Preoperative Visual Acuity Thresholds in Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Epiretinal Membrane: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This review consolidates findings from studies that used a preoperative visual acuity (VA) threshold as an indication for epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery. METHODS: The literature was systematically searched using Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from January 2000 to October 2022 to select studies reporting on pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for ERM that used a preoperative VA threshold as an inclusion criterion. Primary outcomes were final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and change in BCVA relative to baseline. Secondary outcomes included risk of intra- and postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 639 eyes from seven studies were included. The most liberal preoperative VA threshold was 20/28.5 or worse, whereas the most conservative threshold was worse than 20/60. The mean preoperative BCVA was 0.55 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (∼20/70), and the mean postoperative BCVA was 0.35 logMAR (∼20/45). Generally, VA improved relative to baseline, regardless of the preoperative VA threshold. The smallest improvement in VA was observed in a study where the pre-operative VA to consider surgery was liberal (20/30 or worse), whereas the greatest VA improvement was observed in a study that used a conservative preoperative VA threshold (worse than 20/60). CONCLUSIONS: The greatest improvement in BCVA was observed in studies where a conservative pre-operative VA threshold was used. The decision to operate should involve a patient-centered approach with a thorough discussion of the risks and benefits of PPV, regardless of the preoperative VA threshold used. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:xx-xx.].

Accuracy of an Artificial Intelligence Chatbot's Interpretation of Clinical Ophthalmic Images.

Importance: Ophthalmology is reliant on effective interpretation of multimodal imaging to ensure diagnostic accuracy. The new ability of ChatGPT-4 (OpenAI) to interpret ophthalmic images has not yet been explored. Objective: To evaluate the performance of the novel release of an artificial intelligence chatbot that is capable of processing imaging data. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used a publicly available dataset of ophthalmic cases from OCTCases, a medical education platform based out of the Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences at the University of Toronto, with accompanying clinical multimodal imaging and multiple-choice questions. Across 137 available cases, 136 contained multiple-choice questions (99%). Exposures: The chatbot answered questions requiring multimodal input from October 16 to October 23, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the accuracy of the chatbot in answering multiple-choice questions pertaining to image recognition in ophthalmic cases, measured as the proportion of correct responses. χ2 Tests were conducted to compare the proportion of correct responses across different ophthalmic subspecialties. Results: A total of 429 multiple-choice questions from 136 ophthalmic cases and 448 images were included in the analysis. The chatbot answered 299 of multiple-choice questions correctly across all cases (70%). The chatbot's performance was better on retina questions than neuro-ophthalmology questions (77% vs 58%; difference = 18%; 95% CI, 7.5%-29.4%; χ21 = 11.4; P < .001). The chatbot achieved a better performance on nonimage-based questions compared with image-based questions (82% vs 65%; difference = 17%; 95% CI, 7.8%-25.1%; χ21 = 12.2; P < .001).The chatbot performed best on questions in the retina category (77% correct) and poorest in the neuro-ophthalmology category (58% correct). The chatbot demonstrated intermediate performance on questions from the ocular oncology (72% correct), pediatric ophthalmology (68% correct), uveitis (67% correct), and glaucoma (61% correct) categories. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the recent version of the chatbot accurately responded to approximately two-thirds of multiple-choice questions pertaining to ophthalmic cases based on imaging interpretation. The multimodal chatbot performed better on questions that did not rely on the interpretation of imaging modalities. As the use of multimodal chatbots becomes increasingly widespread, it is imperative to stress their appropriate integration within medical contexts.

Diagnostic methods for primary vitreoretinal lymphoma: A systematic review.

Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma is a potentially aggressive intraocular malignancy with poor systemic prognosis and sometimes significant diagnostic delays as it may masquerade as chronic uveitis. Despite the variety of diagnostic techniques, it is unclear which modality is most accurate in the diagnosis of PVRL. A systematic literature search was conducted on Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials for studies published between January, 2000, and June, 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on the following diagnostic tools used to diagnose patients with PVRL were included: cytology, flow cytometry, MYD88 L265P mutation, CD79B mutation, interleukin 10/interleukin-6 (IL-10/IL-6) ratio, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for monoclonal immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) and immunoglobulin kappa light chain (IgK) rearrangements, and imaging findings. The aggregated sensitivity of each diagnostic modality was reported and compared using the chi-squared (χ2) test. A total of 662 eyes from 29 retrospective studies reporting on patients diagnosed with PVRL were included. An IL-10/IL-6 ratio greater than 1 had the highest sensitivity (89.39%, n = 278/311 eyes, n = 16 studies) for PVRL, where the sensitivity was not significantly different when only vitreous samples were drawn (88.89%, n = 232/261 eyes, n = 13 studies) compared to aqueous samples (83.33%, n = 20/24, n = 2) (p = 0.42). Flow cytometry of vitreous samples gave a positive result in 66/75 eyes (88.00%, n = 6 studies) with PVRL, and monoclonal IgH rearrangements on PCR gave a positive result in 354/416 eyes (85.10%, n = 20 studies) with PVRL. MYD88 L265P and CD79B mutation analysis performed poorly, yielding a positive result in 63/90 eyes (70.00%, n = 8 studies) with PVRL, and 20/57 eyes (35.09%, n = 4 studies) with PVRL, respectively. Overall, our systematic review found that an IL-10/IL-6 ratio greater or equal to one may provide the highest sensitivity in identifying patients with PVRL. Future studies are needed to employ multiple diagnostic tools to aid in the detection of PVRL and to further establish nuanced guidelines when determining the optimal diagnostic tool to use in diverse patient populations.

RETINAL OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY IMAGING BIOMARKERS: A Review of the Literature.

PURPOSE: The aim of this literature review was to summarize novel optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging biomarkers that have recently been described in the literature and are frequently encountered clinically. METHODS: The literature was reviewed to identify novel OCT biomarkers reported to date. A descriptive summary of all terms and representative illustrations were provided to highlight the most relevant features. RESULTS: Thirty-seven OCT terminologies were identified. The vitreomacular interface disorder group included the four stages of epiretinal membrane, macular pseudohole, tractional lamellar hole (LH), degenerative LH, cotton ball sign, and foveal crack sign. The age-related macular degeneration group included outer retinal tubulation, multilayered pigment epithelial detachment, prechoroidal cleft, onion sign, double-layer sign, complete outer retinal atrophy, complete retinal pigment epithelium and outer retinal atrophy, and reticular pseudodrusen. The uveitic disorder group consisted of bacillary layer detachment, syphilis placoid, rain-cloud sign, and pitchfork sign. The disorders relating to the toxicity group included flying saucer sign and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibitor-associated retinopathy. The disorders associated with the systemic condition group included choroidal nodules and needle sign. The pachychoroid spectrum group included pachychoroid and brush border pattern. The vascular disorder group included pearl necklace sign, diffuse retinal thickening, disorganization of retinal inner layers, inner nuclear layer microcysts, hyperreflective retinal spots, paracentral acute middle maculopathy, and acute macular neuroretinopathy. The miscellaneous group included omega sign (ω), macular telangiectasia (type 2), and omega sign (Ω). CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-seven OCT terminologies were summarized, and detailed illustrations consolidating the features of each biomarker were included. A nuanced understanding of OCT biomarkers and their clinical significance is essential because of their predictive and prognostic value.

Prevalence of Person-First Language in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Systematic Review of Case Reports.

BACKGROUND: Person-first language (PFL) is a linguistic prescription, which places a person before their disease. It is considered an important tool to reduce stigma. However, PFL is not routinely used across the scientific literature, particularly in patients with overweight or obesity. Patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) face various stigmas through high rates of poverty, female gender, and frequent rates of comorbidities. Non-PFL language use intersects and worsen the health inequities faced by these patients. METHODS: A systematic review of case reports. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for all case reports with "pseudotumor cerebri" [MESH] OR "Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension" as key word between January 1974 and August 2022. The primary criterion was the article's inclusion of patients with overweight or obesity. The secondary criterion was the article's discussion regarding obesity as risk factor. Articles not meeting primary or secondary criteria were excluded. RESULTS: Approximately 514/716 (71.8%) articles used non-PFL language. The publication year was predictive of non-PFL language: 1976-1991 (82.3%) vs 1992-2007 (72.3%, P = 0.0394) and 2008-2022 (68.3%, P = 0.0056). Non-PFL was significantly higher in obesity compared with other medical conditions (60.3% vs 7.3%, P < 0.001). The patient gender (P = 0.111) and ethnicity (P = 0.697), author's specialty (P = 0.298), and primary English-speaking status (P = 0.231), as well as the journal's impact factor (P = 0.795), were not predictive of non-PFL. CONCLUSIONS: Most literature focused on IIH use non-PFL when discussing overweight or obesity, regardless of the patient's gender and ethnicity, journal's impact factor, senior author's specialty, and English-speaking status. Non-PFL use is much more common when discussing obesity compared with other medical conditions. Appropriate use of PFL can decrease stigma and, more importantly, decrease the intersectionality of health stigma faced by patients with IIH.

The Causes of Optic Disc Edema in Patients Presenting With Significantly Compromised Vision.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the most common causes of optic disc edema (ODE) in patients with significantly compromised vision (initial best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA] of 20/400 or worse) at presentation. METHODS: Retrospective chart review over a 5-year period of consecutive patients presenting to tertiary neuro-ophthalmology clinics at the University of Toronto. RESULTS: A total of 656 patients with ODE were included, and 49 patients (7.47%) had an initial BCVA of 20/400 or worse. There were 54 eyes included at baseline and 49 eyes at final follow-up. There were 29 female and 20 male patients. The mean age at first visit across patients was 55.9 years. Female patients (n = 29) were significantly older than male patients (n = 20) (P < 0.05). The causes of ODE were optic neuritis (ON) (n = 22; 40.7%), nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) (n = 22; 40.7%), arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AAION) (n = 5; 9.26%), uveitis-related (n = 3; 5.56%), papilledema from idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) (n = 1; 1.85%), and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (n = 1; 1.85%). Initial BCVA was not significantly different between ON and NAION groups (P = 0.52); however, final BCVA was significantly better in the ON group (P < 0.0001). The mean initial BCVA was worst in the AAION group (2.62 ± 0.54 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution). The most common cause of ODE in patients <40 years old was ON (83.3%), whereas the 2 most common causes in patients >80 were NAION (60%) and AAION (40%). In patients between the ages of 60-80, NAION (100%) was the only cause. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ODE and poor vision at presentation represent a minority of cases seen in neuro-ophthalmology clinics (<10%). Optic neuritis and NAION are the 2 most common causes of ODE with poor vision at presentation. These findings are limited by a small sample size and potential sampling bias.

Inappropriate Indexing of Case Reports to the "Papilledema" Subject Heading: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Papilledema must be managed distinctly from other causes of optic disc edema (ODE) due to its basis in raised intracranial pressure (ICP). However, evidence indicates that the term "papilledema" is widely misused across specialties to describe ODE without raised ICP. Sources of this misconception remain undiscerned. Because all physicians consult medical databases, our objective was to evaluate whether nonspecific "papilledema" subject heading definitions misleadingly associate articles on other conditions with papilledema proper. METHODS: Systematic review of case reports, prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022363651). MEDLINE and Embase were searched to July 2022 for any full-length case report indexed to the "papilledema" subject heading. Studies were graded for incorrect indexing, defined as cases lacking evidence for raised ICP. Nonpapilledema diagnoses were assigned to a predefined set of diseases and pathophysiological mechanisms for subsequent comparison. RESULTS: Incorrect indexing occurred in 40.67% of 949 included reports. Embase-derived studies were misindexed significantly less than MEDLINE-derived studies ( P < 0.01). There was also significant heterogeneity in incorrect indexing among specific diseases ( P = 0.0015) and mechanisms ( P = 0.0003). The most commonly misindexed diseases were uveitis (21.24% of errors), optic neuritis (13.47%), and instances with no mention of ODE (13.99%). The most commonly misindexed mechanisms were inflammation (34.97%), other mechanism (e.g., genetic; 25.91%), and ischemia (20.47%). CONCLUSIONS: Database subject headings, especially from MEDLINE, do not adequately distinguish between true papilledema and other causes of ODE. Inflammatory diseases were most often incorrectly indexed among other diseases and mechanisms. Current "papilledema" subject headings should be revised to reduce the probability of misinformation.

A Rare ND5 Mutation Causing Leber's Hereditary Optic Neuropathy.

Mutations to the ND5 gene are uncommonly associated with Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON). Herein, we describe a 57-year-old man with the m. 13528A>G, p. (Thr398Ala) mutation at the ND5 gene who presented with progressive bilateral vision loss over the course of 3 months. He had a significant history of smoking and alcohol consumption. Visual field testing demonstrated bilateral central scotomas. At 2-year follow-up, his visual acuity improved relative to baseline and temporal optic disc pallor was observed in both eyes. There are scarce reports of this mutation in the literature, and this case report further expands the clinical presentation of the m. 13528A>G mutation at the ND5 gene in patients with LHON phenotype.