NIPBL::NACC1 Fusion Hepatic Carcinoma.

Several reports describing a rare primary liver tumor with histologic features reminiscent of follicular thyroid neoplasms have been published under a variety of descriptive terms including thyroid-like, solid tubulocystic, and cholangioblastic cholangiocarcinoma. Although these tumors are considered to represent histologic variants, they lack classic features of cholangiocarcinoma and have unique characteristics, namely immunoreactivity for inhibin and NIPBL::NACC1 fusions. The purpose of this study is to present clinicopathologic and molecular data for a large series of these tumors to better understand their pathogenesis. We identified 11 hepatic tumors with these features. Immunohistochemical and NACC1 and NIPBL fluorescence in situ hybridization assays were performed on all cases. Four cases had available material for whole-genome sequencing (WGS) analysis. Most patients were adult women (mean age: 42 y) who presented with abdominal pain and large hepatic masses (mean size: 14 cm). Ten patients had no known liver disease. Of the patients with follow-up information, 3/9 (33%) pursued aggressive behavior. All tumors were composed of bland cuboidal cells with follicular and solid/trabecular growth patterns in various combinations, were immunoreactive for inhibin, showed albumin mRNA by in situ hybridization, and harbored the NIPBL::NACC1 fusion by fluorescence in situ hybridization. WGS corroborated the presence of the fusion in all 4 tested cases, high tumor mutational burden in 2 cases, and over 30 structural variants per case in 3 sequenced tumors. The cases lacked mutations typical of conventional intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. In this report, we describe the largest series of primary inhibin-positive hepatic neoplasms harboring a NIPBL::NACC1 fusion and the first WGS analysis of these tumors. We propose to name this neoplasm NIPBL:NACC1 fusion hepatic carcinoma.

Features of fibrosis regression abound in "non-cirrhotic" patients with resected hepatocellular carcinoma.

Cirrhosis is a major risk factor for developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, many surgically resected HCCs are presumably non-cirrhotic. The dynamic nature of chronic liver disease leads to periods of hepatic repair and fibrosis regression. We hypothesize that most resected HCCs, including those from non-cirrhotic patients, exhibit features of fibrosis regression in their background liver, suggesting previously more advanced liver disease. We reviewed the histology of 37 HCC resections performed between 2005-2020, including 30 from non-cirrhotic patients. The non-neoplastic liver was evaluated for features of liver disease and of the hepatic repair complex (HRC). CD34 immunohistochemistry was performed as a marker of sinusoidal capillarization. CD34 staining was evaluated manually and also by a digital image classifier algorithm. Overall, 28 cases (76%) had a high number of fibrosis regression and hepatic repair features (≥4 out of 8 features). Amongst the 30 non-cirrhotic patients, 21 (70%) showed a high number of repair features. Relative CD34 expression was increased in cases with a high number (≥4) of HRC features versus a low number (≤3) of features (p = 0.019). High HRC cases were more likely to exhibit nodular circumferential CD34 staining (p = 0.019). Our findings suggest that most resected HCC from non-cirrhotic patients display features of fibrosis regression in their background liver. Thus many, if not most, HCC patients who are "non-cirrhotic" may in fact have regressed cirrhosis. This finding reinforces that patients with regressed cirrhosis continue to be at high risk for HCC.

High interobserver variability and frequent overdiagnosis of dysplasia in fundic gland polyps can be improved by detecting atypia on the surface epithelium and an abrupt transition to non-neoplastic cells.

AIMS: Fundic gland polyps (FGPs) arise sporadically and in combination with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Criteria for distinguishing low-grade dysplasia (LGD) from regenerative atypia in FGPs are not well established. The aims of study were to determine: (i) interobserver variability in diagnosing LGD in FGPs; (ii) bias in diagnosing LGD in FAP patients; and (iii) stringent criteria for LGD in FGPs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Five senior pathologists who were blinded to the clinical history reviewed 72 FAP-associated FGPs and 34 sporadic FGPs. Cases were classified as negative (score = 0) or positive (score = 1) for LGD. Each case was assigned a 'combined dysplasia score' (CDS) ranging from 0 to 5 to reflect all five opinions. Fleiss' kappa showed only moderate interobserver agreement (κ = 0.46). Forty-one FGPs were classified as negative for dysplasia by consensus (CDS = 0-1), including 10 (24%) originally diagnosed as LGD. In contrast, all 37 cases classified as LGD by consensus (CDS = 4-5) were originally diagnosed as LGD, indicating that overdiagnosis of dysplasia is more common than underdiagnosis (P = 0.0012). Cytological atypia in the surface epithelium and an abrupt transition between atypical and normal-appearing epithelium were the most sensitive (97% and 100%, respectively) and specific (100% and 98%, respectively) features of dysplasia (P < 0.0001 for both comparisons). Very good agreement was achieved when a diagnosis of dysplasia was based on the presence of both features (κ = 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: There is high interobserver variability and a tendency to overdiagnose LGD in FGPs. Strict criteria requiring both surface atypia and abrupt transition for LGD in FGPs result in low interobserver variability.

Controversies in appendiceal pathology: mucinous and goblet cell neoplasms.

Appendiceal goblet cell adenocarcinomas and mucinous neoplasms are uncommon compared with other epithelial tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. Both tumour types have been subjected to terminology that belies their biological risk and leads to confusion. Goblet cell adenocarcinomas display patchy staining for endocrine markers and, thus, were previously classified as goblet cell carcinoids. Unlike well-differentiated endocrine neoplasms, however, they often contain high-grade glandular elements and pursue an aggressive course akin to that of conventional adenocarcinoma. Although several authors have recently proposed grading schemes to predict behaviour among goblet cell neoplasms, most that contain high-grade components have already spread beyond the appendix at the time of diagnosis, whereas those confined to the appendix almost always have low-grade features; the added value of grading these tumours is limited. Contradictions also surround the nomenclature of mucinous neoplasms. The World Health Organization and others promote non-malignant terminology to describe metastatic mucinous neoplasms of the peritoneum and eliminate a benign category entirely, even though virtually all neoplasms confined to the appendix pose no recurrence risk following appendectomy. 'Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm' now encompasses a spectrum of benign tumours and malignant neoplasms in the appendix and peritoneum. Although using an umbrella term in this fashion simplifies the roles of pathologists, it provides essentially no actionable information beyond that which is already clinically apparent. Broad strokes nomenclature also ensures that many patients with no risk of recurrence will receive unnecessary surveillance while others will undergo inappropriate surgical procedures due to lapses in communication. Moreover, a surprising number of non-neoplastic mucinous lesions are misclassified as low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms, which can result in unwarranted patient concern or even mismanagement. The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the literature and describe an approach to appendiceal neoplasms that more clearly denotes their biologic risk.

Filaggrin expression via immunohistochemistry in basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Filaggrin is a protein integral to the structure and function of the epidermis. Filaggrin (FLG) loss-of-function (LOF) mutations are common and increase the risk of developing atopic dermatitis (AD) and ichthyosis vulgaris (IV). Epidemiologic data suggest a link between skin cancer and AD. We examined if FLG staining pattern can be used to characterize cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), basal cell carcinomas (BCC), and reactive squamous epithelium. METHODS: Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were created from 196 cases of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) SCC and 144 BCC cases. TMAs and sections of reactive squamous epithelium were stained with optimized anti-FLG antibody and evaluated for FLG expression (normal, abnormal, or negative). RESULTS: FLG was absent in poorly differentiated (PD) compared to well-differentiated (WD) SCC (P < .0001) and moderately-differentiated (MD) (P = .0231) SCC, and in MD compared to WD SCC (P = .0099). Abnormal staining was significantly increased in PD compared to WD cases (P = .0039) and in MD compared to WD cases (P = .0006). Most BCC did not exhibit FLG expression (P < .05). Reactive squamous epithelium demonstrated normal, but exaggerated FLG expression. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate the differences in FLG expression patterns in types of keratinocyte carcinomas and their mimickers.

Prevalence of histological features resembling autoimmune pancreatitis in neoplastic pancreas resections.

AIMS: Types 1 and 2 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) can mimic pancreatic neoplasia. Due to the small quantity of tissue in mass-targeted pancreas biopsies, inflammatory features may raise the differential of AIP. However, the frequency of AIP-like histology in neoplastic pancreas is not well characterised. Therefore, the specificity of inflammatory lesions on biopsy with respect to the diagnosis of AIP is uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: Neoplastic pancreas resections performed at our institution between 2008 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Features of AIP types 1 and 2 were assessed in the non-neoplastic areas. If features of immunoglobulin (Ig)G4-associated AIP were seen, IgG4 immunohistochemistry was performed. We identified 163 neoplastic pancreas resections. Of these, 34 had one or more types of inflammatory lesions in non-neoplastic pancreatic tissue. Dense lymphoplasmacytic inflammation mimicking type 1 AIP was found in six cases with mild to moderately increased IgG4-positive plasma cells. Neutrophilic infiltrates in small intralobular ducts were found in 20 cases. Mild extralobular ductitis or duct microabscess was found in 10 specimens. Marked neutrophilic duct destruction that resembled granulocytic epithelial lesions was found in 12 cases. Some cases showed multiple features. CONCLUSION: Approximately 20% of neoplastic pancreas resections showed focal areas that could raise the differential of AIP. More cases showed neutrophilic predominant inflammation as seen in type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis, compared to dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates seen in type 1 AIP. Pathologists must be cautious when making a diagnosis of AIP on biopsy tissue based on histological findings alone.