Clinical factors associated with the therapeutic efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter prospective observational study.

The treatment efficiency and predictors of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in real-world practice have not been established. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and to investigate predictors of progression-free survival and overall survival. Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy in 19 hospitals were enrolled before treatment and observed prospectively. The outcomes of 222 patients in this cohort were analyzed. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 22.0% and 70.6%, respectively, whereas the median progression-free survival was 5.7 months. Independent risk factors for shortened progression-free survival were younger age (<75 years; 3.9 months vs. 8.6 months), higher number of intrahepatic tumors (≥5; 4.0 months vs. 7.9 months), macrovascular invasion (2.3 months vs. 6.7 months), and higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (≥3.03; 3.0 months vs. 7.8 months). The median overall survival was not reached; however, independent risk factors for shortened overall survival were absence of hyperlipidemia, higher number of intrahepatic tumors (≥5), macrovascular invasion, higher α-fetoprotein level (≥400 ng/mL), worse Child-Pugh score (≥6), and higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (≥3.03). Severe adverse events (grade ≥3) were observed in 96 patients (36.0%), with proteinuria being the most frequent. In conclusion, patients with older age, lower number of intrahepatic tumors, absent macrovascular invasion, and lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio are expected to have better progression-free survival with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Incidence and risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma change over time in patients with hepatitis C virus infection who achieved sustained virologic response.

AIM: In patients with chronic hepatitis C, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurs at a certain frequency, even if a sustained virologic response (SVR) is achieved by antiviral treatment. Old age, liver fibrosis, and high post-treatment α-fetoprotein (AFP) level are typical risk factors of post-SVR HCC. We examined whether the frequencies and factors of HCC in patients with an SVR achieved from interferon treatment changed. Methods Among patients prospectively registered for pegylated interferon and ribavirin treatment, 2021 with an SVR without HCC development during the treatment period were followed up. The mean observation period was 49.5 ± 26.2 months. RESULTS: The multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that older age, diabetes mellitus, advanced liver disease, and higher post-treatment AFP level were the independent risk factors throughout the observation period. The annual occurrence rate of HCC was 0.74% in the third year, 0.54% in the fourth year, and 0.40% in the fifth year; it gradually decreased from the third year. Because the time course hazards for HCC changed at 48 months, we separately analyzed its risk factors before and after this change point. The multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that the four above-mentioned factors were significantly related to HCC development within 4 years. Conversely, the univariable Cox regression analysis only identified diabetes mellitus as a significant factor for HCC development after 4 years. CONCLUSION: The frequency of HCC in hepatitis C patients who achieved an SVR from interferon treatment decreased during the observation period, and its risk factors changed between the early and late periods.

Baseline quasispecies selection and novel mutations contribute to emerging resistance-associated substitutions in hepatitis C virus after direct-acting antiviral treatment.

Resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) in hepatitis C virus (HCV) appear upon failure of treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). However, their origin has not been clarified in detail. Among 11 HCV genotype 1b patients who experienced virologic failure with asunaprevir (ASV)/daclatasvir (DCV), 10 had major NS5A L31M/V-Y93H variants after treatment. L31M/V-Y93H variants were detected as a minor clone before therapy in 6 patients and were the most closely related to the post-treatment variants by phylogenetic tree analysis in 4 patients. Next, to consider the involvement of a trace amount of pre-existing variants below the detection limit, we analysed human hepatocyte chimeric mice infected with DAA-naïve patient serum. L31V-Y93H variants emerged after treatment with ledipasvir (LDV)/GS-558093 (nucleotide NS5B inhibitor) and decreased under the detection limit, but these variants were dissimilar to the L31V-Y93H variants reappearing after ASV/DCV re-treatment. Finally, to develop an infection derived from a single HCV clone, we intrahepatically injected full-genome HCV RNA (engineered based on the wild-type genotype 1b sequence) into chimeric mice. A new Y93H mutation actually occurred in this model after LDV monotherapy failure. In conclusion, post-treatment RASs appear by 2 mechanisms: the selection of pre-existing substitutions among quasispecies and the generation of novel mutations during therapy.

Ultra-deep sequencing analysis of resistance-associated variants during retreatment with simeprevir-based triple therapy after failure of telaprevir-based triple therapy in patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus infection.

AIM: Simeprevir (SMV)-based triple therapy is an effective retreatment option following failure of telaprevir (TVR)-based triple therapy. However, it is unclear whether the persistence of resistance-associated variants (RAVs) induced by TVR-based therapy may reduce the treatment effect of SMV-based therapy. METHODS: The factors associated with the treatment effect, including RAVs in the NS3 region, were examined in 21 patients with genotype 1b HCV infection who were treated with SMV-based therapy after failure of TVR-based therapy. Ultra-deep sequencing was carried out to detect RAVs. RESULTS: With the exception of one patient who discontinued treatment owing to adverse events, the sustained virologic response (SVR) rate was 50% (10/20). Ultra-deep sequencing at the start of SMV-based therapy revealed that TVR-resistant variants were detected in six patients (29%), and no variants were observed at position 168. Cross-resistance between TVR and SMV with low frequency was detected in only one patient, and this patient achieved SVR. Higher SVRs for SMV-based therapy were attained in patients who discontinued treatment owing to the adverse effects of prior TVR-based therapy (discontinuation 100% vs. non-discontinuation 29%, P = 0.005), and patients who relapsed following prior pegylated interferon plus ribavirin therapy (relapse 100% vs. non-response 20%, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, ultra-deep sequencing analysis revealed that TVR and/or SMV-resistant variants may have no influence on the effect of SMV-based therapy after failure of TVR-based therapy. Patients who discontinued treatment owing to adverse effects of TVR-based therapy and relapsers to previous pegylated interferon/ribavirin therapy would be good candidates for retreatment with SMV-based therapy.

Impact of ribavirin dosage in chronic hepatitis C patients treated with simeprevir, pegylated interferon plus ribavirin combination therapy.

The factors associated with sustained virologic response (SVR) in chronic hepatitis C (CH-C) genotype 1 patients treated with simeprevir (SMV), pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) triple therapy have not been fully investigated. Two hundred and twenty-nine treatment-naïve CH-C patients treated with SMV triple therapy were enrolled in this study. The overall SVR rate was 87% in per-protocol analysis. In multivariate analysis, the interleukin (IL) 28B genotype (rs8099917, TT vs. non-TT, odds ratio [OR]: 0.044, P = 0.001) and RBV dose (< 10/10-12/ ≥ 12 mg/kg/day, OR: 4.513, P = 0.041) were significant factors associated with SVR. In patients with the IL28B non-TT genotype, RBV dose affected SVR dose-dependently in stratified analysis of RBV dose (P = 0.015); it was 44% (8/18) for patients administered <10 mg/kg/day of RBV, 78% (14/18) for those administered 10-12 mg/kg/day of RBV, and 100% (3/3) for those administered ≥12 mg/kg/day of RBV, whereas in patients with the IL28B TT genotype, a significant correlation between SVR and RBV dose was not observed (P = 0.229). Regarding RBV dose reduction of less than 10 mg/kg/day, the inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase (ITPA) genotype (rs1127354, CC vs. non-CC, OR: 0.239, P = 0.003) and age (by 1 y.o., OR: 1.084, P = 0.002) were significant independent factors. RBV dosage affected SVR dose-dependently in patients with the IL28B non-TT genotype treated with SMV triple therapy. Special attention to anemia progression and RBV dosage should be paid to aged patients with the ITPA CC genotype. J. Med. Virol. 88:1776-1784, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The impact of an inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase genotype on bilirubin increase in chronic hepatitis C patients treated with simeprevir, pegylated interferon plus ribavirin.

BACKGROUND: Hyperbilirubinemia, mild or moderate, is a commonly observed laboratory abnormality in chronic hepatitis C patients treated with simeprevir with pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) plus ribavirin. In this prospective, multicenter study, we aimed to investigate the clinical features and factors associated with bilirubin increases during the therapy. METHODS: A total of 192 patients with chronic hepatitis C who were treated with simeprevir with Peg-IFN plus ribavirin were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean serum bilirubin level increased significantly during the initial 12 weeks of simeprevir administration and peaked at 2 weeks after the administration. Hyperbilirubinemia of more than 2 mg/dl developed in 18% of the patients; in 85% of those patients, the bilirubin levels peaked within 6 weeks and gradually decreased thereafter. A univariable analysis revealed that an increase in serum total bilirubin of 1.0 mg/dl or more from baseline was significantly associated with the sex, red blood cell count, serum hemoglobin level, serum alanine aminotransferase level, serum creatinine level and inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase (ITPA) genotype. In the multivariable analysis, the ITPA genotype (CC odds ratio 4.990, p = 0.011) was found to be the only independent factor. Consistent with this result, there was a significant correlation between hyperbilirubinemia and the degree of hemolytic anemia. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperbilirubinemia develops at early time points after simeprevir administration in most cases and is dependent on the ITPA genotype. Careful attention should be paid to hyperbilirubinemia, which occurs at later time points or in patients with an ITPA non-CC genotype so that a diagnosis of liver damage with hyperbilirubinemia is not missed.

Emergence of hepatitis C virus NS5A L31V plus Y93H variant upon treatment failure of daclatasvir and asunaprevir is relatively resistant to ledipasvir and NS5B polymerase nucleotide inhibitor GS-558093 in human hepatocyte chimeric mice.

BACKGROUND: Resistance-associated variants (RAVs) emerge at multiple positions spanning hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A and NS5A regions upon failure of asunaprevir/daclatasvir combination therapy. It has not been determined whether the emergence of such RAVs have an impact on re-treatment by a combination of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir, a potent regimen for HCV genotype 1 infection. METHODS: TK-NOG human hepatocyte chimeric mice were inoculated with sera from a patient with treatment failure of asunaprevir/daclatasvir therapy. RESULTS: They developed persistent HCV infection with triple variants of NS3/4A D168V, NS5A L31V plus Y93H. Administration of ledipasvir/GS-558093 (a NS5B nucleotide analog) in these mice failed to achieve end-of-treatment response or sustained virologic response, which was in sharp contrast to the results in mice with wild-type virus infection. The administration of telaprevir/GS-558093 successfully achieved it in those mice. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment failure with asunaprevir/daclatasvir may limit further treatment options. This population may represent a growing unmet medical need.

Efficacy of pegylated interferon and ribavirin combination therapy for patients with hepatitis C virus infection after curative resection or ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma--A retrospective multicenter study.

The use of pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) plus ribavirin combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C patients who received curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma is controversial. This study tried to clarify this. Ninety-nine chronic hepatitis C patients who received curative resection or radiofrequency ablation for primary hepatocellular carcinoma, met the Milan criteria and were treated with Peg-IFN plus ribavirin therapy were enrolled (75 males, 24 females; mean age, 65.0 ± 5.9 years; 79 HCV genotype 1, 20 genotype 2). Among them, 40 patients who had received curative treatment for a single carcinoma were analyzed for recurrence (observation period: 27.6 ± 18.1 months). The factors associated with recurrence were examined using a log-rank test and a Cox proportional-hazards model. The discontinuation rate of the Peg-IFN plus ribavirin combination therapy was 25% (25/99). Among the patients who completed the therapy, the sustained virologic response rates were 35% for the genotype 1 patients and 56% for the genotype 2 patients. The cumulative incidence rates of recurrence were 10.0% at 1 year and 40.8% at 3 years. On multivariate analysis, a virologic response and platelet counts served as independent factors of recurrence (sustained virologic response, hazard ratio = 0.190, P = 0.029; platelet counts <12 × 10(4) /mm(3), hazard ratio = 3.19, P = 0.019). It is concluded that patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection after curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma can be candidates for anti-viral therapy to reduce the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma, especially patients with low platelet counts.

[Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C].

The antiviral therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus(HCV) infection has changed from interferon(IFN) monotherapy to dual therapy with IFN plus ribavirin(RBV), moreover pegylated IFN(Peg-IFN) plus RBV. The sustained virologic response(SVR), defined as HCV RNA negativiation at 24 weeks after the treatment, were obtained 50% among the patients with genotype 1 (48 weeks treatment) and 80% among those with genotype 2 (24 weeks treatment) in Peg-IFN plus RBV combination therapy. The baseline host factors such as age, the degree of liver fibrosis progression and a genetic polymorphism near the IL28B gene, the viral factors such as HCV genotype, mutant virus at HCV core region and interferon sensitivity determining region, the treatment factors such as drug adherence and treatment duration have been reported to be associated with SVR. The risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence was significantly lower in SVR patients than non-SVR patients. Especially, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels decreased through therapy, and the patients with < 5 ng/mL had a low potential of HCC incidence regardless of HCV eradication. It is suggested that AFP levels at 24 weeks after the treatment can be a good surrogate marker for HCC incidence irrespective of the virologic response.

Suppression of hepatocellular carcinoma development in hepatitis C patients given interferon-based antiviral therapy.

The advance of antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis C has brought a high sustained virological response (SVR) rate. In this review article, the suppressive effect of interferon (IFN)-based therapy on the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), risk factors for developing HCC and the characteristics of HCC development after SVR among chronic hepatitis C patients given IFN-based therapy were studied. The HCC incidence has been revealed to decrease with IFN-based antiviral therapy, especially in SVR, and the risk factors for developing HCC were older age, advanced liver fibrosis and male sex. α-Fetoprotein levels at 24 weeks after the end of IFN-based treatment was associated strongly with HCC incidence irrespective of virological response. In patients with SVR, other risk factors were glucose metabolism disorders, lipid metabolism disorders and alcohol intake. Extra attention to the possibility of HCC incidence should be required for these SVR patients. Antiviral therapy with a combination of HCV-specific direct-acting antivirals (DAA) is expected to be utilized in the future. However, it is not known whether DAA-based treatment can suppress HCC to the level of IFN-based treatment. Further research is required to clarify this.

Impact of alpha-fetoprotein on hepatocellular carcinoma development during entecavir treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection.

BACKGROUND: Entecavir (ETV) is one of the first-line nucleoside analogs for treating patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. However, the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk for ETV-treated patients remains unclear. METHODS: A total of 496 Japanese patients with chronic HBV infection undergoing ETV treatment were enrolled in this study. The baseline characteristics were as follows: age 52.6 ± 12.0 years, males 58%, positive for hepatitis B e antigen 45 %, cirrhosis 19%, and median HBV DNA level 6.9 log copies (LC) per milliliter. The mean treatment duration was 49.9 ± 17.5 months. RESULTS: The proportions of HBV DNA negativity (below 2.6 LC/mL) were 68% at 24 weeks and 86% at 1 year, and the rates of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level normalization were 62 and 72%, respectively. The mean serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels decreased significantly at 24 weeks after ETV treatment initiation (from 29.0 ± 137.1 to 5.7 ± 27.9 ng/mL, p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of HCC at 3, 5, and 7 years was 6.0, 9.6, and 17.2%, respectively, among all enrolled patients. In a multivariate analysis, advanced age [55 years or older, hazard ratio (HR) 2.84; p = 0.018], cirrhosis (HR 5.59, p < 0.001), and a higher AFP level (10 ng/mL or greater) at 24 weeks (HR 2.38, p = 0.034) were independent risk factors for HCC incidence. HCC incidence was not affected by HBV DNA negativity or by ALT level normalization at 24 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The AFP level at 24 weeks after ETV treatment initiation can be the on-treatment predictive factor for HCC incidence among patients with chronic HBV infection.

The prospective randomized study on telaprevir at 1500 or 2250 mg with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in Japanese patients with HCV genotype 1.

BACKGROUND: Triple therapy with telaprevir (TVR), pegylated interferon and ribavirin has improved antiviral efficacy in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CH-C). However, the severe adverse effects caused by TVR are important to resolve. In this prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label study, the antiviral efficacy and safety in the reduced administration of TVR were examined. METHODS: A total of 81 CH-C Japanese patients with HCV genotype 1 were randomized into two regimens of TVR 2250 mg (TVR-2250) or 1500 mg (TVR-1500) and treated with triple therapy for 24 weeks. RESULTS: The mean HCV RNA at start, 2 and 4 weeks of treatment were 6.69 ± 0.70, 1.05 ± 0.74, 0.22 ± 0.48 log10 IU/ml in the TVR-2250 group and 6.70 ± 0.62, 1.02 ± 0.62, 0.13 ± 0.41 log10 IU/ml in the TVR-1500 group. The SVR rates were 85% in both groups (35/41 and 34/40, respectively). There were no patients with viral breakthrough in either group. As for adverse effects, rash more than moderate and severe anemia with <8.5 g/dl of hemoglobin were higher in the TVR-2250 group than in the TVR-1500 group (p = 0.046, p < 0.001, respectively). The increase in serum creatinine levels and decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rates were higher in the TVR-2250 group than in the TVR-1500 group. CONCLUSIONS: The lower dose of TVR (1500 mg/day) can result in similar SVR rates and lower treatment-related adverse effects compared to the higher dose of TVR (2250 mg/day) in triple therapy (UMIN: 000007313, 000007330).

Using early viral kinetics to predict antiviral outcome in response-guided pegylated interferon plus ribavirin therapy among patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1.

BACKGROUND: HCV kinetics during treatment demonstrated strong association with the antiviral outcome of patients treated with pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) plus ribavirin. However, the relationship between HCV kinetics and pre-treatment factors remains unclear. METHODS: Of 547 patients with HCV genotype 1 treated with Peg-IFN alfa-2b plus ribavirin, 401 completed the response-guided therapy and were assessed for per protocol analysis. RESULTS: The sustained virologic response (SVR) rate was 53 % for all patients, 60 % for those with genotype TT, and 19 % for those with genotype TG/GG according to IL28B (rs8099917) single nucleotide polymorphisms. The SVR rates increased with HCV decrease at week 4; 4 % (2/56) with <1 log10 decrease, 13 % (7/56) with 1-2 log10 decrease, 51 % (44/87) with 2-3 log10 decrease, 64 % (56/87) with 3-4 log10 decrease, 88 % (72/82) with more than 4 log10 decrease but with detectable HCV RNA and 100 % (33/33) with undetectable HCV RNA (p < 0.001). Similarly, SVR rates increased step-by-step in proportion to HCV decrease in both IL28B TT and TG/GG groups, showing almost the same SVR rates for the same conditions. In multivariate analysis, age (p = 0.005) and the magnitude of HCV decrease at week 4 (p < 0.001) but not IL28B were associated with SVR. Advanced liver fibrosis (p = 0.004) and the magnitude of HCV decrease at week 4 (p < 0.001) but not IL28B were associated with non-response. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of the HCV decrease at week 4 seems to be the most reliable marker for predicting antiviral outcome after starting Peg-IFN plus ribavirin therapy.

Post-treatment levels of α-fetoprotein predict incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma after interferon therapy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, lack of sustained virologic response (SVR) 24 weeks after the end of interferon therapy is a significant risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although many pretreatment factors are known to affect HCC incidence, less is known about post-treatment factors-many change during the course of interferon therapy. METHODS: We performed a prospective study, collecting data from 2659 patients with chronic hepatitis C without a history of HCC who had been treated with pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) plus ribavirin from 2002 through 2008 at hospitals in Japan. Biopsy specimens were collected before treatment; all patients received Peg-IFN plus ribavirin for 48 to 72 weeks (HCV genotype 1) or 24 weeks (HCV genotype 2). Hematologic, biochemical, and virologic data were collected every 4 weeks during treatment and every 6 months after treatment. HCC was diagnosed based on angiography, computed tomography, and/or magnetic resonance imaging findings. RESULTS: HCC developed in 104 patients during a mean observation period of 40 months. Older age, male sex, lower platelet counts and higher levels of α-fetoprotein at baseline, and lack of an SVR were significant risk factors for HCC. The cumulative incidence of HCC was significantly lower in patients without SVRs who relapsed than those with no response to treatment. Levels of α-fetoprotein 24 weeks after the end of treatment (AFP24) were significantly lower than levels of α-fetoprotein at baseline in patients with SVRs and those who relapsed, but not in nonresponders. Post-treatment risk factors for HCC among patients with SVRs included higher AFP24 level and older age; among those without SVRs, risk factors included higher AFP24 level, integrated level of alanine aminotransferase, older age, and male sex. AFP24 (≥10 ng/mL, 10-5 ng/mL, and then <5 ng/mL) was a better predictor of HCC incidence than pretreatment level of AFP among patients with and without SVRs. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic HCV infection, levels of α-fetoprotein decrease during interferon therapy. High post-treatment levels of α-fetoprotein predict HCC, regardless of whether patients achieve an SVR. University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry: C000000196, C000000197.

Liver stiffness measurement by acoustic radiation force impulse is useful in predicting the presence of esophageal varices or high-risk esophageal varices among patients with HCV-related cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Screening and periodic surveillance for esophageal varices (EVs) by esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) are recommended for cirrhotic patients. We investigated non-invasive liver stiffness measurement using acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) for the diagnosis of EV presence and high-risk EVs among patients with HCV-related cirrhosis. METHODS: Among 181 consecutive patients with HCV-related cirrhosis, we studied 135 patients who had received EGD and ARFI. Serum fibrosis markers [platelet count, FIB-4, and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI)] were measured in a training set of 92 patients and compared with ARFI in the diagnostic performance for EV presence and high-risk EVs. Furthermore, the obtained optimal cutoff values of ARFI were prospectively examined in a validation set of 43 patients. RESULTS: In the training set, the ARFI value increased with the EV grade (p < 0.001). The ARFI value for high-risk EVs was significantly higher than that for low-risk EVs (p < 0.001). AUROC values for diagnosis of EV presence and high-risk EVs by ARFI were 0.890 and 0.868, which had the highest diagnostic performance among factors including serum fibrosis markers. The optimal cutoff value of ARFI for EV presence was 2.05 m/s with good sensitivity (83%), specificity (76%), PPV (78%), and NPV (81%), and that for high-risk EVs was 2.39 m/s with good sensitivity (81%), specificity (82%), PPV (69%), and NPV (89%). These cutoff values obtained in the training cohort also showed excellent performance in the validation set. CONCLUSIONS: Liver stiffness measurement by ARFI is useful in predicting EV presence or high-risk EVs among patients with HCV-related cirrhosis.

Significance of liver stiffness measurement by acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) among hepatitis C patients.

The degree of liver fibrosis is strongly associated with the antiviral effect of interferon on chronic hepatitis C patients. In this study, the accuracy of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) in assessing liver fibrosis and the association between liver stiffness using ARFI and antiviral effects were investigated. The 124 patients with chronic hepatitis C enrolled in this study included 94 with HCV genotype 1 and 40 (30%) with moderate fibrosis (METAVIR fibrosis score ≥ F2). Sixty-one patients received pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) plus ribavirin combination therapy and the treatment responses were assessed. The shear wave velocity (Vs value) by ARFI had a strong correlation with the histological fibrosis stage (P < 0.001). The AUROC of the Vs value, aspartate aminotransferase platelet ratio index and FIB4 for the diagnoses of moderate fibrosis (≥F2) were 0.890, 0.779, and 0.737, respectively. HCV genotype 1 patients with the TT allele of IL28B and with a low Vs value (<1.40 m/sec) who were treated with peg-IFN plus ribavirin therapy achieved a sustained virologic response at a rate of 79% (15/19), while all patients with the TG/GG allele of IL28B and a high Vs value (≥1.40 m/sec) experienced a non-virologic response (6/6). The Vs value measured by ARFI could not predict the treatment response for patients with HCV genotype 2. It is concluded that the combination of ARFI at cut off of 1.4 m/sec and IL28B may be useful for patients with chronic hepatitis C with genotype 1 treated with peg-IFN/ribavirin combination therapy.

Renal impairment during the treatment of telaprevir with peginterferon and ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

AIM: Renal damage has been reported as an important complication during combination treatment of peginterferon (PEG IFN), ribavirin (RBV) and telaprevir (TVR) for chronic hepatitis C. However, very little is known about this complication. We investigated the role TVR plays in renal damage during this triple therapy. METHODS: Twenty-five chronic hepatitis C patients with genotype 1 and high viral load received TVR in combination with PEG IFN and RBV for 12 weeks followed by treatment with PEG IFN and RBV. Renal function of these patients was prospectively evaluated for 16 weeks. RESULTS: Creatinine clearance decreased significantly during PEG IFN/RBV/TVR treatment. Consequently, serum creatinine and cystatin C significantly rose during PEG IFN/RBV/TVR treatment. Serum creatinine returned to pretreatment levels after the termination of TVR. The increase of serum creatinine and cystatin C from baseline significantly correlated with serum TVR level at day 7, which was determined by starting dose of TVR per bodyweight . When the patients were classified according to the starting dose of TVR per bodyweight, renal impairment was observed only in the high-dose (TVR ≥33 mg/kg per day) group, not in the low-dose (TVR <33 mg/kg per day) group. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that TVR dose per bodyweight is important for the occurrence of renal impairment in PEG IFN/RBV/TVR treatment.

A multicenter survey of re-treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C in Japan.

AIM: This study aimed to clarify the factors associated the efficacy of re-treatment with pegylated interferon (PEG IFN) plus ribavirin combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C who had failed to respond to previous treatment. METHODS: One hundred and forty-three patients who had previously shown relapse (n = 79), non-response (n = 34) or intolerance (n = 30) to PEG IFN plus ribavirin were re-treated with PEG IFN plus ribavirin. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients with intolerance to previous treatment completed re-treatment and the sustained virological response (SVR) rates were 55% and 80% for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 and 2, respectively. On re-treatment of the 113 patients who completed the previous treatment, the SVR rates were 48% and 63% for genotype 1 and 2, respectively. Relapse after previous treatment and a low baseline HCV RNA level on re-treatment were associated with SVR in genotype 1 (P < 0.001). Patients with the interleukin-28B major genotype responded significantly better and earlier to re-treatment, but the difference in the SVR rate did not reach a significant level between the major and minor genotypes (P = 0.09). Extended treatment of 72 weeks raised the SVR rate among the patients who attained complete early virological response but not rapid virological response with re-treatment (72 weeks, 73%, 16/22, vs 48 weeks, 38%, 5/13, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Relapse after previous treatment and a low baseline HCV RNA level have predictive values for a favorable response of PEG IFN plus ribavirin re-treatment for HCV genotype 1 patients. Re-treatment for 72 weeks may lead to clinical improvement for genotype 1 patients with complete early virological response and without rapid virological response on re-treatment.