Transition from intravenous to subcutaneous biological therapies in inflammatory bowel disease: An online survey of patients.

BACKGROUND: The transition from in-hospital intravenous administration to subcutaneous therapies to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can raise some concerns among patients due to the self-administration concerns, the management of potential side effects and the overall worries related to a change of treatment. This study aimed at evaluating patients' opinion about the switch from intravenous to subcutaneous formulations and their knowledge on new available therapeutic options. METHODS: We conducted a survey using a questionnaire prepared by a team of gastroenterologists and nurses working at the IBD unit. It consists of 31 items and has been divided into four sections: descriptive, commitment, knowledge and passage mode opinion. The questions were formulated in Italian and conceived according to daily consultations with patients in everyday practice, without any previous piloting or specific medical literature reference. The survey was administered to consecutive IBD patients in intravenous biological treatment; patients currently or previously treated with subcutaneous therapy were excluded. RESULTS: Four hundred questionnaires were distributed to participants. As many as 311 patients (77.7%) completed the survey, while the remaining were excluded from the analysis; 155 (49.8%) patients were favorable to switch from intravenous to subcutaneous therapy, while only 78 (25.1%) disagreed. In univariate and multi-variate analysis, the approval rate for home therapy was significantly associated with the distance from the IBD center and work/family/personal commitments. Surprisingly, only a quarter of the IBD patients knew that almost all available therapeutic agents have a subcutaneous administration route. Regarding patients' opinion on the efficacy of subcutaneous administration of biological agents compared to intravenous drugs, 194 (63%) had no definite idea, while 44 (14%) believed that the effectiveness could be reduced. CONCLUSION: The transition from in-hospital to subcutaneous therapeutic management of biological therapy at home was generally viewed favorably by patients, especially if they have commitments or were residents far from the IBD center.

The inflammatory bowel disease care manager: Italian state of the art.

Background: In the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) multidisciplinary team, a key figure is the IBD care manager, usually an independent practice nurse, responsible for evidence-based assessment, care planning, treatment evaluation, and provision of practical information, health education, and emotional support to patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the profile of this figure in Italy. Methods: A team of experienced nurses created a questionnaire based on the Second N-ECCO declaration, which was administered to nurses who worked in an IBD unit for a period of at least 3 years. A definition of IBD care manager was provided to every participant. The questionnaire consisted of 3 sections: behavioral, knowledge and managerial skills that an IBD care manager should exhibit. Results were studied in relation to the benefits for the patient, organizational advantages, clinical advantages and Italian state of the art. Results: Fifty-five nurses participated in the study, from 28 Italian centers. In the evaluation of behavioral skills of IBD care managers, "management and support of the pregnant patient" was the lowest scored item, while "patient privacy" obtained higher scores. In the evaluation of knowledge, "knowledge of intimacy and sexuality" obtained the lowest scores, while "knowledge of psychophysical and social impact of the disease" obtained a higher score. In managerial skills "management of pain" obtained the lowest scores. Conclusion: Our study confirmed that IBD care managers are invaluable nursing figures within the multidisciplinary team that cares for IBD patients, providing benefits to both patients' clinics and management.