Screening of the Pandemic Response Box library identified promising compound candidate drug combinations against extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

Infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii pose a significant threat to human health, particularly in the context of hospital-acquired infections. As existing antibiotics lose efficacy against Acinetobacter isolates, there is an urgent need for the development of novel antimicrobial agents. In this study, we assessed 400 structurally diverse compounds from the Medicines for Malaria Pandemic Response Box for their activity against two clinical isolates of A. baumannii: A. baumannii 5075, known for its extensive drug resistance, and A. baumannii QS17-1084, obtained from an infected wound in a Thai patient. Among the compounds tested, seven from the Pathogen box exhibited inhibitory effects on the in vitro growth of A. baumannii isolates, with IC50s ≤ 48 µM for A. baumannii QS17-1084 and IC50s ≤ 17 µM for A. baumannii 5075. Notably, two of these compounds, MUT056399 and MMV1580854, shared chemical scaffolds resembling triclosan. Further investigations involving drug combinations identified five synergistic drug combinations, suggesting potential avenues for therapeutic development. The combination of MUT056399 and brilacidin against A. baumannii QS17-1084 and that of MUT056399 and eravacycline against A. baumannii 5075 showed bactericidal activity. These combinations significantly inhibited biofilm formation produced by both A. baumannii strains. Our findings highlight the drug combinations as promising candidates for further evaluation in murine wound infection models against multidrug-resistant A. baumannii. These compounds hold potential for addressing the critical need for effective antibiotics in the face of rising antimicrobial resistance.

Prevalence of Intestinal Parasitic Infections, Genotypes, and Drug Susceptibility of Giardia lamblia among Preschool and School-Aged Children: A Cross-Sectional Study in Thailand.

This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections in children and assess the drug susceptibility and genotypes/assemblages of Giardia lamblia in Thailand. This cross-sectional study was conducted among children aged 3-12 years in Sangkhlaburi District, Kanchanaburi Province, Thailand, between 25 September 2017 and 12 January 2018. Parasites were identified by stool microscopic examination, cultivation of intestinal parasitic protozoa, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Drug susceptibility and genotype of G. lamblia were performed, respectively, by a resazurin assay and Triosephosphate Isomerase A and B genes using modified primers and probes. Among the 661 participants, 445 had an intestinal parasitic infection, resulting in a prevalence of 67.32% (95% CI: 63.60-70.89%). Blastocystis hominis was the most prevalent protozoa infection (49.32%; 95% CI: 45.44-53.22%), while Ascaris lumbricoides was the most prevalent helminth infection (0.91%; 95% CI: 0.33-1.97%). The prevalence of G. lamblia was 17.40%, with genotype B being the most common. According to our study, intestinal parasitic infections were commonly found in Thai children. G. lamblia was the most common pathogenic protozoa infection identified and exhibited less susceptibility to metronidazole compared to furazolidone and mebendazole.

Enteric etiological surveillance in acute diarrhea stool of United States Military Personnel on deployment in Thailand, 2013-2017.

BACKGROUND: Diarrhea remains a major public health problem for both civilian and military populations. This study describes the prevalence of acute diarrheal illness etiological agents, their antibiotic resistance distribution patterns, the resulting impact upon military force health protection, and potential prevention and treatment strategies. RESULTS: Forty-eight acute diarrhea stool samples from US military personnel deployed to Thailand from 2013-2017 were screened for enteric pathogens using ELISA, the TaqMan Array Card (TAC), and conventional microbiological methods. These isolates were also evaluated using antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) against ampicillin (AMP), azithromycin (AZM), ceftriaxone (CRO), ciprofloxacin (CIP), nalidixic acid (NA), erythromycin (ERY), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT) using commercial methodology. Susceptibility results were interpreted following the CLSI and NARM guidelines. Questionnaire data obtained from 47/48 volunteers indicated that 89.4% (42/47) reported eating local food and the most common clinical symptoms were nausea and abdominal pain (51%; 24/47). Multiple bacterial species were identified from the 48 stool samples with diarrhea etiological agents being detected in 79% (38/48) of the samples distributed as follows: 43.8% (21/48) Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter species, 42% (20/48) diarrheagenic Escherichia coli, and 23% (11/48) Salmonella. Co-infections were detected in 46% (22/48) of the samples. All C. jejuni isolates were resistant to CIP and NA. One C. jejuni isolate exhibited resistance to both AZM and ERY. Lastly, an association between exposure to poultry and subsequent detection of the diarrhea-associated pathogens E. coli and P. shigelloides was significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The detection of Campylobacter isolates with CIP, AZM and ERY resistance has critical force health protection and public health implications, as these data should guide effective Campylobacteriosis treatment options for deployed military members and travelers to Southeast Asia. Additional research efforts are recommended to determine the association of pathogen co-infections and/or other contributing factors towards diarrheal disease in military and traveler populations. Ongoing surveillance and AST profiling of potential disease-causing bacteria is required for effective disease prevention efforts and treatment strategies.