Guidelines for Pathologic Diagnosis of Malignant Mesothelioma 2017 Update of the Consensus Statement From the International Mesothelioma Interest Group.

CONTEXT: - Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is an uncommon tumor that can be difficult to diagnose. OBJECTIVE: - To provide updated, practical guidelines for the pathologic diagnosis of MM. DATA SOURCES: - Pathologists involved in the International Mesothelioma Interest Group and others with an interest and expertise in the field contributed to this update. Reference material included up-to-date, peer-reviewed publications and textbooks. CONCLUSIONS: - There was discussion and consensus opinion regarding guidelines for (1) distinguishing benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations (both epithelioid and spindle cell lesions), (2) cytologic diagnosis of MM, (3) recognition of the key histologic features of pleural and peritoneal MM, (4) use of histochemical and immunohistochemical stains in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of MM, (5) differentiating epithelioid MM from various carcinomas (lung, breast, ovarian, and colonic adenocarcinomas, and squamous cell and renal cell carcinomas), (6) diagnosis of sarcomatoid MM, (7) use of molecular markers in the diagnosis of MM, (8) electron microscopy in the diagnosis of MM, and (9) some caveats and pitfalls in the diagnosis of MM. Immunohistochemical panels are integral to the diagnosis of MM, but the exact makeup of panels employed is dependent on the differential diagnosis and on the antibodies available in a given laboratory. Depending on the morphology, immunohistochemical panels should contain both positive and negative markers for mesothelial differentiation and for lesions considered in the differential diagnosis. Immunohistochemical markers should have either sensitivity or specificity greater than 80% for the lesions in question. Interpretation of positivity generally should take into account the localization of the stain (eg, nuclear versus cytoplasmic) and the percentage of cells staining (>10% is suggested for cytoplasmic and membranous markers). Selected molecular markers are now being used to distinguish benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations. These guidelines are meant to be a practical diagnostic reference for the pathologist; however, some new pathologic predictors of prognosis and response to therapy are also included.

Value of GATA3 immunostaining in the diagnosis of parathyroid tumors.

GATA3 is a transcription factor that is involved in the embryonic development of the parathyroid glands and in adult parathyroid cell proliferation. The aim of this study is to investigate the expression of GATA3 in parathyroid tumors and to determine whether it could be used as an immunohistochemical marker for parathyroid differentiation in tumors. Immunoreactivity for GATA3 was nuclear and was demonstrated in all 10 hyperplastic parathyroid glands, 22 parathyroid adenomas, and 6 parathyroid carcinomas; whereas, all thyroid tumors, renal cell carcinomas, thymic epithelial tumors, and carcinoid tumors investigated for comparison purposes were negative for this marker. It is concluded that GATA3 is a very sensitive and relatively specific immunohistochemical marker for parathyroid differentiation that can assist in the differential diagnosis of parathyroid tumors.

Arginase-1 is a novel immunohistochemical marker of hepatocellular differentiation.

Arginase-1 is an enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of arginine to ornithine and urea in the urea cycle. In normal tissues, arginase-1 is primarily expressed in hepatocytes. Recent investigations have reported that the vast majority of hepatocellular carcinomas express this marker, but it is found only rarely in nonhepatocellular tumors. Owing to its restricted expression in hepatocellular carcinomas, arginase-1 has proved to be a useful immunohistochemical marker for assisting in distinguishing between these tumors and other neoplasms with which they may be confused.

Diagnostic utility of immunohistochemistry in distinguishing between epithelioid pleural mesotheliomas and breast carcinomas: a comparative study.

Epithelioid mesotheliomas and breast carcinomas can present a variety of morphologic patterns. Because of this, breast carcinomas that metastasize to the pleura and lung may be confused with mesotheliomas. The aim of the present study is to compare the immunohistochemical markers currently available for the diagnosis of these 2 malignancies and to determine the best panel of markers that can be used to assist in discriminating between them. Sixty epithelioid mesotheliomas and 80 breast carcinomas (40 triple negative and 40 estrogen receptor positive) were investigated for expression of the positive mesothelioma markers calretinin, keratin 5/6, mesothelin, podoplanin, thrombomodulin, and WT1; the positive carcinoma marker claudin 4; and the breast-associated markers gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP-15), mammaglobin, and GATA3. All of the epithelioid mesotheliomas reacted for calretinin and keratin 5/6, 93% for WT1; 88% for podoplanin; 77% for thrombomodulin; 23% for GATA3; and 0% for claudin 4, GCDFP-15, and mammaglobin, respectively. Of the triple-negative breast carcinomas, 100% expressed claudin 4; 5%, keratin 5/6; 30%, GATA3; 18%, mammaglobin; 15%, GCDFP-15; 56%, mesothelin; 38%, calretinin; 18%, thrombomodulin; 5%, WT1; and 3%, podoplanin. Among the estrogen receptor-positive breast carcinomas, 100% were claudin 4 and GATA3 positive; 70% expressed GCDFP-15; 63%, mammaglobin; 13%, calretinin; 13%, thrombomodulin; 8%, WT1; 5%, keratin 5/6; 3%, mesothelin; and 0%, podoplanin. It is concluded that podoplanin and WT1 are the best positive mesothelioma markers for differentiating epithelioid mesotheliomas from breast carcinomas. An accurate differential diagnosis can be reached with the use of these two markers in combination with the breast-associated markers GCDFP-15, mammaglobin, and GATA3.

Cadherin 17 is a novel diagnostic marker for adenocarcinomas of the digestive system.

Cadherin 17 is a member of a multigene family of calcium-dependent, transmembrane proteins that mediates cell-cell adhesion, plays important roles during embryogenesis, and is crucial for tissue morphogenesis and maintenance. Cadherin 17 is exclusively expressed in the epithelial cells of embryonic and adult small intestine and colon, and pancreatic ducts. It has also been reported to be frequently expressed in adenocarcinomas arising in the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. Owing to its restricted expression in these groups of tumors, cadherin 17 has proven to be a useful immunohistochemical marker for assisting in distinguishing these neoplasms from other malignancies with which they may be confused.

Value of podoplanin as an immunohistochemical marker in tumor diagnosis: a review and update.

Podoplanin is a type I integral membrane glycoprotein that, because it is expressed in lymphatic endothelium, but not in vascular blood vessel endothelial cells, is commonly used in the identification of lymphatic endothelial differentiation in vascular endothelial neoplasms and lymphatic invasion by tumor. Because podoplanin is also expressed in mesothelial cells and fetal gonocytes, it has proved to be a useful marker for assisting in the differential diagnosis of mesotheliomas and germ cell tumors, particularly seminomas/dysgerminomas. Podoplanin expression has also been reported in a wide variety of other neoplasms, including hemangioblastomas, meningiomas, cartilaginous tumors, and follicular dendritic cell neoplasms. This article reviews the information that is currently available on the application of podoplanin immunostaining in diagnostic pathology.

Value of calretinin immunostaining in diagnostic pathology: a review and update.

Calretinin is a member of the EF-hand family of calcium-binding proteins. Because its expression is highly restricted to mesotheliomas, calretinin is, at present, the most commonly used positive mesothelioma marker that is most often recommended to be included in the various immunohistochemical panels used to assist in the differential diagnosis of these tumors. Calretinin expression has also been reported to be commonly expressed in a wide variety of other neoplasms, including sex cord-stromal tumors, adrenal cortical neoplasms, olfactory neuroblastomas, Schwann cell tumors, cardiac myxomas, and ameloblastomas. This article reviews the information that is currently available on calretinin expression in tumors and on its application as an immunohistochemical marker in diagnostic pathology.

SATB2 is a novel marker of osteoblastic differentiation and colorectal adenocarcinoma.

SATB2 is a nuclear matrix-associated transcription factor and epigenetic regulator that is involved in osteoblastic differentiation and is also expressed in the glandular epithelial cells of the lower gastrointestinal tract. Recent studies have shown that, because of its relative specificity for osteoblastic differentiation, SATB2 immunostaining could potentially be a useful adjunct for assisting in the differential diagnosis of both benign and malignant osteogenic tumors. In addition, because SATB2 is also a highly sensitive and specific marker for colorectal adenocarcinomas, it could also serve as a complementary marker in the differential diagnosis of a carcinoma of unknown primary origin.

Value of melanocytic-associated immunohistochemical markers in the diagnosis of malignant melanoma: a review and update.

Since the identification of S100 protein as an immunohistochemical marker that could be useful in the diagnosis of melanoma in the early 1980s, a large number of other melanocytic-associated markers that could potentially be used to assist in the differential diagnosis of these tumors have also been investigated. A great variation exists, however, among these markers, not only in their expression in some subtypes of melanoma, particularly desmoplastic melanoma, but also in their specificity because some of them can also be expressed in nonmelanocytic neoplasms, including various types of soft tissue tumors and carcinomas. This article reviews the information that is currently available on the practical value of some of the markers that have more often been recommended for assisting in the diagnosis of melanomas, including those that have only recently become available.

Value of GATA3 immunostaining in tumor diagnosis: a review.

GATA3 is a member of a group of zinc-finger transcription factors that is involved in cell development and differentiation. Recent studies have shown that, among tumors, GATA3 is commonly expressed in both urothelial tumors and breast epithelial neoplasms. With the exception of salivary gland and parathyroid tumors, GATA3 has been reported to be either absent or only rarely expressed in other epithelial tumors. Owing to its restricted expression in urothelial and breast carcinomas, GATA3 has proved to be a useful immunohistochemical marker for assisting in distinguishing these 2 groups of neoplasms from other malignancies with which they may be confused.

Value of SOX10 immunostaining in tumor diagnosis.

SOX10 is a transcription factor that is essential for the generation of neural crest cells, their survival, and maintenance of pluripotency. Recent studies have shown that, among tumors, SOX10 is commonly expressed in melanomas, including desmoplastic melanomas, tumors with Schwann cell differentiation, and some salivary gland neoplasms, particularly those with myoepithelial differentiation. Because of its restricted expression, SOX10 has proved to be a useful immunohistochemical marker with a wide range of diagnostic applications in surgical pathology, some of which are briefly reviewed.

Value of claudin-4 immunostaining in the diagnosis of mesothelioma.

Claudin-4 (CL-4) is a tight junction-associated protein that is expressed in most epithelial cells but absent in mesothelial cells. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of CL-4 immunostaining for assisting in the differential diagnosis of mesothelioma. Sixty mesotheliomas (40 epithelioid, 10 biphasic, and 10 sarcomatoid), 185 carcinomas of different origins that can potentially be confused with mesotheliomas, 37 soft-tissue sarcomas, and 5 melanomas were investigated for CL-4 expression. All 60 mesotheliomas were CL-4 negative. In contrast, 169 (91%) of 185 carcinomas expressed this marker. Five of 8 desmoplastic small round cell tumors and the epithelial component of all 5 biphasic synovial sarcomas were CL-4 positive, whereas none of the remaining soft-tissue sarcomas or melanomas expressed this marker. It is concluded that CL-4 is a highly specific and sensitive immunohistochemical marker for assisting in distinguishing epithelioid mesotheliomas from metastatic carcinomas to the serosal membranes.

Value of PAX8, PAX2, napsin A, carbonic anhydrase IX, and claudin-4 immunostaining in distinguishing pleural epithelioid mesothelioma from metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Both mesotheliomas and renal cell carcinomas can present a wide variety of cytomorphologic features and histologic patterns. Because of this, renal cell carcinomas metastatic to the pleura and lung can be confused with mesotheliomas. Recently, a variety of positive carcinoma markers, including kidney-associated markers, have become available. The aim of this study is to investigate the value of some of these markers, specifically PAX8, PAX2, napsin A, carbonic anhydrase IX, and claudin-4, for assisting in distinguishing pleural epithelioid mesotheliomas from metastatic renal cell carcinomas. To do so, a total of 40 pleural epithelioid mesotheliomas and 55 renal cell carcinomas (33 clear cell, 10 papillary, and 12 chromophobe) were investigated. In all, 91% of the renal cell carcinomas expressed claudin-4, 89% PAX8, 60% PAX2, 71% carbonic anhydrase IX, and 29% napsin A. All of the mesotheliomas were positive for carbonic anhydrase IX and were negative for all of the other markers. On the basis of these results, it is concluded that claudin-4 and PAX8 have a higher sensitivity and specificity for assisting in discriminating between pleural epithelioid mesotheliomas and renal cell carcinomas when compared with all of the other positive carcinoma markers that are, at present, recommended to be included in the immunohistochemical panels used in this differential diagnosis. Even though PAX2 and napsin A are highly specific, because of their low sensitivity, they have only a limited value. Carbonic anhydrase IX is not useful.

Broad-spectrum immunohistochemical epithelial markers: a review.

A relatively large number of broad-spectrum immunohistochemical epithelial markers that can be used as part of the screening panels employed in the recognition of the main cell lineages during the initial evaluation of a poorly differentiated tumor are currently available. Variations exist in the sensitivity and specificity of the individual markers that have traditionally been used for the demonstration of epithelial differentiation and in the pitfalls associated with these markers. This article reviews not only the reactivity of the various pan-keratin antibodies that are often used to assist in the demonstration of epithelial differentiation, but also that of those that have recently become available. A review of the non-keratin, broad-spectrum epithelial markers that have been recognized as being useful is also presented.

Application of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of epithelioid mesothelioma: a review and update.

A large number of immunohistochemical markers that can assist in the differential diagnosis of epithelioid mesotheliomas are currently available. Because these markers are expressed differently in the various types of carcinomas that can metastasize to the serosal membranes and can potentially be confused with epithelioid mesothelioma, their selection for inclusion in a diagnostic panel largely depends on the differential diagnosis, as well as on which ones work the best in a given laboratory. Traditionally, the panels used in the differential diagnosis of epithelioid mesothelioma have consisted of a combination of positive mesothelioma markers and broad-spectrum carcinoma markers. At present, a wide variety of organ-associated carcinoma markers such as thyroid transcription factor-1 and napsin A for the lung, PAX 8 and PAX 2 for the kidney, and Müllerian-derived tumors; gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 and mammaglobin for the breast; and CDX2 for intestinal differentiation are available, which can assist in establishing the site of origin of an adenocarcinoma when included in a diagnostic panel. This article provides updated information on the composition of the panels of markers recommended in the various differential diagnoses.

Mesothelioma with signet-ring cell features: report of 23 cases.

Signet-ring cell mesothelioma is uncommon and only two case reports have been published on this mesothelioma variant, both of which were initially misdiagnosed as signet-ring cell carcinoma. Herein are reported 23 signet-ring cell mesotheliomas that were investigated by immunohistochemistry, 12 of which were also studied by electron microscopy. Twenty-one of the cases originated in the pleura and two in the peritoneum. For comparison purposes and in order to determine the value of these techniques in the differential diagnosis of these tumors, seven cases of signet-ring cell lung adenocarcinoma were also studied. All signet-ring cell mesotheliomas were positive for calretinin, keratin 5/6, keratin 7, and mesothelin, 93% for podoplanin, and 91% for WT1; whereas, none reacted for MOC-31, CEA, TAG-72, CD15, TTF-1, napsin A, or CDX2. Among signet-ring cell lung adenocarcinomas, 100% were positive for keratin 7, CEA, and napsin A, 86% each for TTF-1 and TAG-72, 71% for CD15, and 14% for mesothelin, while all were negative for calretinin, keratin 5/6, WT1, podoplanin, and CDX2. After analyzing the results, it is concluded that the panels of markers used in the differential diagnosis of this mesothelioma variant should include those markers that are usually expressed in mesotheliomas (eg, calretinin, keratin 5/6, WT1, and podoplanin), broad-spectrum carcinoma markers that are frequently expressed in adenocarcinomas regardless of their site of origin (eg, MOC-31 and CEA), and organ-associated markers (eg, TTF-1 and napsin A for lung), which allow the site of origin of a metastatic adenocarcinoma to be established. Electron microscopy can be very useful as it permits the identification of characteristic ultrastructural mesothelioma and adenocarcinoma markers, and it also allows a better understanding of the morphologic features seen on routine light microscopy. Pathologists should be aware of this mesothelioma subtype as it can potentially be confused with other tumors that exhibit signet-ring features.

Melan A (A103) is not a marker of mesothelioma.

Although a large number of immunohistochemical markers have been proven to be valuable in the differential diagnosis between epithelioid mesotheliomas and metastatic carcinomas involving the serosal membrane, no single antibody has been found that is absolutely sensitive and/or specific in making this distinction. A recent study reported melan A positivity in all 12 of the epithelioid mesotheliomas stained with a melan A antibody (clone A103). To fully determine the practical value of this antibody for assisting in the differential diagnosis of mesotheliomas, we investigated the expression of melan A (A103) in 40 mesotheliomas (27 epithelioid, 6 sarcomatoid, and 7 biphasic), 10 lung adenocarcinomas, and 10 serous carcinomas of the ovary. None of the mesotheliomas, lung adenocarcinomas, or serous carcinomas of the ovary were melan A (A103) positive. Similar staining results were observed in the 20 mesotheliomas immunostained in another institution using the same antibody clone from a different commercial source. On the basis of these results, it is concluded that in contrast to the initial report, melan A (A103) is not expressed in mesotheliomas and therefore, immunostaining with this antibody has no utility in the diagnosis of mesothelioma. The possible cause of the discrepancies between the results obtained in the present investigation and those of the initial study is discussed.