RESUMO
Introduction: The gut microbiome is an integral partner in host health and plays a role in immune development, altered nutrition, and pathogen prevention. The mycobiome (fungal microbiome) is considered part of the rare biosphere but is still a critical component in health. Next generation sequencing has improved our understanding of fungi in the gut, but methodological challenges remain. Biases are introduced during DNA isolation, primer design and choice, polymerase selection, sequencing platform selection, and data analyses, as fungal reference databases are often incomplete or contain erroneous sequences. Methods: Here, we compared the accuracy of taxonomic identifications and abundances from mycobiome analyses which vary among three commonly selected target gene regions (18S, ITS1, or ITS2) and the reference database (UNITE - ITS1, ITS2 and SILVA - 18S). We analyze multiple communities including individual fungal isolates, a mixed mock community created from five common fungal isolates found in weanling piglet feces, a purchased commercial fungal mock community, and piglet fecal samples. In addition, we calculated gene copy numbers for the 18S, ITS1, and ITS2 regions of each of the five isolates from the piglet fecal mock community to determine whether copy number affects abundance estimates. Finally, we determined the abundance of taxa from several iterations of our in-house fecal community to assess the effects of community composition on taxon abundance. Results: Overall, no marker-database combination consistently outperformed the others. Internal transcribed space markers were slightly superior to 18S in the identification of species in tested communities, but Lichtheimia corymbifera, a common member of piglet gut communities, was not amplified by ITS1 and ITS2 primers. Thus, ITS based abundance estimates of taxa in piglet mock communities were skewed while 18S marker profiles were more accurate. Kazachstania slooffiae displayed the most stable copy numbers (83-85) while L. corymbifera displayed significant variability (90-144) across gene regions. Discussion: This study underscores the importance of preliminary studies to assess primer combinations and database choice for the mycobiome sample of interest and raises questions regarding the validity of fungal abundance estimates.