Catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia in patients with dextrocardia and situs inversus.

BACKGROUND: Dextrocardia with situs inversus is a rare cardiac positional anomaly. Catheter ablation procedures performed in this set of patients have not been sufficiently reported. METHODS: A total of 10 patients with dextrocardia and situs inversus who received catheter ablation for supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) were included from a cohort of over 20 000 cases of catheter ablation for SVT in three centers from 2005 to 2016. All patients underwent electrophysiologic study and catheter ablation of SVT. Ablation targets were selected based on different tachycardia mechanisms with the primary endpoint of noninduction of tachycardia. RESULTS: The average age was 32.4 ± 5.6 years. Congenitally corrected transposition of great arteries (TGA) with situs inversus and D-looping of the ventricles and aorta (congenitally corrected TGA {I,D,D}) was found in four patients, while the other six patients exhibited mirror-image dextrocardia {I,L,L}. The mechanisms of SVT were atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in four patients, atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia in three, typical atrial flutter in one, intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia in one, and focal atrial tachycardia in one. Immediate procedural success was achieved in 9 out of 10 patients with no procedural complications. During a follow-up period of 6.3 ± 3.5 years on average, all patients remained free from recurrent tachycardia. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with dextrocardia and situs inversus, catheter ablation of SVT is safe and feasible. Differences in catheter maneuver and fluroscopy projection, along with difficulties in distorted anatomy are major obstacles for successful ablation.

Electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic differentiation between atriofascicular, long atrioventricular, and short atrioventricular decrementally conducting accessory pathways.

Aims: We aimed to examine the electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic characteristics of anterograde-conducting decremental accessory pathways (DAP) and to identify surrogate criteria to distinguish short atrioventricular (SAV) DAP from atriofascicular (AF) AP and long atrioventricular (LAV) DAP. Methods and results: We identified all patients with DAPs and analysed electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic characteristics. Distal insertion sites were examined using existing criteria, including V-H interval, ventricular activation at the right ventricular apex, and around tricuspid annulus during antidromic atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia (A-AVRT) or complete pre-excitation and evaluated the AV node-like properties according to the response to adenosine and radiofrequency ablation. Out of 45 patients with DAPs, 28 (62.2%) had SAV-DAP (13 with definite AF-AP, 2 with definite LAV-DAP, 2 indeterminate). In all, 50% of SAV-DAPs and 53.3% of AF-AP/LAV-DAPs had 'rS' pattern in lead III. Longer QRS duration (159.9 ± 17.4 ms vs. 139.2 ± 14.3 ms, P < 0.0001) during full pre-excitation or A-AVRT differentiated SAV-DAP from AF-AP. The QRS-V(His) interval was longer for those with SAV-DAP compared vs. AF-AP/LAV-DAP (45.3 ± 2.4 ms vs. 22.9 ± 2.5 ms, P < 0.0001) and a cut-off value of 33.0 ms differentiated the two (sensitivity 81.3%, specificity 87.5%). Conclusion: The majority of the SAV-DAPs are located at the TA free wall. An 'rS' pattern in lead III is frequently seen in SAV-DAP as well as AF-AP/LAV-DAPs. Measuring the QRS-V(His) interval would be helpful to distinguish SAV-DAP from AF-AP/LAV-DAP.

Very long-term outcome of catheter ablation of post-incisional atrial tachycardia: Role of incisional and non-incisional scar.

BACKGROUND: The arrhythmogenicity of right atrial (RA) incisional scar after cardiac surgery could result in atrial tachycardia (AT). Radiofrequency catheter ablation is effective in the treatment of such tachycardia. However, data regarding long-term outcomes are limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 105 patients with prior RA incision who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation of AT were included. In the first procedure, electroanatomic mapping (EAM) revealed a total of 139 ATs in 105 patients, including 88 cavotricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutters (IDAFs), 5 mitral annulus reentrant tachycardias (MARTs), 44 intra-atrial reentrant tachycardias (IARTs) and 2 focal ATs (FATs). AT was successfully eliminated in 101 (96.1%) patients. During a mean follow-up period of 90 ± 36 months, recurrent AT was observed in 23 patients and 21 underwent a second ablation. A total of 23 ATs were identified in redo procedures including 4 IDAFs, 2 MARTs, 12 IARTs and 5 FATs. The time to recurrence was significantly different among various AT types. Acute success was achieved in 20 of 23 redo procedures. Taking a total of 21 patients presenting atrial fibrillation during follow-up into account, 85 patients (81.9%) were in sinus rhythm. No complications except for a case of RA compartmentation occurred. CONCLUSION: RA incisional scar played an essential role in promoting both IDAF and IART, while non-incisional scar contributed to a substantial rate of late recurrent AT in forms of both macroreentry and small reentry. Catheter ablation using EAM system resulted in a high success rate during long-term follow-up.

Successful radiofrequency ablation of a right posteroseptal accessory pathway through an anomalous inferior vena cava and azygos continuation in a patient with incomplete situs inversus.

We present a 43-year-old patient with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. In the process of catheter ablation, we found interruption of the inferior vena cava with azygos continuation with incomplete situs inversus. In this patient, we adopted the lower approach via the anomalous inferior vena cava and azygos continuation to achieve stability of radiofrequency catheter for right posteroseptal accessory pathway, and successfully abolished the preexcitation.