[A clinical observational study on the preliminary effect of dupilumab in the treatment of severe asthma].

Objective: To investigate the effect and safety of dupilumab in the treatment of patients with severe asthma in a preliminary clinical observational study. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 20 patients with severe asthma who received dupilumab for 4-12 months between 2019 and 2022 at the First Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, comparing pre-and post-treatment laboratory data, oral glucocorticoid dose (OCS), asthma control test (ACT) and adverse effects. The median age of the 20 patients was 48.5 (41.0-52.8) years, including 14 males and 6 females. The clinical data of 10 patients treated with other biologic agents were further analyzed to determine the reasons for switching to biologic drug treatment and the efficacy of dupilumab in these patients. Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for comparisons. Mann-Whitney analysis was used for inter-group comparison, and chi-square test or Fisher test was used for inter-group comparisons of count data. Results: A total of 20 patients were included in this study. All 20 severe asthma phenotypes were type 2 (T2)-high and completed at least the first 4 months of treatment, including 17 patients who completed 12 months of treatment. Among patients who completed 4 months of treatment, the asthma exacerbation score decreased from 1.0(0.3-1.0) episodes/4 months to 0.0(0.0-1.0) episodes/4 months, P<0.001, and FEV1/FVC increased from 58.4% (50.5%-69.0%) to 66.9% (59.6%-77.7%), P<0.01. The number of patients requiring OCS maintenance therapy decreased from 15 (75%) to 9 (45%), P<0.05. Among patients who completed 12 months of treatment, the asthma exacerbation score decreased from 1.0(0.5-1.0) episodes/4 months to 0.0 (0.0-0.0) episodes/4 months, P<0.01, and FEV1/FVC increased from 57.9% (49.6%-67.8%) to 72.7% (64.6%-78.7%), P<0.01. The number of patients requiring OCS maintenance therapy decreased from 13 (76%) to 6 (35%), P<0.01. In 10 patients with a history of previous biologic therapy, the most common reasons for switching to a biologic were a poor response to previous monoclonal antibodies (40%) and loss of control of asthma symptom control after discontinuation of monoclonal antibodies (30%). The remaining reasons were patients' uncontrolled symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis (20%) and irregular or underdosed use of previous biologics (10%). After 4 months of switching to dupilumab, 10 patients experienced varying degrees of improvement in asthma control. Conclusions: The application of dupilumab for the treatment of T2-high severe asthma showed good efficacy and few adverse effects. Biologically targeted therapy is an important treatment approach to achieving better control of severe asthma.

[Efficacy of omalizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic granulomatous polyangiitis with asthma as the first symptom].

Objective: To investigate the efficacy, and safety of omalizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic granulomatous with polyangiitis (EGPA) with asthma as the first symptom. Method: The clinical characteristics of 22 EGPA patients with asthma as the first symptom treated with omalizumab in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from March 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The asthma control test (ACT) score, the frequency of asthma exacerbation (AE), the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS), the variation rate of peak expiratory flow (PEF), the percentage of PEF to predicted value of PEF (PEFpred%), the percentage of forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV1) to predicted value of FEV1 (FEV1pred%), the dosage of oral corticosteroid (OCS) and other clinical data [M(Q1, Q3)] were collected before and after treatment, to observe the efficacy and adverse reactions of omalizumab. Results: There were 22 subjects recruited in this study. The median age was 42 (22-70) years. Eleven of the patients were males. After treated with omalizumab for 4 months, there were 68.2%(15/21) of patients who responded to the treatment. In the response group (n=15), the patients' ACT score increased from 19.0 (16.5, 21.0) to 23.0 (21.5, 24.0) (P=0.001). The frequency of AE decreased from 0.7 (0.3, 1.0) to 0 (0, 0.7) per four mouths (P<0.001). The BVAS decreased from 4.0 (2.0, 6.0) to 2.0 (2.0, 4.0) (P=0.007). The variation rate of PEF decreased from 18.8% (14.0%, 27.7%) to 9.2% (6.8%, 11.9%) (P=0.007). The PEFpred% increased from 80.8% (73.5%, 90.7%) to 100.5% (79.4%, 114.0%) (P=0.005). The maintenance dosage of OCS reduced from 15.0 (10.0, 20.0) mg/d to 8.8 (5.0, 10.0) mg/d (P=0.005). The level of baseline eosinophil in peripheral blood of patients in non-response group was higher than that in response group [11.4% (9.2%, 22.6%) vs 3.4% (1.1%, 6.5%), P<0.05]. A total of 190 injections were performed in 22 patients, and only 4 patients (2.1%) had adverse reactions after a single injection of omalizumab, such as dizziness, swelling of injection site and pruritus. The adverse reactions were tolerable. Conclusions: Omalizumab has certain curative effect on EGPA, can reduce asthmatic symptoms and OCS maintenance dosage, and has a good safety profile. The rate of response to the treatment is higher in patients with mild eosinophilic inflammation.

[Preliminary clinical observation of omalizumab therapy for moderate to severe asthma].

Objective: To observe the effectiveness, safety and management of omalizumab therapy for moderate to severe asthma in real-world clinical practice in China. Methods: This retrospective analysis involved 79 patients with moderate to severe asthma who received omalizumab therapy for at least 4 months in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from March 2018 to April 2020. All participants were between 14 to 76 years old(median 50 years),including 30 males and 49 females. Data regarding the patients' clinical manifestations, eosinophil count, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), lung function, oral corticosteroid dosage, and adverse reactions were collected before and after treatment. Paired t-test or non-parametric paired Wilcoxon analysis was used for pairwise comparison, Mann Whitney analysis for inter-group comparison, and Chi square test or Fisher test for inter-group comparison of count data. Results: The following changes were noted after 4 months of omalizumab thearpy. The patients' Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores increased from 17.0 (13.0-19.0) to 20.0 (18.0-24.0) points (P<0.001). The frequency of acute exacerbations(AE) decreased from 1.0 (0-1.0) to 0 (0-1.0) episodes every 4 months (P<0.001). The variation rate of the peak expiratory flow (PEF) decreased from 16.5 (13.8-27.3)% to 10.4 (6.0-16.2)% (P<0.001). The percent predicted value of PEF (PEFpred%) increased from 71.7 (51.4-91.6)% to 87.5 (65.2-105.5)% (P<0.001). The percent predicted value of the forced expiratory volume in 1 second(FEV1%pred) increased from 73.6 (53.9-90.8)% to 80.6 (68.7-91.8)% (P=0.007). The maintenance dose of oral corticosteroids (OCS) decreased from 12.0 (10.0-20.0) to 5.0 (0-17.5) mg/day (P=0.001). After 4 months of treatment, the response rate of the 79 patients with asthma was 74.7%. The response rate of patients with allergic asthma (77.3%) was higher than that of patients with non-allergic asthma (25.0%) (P=0.019). Among 5 patients who completed 1 year of treatment, the ACT score, frequency of AE, PEFpred%, variation rate of PEF and OCS maintenance dose were still improved after 1 year of treatment. Adverse reactions occurred in 3 patients (3.8%), for a total of 3 (0.6%) times. Stratified analysis showed that after 4 months of treatment, the improvement in the ACT score and the decrease in the PEF variation rate among patients who reached the recommended treatment dose (full dose) [3.0 (1.0-8.0) points, 6.5 (3.5-15.8) %] were significantly higher than those among patients who did not reach the recommended treatment dose (insufficient dose) [1.0 (-0.3-3.0) points, 2.9 (1.5-5.0) %] (P<0.05). Additionally, the treatment response rate in patients with a sufficient dose (80.0%) was higher than that in patients with an insufficient dose (50.0%) (P=0.019).The main factors associated with stopping treatment within 1 year despite a response to omalizumab was economic burden (70.3%), followed by satisfactory improvement by self-evaluation (21.9%) and less improvement in symptoms than expected (7.8%). Conclusion: Omalizumab was an effective treatment for moderate to severe allergic asthma with few adverse effects. The response rate was higher when the recommended injection dose was achieved. Financial difficulty was the main reason for stopping treatment within 1 year despite a good therapeutic response.