distal duodenal involvement, and PPI usage is an independent predictor for clinical success.

Outcomes with use of extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation in high-risk pulmonary embolism: a national database perspective.

High-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) patients can be managed with systemic lysis, catheter-based therapies, or surgical embolectomy. Despite the advent of newer therapies, patients with high-risk PE remain with a 50-60% short-term mortality risk. In such patients, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly utilized for hemodynamic support. To evaluate the outcomes of the use of ECMO in patients with high-risk PE. Using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, we identified patients with high-risk PE using ICD 10 codes and compared in-hospital outcomes of patients with and without ECMO support. We identified 38,035 patients with high-risk PE, of whom 820 had undergone ECMO placement. Most patients who underwent ECMO were male (54%), white (65%), and with a mean age of 53.7 years. ECMO use was not associated with a meaningful difference in patient mortality when comparing treatment groups (OR, 1.32 ± 0.39; 0.74-2.35; p = 0.35). Rather, ECMO use was associated with a higher frequency of inpatient complications. ECMO use was not associated with a significant difference in patient mortality in patients with high-risk PE.

The Burden of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Gout: A National Representative Database Study.

The association between gout and arrhythmias has not been thoroughly examined. This study discusses the underappreciated burden, patterns, and outcomes of several arrhythmias, which may have prognostic value in patients with gout. This is a retrospective cohort study that used the US National Inpatient Sample for 2015-2019. Complex samples multivariable logistic and linear regression models were used to assess the incidence and trends in gout-related arrhythmia and consequential inpatient mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), hospitalization charges, and predictors of mortality. Hospitalizations that included a diagnosis of gout accounted for 60,360 admissions. Arrhythmias affected roughly one-fourth of those. When compared to individuals without arrhythmia, those who experienced arrhythmias were older. Arrhythmias were found to be equally common in both men and women. The most common subtype was AF (88%), followed by atrial flutter (6.2%), conduction disorders (4.7%), and ventricular tachycardia (3.2%). In individuals with gout, there was a rising trend in arrhythmia-related hospital admissions and mortality. The gout-arrhythmia group had more traditional cardiac comorbidities. After adjusting for baseline variables, the arrhythmia group had significantly greater mortality (693 vs 77 per 100,000 hospitalizations), mean LOS (4.3 vs 3.7 days), and hospital costs ($33,057 vs $28,384). In gout, incident arrhythmia dramatically raised the risk of death (adjusted odds ratio, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.95-2.16; P < 0.001). Gout patients who are hospitalized with concurrent arrhythmia have a likelihood of longer stays in the hospital and higher mortality. Early identification and treatment of arrhythmia may benefit outcomes in gout patients.

Predictors of poor bowel preparations and colonoscopy cancellations in inpatient colonoscopies, a single center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: An adequate bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy is a major quality-limiting factor that determines both the diagnostic and therapeutic yield of a colonoscopy. Colonoscopy is considered the gold standard for colon cancer screening and it is the primary approach to the workup of hematochezia, diarrhea and iron deficiency anemia (IDA). Several modifiable factors of bowel prep adequacy have been identified, that account for around 25% of inadequate bowel preparations in outpatient colonoscopies. However, the literature is sparse when examining the factors associated with inadequate preparations and procedure cancellations in an inpatient hospital setting. We aim to identify factors that affect bowel preparation adequacy and procedure cancellations among diagnostic colonoscopies performed during hospitalization. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of 1,500 consecutive patients who had a diagnostic colonoscopy as an inpatient at a tertiary level hospital over a 2-year period. All patients were administered a clear liquid diet the day prior to the colonoscopy. Patients were then instructed to drink 4 L of polyethylene glycol (PEG, Golytely) between 5 am to 9 am on the day of the procedure. The clinical course of each case was followed to identify quality of preparations, cancelled procedures and the reasons for cancellations. We applied univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify variables to predict cancellation and poor preparation. RESULTS: A total of 1,029 patients were included in the study. 194 (18.8%) patients had colonoscopy cancellations and 268 (26.0%) had poor bowel preparations. Multivariate analysis revealed these factors to be associated with colonoscopy cancellations: education at the graduate school level [odds ratio (OR) =1.93, P=0.04], Hispanic ethnicity (OR =0.47, P<0.01), hemoglobin level <10 g/dL (OR =1.41, P=0.05) and if the colonoscopy was done for other indications (OR =0.53, P=0.04). Factors associated with poor bowel preparation on multivariate analysis, were dementia (OR =2.44, P=0.02), gastroparesis (OR =3.97, P=0.01) and inpatient opioids use (OR =1.69, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of colonoscopy cancellations and poor bowel preparations in inpatient colonoscopies were high, and we were able to identify predictors of inadequate colon preparation and procedure cancellations. Exploring more individualized colon preparation regimens based on personal risk factors could reduce the number of inadequate and cancelled colonoscopies in an inpatient setting.

Identifying predictors and evaluating the role of steroids in the prevention of post-embolization syndrome after transarterial chemoembolization and bland embolization.

BACKGROUND: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and bland embolization (TAE), performed for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), are often complicated by post-embolization syndrome (PES). There are limited data regarding the incidence of PES after TAE and the role of steroids in PES. We report the incidence of PES post TACE and TAE, identify predictors, and evaluate the role of steroids in PES. METHODS: Demographic and clinical variables of patients who underwent embolization were collected and PES was identified. Risk factors for PES, TACE and TAE were derived by logistic regression. We compared patients who received dexamethasone to those who did not, regarding baseline characteristics, occurrence of PES, and hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients, average age 60.5 years, underwent the procedure, 77.8% were male, and 87.7% had cirrhosis. Of these 171, 107 underwent TACE and 64 TAE. Dexamethasone was given to 106 (61.9%) patients, of whom 85 had TACE and 21 TAE. One hundred twenty-four patients (72.5%) developed PES. PES occurred in more patients who underwent TACE, 80 (74.7%) vs. 44 (68.7%), and resulted in a longer hospital stay (1.47 vs. 1.12 days, P=0.034). Predictive factors for PES included female sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-7.34; P=0.041), and alcohol-related HCC (OR 3.14, 95%CI 1.42-6.95; P=0.005). Dexamethasone did not affect the length of hospital stay (1.43 vs. 1.29 days, P=0.422) or the rate of prolonged hospitalization (18.8% vs. 15.4%, P=0.561). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the incidence of PES following TACE or TAE and the use of dexamethasone did not reduce the incidence of PES or the duration of hospital stay.

Fragility index: how fragile is the data that support the American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of Crohn's disease?

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the cornerstone of evidence-based medicine. However, recent literature has drawn attention to the limitations of using P-value to report statistical significance of outcomes in the clinical trials. We performed this analysis to analyze the strength of the data that supported the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) guidelines for 'Management of Crohn's disease in adults' using fragility index (FI). We screened all the RCTs referenced in the 2018 ACG guidelines 'Management of Crohn's disease in adults'. We calculated the FI and the fragility quotient (FQ) and its correlation with P-value. Data were also collected on the patients lost to follow up, year of publication, sample size, number needed to treat (NNT), science citation index (SCI), presence of blinding and the number of centers in these studies. Of the 91 RCTs cited in this guideline, 32 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The median values for FI for 32 trials were 3 [interquartile range (IQR) 2-6], FQ 0.026 (IQR 0.012-0.413), P-value 0.010 (IQR 0.001-0.03), lost to follow up 17 (IQR 10-39.5) and sample size 133 (IQR 74.5-281.5). There was statistically significant correlation between FI and P-value (rs -0.86, P <0.001) and sample size (rs 0.56, P = 0.002). There was no correlation found with number lost to follow up, NNT, SCI, year of publication, blinding and number of centers. The majority of the RCTs conducted in the field of Crohn's disease rely on small number of superior events for statistical significance, thus rendering the validity of their conclusion questionable. At least 18 out of 60 ACG recommendations are based on RCTs in which, number of patients lost to follow up exceeds FI, thus making reported outcomes of the trial weak. We suggest that FI and FQ should be included in clinical trials to better understand if the data are meaningful, beyond a P-value.

Reexamining the data used in the 2012 guidelines of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases for the management of adult patients with ascites due to cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: In 2012, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases published practice guidelines for the management of patients with ascites caused by cirrhosis, using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. We reexamined the strength of these RCTs by calculating the fragility index (FI), a novel metric proposed for evaluating the robustness of RCTs. METHODS: We screened all RCTs referenced in the guidelines for specific criteria. We calculated the FI and fragility quotient (FQ), and analyzed the correlation between FI and several variables. RESULTS: Twenty-one RCTs were included. The median (25th, 75th) FI and FQ were 1 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.5-6) and 0.070 (IQR 0.008-0.166), respectively. For studies that reported the number of patients lost to follow up (12 RCTs), the median of patients lost was 2 (IQR 0-6.5). There was no significant correlation between FI and sample size (rs=0.357), P-value (rs=-0.299), number lost to follow up (rs=0.355), Science Citation Index (rs=0.347), year of publication (rs=-0.085), blinding (rpb=-0.18) or number of centers (rpb=0.10). However, a significant correlation was seen between FI and number needed to treat (rs=-0.549; P=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: RCTs in the field of cirrhosis-related ascites are fragile. Of the 21 trials analyzed, 13 had an FI of 3 or below and these trials influenced 13 of the 49 recommendations in the guidelines. We recommend the incorporation of FI and FQ in addition to P-value to better understand the meaning of the results in gastroenterological studies.

Comparison of treatment modalities in pancreatic pseudocyst: A population based study.

BACKGROUND: Current therapeutic techniques for pancreatic pseudocyst include surgical management with a laparoscopic approach or an open surgical procedure, percutaneous catheter drainage and endoscopic drainage. Yet it remains controversial whether different treatment approaches affect inpatient outcome. AIM: To investigate inpatient outcome of different treatment approaches in treating pancreatic pseudocyst. METHODS: Here we conducted a retrospective analysis of pancreatic pseudocyst-associated hospitalizations using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample. International Classification of Diseases 10 clinical modification and procedure codes are used. RESULTS: A total of 7060 patients meeting the above criteria were identified. Our study revealed laparoscopic approach associated with the lowest rate of red blood cell transfusion (P < 0.001), and it had lower short-term complications including acute renal failure (P = 0.01), urinary tract infection (P = 0.01), sepsis (P < 0.001) and acute respiratory failure (P = 0.01). Laparoscopic surgical approach associated with the shortest mean length of stay (P = 0.009), and it had the lowest total charge (P = 0.03). All three modalities have similar inpatient mortality (P = 0.28). The study also revealed that percutaneous drainage associated with more emergent admission (P < 0.001), rural hospital performs the most open surgical drainage (P < 0.001) and patients who received laparoscopic drainage are more likely to be discharged home (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts associated with the least short-term complications and had better outcomes comparing to percutaneous and open surgical drainage from 2016 National Inpatient Sample database.

Effectiveness of bezafibrate and ursodeoxycholic acid in patients with primary biliary cholangitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and obeticholic acid are currently approved treatments for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Since some patients do not respond adequately to UDCA, other therapies, such as bezafibrate, have been developed. In this meta-analysis we evaluated the efficacy and safety of using both UDCA and bezafibrate in patients with an inadequate response to UDCA. METHODS: We evaluated all randomized controlled trials comparing the combination of UDCA and bezafibrate with UDCA monotherapy. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to assess the treatment effect of combination therapy compared with UDCA alone. RESULTS: Ten trials with a total of 369 patients were analyzed. UDCA and bezafibrate combination therapy was more effective than UDCA monotherapy in improving alanine aminotransferase (SMD -2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.30 to -0.79), alkaline phosphatase at both less than 12 months (SMD -3.63, 95%CI -6.43 to -0.84) and more than 12 months (SMD -2.33, 95%CI -4.03 to -0.63), gamma-glutamyltransferase (SMD -1.29, 95%CI -2.67 to 0.08), triglyceride (SMD -0.80, 95%CI -1.41 to -0.19), immunoglobulin M (SMD -1.48, 95%CI -2.39 to -0.56), and cholesterol (SMD -4.61, 95%CI -7.34 to -1.89). There was no difference between the 2 groups in bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase or albumin. None of the adverse effects differed statistically between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: UDCA and bezafibrate combined treatment is superior to UDCA alone in UDCA non-responders with regard to decreasing liver biochemistry markers, without any significant increase in side effects in patients with PBC.