RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Children are removed from the liver transplant waitlist because of death or progressive illness. Size mismatch accounts for 30% of organ refusal. This study aimed to demonstrate that 3-dimensional (3D) technology is a feasible and accurate adjunct to organ allocation and living donor selection process. METHODS: This prospective multicenter study included pediatric liver transplant candidates and living donors from January 2020 to February 2023. Patient-specific, 3D-printed liver models were used for anatomic planning, real-time evaluation during organ procurement, and surgical navigation. The primary outcome was to determine model accuracy. The secondary outcome was to determine the impact of outcomes in living donor hepatectomy. Study groups were analyzed using propensity score matching with a retrospective cohort. RESULTS: Twenty-eight recipients were included. The median percentage error was -0.6% for 3D models and had the highest correlation to the actual liver explant (Pearson's R = 0.96, P < 0.001) compared with other volume calculation methods. Patient and graft survival were comparable. From 41 living donors, the median percentage error of the allograft was 12.4%. The donor-matched study group had lower central line utilization (21.4% versus 75%, P = 0.045), shorter length of stay (4 versus 7 d, P = 0.003), and lower mean comprehensive complication index (3 versus 21, P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional volume is highly correlated with actual liver explant volume and may vary across different allografts for living donation. The addition of 3D-printed liver models during the transplant evaluation and organ procurement process is a feasible and safe adjunct to the perioperative decision-making process.
Assuntos
Transplante de Fígado , Modelos Anatômicos , Criança , Humanos , Fígado , Doadores Vivos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Impressão TridimensionalRESUMO
This article reviews the current evidence and knowledge of progressive liver fibrosis after pediatric liver transplantation. This often-silent histologic finding is common in long-term survivors and may lead to allograft dysfunction in advanced stages. Surveillance through protocolized liver allograft biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis, and recent evidence suggests that chronic inflammation precedes fibrosis.
Assuntos
Aloenxertos/patologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/imunologia , Cirrose Hepática/diagnóstico , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Fígado/patologia , Aloenxertos/diagnóstico por imagem , Aloenxertos/imunologia , Biópsia/normas , Criança , Técnicas de Imagem por Elasticidade/normas , Rejeição de Enxerto/patologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Fígado/diagnóstico por imagem , Fígado/imunologia , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Cirrose Hepática/tratamento farmacológico , Cirrose Hepática/imunologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Sobreviventes/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: While evidence supports early compared to delayed cholecystectomy as optimal management of acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC), significant variability in practice remains. The purpose of this study was to identify variables associated with early cholecystectomy, to target opportunities to improve adherence to best practices. METHODS: Adult patients admitted to surgical units with ACC at two hospitals in a university hospital network between June 2010 and January 2015 were reviewed. Patients with concurrent pancreatitis, cholangitis or severe ACC (with organ system failure) were excluded. Early cholecystectomy was defined as surgery performed during same admission and within 7 days of presentation. Non-operative management was defined as admission for ACC treated conservatively, with or without eventual delayed cholecystectomy. The primary outcome was early cholecystectomy versus initial non-operative management; secondary outcomes included time to cholecystectomy, complications, and total hospital length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: A total of 374 patients were included. Two hundred and forty six patients (66%) underwent early cholecystectomy, 60 (16%) were treated non-operatively and had delayed cholecystectomy, and 68 (18%) were only treated non-operatively. Median time to OR from initial presentation was 38 h [22-63] for early cholecystectomy patients and 69 days [29-116] for the non-operative patients who had delayed cholecystectomy. When comparing both groups, early cholecystectomy patients were younger and were treated more often at site 1. There were no differences in complications during hospitalization, but early cholecystectomy patients had a lower median total LOS (3 [2-5] vs. 5 [4-9], p < 0.001), and they had fewer gallstone-related events after discharge (1 vs. 18%, p < 0.001). On multiple logistic regression analysis, lower age, hospital site and lower risk of concurrent choledocholithiasis were all significantly associated with early cholecystectomy (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our data supports early cholecystectomy as best practice in management of ACC with no differences in complications during hospitalization, shorter median LOS and fewer gallstone-related events compared to non-operative management. We identified patient and institutional factors associated with early cholecystectomy. This suggests that multiple strategies will be necessary to promote adherence to best practices in the management of ACC within our institution.
Assuntos
Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/estatística & dados numéricos , Colecistite Aguda/cirurgia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Adulto , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Benchmarking , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Multimodal enhanced recovery pathways (ERP) improve clinical outcomes and hospital length of stay for patients undergoing lung resection. However, data supporting their economic impact is lacking. This study evaluated the effect of an ERP on costs of lung resection. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing elective lung resection from August 2011 to August 2013 at a single university-affiliated institution were prospectively recruited. Pneumonectomies and extended resections were excluded. Beginning in September 2012, patients were enrolled in a multimodal ERP. Outcomes were recorded until 90 days after discharge. Total costs from institutional, health care system, and societal perspectives are reported in 2016 Canadian dollars, with uncertainty expressed as 95% confidence intervals derived using bootstrapped estimates (10,000 repetitions). RESULTS: The study included 133 patients (conventional care: n = 58; ERP: n = 75). Patient and operative characteristics were similar between the groups. The ERP group had shorter median (interquartile range) length of stay (4 [3 to 6] days vs 6 [4 to 9] days, p < 0.01), decreased total complications (32% vs 52%, p = 0.02), and decreased pulmonary complications (16% vs 34%, p = 0.01), with no difference in readmissions. After discharge, there was a trend towards less caregiver burden for the ERP group (53 ± 90 hours vs 101 ± 252 hours, p = 0.17). Overall societal costs were lower in the ERP group (mean difference per patient: -$4,396 Canadian; 95% confidence interval -$8,674 to $618 Canadian). CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary ERP is associated with improved clinical outcomes and societal cost savings compared with conventional perioperative management for elective lung resection.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/economia , Pneumopatias/cirurgia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Pneumonectomia/economia , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Seguimentos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Pneumopatias/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Estudos ProspectivosAssuntos
Neoplasias Duodenais/complicações , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Obstrução Intestinal/etiologia , Sarcoma Mieloide/complicações , Idoso , Biópsia , Neoplasias Duodenais/patologia , Duodenoscopia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/patologia , Humanos , Obstrução Intestinal/patologia , Masculino , Sarcoma Mieloide/patologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether African American ethnicity is a risk factor for major respiratory complications following adenotonsillectomy (T&A). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A Canadian tertiary care center. PATIENTS Children aged 0 to 18 years who underwent T&A at our institution from 2002 to 2006 with planned or unplanned postoperative admissions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We evaluated the association between ethnicity and our main outcome measure, major perioperative respiratory complications of T&A. Parental report of ethnicity was available for 23% of our cohort. At our institution, African American children undergo a routine preoperative sickle cell test (TestSC). Data on TestSC were included for all children. We established that having a TestSC was an accurate proxy for African American ethnicity (sensitivity, 96%; specificity, 93%; positive predictive value, 77%; negative predictive value, 99%). RESULTS: Seventy-four of 594 children experienced major respiratory complications (12.5%). Compared with children who did not have major respiratory complications, those who did had a TestSC (P = .01), were 2 years or younger (P < .001) and had lower weight-for-age z scores (P = .04), moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (P = .003), and comorbidities (P < .001). When controlling for these variables in a multivariate analysis, children of African American ethnicity (TestSC used as a proxy) were at higher risk of having major perioperative respiratory complications (adjusted odds ratio, 1.82 [95% CI 1.05-3.14]) (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Children of African American ethnicity (TestSC used as a proxy) are nearly twice as likely to experience major respiratory complications related to T&A. Ethnicity may be an additional independent risk factor for clinicians to consider when planning for T&A.