Applicability, safety and efficiency of outpatient treatment in uncomplicated diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND: In most cases of diverticulitis, inflammation is mild, and the only treatment required is a clear liquid diet and antibiotics. Until recently, patients were given this treatment as inpatients with the consequent expenditure of resources. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of an outpatient treatment protocol with oral antibiotics in selected patients with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis in comparison with inpatient intravenous treatment. METHODS: We conducted a prospective non-randomized study between January 2007 and December 2009. We included all patients diagnosed with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis, at the Emergency Department of the University General Hospital of Elche. We compared the efficacy, safety and costs of hospital treatment with intravenous antibiotics and outpatient treatment with oral antibiotics. Seventy-six patients were included in the study. Forty-four of them underwent intravenous treatment with Metronidazole 500 mg/8 h + Ciprofloxacin 400 mg/12 h (hospital treatment group) and 32 took oral antibiotics Metronidazole 500 mg/8 h and Ciprofloxacin 500 mg/12 h (outpatient group). RESULTS: Outpatient treatment is viable in almost 95 % of those patients suffering from uncomplicated acute diverticulitis. Treatment was effective in resolving inflammation, and there were no complications in the majority of cases (94 %). Only 2 patients (6 %) required admission after outpatient treatment. The results further reflect complications and relapse rates similar to those of patients admitted to hospital and treated with intravenous antibiotics. There are no significant statistical differences (p = 0.86) between inpatients and outpatients. It is possible to save approximately 1,600 € per patient with outpatient treatment (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient treatment has demonstrated a safety and efficiency similar to inpatient treatment, producing an important reduction in expenses and medical resources.

[Sacral root neuromodulation as treatment for fecal incontinence. Preliminary results]. / Neuromodulación de raíces sacras como tratamiento de la incontinencia fecal. Resultados preliminares.

We present our initial experience in the treatment of fecal incontinence (FI) with sacral root neuromodulation (SRN) by reporting the results of a prospective study with 26 patients where baseline Wexner-Cleveland scale scores and ability to delay defecation were compared to results after one year with SRN. The initial study of patients included history taking, general examination, anal ultrasonography, and manometry, and a three-week diary of continence and quality of life specific for FI was used. Before SRN the mean baseline Wexner-Cleveland score was 15.00 +/- 1.81, and 62.50% of patients could only delay defecation for less than a minute. After a year with NRS the mean Wexner-Cleveland score was 4.87 +/- 2.54 (p = 0.0031), and 75.01% of patients could delay defecation above fifteen minutes (p = 0.0018). We also describe the surgical technique and its indications, and finally review the various therapeutical options for FI and show our algorithm for this condition. SRN is an effective technique for the treatment of FI in properly selected patients with no response to medical therapies (including biofeedback) or anatomic correction (sphincteroplasty), with efficacy, little morbidity, and a short hospital stay.