RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The valgus cut angle (VCA) of the distal femur in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is measured preoperatively on three-joint alignment radiographs. The anatomical axis of the femur can be described as the anatomical axis of the full length of the femur or as the anatomical axis of the distal half of the femur, which may result in different angles in some cases. During TKA, the anatomical axis of the femur is determined by intramedullary femoral guides, which may follow the distal half or near full anatomical axis, based on the length of the femoral guide. The aim of this study was to compare using the anatomical axis of the full length of the femur versus the anatomical axis of the distal half of the femur for measuring VCA, in normal and varus aligned femurs. We hypothesized that the VCA would be different based upon these two definitions of the anatomical axis of the femur. METHODS: Full-length weight bearing radiographs were used to determine three-joint alignment in normal aligned (Lateral Distal Femoral Angle; LDFA = 87º ± 2º) and varus aligned (LDFA >89º) femurs. Full-length anatomical axis-mechanical axis angle (angle 1) and distal half anatomical axis-mechanical axis angle (angle 2) were measured in all subjects by two independent orthopedic surgeons using a DICOM viewer software (PACS). Angles 1 and 2 were compared in normal and varus aligned subjects to determine whether there was a significant difference. RESULTS: Ninety-seven consecutive subjects with normally aligned femurs and 97 consecutive subjects with varus aligned femurs were included in this study. In normally aligned femurs, the mean value of angle 1 was 5.05° ± 0.76° and for angle 2 was 3.62° ± 1.19°, which were statistically different (P= 0.0001). In varus aligned femurs, the mean value of angle 1 was 5.42° ± 0.85° and for angle 2 was 4.23° ± 1.27°, which were also statistically different (P= 0.0047). CONCLUSION: The two different methods of outlining the anatomical axis of the femur lead to different results in both normal and varus-aligned femurs. This should be considered in determination of the valgus cut angle on pre-operative radiographs and be adjusted according to the length of the intramedullary guide.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The anatomical axis of the femur is crucial for determining the correct alignment in corrective osteotomies of the knee, total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and retrograde and antegrade femoral intramedullary nailing (IMN). The aim of this study was to propose the concept of different anatomical axes for the proximal and distal parts of the femur; compare these axes in normally aligned subjects and also to propose the clinical application of these axes. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, the horizontal distances between the anatomical axis of the proximal and distal halves of the femur and the center of the intercondylar notch were measured in 100 normally aligned femurs using standard full length alignment view X-rays. RESULTS: The average age was 34.44 ± 11.14 years. The average distance from the proximal anatomical axis to the center of the intercondylar notch was 6.68 ± 5.23 mm. The proximal anatomical axis of femur passed lateral to the center of the intercondylar notch in 12 cases (12%), medial in 84 cases (84%) and exactly central in 4 cases (4%). The average distance from the distal anatomical axis to the center of the intercondylar notch was 3.63 ± 2.09 mm. The distal anatomical axis of the femur passed medially to the center of the intercondylar notch in 82 cases (82%) and exactly central in 18 cases (18%). There was a significant difference between the anatomical axis of the proximal and distal parts of the femur in reference to the center of intercondylar notch (P value < 0.05), supporting the hypothesis that anatomical axes of the proximal and distal halves of the femur are different in the coronal plane. CONCLUSIONS: While surgeons are aware that the anatomical axis of the distal part of the femur is different than the anatomical axis of the proximal part in patients with femoral deformities, we have shown that these axes are also different in the normally aligned healthy people due to the anatomy of the femur in coronal plane. Also the normal ranges provided here can be used as a reference for the alignment guide entry point in TKA and antegrade and retrograde intramedullary femoral nailing.
Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Fêmur/anatomia & histologia , Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/métodos , Osteotomia/métodos , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Fêmur/cirurgia , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Abdominal wall defects are a complex group of anomalies, and many are incorrectly diagnosed. Evaluation of the defect relative to the umbilical cord insertion site is fundamentally important in differentiating among the various malformations. The two most common abdominal wall defects are gastroschisis, in which the defect is on the right side of the normally inserting cord and free-floating bowel loops are present, and omphalocele, in which the cord inserts on a membrane-covered midline defect. Omphalocele may also form a portion of a more complex defect that may remain undiagnosed without thorough evaluation. In cloacal exstrophy, the defect extends inferiorly and the bowel loops extrude between the two bladder halves. In pentalogy of Cantrell, the defect extends superiorly and is typically associated with ectopia cordis. Bladder exstrophy is a lower abdominal defect in which the hallmark finding is absence of a fluid-filled bladder. The cord insertion site is normal to low but does not form part of the defect. Both body stalk anomaly and abdominoschisis due to amniotic bands cause severe malformations, often involving extrusion of solid organs and the bowel. Although these two entities have many overlapping features, body stalk anomaly may be recognized on the basis of absence of a free-floating umbilical cord. With use of an algorithmic approach beginning with discovery of the location of the defect, a more precise diagnosis can be determined that may directly affect pre- and postnatal management decisions.
Assuntos
Parede Abdominal/anormalidades , Parede Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal , Algoritmos , Extrofia Vesical/diagnóstico por imagem , Cloaca/anormalidades , Feminino , Gastrosquise/diagnóstico por imagem , Hérnia Umbilical/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional , GravidezRESUMO
The "Dual-Core Beamformer" (DCBF) is a new lead-field based MEG inverse-modeling technique designed for localizing highly correlated networks from noisy MEG data. Conventional beamformer techniques are successful in localizing neuronal sources that are uncorrelated under poor signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions. However, they fail to reconstruct multiple highly correlated sources. Though previously published dual-beamformer techniques can successfully localize multiple correlated sources, they are computationally expensive and impractical, requiring a priori information. The DCBF is able to automatically calculate optimal amplitude-weighting and dipole orientation for reconstruction, greatly reducing the computational cost of the dual-beamformer technique. Paired with a modified Powell algorithm, the DCBF can quickly identify multiple sets of correlated sources contributing to the MEG signal. Through computer simulations, we show that the DCBF quickly and accurately reconstructs source locations and their time-courses under widely varying SNR, degrees of correlation, and source strengths. Simulations also show that the DCBF identifies multiple simultaneously active correlated networks. Additionally, DCBF performance was tested using MEG data in humans. In an auditory task, the DCBF localized and reconstructed highly correlated left and right auditory responses. In a median-nerve stimulation task, the DCBF identified multiple meaningful networks of activation without any a priori information. Altogether, our results indicate that the DCBF is an effective and valuable tool for reconstructing correlated networks of neural activity from MEG recordings.
Assuntos
Encéfalo/fisiologia , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Rede Nervosa/fisiologia , Neurônios/fisiologia , Algoritmos , Simulação por Computador , Estimulação Elétrica , Potenciais Somatossensoriais Evocados/fisiologia , Humanos , Magnetoencefalografia/métodos , Nervo Mediano/fisiologia , Modelos Neurológicos , Transdução de SinaisRESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare the quantities of emboli dislodged during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/stenting in the vertebral artery (VA) with those released during stent placement in the internal carotid artery (ICA). METHODS: Macroscopic images of distal protection devices (DPD) used during 30 stent procedures in 16 ICAs (11 men; mean age 64.6+/-10.6 years) and 14 VAs (9 men; mean age 67.1+/-9.8 years) were reviewed. The amount of captured embolic debris was calculated and expressed as a proportion to the size of the filter. Histological examinations were performed to characterize the material trapped in the filters. RESULTS: Relative to the size of the filter, the proportion of captured debris ranged from 0.1% to approximately 22% in the ostial VA filters and from 0.1% to approximately 21% in the filters used in the ICA procedures (p = NS). Plaque fragments with or without thrombus were discovered in the histological examinations of captured material. There were no significant differences in the characteristics of the debris between the 2 vascular regions, nor did sex, race, or plaque morphology correlate significantly with the proportion of captured debris. However, the severity of stenosis was significantly (p<0.029) greater in the ICA (73%+/-0.11%) than the VA (63%+/-0.09%) territory. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that the frequency and amount of captured emboli during stent procedures in ICA and ostial VAs are comparable. Therefore, the use of a DPD for stent placement in the vertebral artery may be advisable.