RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Relatively few studies focused on the coping strategies adopted by the healthcare workers during the second phase of the pandemic. The present study compared the coping strategies between Italian nurses working in Covid-19 and in other units and it explored whether socio-demographic and work-related variables moderate the relation between the type of unit and coping strategies. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire that included sociodemographic and work-related questions and the Coping Orientation to Problem Experienced-New Italian Version-25 item was administered. Moderation effects between variables and coping strategies were analyzed using generalized linear models. RESULTS: 253 nurses participated. Nurses who worked in a Covid-19 unit had significantly lower scores on Avoidance Strategies subscale and higher scores on Positive Attitude and Social Support subscales than nurses working in other units. DISCUSSION: Gender differences emerged only on the social support coping dimension, with women being more likely to adopt social support than men. No association between the type of unit and the other coping strategies was found. CONCLUSION: Nurses working in Covid-19 units showed better coping strategies than their colleagues: this suggests that support interventions aimed to promote coping strategies should be offered also to Covid-19-free units' nurses.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Adaptação Psicológica , Modificador do Efeito Epidemiológico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , Apoio SocialRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The sense of dignity is a multifactorial feeling influenced also by the healthcare context. PDI-IT is a tool that measures this construct, but its psychometric characteristics have not been adequately investigated in patients which are not experiencing and End- Of-Life condition. The aim of this study is to examine the psychometric characteristics of PDI-IT in a group of non-terminal chronic patients and to verify the instrument's invariance with respect to the individual characteristics of patients. METHODS: A multicentric study was conducted on 421 patients undergoing ambulatory care or hospitalized in specialized medical, surgical and oncological areas. The study of the PDIIT validity in this population was achieved by structural equation (SEM) models; reliability was assessed by Cronbach's Alpha, whereas invariance was studied through multigroup analysis. RESULTS: Findings show an excellent reliability and confirm the monodimensionality of the theoretical structure. After the model optimization interventions, fit indices point out a good data fitting on the reference model. The instrument is invariant with respect to individual characteristics (sex and age) but does not appear to be appropriate for all chronic patients. DISCUSSION: Although with some cautions about the state of progression of the disease, PDIIT seems to be a valid and reliable tool, useful in measuring the sense of dignity even in populations of chronic patients. Future research should address the development of a short form of the tool.