Impact on Prevalence of the Application of NAFLD/MAFLD Criteria in Overweight and Normal Weight Patients.

BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is considered the hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome. Recently, the term metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has been proposed and adapted to body mass index (BMI). This study describes the impact on prevalence of the application of both criteria in overweight and lean patients. METHODS: Patients who were evaluated for liver steatosis by transient elastography were included and divided according to BMI (≥25 kg/m2 and <25 kg/m2) and classified as NAFLD or MAFLD, according to metabolic abnormalities. Differences in prevalence were evaluated applying both criteria. A multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate independent associations of metabolic abnormalities and liver steatosis in lean patients. RESULTS: 3847 patients were included. In overweight patients (61%), the prevalence NAFLD was 63.6% and 65.3% for MAFLD (p = 0.22). In contrast, the prevalence of MAFLD was lower (7.9% vs. 18.3%, p ≤ 0.001) in lean patients. In this group, higher age, fasting glucose, triglycerides, and waist circumference showed independent association with liver steatosis. CONCLUSION: The application of NAFLD/MAFLD criteria did not show prevalence differences in overweight patients. With MAFLD criteria, the prevalence is lower in lean patients, but patients with high risk of progression of liver disease for steatosis were identified, according to their metabolic abnormalities.

Editorial: Treatment with Dual Incretin Receptor Agonists to Maintain Normal Glucose Levels May Also Maintain Normal Weight and Control Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD).

Worldwide, metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease. MAFLD is associated with insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), obesity, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Early diagnosis and management are vital to improving hepatic and cardiometabolic outcomes. Dietary change, weight loss, and structured exercise are the main treatment approaches for fatty liver disease. Since 2010, several investigational drug treatments failed to achieve regulatory approval due to mixed and unsatisfactory results. Although glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) showed initial promise as therapeutic agents, metabolic liver damage can recur after monotherapy cessation. Dual incretin receptor agonists target the receptors for glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP). Importantly, on May 13, 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved tirzepatide as the first dual GLP-1 and GIP receptor agonist for the treatment of T2DM. Dual incretin receptor agonists induce weight loss and enhance hepatic lipid metabolism and systemic insulin sensitivity. Insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis are the main contributors to the development of MAFLD. Treatment with dual incretin analogs reduces hepatic steatosis, lobular inflammation, liver cell damage, fibrosis, and total liver triglyceride levels. The availability of dual incretin receptor agonists for patients with MAFLD may result in weight control, normalizing insulin sensitivity, and reducing or even reversing metabolic dysfunction and liver damage. This Editorial aims to provide an update and discuss how treatment with dual incretin receptor agonists may maintain normal glucose levels and weight and control MAFLD.

Understanding the Role of Metabolic Syndrome as a Risk Factor for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) have a rising prevalence worldwide. The relationship between these two entities has long been studied and understanding it has become a public health and clinical priority. This association follows, in most patients, the path through non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), cirrhosis and finally HCC. Nonetheless, increasing evidence has been found, that shows MetS as an independent risk factor for the development of HCC. This review brings together the clinical evidence of the relationship between these highly prevalent diseases, with a particular interest in the impact of each component of MetS on HCC; It aims to summarize the complex physiopathological pathways that explain this relationship, and to shed light on the different clinical scenarios of this association, the impact of treating the different components of MetS on the risk of HCC and what is known about screening for HCC in patients with MetS. By doing so, it hopes to improve awareness on this topic.