A multicenter study on the epidemiology of complicated parapneumonic effusion in the era of currently available pneumococcal conjugate vaccines.

BACKGROUND: Parapneumonic effusion (PPE) is a common complication of pneumonia. Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most common cause of bacterial pneumonia. A reduction in pneumonia hospitalizations has been observed since the introduction of the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7). Despite this apparent benefit, an increase in the incidence of PPE was recorded in some countries following PCV7 implementation. As the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) was expected to provide a wider protection against PPE, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of PCV13 introduction on the epidemiology of complicated parapneumonic effusion (c-PPE) among children in the Athens greater area. METHODS: All cases of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) with PPE requiring chest tube insertion (complicated PPE, c-PPE) hospitalized in the 3 public Children's hospitals in Athens between 01/01/2004 and 31/12/2019 were included in the study. RESULTS: A total of 426 cases of c-PPE associated with pneumonia were recorded of which 198 were admitted during 2004-2010 (period A, prePCV13/PCV -7 introduction period) and 228 during 2011-2018 (period B, post - PCV13 period). A definite bacterial etiology was established in 44.4 % of all cases and of those 25.4 % were caused by S. pneumoniae. An increasing trend in c-PPE incidence was observed during period A; although, a significant decrease on c-PPE annual rates was observed during the period B (p = 0.011), a remarkable increase in serotype 3 cases was recorded. CONCLUSION: A decreasing time trend in c-PPE cases among children was shown after the introduction of PCV13 in our area. However, serotype 3 is nowadays a common cause of PPE. Hence, continuous surveillance is imperative in order to follow c-PPE epidemiology over time.

Newer-generation antihistamines and the risk of adverse events in children: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: H1-antihistamines (AHs) are widely used for the treatment of allergic diseases, being one of the most commonly prescribed classes of medications in pediatrics. Newer-generation AHs are associated with fewer adverse effects compared with first-generation AHs. However, their relative harms in the pediatric population still need scrutiny. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which included comparisons of safety parameters between an orally administered newer-generation AH and another AH (first- or second-generation), montelukast, or placebo in children aged ≤12 years. We searched MEDLINE and CENTRAL, independently extracted data on study population, interventions, adverse events (AEs), and treatment discontinuations, and assessed the methodologic quality of the included RCTs using the Cochrane's risk of bias tool. RESULTS: Forty-five RCTs published between 1989 and 2017 met eligibility criteria. The majority of RCTs included school-aged children with allergic rhinitis and had a follow-up period of up to a month. Four RCTs reported serious AEs in patients receiving a newer-generation AH, but only two patients experienced a possibly drug-related serious AE. The occurrence of AEs, drug-related AEs, and treatment discontinuations due to AEs varied between RCTs. Most AEs reported were of mild intensity. Indirect evidence indicates that cetirizine is more sedating than the other newer-generation AHs. CONCLUSION: Our findings confirm that newer-generation AHs have a favorable safety and tolerability profile. However, we could not draw firm conclusions regarding the comparative safety profile of the newer-generation AHs due to the paucity of head-to-head RCTs, variation in definitions and reporting of AEs, and short follow-up duration.