Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Insights Imaging ; 10(1): 95, 2019 Sep 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31549234

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To develop and assess the value and limitations of an image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for pediatric CT exams. METHODS: IQSC was developed for subjective assessment of image quality using the scoring scale from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating desired anatomy or features not seen, 3 for adequate image quality, and 4 depicting higher than needed image quality. Pediatric CT examinations from 30 separate patients were selected, five each for routine chest, routine abdomen, kidney stone, appendicitis, craniosynostosis, and ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt. Five board-certified pediatric radiologists independently performed image quality evaluation using the proposed IQSC. The kappa statistics were used to assess the interobserver variability. RESULTS: All five radiologists gave a score of 3 to two-third (67%) of all CT exams, followed by a score of 4 for 29% of CT exams, and 2 for 4% exams. The median image quality scores for all exams were 3 and the interobserver agreement among five readers (acceptable image quality [scores 3 or 4] vs sub-optimal image quality ([scores 1 and 2]) was moderate to very good (kappa 0.4-1). For all five radiologists, the lesion detection was adequate for all CT exams. CONCLUSIONS: The image quality scoring criteria covering routine and some clinical indication-based imaging scenarios for pediatric CT examinations has potential to offer a simple and practical tool for assessing image quality with a reasonable degree of interobserver agreement. A more extensive and multi-centric study is recommended to establish wider usefulness of these criteria.

2.
Cancer Imaging ; 19(1): 36, 2019 Jun 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31182167

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To assess if radiomics can differentiate benign and malignant subsolid lung nodules (SSNs) on baseline or follow up chest CT examinations. If radiomics can differentiate between benign and malignant subsolid lung nodules, the clinical implications are shorter follow up CT imaging and early recognition of lung adenocarcinoma on imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The IRB approved retrospective study included 36 patients (mean age 69 ± 8 years; 5 males, 31 females) with 108 SSNs (31benign, 77 malignant) who underwent follow up chest CT for evaluation of indeterminate SSN. All SSNs were identified on both baseline and follow up chest CT. DICOM CT images were deidentified and exported into the open access 3D Slicer software (version 4.7) to obtain radiomic features. Logistic regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for various quantitative parameters were generated with SPSS statistical software. RESULTS: Only 2/92 radiomic features (cluster shade and surface volume ratio) enabled differentiation between malignant and benign SSN on baseline chest CT (P = 0.01 and 0.03) with moderate accuracy [AUC 0.624 (0.505-0.743)]. On follow-up CT, 52/92 radiomic features were significantly different between benign and malignant SSN (P: 0.04 - < 0.0001) with improved accuracy [AUC: 0.708 (0.605-0.811), P = 0.04 - < 0.0001]. Radiomics of benign SSN were stable over time, whereas 63/92 radiomic features of malignant SSNs changed significantly between the baseline and follow up chest CT (P: 0.04 - < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Temporal changes in radiomic features of subsolid lung nodules favor malignant etiology over benign. The change in radiomics features of subsolid lung nodules can allow shorter follow up CT imaging and early recognition of lung adenocarcinoma on imaging. Radiomic features have limited application in differentiating benign and early malignant SSN on baseline chest CT.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma de Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Adenocarcinoma de Pulmão/patologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/normas
3.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 98(1): e13963, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30608433

RESUMO

To assess the role of radiomic features in distinguishing squamous and adenocarcinoma subtypes of nonsmall cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and predict EGFR mutations.Institution Review Board-approved study included chest CT scans of 93 consecutive patients (43 men, 50 women, mean age 60 ±â€Š11 years) with biopsy-proven squamous and adenocarcinoma lung cancers greater than 1 cm. All cancers were evaluated for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. The clinical parameters such as age, sex, and smoking history and standard morphology-based CT imaging features such as target lesion longest diameter (LD), longest perpendicular diameter (LPD), density, and presence of cavity were recorded. The radiomics data was obtained using commercial CT texture analysis (CTTA) software. The CTTA was performed on a single image of the dominant lung lesion. The predictive value of clinical history, standard imaging features, and radiomics was assessed with multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses.Between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinomas, ROC analysis showed significant difference in 3/11 radiomic features (entropy, normalized SD, total) [AUC 0.686-0.744, P = .006 to <.0001], 1/3 clinical features (smoking) [AUC 0.732, P = .001], and 2/3 imaging features (LD and LPD) [AUC 0.646-0658, P = .020 to .032]. ROC analysis for probability variables showed higher values for radiomics (AUC 0.800, P < .0001) than clinical (AUC 0.676, P = .017) and standard imaging (AUC 0.708, P < .0001). Between EGFR mutant and wild-type adenocarcinoma, ROC analysis showed significant difference in 2/11 radiomic features (kurtosis, K2) [AUC 0.656-0.713, P = .03 to .003], 1/3 clinical features (smoking) [AUC 0.758, P < .0001]. The combined probability variable for radiomics, clinical and imaging features was higher (AUC 0.890, P < .0001) than independent probability variables.The radiomics evaluation adds incremental value to clinical history and standard imaging features in predicting histology and EGFR mutations.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Mutação/genética , Adenocarcinoma de Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Adenocarcinoma de Pulmão/patologia , Idoso , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Entropia , Receptores ErbB/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Software , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos
4.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 97(26): e11172, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29952966

RESUMO

The purpose of our study was to determine accuracy of CT texture analysis (CTTA) for differentiating benign from malignant pulmonary nodules, and well-differentiated from poorly differentiated lung cancers, with histology as the standard of reference.In this IRB-approved study, 175 adult patients (average age 66 ±â€Š12 years; age range 27-89 years, male 82: female 93) who underwent a noncontrast chest CT examination prior to CT-guided biopsy of pulmonary nodules were included. There were 57 benign (24 tumors or tumor-like lesions; 33 inflammatory conditions) and 120 malignant (29 well-differentiated adenocarcinomas, 48 poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas, and 43 squamous cell carcinomas) diagnoses on pathology. CTTA was performed on the prebiopsy noncontrast CT images using a commercially available software (TexRAD limited, UK). The CTCA features analyzed included mean HU values, percent positive pixels (PPP), mean value of positive pixels (MPP), standard deviation (SD), normalized SD, skewness, kurtosis, and entropy.The ROC analyses showed that normalized SD [AUC: 0.63, (CI: 0.55-72), P = .003] had moderate accuracy for differentiating between benign and malignant lesions. For differentiating among well-differentiated and poorly differentiated tumors, the ROC analysis showed that except skewness all other parameters were statistically significant The AUC values of other CTTA parameters were: mean (AUC: 0.73-0.76, P = .001- < .0001).CT texture analyses can reliably predict well- and poorly differentiated lung malignancies. However, inflammatory lung lesions with tissue heterogeneity negatively affect the performance of CTTA when it comes to differentiation between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Pulmão/patologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Área Sob a Curva , Feminino , Humanos , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Curva ROC , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA