Effects of Vagal Nerve Stimulation on Ganglionated Plexi Nerve Activity and Ventricular Rate in Ambulatory Dogs With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to test the hypothesis that low-level vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) reduces the ventricular rate (VR) during atrial fibrillation (AF) through the activation of the inferior vena cava (IVC)-inferior atrial ganglionated plexus nerve activity (IAGPNA). BACKGROUND: Increased IVC-IAGPNA can suppress atrioventricular node conduction and slow VR in canine models of AF. METHODS: Persistent AF was induced in 6 dogs and the IVC-IAGPNA, right vagal nerve activity, left vagal nerve activity, and an electrocardiogram were recorded. After persistent AF was documented, VNS was programed to 14 s "on" and 1.1 min "off." After 1 week, the VNS was reprogramed to 3 min off and stimulation continued for another week. Neural remodeling of the stellate ganglion (SG) was assessed with tyrosine hydroxylase staining and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase deoxyuridine triphosphate nick-end labeling staining. RESULTS: Average IVC-IAGPNA was increased during both VNS 1.1 min off (8.20 ± 2.25 µV [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.33 to 9.53 µV]; p = 0.002) and 3 min off (7.96 ± 2.03 µV [95% CI: 6.30 to 9.27 µV]; p = 0.001) versus baseline (7.14 ± 2.20 µV [95% CI: 5.35 to 8.52 µV]). VR was reduced during both VNS 1.1 min off (123.29 ± 6.29 beats/min [95% CI: 116.69 to 129.89 beats/min]; p = 0.001) and 3 min off (120.01 ± 4.93 beats/min [95% CI: 114.84 to 125.18 beats/min]; p = 0.001) compared to baseline (142.04 ± 7.93 bpm [95% CI: 133.72 to 150.37]). Abnormal regions were observed in the left SG, but not in the right SG. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase deoxyuridine triphosphate nick-end labeling-positive neurons were found in 22.2 ± 17.2% [95% CI: 0.9% to 43.5%] of left SG cells and 12.8 ± 8.4% [95% CI: 2.4% to 23.2%] of right SG cells. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic low-level VNS increases IVC-IAGPNA and damages bilateral stellate ganglia. Both mechanisms could contribute to the underlying mechanism of VR control during AF.

Cervical vagal nerve stimulation activates the stellate ganglion in ambulatory dogs.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recent studies showed that, in addition to parasympathetic nerves, cervical vagal nerves contained significant sympathetic nerves. We hypothesized that cervical vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) may capture the sympathetic nerves within the vagal nerve and activate the stellate ganglion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recorded left stellate ganglion nerve activity (SGNA), left thoracic vagal nerve activity (VNA), and subcutaneous electrocardiogram in seven dogs during left cervical VNS with 30 seconds on-time and 30 seconds off time. We then compared the SGNA between VNS on and off times. RESULTS: Cervical VNS at moderate (0.75 mA) output induced large SGNA, elevated heart rate (HR), and reduced HR variability, suggesting sympathetic activation. Further increase of the VNS output to >1.5 mA increased SGNA but did not significantly increase the HR, suggesting simultaneous sympathetic and parasympathetic activation. The differences of integrated SGNA and integrated VNA between VNS on and off times (ΔSGNA) increased progressively from 5.2 mV-s {95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25-9.06, p=0.018, n=7} at 1.0 mA to 13.7 mV-s (CI: 5.97-21.43, p=0.005, n=7) at 1.5 mA. The difference in HR (ΔHR, bpm) between on and off times was 5.8 bpm (CI: 0.28-11.29, p=0.042, n=7) at 1.0 mA and 5.3 bpm (CI 1.92 to 12.61, p=0.122, n=7) at 1.5 mA. CONCLUSION: Intermittent cervical VNS may selectively capture the sympathetic components of the vagal nerve and excite the stellate ganglion at moderate output. Increasing the output may result in simultaneously sympathetic and parasympathetic capture.

Sympathetic nerve fibers and ganglia in canine cervical vagus nerves: localization and quantitation.

BACKGROUND: Cervical vagal nerve (CVN) stimulation may improve left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with heart failure. OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that sympathetic structures are present in the CVN and to describe the location and quantitate these sympathetic components of the CVN. METHODS: We performed immunohistochemical studies of the CVN from 11 normal dogs and simultaneously recorded stellate ganglion nerve activity, left thoracic vagal nerve activity, and subcutaneous electrocardiogram in 2 additional dogs. RESULTS: A total of 28 individual nerve bundles were present in the CVNs of the first 11 dogs, with an average of 1.87±1.06 per dog. All CVNs contain tyrosine hydroxylase-positive (sympathetic) nerves, with a total cross-sectional area of 0.97±0.38 mm(2). The sympathetic nerves were nonmyelinated, typically located at the periphery of the nerve bundles and occupied 0.03%-2.80% of the CVN cross-sectional area. Cholineacetyltransferase-positive nerve fibers occupied 12.90%-42.86% of the CVN cross-sectional areas. Ten of 11 CVNs showed tyrosine hydroxylase and cholineacetyltransferase colocalization. In 2 dogs with nerve recordings, we documented heart rate acceleration during spontaneous vagal nerve activity in the absence of stellate ganglion nerve activity. CONCLUSIONS: Sympathetic nerve fibers are invariably present in the CVNs of normal dogs and occupy in average up to 2.8% of the cross-sectional area. Because sympathetic nerve fibers are present in the periphery of the CVNs, they may be susceptible to activation by electrical stimulation. Spontaneous activation of the sympathetic component of the vagal nerve may accelerate the heart rate.