Modified Mach-Zehnder interferometer for spatial coherence measurement.

Spatial coherence of light sources is usually obtained by using the classical Young's interferometer. Although the original experiment was improved upon in successive works, some drawbacks still remain. For example, several pairs of points must be used to obtain the complex coherence degree (normalized first-order correlation function) of the source. In this work, a modified Mach-Zehnder interferometer which includes a pair of lenses and is able to measure the spatial coherence degree is presented. With this modified Mach-Zehnder interferometer, it is possible to measure the full 4D spatial coherence function by displacing the incoming beam laterally. To test it, we have measured only a 2D projection (zero shear) of the 4D spatial coherence, which is enough to characterize some types of sources. The setup has no movable parts, making it robust and portable. To test it, the two-dimensional spatial coherence of a high-speed laser with two cavities was measured for different pulse energy values. We observe from the experimental measurements that the complex degree of coherence changes with the selected output energy. Both laser cavities seem to have similar complex coherence degrees for the maximum energy, although it is not symmetrical. Thus, this analysis will allow us to determine the best configuration of the double-cavity laser for interferometric applications. Furthermore, the proposed approach can be applied to any other light sources.

Accuracy and reproducibility of patient-specific hemodynamic models of stented intracranial aneurysms: report on the Virtual Intracranial Stenting Challenge 2011.

Validation studies are prerequisites for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations to be accepted as part of clinical decision-making. This paper reports on the 2011 edition of the Virtual Intracranial Stenting Challenge. The challenge aimed to assess the reproducibility with which research groups can simulate the velocity field in an intracranial aneurysm, both untreated and treated with five different configurations of high-porosity stents. Particle imaging velocimetry (PIV) measurements were obtained to validate the untreated velocity field. Six participants, totaling three CFD solvers, were provided with surface meshes of the vascular geometry and the deployed stent geometries, and flow rate boundary conditions for all inlets and outlets. As output, they were invited to submit an abstract to the 8th International Interdisciplinary Cerebrovascular Symposium 2011 (ICS'11), outlining their methods and giving their interpretation of the performance of each stent configuration. After the challenge, all CFD solutions were collected and analyzed. To quantitatively analyze the data, we calculated the root-mean-square error (RMSE) over uniformly distributed nodes on a plane slicing the main flow jet along its axis and normalized it with the maximum velocity on the slice of the untreated case (NRMSE). Good agreement was found between CFD and PIV with a NRMSE of 7.28%. Excellent agreement was found between CFD solutions, both untreated and treated. The maximum difference between any two groups (along a line perpendicular to the main flow jet) was 4.0 mm/s, i.e. 4.1% of the maximum velocity of the untreated case, and the average NRMSE was 0.47% (range 0.28-1.03%). In conclusion, given geometry and flow rates, research groups can accurately simulate the velocity field inside an intracranial aneurysm-as assessed by comparison with in vitro measurements-and find excellent agreement on the hemodynamic effect of different stent configurations.