Population pharmacokinetics of flucloxacillin as intermittent bolus infusion in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection.

BACKGROUND: Optimal antibiotic dosing for Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (BSI) is still controversial. One reason is inter-individual variation in pharmacokinetics, which may be influenced by various patient-related factors, particularly in critically ill patients. OBJECTIVES: To describe the population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) of the antibiotic flucloxacillin in patients with S. aureus BSI. Subsequently, we sought to translate the model into a user-friendly app for generating a priori and a posteriori time-concentration curves and dose recommendations to optimize dosing regimens. METHODS: Total and unbound flucloxacillin concentrations were included from 49 patients from a prospective cohort study conducted during clinical routine, including non-critically ill and critically ill individuals who received intermittent bolus applications. These data were analysed using non-linear mixed-effects modelling. RESULTS: Most patients (98%) were treated with 2 g of flucloxacillin every 4 h. We developed a joint model that simultaneously described total and unbound concentrations. The model included an allometric effect of glomerular filtration rate on clearance and albumin on the albumin dissociation constant. The latter was especially important, as in our population the unbound fraction was higher at 11.5% (16.7% for critically ill patients) compared with reported values of approximately 5%. Based on our joint model, we developed a web-based app for optimizing dosing regimens of flucloxacillin. CONCLUSIONS: By utilizing data from clinical routine, we were able to create a predictive PopPK model of flucloxacillin and identify influential covariates. The web-based app is currently being validated in a clinical trial.

Iodide based electrochemical gold quantification method for lateral flow assays.

The lateral flow assay (LFA) is an ideal technology for at-home medical diagnostic tests due to its ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and rapid results. Despite these advantages, only few LFAs, such as the pregnancy and COVID-19 tests, have been translated from the laboratory to the homes of patients. To date, the medical applicability of LFAs is limited by the fact that they only provide yes/no answers unless combined with optical readers that are too expensive for at-home applications. Furthermore, LFAs are unable to compete with the state-of-the-art technologies in centralized laboratories in terms of detection limits. To address those shortcomings, we have developed an electrochemical readout procedure to enable quantitative and sensitive LFAs. This technique is based on a voltage-triggered in-situ dissolution of gold nanoparticles, the conventional label used to visualize target-specific signals on the test line in LFAs. Following the dissolution, the amount of gold is measured by electroplating onto an electrode and subsequent electrochemical quantification of the deposited gold. The measured current has a low noise, which achieves superior detection limits compared to optical techniques where background light scattering is limiting the readout performance. In addition, the hardware for the readout was developed to demonstrate translatability towards low-cost electronics.

Utilization of a Meningitis/Encephalitis PCR panel at the University Hospital Basel - a retrospective study to develop a diagnostic decision rule.

Background: The Biofire® FilmArray® Meningitis/Encephalitis (ME) PCR panel covers 14 viral, bacterial, and fungal pathogens and has been implemented in many institutions worldwide. Post-marketing studies indicate a reduced sensitivity and overutilization underscoring the need for a more targeted usage. The aim of our study is to describe the utilization of the ME panel and to develop a diagnostic-stewardship based decision rule. Materials: Adult patients, who underwent CSF analysis with the ME panel between August 2016 and June 2021 at the University Hospital Basel, were included. Demographic, clinical, microbiological, and laboratory data were extracted from the electronic health record. Factors associated with a positive ME panel result were identified, and a decision rule was developed to potentially optimize the diagnostic yield and reduce the number of unnecessary tests. Results: 1,236 adult patients received at least one panel in the observed period, of whom 106 panels tested positive (8.6%). The most frequently observed pathogens were Varicella Zoster Virus (VZV, 27%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (19%), Enterovirus (16%), Herpes simplex Virus 1/2 (16%), and Human Herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6, 13%). Fever, vomiting, headache, and photophobia were more frequently present in test positive patients as were significantly higher CSF leukocytes and protein concentrations. When simulating a decision rule based on CSF leukocytes and protein concentration, only 35% of all patients would have qualified for a ME panel tests, thereby increasing the positivity rate to 22.7%. 10 of 106 positive ME panels would have been missed, only involving HHV-6 and VZV (6 and 4 cases, respectively). As these subjects were either severely immunocompromised or had clinical features of shingles we propose extending the testing algorithm by including those criteria. Conclusion: The ME panel positivity rate at our institution was similar as previously published. Our results highlight the need for diagnostic-stewardship interventions when utilizing this assay by implementing a stepwise approach based on a limited number of clinical and laboratory features. This decision rule may improve the pretest probability of a positive test result, increase the quality of test utilization, and reduce costs.

Impact of Swabbing Location, Self-Swabbing, and Food Intake on SARS-CoV-2 RNA Detection.

This study compared SARS-CoV-2 RNA loads at different anatomical sites, and the impact of self-swabbing and food intake. Adult symptomatic patients with SARS-CoV-2 or non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory tract infection were included between 2021 and 2022. Patients performed a nasal and buccal swab before a professionally collected nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab (NOPS). Buccal swabs were collected fasting and after breakfast in a subgroup of patients. SARS-CoV-2 RNA loads were determined by nucleic acid testing. Swabbing convenience was evaluated using a survey. The median age of 199 patients was 54 years (interquartile range 38-68); 42% were female and 52% tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. The majority of patients (70%) were hospitalized. The mean SARS-CoV-2 RNA load was 6.6 log10 copies/mL (standard deviation (SD), ±1.5), 5.6 log10 copies/mL (SD ± 1.9), and 3.4 log10 copies/mL (SD ± 1.9) in the professionally collected NOPS, and self-collected nasal and buccal swabs, respectively (p < 0.0001). Sensitivity was 96.1% (95% CI 90.4-98.9) and 75.3% (95% CI 63.9-81.8) for the nasal and buccal swabs, respectively. After food intake, SARS-CoV-2 RNA load decreased (p = 0.0006). Buccal swabbing was the preferred sampling procedure for the patients. In conclusion, NOPS yielded the highest SARS-CoV-2 RNA loads. Nasal self-swabbing emerged as a reliable alternative in contrast to buccal swabs. If buccal swabs are used, they should be performed before food intake.

Exploring the Impact of Model-Informed Precision Dosing on Procalcitonin Concentrations in Critically Ill Patients: A Secondary Analysis of the DOLPHIN Trial.

Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) might be used to optimize antibiotic treatment. Procalcitonin (PCT) is a biomarker for severity of infection and response to antibiotic treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of MIPD on the course of PCT and to investigate the association of PCT with pharmacodynamic target (PDT) attainment in critically ill patients. This is a secondary analysis of the DOLPHIN trial, a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Patients with a PCT value available at day 1 (T1), day 3 (T3), or day 5 (T5) after randomisation were included. The primary outcome was the absolute difference in PCT concentration at T1, T3, and T5 between the MIPD and the standard dosing group. In total, 662 PCT concentrations from 351 critically ill patients were analysed. There was no statistically significant difference in PCT concentration between the trial arms at T1, T3, or T5. The median PCT concentration was highest in patients who exceeded 10× PDT at T1 [13.15 ng/mL (IQR 5.43-22.75)]. In 28-day non-survivors and in patients that exceeded PDT at T1, PCT decreased significantly between T1 and T3, but plateaued between T3 and T5. PCT concentrations were not significantly different between patients receiving antibiotic treatment with or without MIPD guidance. The potential of PCT to guide antibiotic dosing merits further investigation.

Recombinant C1 inhibitor in the prevention of severe COVID-19: a randomized, open-label, multi-center phase IIa trial.

Background: Conestat alfa (ConA), a recombinant human C1 inhibitor, may prevent thromboinflammation. Methods: We conducted a randomized, open-label, multi-national clinical trial in which hospitalized adults at risk for progression to severe COVID-19 were assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either 3 days of ConA plus standard of care (SOC) or SOC alone. Primary and secondary endpoints were day 7 disease severity on the WHO Ordinal Scale, time to clinical improvement within 14 days, and safety, respectively. Results: The trial was prematurely terminated because of futility after randomization of 84 patients, 56 in the ConA and 28 in the control arm. At baseline, higher WHO Ordinal Scale scores were more frequently observed in the ConA than in the control arm. On day 7, no relevant differences in the primary outcome were noted between the two arms (p = 0.11). The median time to defervescence was 3 days, and the median time to clinical improvement was 7 days in both arms (p = 0.22 and 0.56, respectively). Activation of plasma cascades and endothelial cells over time was similar in both groups. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was higher in the intervention arm (any AE, 30% with ConA vs. 19% with SOC alone; serious AE, 27% vs. 15%; death, 11% vs. 0%). None of these were judged as being related to the study drug. Conclusion: The study results do not support the use of ConA to prevent COVID-19 progression. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04414631.

Identification of microorganisms by a rapid PCR panel from positive blood cultures leads to faster optimal antimicrobial therapy - a before-after study.

BACKGROUND: The BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification Panel 1 (BF-FA-BCIP) detects microorganisms with high accuracy in positive blood cultures (BC) - a key step in the management of patients with suspected bacteraemia. We aimed to compare the time to optimal antimicrobial therapy (OAT) for the BF-FA-BCIP vs. standard culture-based identification. METHODS: In this retrospective single-centre study with a before-after design, 386 positive BC cases with identification by BF-FA-BCIP were compared to 414 controls with culture-based identification. The primary endpoint was the time from BC sampling to OAT. Secondary endpoints were time to effective therapy, length of stay, (re-)admission to ICU, in-hospital and 30-day mortality. Outcomes were assessed using Cox proportional hazard models and logistic regressions. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of included adult inpatients were comparable. Main sources of bacteraemia were urinary tract and intra-abdominal infection (19.2% vs. 22.0% and 16.8% vs. 15.7%, for cases and controls, respectively). Median (95%CI) time to OAT was 25.5 (21.0-31.2) hours with BF-FA-BCIP compared to 45.7 (37.7-51.4) hours with culture-based identification. We observed no significant difference for secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid microorganism identification by BF-FA-BCIP was associated with a median 20-h earlier initiation of OAT in patients with positive BC. No impact on length of stay and mortality was noted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04156633, registered on November 5, 2019.

Occurrence of sensitive topics during ward round: an ancillary analysis of the BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE trial.

OBJECTIVE: Discussing sensitive topics (eg, medical uncertainty, social issues, non-adherence) during ward rounds is challenging and may negatively impact patient satisfaction with the healthcare they are receiving. In the previous multicentre randomised BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE trial focusing on communication during ward rounds, we investigated the interplay between sensitive topics and low reported satisfaction with care. DESIGN: Pre-planned secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. For this analysis data of the original trial was pooled across intervention groups. SETTING: Three Swiss teaching hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients hospitalised for medical care. INTERVENTIONS: We analysed predefined sensitive health topics and specific elements of communication from audiotapes recorded during ward rounds, for both patients dealing with and without sensitive topics. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was overall patient satisfaction with care; measured on a Visual Analogue Scale from 0 to 100. Secondary endpoints included duration of ward rounds and further satisfaction outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 919 included patients, 474 had at least one sensitive topic including medical uncertainty (n=251), psychiatric comorbidities (n=161), tumour diagnosis (n=137) and social issues (n=125). Compared with patients without sensitive topics, patients with sensitive topics reported lower satisfaction with care (mean (SD), 87.7 (±14.6) vs 90.2 (±12.1), adjusted difference -2.5 (95% CI -4.28 to -0.72), p=0.006. Among patients with sensitive topics, risk factors for low satisfaction included several parameters concerning patient-physician interaction such as disagreements during ward rounds (mean (SD), 14/212 (6.6%) vs 41/254 (16.1%), adjusted OR 2.78 (95% CI 1.47 to 5.27), p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of medical inpatients must deal with sensitive health topics. This is associated with lower satisfaction with care, particularly if the patient perceives the interaction with doctors during ward rounds as unsatisfactory. Educating physicians on specific communication techniques may help improve care for these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03210987.

Appropriateness of inpatient intravenous iron therapy in a Swiss tertiary care hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Intravenous (IV) iron replacement is an established treatment for iron deficiency and is recommended in various medical guidelines, but cheaper oral iron formulations remain first-line therapy in several instances. Data on adherence to current prescription standards are lacking in Switzerland. METHODS: Retrospective single center quality control study evaluating the appropriateness of IV iron replacement in 400 inpatients during 2019 and 2021 at a Swiss tertiary care hospital. Appropriateness of IV iron was assessed by expert chart review according to national and international guidelines. RESULTS: IV iron prescriptions were assessed as inappropriate in 147 (37%) of cases (indication lacking in 13%, oral route preferred in 24%). Inappropriate prescribing was more common (p < .001) in surgical wards (66%) compared to medical units (48%) and the gynecologic ward (19%). Iron studies were lacking in 29% of inappropriate IV administrations. Insufficient replacement dosages were chosen in 38% of patients with appropriate prescription. CONCLUSION: Based on current guidelines, inappropriate in-hospital prescription of IV iron was frequently observed. Considerable differences exist between hospital units, which are consistent with conflicting recommendations of professional societies. We recommend increased attention toward the prescription quality to avoid unnecessary, expensive, and potentially harmful use of IV iron.

Multiplexed on-yeast serological assay for immune escape screening of SARS-CoV-2 variants.

The emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant altered patient risk profiles and shifted the trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, sensitive serological tests capable of analyzing patient IgG responses to multiple variants in parallel are highly desirable. Here, we present an adaptable serological test based on yeast surface display and serum biopanning that characterizes immune profiles against SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan (B lineage), Delta (B.1.617.2 lineage), and Omicron (B.1.1.529 lineage) receptor-binding domain (RBD) variants. We examined IgG titers from 30 serum samples from COVID-19-convalescent and vaccinated cohorts in Switzerland, and assessed the relative affinity of polyclonal serum IgG for RBD domains. We demonstrate that serum IgGs from patients recovered from severe COVID-19 between March-June 2021 bound tightly to both original Wuhan and Delta RBD variants, but failed to recognize Omicron RBDs, representing an affinity loss of >10- to 20-fold. Our yeast immunoassay is easily tailored, expandable and parallelized with newly emerging RBD variants.

Early Target Attainment With Continuous Infusion Meropenem and Piperacillin/Tazobactam and Utilization of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study From 2017 to 2020.

Background: We analyzed the attainment of early pharmacological targets of continuous infusion meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam and the use and effect of a real-time therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) program on subsequent dosing and target attainment in patients who are critically ill. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study among patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit in a Swiss tertiary care hospital from 2017 to 2020. The primary outcome was target attainment [100% tT ≥ 4xECOFF (Pseudomonas aeruginosa)] of continuous infusion meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam within 72 hours after initiation of treatment. Results: A total of 234 patients were included. Median first meropenem (n = 186 of 234) and piperacillin (n = 48 of 234) concentration was 21 mg/L (interquartile range [IQR], 15.6-28.6) and 100.7 mg/L (IQR, 64.0-160.2), respectively. Pharmacological target was attained in 95.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.7-98.1) of patients receiving meropenem and 77.0% (95% CI, 62.7-87.9) treated with piperacillin/tazobactam. In the univariable and multivariable logistic regression, body weight and estimated glomerular filtration rate were negatively associated with target attainment. Subsequently, meropenem dosage was decreased or stopped in 35 of 186 (18.8%) and 89 of 186 (47.9%) patients, respectively, and increased in 2 of 186 (1.1%) patients. Conclusions: Continuous infusion meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam yielded excellent and moderate early pharmacological target attainment in critically ill patients, respectively. The TDM was mainly used to decrease meropenem dosage.

Factors impacting the pre-analytical quality of blood cultures-Analysis at a tertiary medical center.

BACKGROUND: Blood cultures (BC) are critical for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections, pathogen identification, and resistance testing. Guidelines recommend a blood volume of 8-10 mL per bottle as lower volumes result in decreased sensitivity. We aimed to evaluate factors for non-adherence to recommended volumes and assess the effects on diagnostic performance. METHODS: From February to April 2020, we measured collected blood volumes by weighing all BC containers from inpatient samples at the University Hospital Basel. Information on BC volumes was merged with clinical and microbiological data, as well as nursing staff schedules. We analyzed factors associated with (i) BC sampling volume, (ii) reaching recommended volumes (≥8 mL), (iii) BC positivity, and (iv) time to positivity using linear and generalized linear mixed effect models. RESULTS: We evaluated a total of 4'118 BC bottles collected from 686 patients. A total of 1'495 (36.3%) of all bottles contained the recommended filling volume of ≥8 mL. Using a central venous and arterial catheter for drawing blood resulted in an increase of filling volume by 0.26 mL (95% CI 0.10, 0.41) and 0.50 mL (95% CI 0.31, 0.69) compared to peripheral venipuncture, respectively. Each additional nursing staff working at the time of blood drawing was associated with 6% higher odds of achieving the recommended filling volume. We found no significant correlation between the filling volume and the positivity rate. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate critical pre-analytical quality markers linked to BC collection procedures to reach recommended collection volumes. No significant impact on the positivity rate was found.

Free-living core body temperature monitoring using a wrist-worn sensor after COVID-19 booster vaccination: a pilot study.

Core body temperature (CBT) is a key vital sign and fever is an important indicator of disease. In the past decade, there has been growing interest for vital sign monitoring technology that may be embedded in wearable devices, and the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for remote patient monitoring systems. While wrist-worn sensors allow continuous assessment of heart rate and oxygen saturation, reliable measurement of CBT at the wrist remains challenging. In this study, CBT was measured continuously in a free-living setting using a novel technology worn at the wrist and compared to reference core body temperature measurements, i.e., CBT values acquired with an ingestible temperature-sensing pill. Fifty individuals who received the COVID-19 booster vaccination were included. The datasets of 33 individuals were used to develop the CBT prediction algorithm, and the algorithm was then validated on the datasets of 17 participants. Mean observation time was 26.4 h and CBT > 38.0 °C occurred in 66% of the participants. CBT predicted by the wrist-worn sensor showed good correlation to the reference CBT (r = 0.72). Bland-Altman statistics showed an average bias of 0.11 °C of CBT predicted by the wrist-worn device compared to reference CBT, and limits of agreement were - 0.67 to + 0.93 °C, which is comparable to the bias and limits of agreement of commonly used tympanic membrane thermometers. The small size of the components needed for this technology would allow its integration into a variety of wearable monitoring systems assessing other vital signs and at the same time allowing maximal freedom of movement to the user.

Antibiotic treatment durations for common infectious diseases in Switzerland: comparison between real-life and local and international guideline recommendations.

OBJECTIVES: Shortening the duration of antibiotic therapy (DAT) for common infectious diseases may be an effective strategy to tackle antimicrobial resistance. Shorter DAT has been proven safe and effective for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), cellulitis, and cholangitis. METHODS: In a retrospective multicentre quality-control study, medical records of 770 patients hospitalized with CAP, cellulitis, and cholangitis at three tertiary care hospitals in Switzerland during 2017-2018 were randomly selected. Appropriateness of antibiotic treatment duration was assessed according to international and local guidelines. RESULTS: Records of 271, 260, and 239 patients with CAP, cellulitis, and cholangitis were included, respectively. Median DAT was seven days (interquartile range [IQR] 6-9), ten days (IQR 8-13), and nine days (IQR 6-13) in CAP, cellulitis, and cholangitis, respectively. DAT longer than recommended by local and international guidelines was observed in 32% and 37% of CAP patients, 23% and 70% of cellulitis patients, and 33% and 37% of cholangitis patients, respectively. Positive blood cultures (odds ratio [OR] = 2.42 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-4.34]), infectious diseases consultation (OR = 1.79 [95% CI 1.05-2.78]), impaired renal function (OR = 0.99 [95% CI 0.98-1.00] per 1 ml/min / 1.73 m2 increase in estimated glomerular filtration rate) and a higher degree of inflammation on admission (OR = 1.0 [95% CI 1.001-1.005] per 10 mg/L increase in C-reactive protein) were independently associated with a DAT longer than recommended in international guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: DAT exceeded recommendations in a significant proportion of patients with mostly community-acquired infections.

Prevention of Hepatitis B Reactivation in Patients Receiving Immunosuppressive Therapy: a Case Series and Appraisal of Society Guidelines.

Hepatitis B (HBV) reactivation (HBVr) is a potentially fatal complication in patients with past HBV exposure receiving immunosuppressive therapy. HBVr can occur in patients with chronic HBV infection as well as in patients with resolved HBV infection. In this article, we present the cases of four patients with resolved hepatitis B who presented with HBVr during or after immunosuppressive treatment, of whom two died as a consequence of HBVr. We then reflect on and summarize the recommendations of four major societies for the screening and management of previously HBV-exposed patients planned to receive immunosuppressive treatment. Current guidelines recommend screening for HBV in all patients planned to receive immunosuppressive therapy. Risk of HBVr is assessed based on the serological status of the patient and the planned immunosuppressive drug regimen. For patients considered to be at low risk of HBVr, management consists of serological monitoring for HBVr and immediate preemptive antiviral therapy in the case of HBVr. For patients considered to be at intermediate or high risk for HBVr, antiviral prophylaxis should be initiated concordantly with the immunosuppressive therapy and continued for up to 18 months after cessation of the immunosuppressive regimen. Areas of uncertainty include the risk of novel and emerging immunosuppressive and immune modulatory drugs and the exact duration of antiviral prophylaxis. Greater awareness is needed among clinicians regarding the risk of HBVr in patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy, especially in low-endemicity settings. Implementation of screening and management programs and decision support tools based on the presented guidelines may improve the management of these patients.

[Better Late than Never - Fever of Unknown Origin in a Patient with a Prosthetic Valve]. / Besser spät als nie ­ Fieber unklarer Ursache bei einem Patienten mit Kunstklappe.

Better Late than Never - Fever of Unknown Origin in a Patient with a Prosthetic Valve Abstract. A patient presents with worsening of his general condition, chills and dyspnoea on exertion. With a history of aortic valve replacement, infective endocarditis is suspected, but due to negative imaging by transesophageal echocardiography and negative blood cultures cannot be confirmed. Finally, Cutibacterium acnes prosthetic valve endocarditis is diagnosed after culture of C. acnes during an extended incubation period of blood cultures, the presence of embolic complications and a characteristic finding on PET-CT scan.

Complement and endothelial cell activation in COVID-19 patients compared to controls with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection: A prospective cohort study.

Background: Thromboinflammation may influence disease outcome in COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate complement and endothelial cell activation in patients with confirmed COVID-19 compared to controls with clinically suspected but excluded SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: In a prospective, observational, single-center study, patients presenting with clinically suspected COVID-19 were recruited in the emergency department. Blood samples on presentation were obtained for analysis of C5a, sC5b-9, E-selectin, Galectin-3, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1. Results: 153 cases and 166 controls (suffering mainly from non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory viral infections, non-infectious inflammatory conditions and bacterial pneumonia) were included. Hospital admission occurred in 62% and 45% of cases and controls, respectively. C5a and VCAM-1 concentrations were significantly elevated and E-selectin concentrations decreased in COVID-19 out- and inpatients compared to the respective controls. However, relative differences in outpatients vs. inpatients in most biomarkers were comparable between cases and controls. Elevated concentrations of C5a, Galectin-3, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 on presentation were associated with the composite outcome of ICU- admission or 30-day mortality in COVID-19 and controls, yet more pronounced in COVID-19. C5a and sC5b-9 concentrations were significantly higher in COVID-19 males vs. females, which was not observed in the control group. Conclusions: Our data indicate an activation of the complement cascade and endothelium in COVID-19 beyond a nonspecific inflammatory trigger as observed in controls (i.e., "over"-activation).

Antibiotic treatment duration in diverticulitis, complicated urinary tract infection, and endocarditis: a retrospective, single-center study.

OBJECTIVES: Despite the availability of international guidelines advocating shorter treatment durations, nonadherence to them is common. We assessed duration of antibiotic treatment for diverticulitis, complicated urinary tract infection (UTI), and endocarditis. METHODS: Medical records of patients hospitalized with the previously stated diseases in 2017 and 2018 were randomly selected at a Swiss tertiary care hospital. The appropriateness of antibiotic treatment duration was assessed according to international and local guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 243 patients were included in the study: 100 with diverticulitis, 200 with complicated UTI, and 43 with endocarditis. The dherence to local and international guidelines was 11% and 18% in diverticulitis, 39% and 40% in complicated UTI, and 84% and 86% in endocarditis, respectively. Nonadherence was primarily due to the prolonged treatment in diverticulitis and complicated UTI with a median duration of antibiotic treatment of 11 days (interquartile range 10-13) and 14 days (interquartile range 10-15), respectively. When pooling diverticulitis and complicated UTI cases, the identification of a pathogen in any microbiological sample was associated with an improved adherence to local guidelines in addition to hospitalization in a medical ward and infectious diseases consultation. CONCLUSION: Prolonged courses of antibiotic treatment were common and the treatment adherence to guidelines were poor in diverticulitis, moderate in complicated UTI, and excellent in endocarditis.

Cefepime-Induced Neurotoxicity in the Setting of Acute Kidney Injury: A Case Series and Discussion of Preventive Measures.

Neurotoxicity is a well-described adverse effect of cefepime. Clinical presentation includes mild neurological deficits, aphasia, impairment of consciousness, and even nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Impaired kidney function is considered the most important risk factor for cefepime-induced neurotoxicity (CIN) and frequently occurs during the course of critical diseases with concomitant acute kidney injury (AKI). Physicians should be aware of situations with increased risk of AKI and the preventive actions required to reduce the risk of CIN. We present three patients with AKI who were treated with cefepime for healthcare-associated infections. Subsequently, two patients developed CIN demonstrating very high cefepime levels in plasma. In the third patient, CIN was likely prevented as the increased risk of neurotoxicity was noted and cefepime treatment was ceased immediately. Diagnosis of CIN might be challenging due to various causes of encephalopathy, in particular in the setting of severely ill patients. Electroencephalogram may assist in establishing the diagnosis, in particular when cefepime therapeutic drug monitoring is not available. As CIN is potentially reversible, it is an important differential diagnosis to consider especially in patients with impaired renal function or being susceptible to AKI. Preventive measures of CIN include therapeutic drug monitoring, consideration of a therapeutic alternative, awareness regarding a potential overestimation of the glomerular filtration rate, and electronic health record alerts about risk constellations for potential overdosing.