Influence of the maxillary dimensions and lateral incisor anatomy on the palatal impaction of maxillary permanent canines: A three-dimensional case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis of impacted upper permanent canines (IUPC) is a relatively common clinical finding. The aim of this study was to investigate associations between the upper permanent canines palatal impaction, lateral incisors morphology and the maxilla bone base. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cone-beam tomography files from 62 subjects were divided into 2 groups: impaction group (ICG/n=31; mean age 14.3±2.4) with 45 canines impacted on the palatal side and age- and sex-matched control group (CG/n=31; mean age 14.3±2.3), with 62 normally erupted canines. Linear and volumetric measurements of the lateral incisors, linear transversal measures and the maxillary anterior perimeter were taken. Independent Student's t-test was used for intergroup analysis with correction of Bonferroni. RESULTS: Significant differences were found for crown length and root diameter (buccal-palatal) (P<0.005). The maxillary anterior perimeter in the ICG was reduced in relation to the GC but not significantly (P=0.008). The transverse skeletal variables of the maxilla were equivalent in the intergroup comparison (P>0.005). CONCLUSION: Smaller dimensions in the crown length and in the upper permanent lateral incisors root buccal-palatal diameter were associated with the impaction of upper permanent canines on the palatal side. The maxillary transverse morphology did not show any association with the occurrence of this condition.

Response of masticatory muscles to treatment with orthodontic aligners: a preliminary prospective longitudinal study.

INTRODUCTION: The emergence of orthodontic aligners has provided an aesthetic and comfortable option for orthodontic treatment. However, the encapsulated design of the aligners can influence the masticatory muscles, and might compromise safe treatment. OBJECTIVE: This preliminary longitudinal study aimed to investigate whether the use of orthodontic aligners affects the biting force and myoelectric activity of the superficial masseter and anterior temporal muscles. METHODS: Ten subjects participated in the study and underwent treatment during an 8-month follow-up period. The root mean square (RMS), the median power frequency (MPF) of the surface electromyography (sEMG) signals, and the biting force (kgf) were recorded and normalized relative to the pretreatment condition. The data were analyzed by repeated-measure analysis of variance (ANOVA), with the significance level set at 5%. RESULTS: Both the superficial masseter and the anterior temporal muscles presented an increase in sEMG signal activity during the treatment, with a marked increase in the latter compared to the former (p<0.05). Moreover, a significant decrease in bite force was evidenced (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study observed that the orthodontic aligners affected the muscle recruitment pattern of masticatory muscles, and reduced biting performance during the 8-month follow-up period.

Response of masticatory muscles to treatment with orthodontic aligners: a preliminary prospective longitudinal study

ABSTRACT Introduction: The emergence of orthodontic aligners has provided an aesthetic and comfortable option for orthodontic treatment. However, the encapsulated design of the aligners can influence the masticatory muscles, and might compromise safe treatment. Objective: This preliminary longitudinal study aimed to investigate whether the use of orthodontic aligners affects the biting force and myoelectric activity of the superficial masseter and anterior temporal muscles. Methods: Ten subjects participated in the study and underwent treatment during an 8-month follow-up period. The root mean square (RMS), the median power frequency (MPF) of the surface electromyography (sEMG) signals, and the biting force (kgf) were recorded and normalized relative to the pretreatment condition. The data were analyzed by repeated-measure analysis of variance (ANOVA), with the significance level set at 5%. Results: Both the superficial masseter and the anterior temporal muscles presented an increase in sEMG signal activity during the treatment, with a marked increase in the latter compared to the former (p<0.05). Moreover, a significant decrease in bite force was evidenced (p<0.05). Conclusions: This preliminary study observed that the orthodontic aligners affected the muscle recruitment pattern of masticatory muscles, and reduced biting performance during the 8-month follow-up period.

RESUMO Introdução: O surgimento dos alinhadores ortodônticos tem proporcionado uma opção estética e confortável para o tratamento ortodôntico. No entanto, o design encapsulado dos alinhadores pode influenciar os músculos mastigatórios e comprometer a segurança do tratamento. Objetivo: Este estudo longitudinal preliminar teve como objetivo investigar se o uso de alinhadores ortodônticos afeta a força de mordida e a atividade mioelétrica dos músculos masseter superficial e temporal anterior. Métodos: Dez indivíduos participaram do estudo e foram submetidos a tratamento durante um período de acompanhamento de 8 meses. A raiz quadrada média (RMS), a frequência mediana de potência (FMP) dos sinais de superfície da eletromiografia (sEMG) e a força de mordida (kgf) foram registradas e normalizadas em relação à condição de pré-tratamento. Os dados foram analisados por análise de variância para medidas repetidas (ANOVA), com nível de significância estabelecido em 5%. Resultados: Tanto o masseter superficial quanto o temporal anterior apresentaram aumento da atividade do sinal sEMG durante o tratamento, com aumento acentuado desse último em comparação ao primeiro (p<0,05). Além disso, foi evidenciada uma diminuição significativa da força de mordida (p<0,05). Conclusões: Esse estudo preliminar observou que os alinhadores ortodônticos afetaram o padrão de recrutamento muscular dos músculos mastigatórios e reduziram o desempenho da mordida durante o período de acompanhamento de oito meses.

Is there variation in the depth of the curve of Spee in individuals with different dentoskeletal patterns? A systematic review with meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate all the evidence assessing variations in the depth of the curve of Spee (COS) according to the presence/absence of different dentoskeletal characteristics. SEARCH METHODS AND ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The eligibility criteria were outlined following the PECO framework, as follows: studies evaluating individuals with complete permanent dentition including second molars (P), which compared a group with a certain dentoskeletal variation (E) versus another group without the variation (C), regarding the depth of the COS (O). MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, LILACS and BBO (via Virtual Health Library), OpenGrey, and Google Scholar were searched up to September 2021 to identify eligible reports. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Duplicates were removed from all the records retrieved. The selection process and data collection were performed independently by two review members. The risk of bias was also assessed independently and in duplicate, using the guideline described by Fowkes and Fulton. Several meta-analyses (α = 0.05) were conducted to estimate the mean differences (MD) or standardized mean differences (SMD) in the depth of COS between individuals presenting or not certain dentoskeletal characteristics. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE tool. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were selected for qualitative synthesis, and 29 of them for quantitative synthesis. All studies had methodological limitations that affected the risk of bias and increased the likelihood that results were due to chance. Syntheses showed that Class II malocclusion (SMD = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.61, 1.13; P < 0.00001; six datasets including 260 subjects analysed), Class II division 1 (SMD = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.62, 1.56; P < 0.00001; 14 datasets including 823 subjects analysed) and Class II division 2 (SMD = 2.65; 95% CI: 1.51, 3.79; P < 0.00001; eight datasets including 476 subjects analysed) had deeper COS than Class I malocclusion. The skeletal Class II also presented higher COS values than skeletal Class I (SMD = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.02, 1.12; P = 0.04; four datasets including 299 subjects analysed). Individuals with Class III malocclusion had flatter COS than the subjects having Class I malocclusion (SMD = -0.57; 95% CI: -1.07, -0.08; P = 0.02; nine datasets including 505 individuals analysed). No difference was shown in the COS depth between skeletal Class III and Class I (P > 0.05). Deep bite individuals had higher COS depth than those with normal overbite (MD = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.41, 0.82; P < 0.00001; two datasets including 250 subjects analysed). In addition, hypodivergent individuals presented deeper COS than normodivergents (SMD = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.86; P < 0.00001; six datasets including 305 subjects analysed), and there was no significant difference in the COS depth between hyperdivergent and normodivergent individuals (P = 0.66). The certainty of evidence was rated as very low for all the syntheses. LIMITATIONS: All the quantitative syntheses included results from studies with methodological flaws. Therefore, they are potentially biased. Moreover, the evidence was also mainly affected in terms of the inconsistency of the results and the imprecision of the estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Although an apparent influence of dentoskeletal Class II, Class III malocclusion, deep bite, and the hypodivergent skeletal pattern on the depth of the COS is suggested, it is not possible to make definitive conclusions on the matter due to the very low certainty of the evidence. Further high-quality research is necessary.

Therapeutic effects of botulinum toxin type A in subjects with gummy smile: A longitudinal sEMG approach.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the response of the myoelectric activity of levator labii superioris (LLS), levator labii superioris alaeque nasi (LLSAN), and minor zygomatic (Zm) muscles in individuals with gummy smile, volunteers to botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) application, with a follow-up of 6 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen individuals were submitted to clinical evaluation and photographic records to monitor the variations of the gingival display (GD) during posed smile. The recording of the surface electromyography (sEMG) signal of muscles studied was performed in three tasks: posed smile (PS), upper lip elevation (ULE) and nose wing elevation (NWE). The root-mean-square value, an amplitude sEMG signal parameter, was extracted from the sEMG signals. One and three-way ANOVA were applied, and the level of significance set at 5%. RESULTS: There were significant differences (P<0.05) in the sEMG signal activity from the control condition (before BTX-A application - T0) to the 8th week of follow up, which was accompanied by clinical evaluation for the gingival display (P<0.05). The peak of the reduction in sEMG signals occurred 2 weeks after T0 for all the studied tasks, with the exception of the left hemiface in the PS, which showed a peak of reduction 4 weeks after T0. CONCLUSIONS: BTX-A led to a decrease in the sEMG signal amplitude over 2 to 4 weeks after application in the muscles, although differently concerning each hemiface when recruited to perform other mouth tasks. During the PS, the recruitment level of the upper lip elevator muscles was compatible with the clinical response obtained in the follow-up period in this study, which corroborates the sEMG assessment to clinical data.