Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Sex Health ; 212024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38522475

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Conversations around disease conducted through social media provide a means for capturing public perspectives that may be useful in considering public health approaches. Syphilis is a sexually transmitted disease that is re-emerging. We sought to characterise online discourse on syphilis using data collected from the social media platform, Twitter. METHODS: We extracted English-language tweets containing the word 'syphilis' posted on Twitter in 2019. Tweet identification number and URL, date and time of posting, number of retweets and likes, and the author's screen name, username and biographical statement were included in the dataset. A systematically sampled 10% subset of the data was subjected to qualitative analysis, involving categorisation on content. All tweets assigned to the category of medical resource were assessed for clinical accuracy. The engagement ratio for each category was calculated as (retweets+likes):tweets. RESULTS: In 2019, 111,388 tweets mentioning syphilis were posted by 69,921 authors. The most frequent content category - totalling 5370 tweets (48%) - was a joke. Of 1762 tweets (16%) categorised as a medical resource, 1484 (84%) were medically correct and 240 (14%) were medically incorrect; for 38 (2%), medical accuracy could not be judged from the information posted. Tweets categorised as personal experiences had the highest engagement ratio at approximately 19:1. Medical resource tweets had an engagement ratio of approximately 7:1. CONCLUSIONS: We found medical information about syphilis was limited on Twitter. As tweets about personal experiences generate high engagement, coupling an experience with information may provide opportunity for public health education.


Assuntos
Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis , Mídias Sociais , Sífilis , Humanos , Sífilis/diagnóstico , Comunicação , Saúde Pública
2.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 59(4): 106577, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35331908

RESUMO

Clonal complex 398 (CC398) livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) has been reported worldwide in a variety of food-animal species. Although CC398 is synonymous with LA-MRSA, community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) variants have emerged, including the Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-positive ST398-V and ST398 single-locus variant ST1232-V, and the PVL-negative ST398-V clones. Using comparative genomic analysis, we determined whether ten CC398 MRSA bacteraemia episodes recently identified in Australia were due to LA-MRSA or CA-MRSA CC398. Isolates were sourced from the Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance S. aureus surveillance programme and episodes occurred across Australia. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and phylogenetic comparison of the ten CC398 bacteraemia isolates with previously published CC398 MRSA whole-genome sequences identified that the Australian CC398 isolates were closely related to the human-associated II-GOI clade and the livestock-associated IIa clade. The identified CC398 MRSA clones were: PVL-positive ST1232-V (5C2&5), PVL-negative community-associated ST398-V (5C2&5) and livestock-associated ST398-V (5C2&5). Our findings demonstrate the importance of using WGS and comparing the sequences with international sequences to distinguish between CC398 CA-MRSA and LA-MRSA and to determine the isolates' origin. Furthermore, our findings suggest that CC398 CA-MRSA has become established in the Australian community and that ST398-V (5C2&5) LA-MRSA is now widespread in Australian piggeries. Our study emphasises the need for national One Health antimicrobial resistance surveillance programmes to assist in monitoring the ongoing epidemiology of MRSA and other clinically significant antimicrobial-resistant organisms.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Animais , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Austrália/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Genômica , Gado , Filogenia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/genética
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 60(1): e0320220, 2022 01 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34705537

RESUMO

Evaluation of penicillin and oxacillin susceptibility testing was conducted on 200 Staphylococcus lugdunensis isolates. Disc diffusion with penicillin 1 IU (P1, EUCAST) and penicillin 10 IU (P10, CLSI) was compared with nitrocefin discs (Cefinase) and automated broth microdilution (Vitek 2). Oxacillin susceptibility was extrapolated from cefoxitin (FOX; 30 µg) disc diffusion and compared with Vitek 2 results. The reference methods were blaZ and mecA PCR. Penicillin zone diameter and zone edge correlated with blaZ PCR results in all except two P10-susceptible isolates (very major error [VME]) and one P1-resistant isolate (major error [ME]). A total of 148 isolates were blaZ negative, of which 146 and 149 isolates were susceptible by P1 and P10, respectively. A total of 127 were penicillin susceptible by Vitek 2. Vitek 2 overcalled resistance in 21 blaZ-negative, 20 P1-susceptible, and 22 P10-susceptible isolates (Vitek 2 ME rate, 14.2%). Two mecA-positive isolates were oxacillin resistant by FOX disc and Vitek 2 methods (categorical agreement). However, 18 FOX-susceptible mecA-negative isolates tested resistant by Vitek 2. In conclusion, Vitek 2 overestimated penicillin and oxacillin resistance compared with disc diffusion and PCR results. In our study, disc diffusion with zone edge interpretation was more accurate and specific than automated broth microdilution for S. lugdunensis.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Staphylococcus lugdunensis , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/análise , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Oxacilina/farmacologia
4.
Vaccine ; 26(33): 4160-7, 2008 Aug 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18599164

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a prototype inactivated, split-virus H5N1 (avian influenza A) vaccine. A secondary objective was to assess the cross-reactivity of immune responses to two variant clade 2 H5N1 strains. METHODS: In two randomised, dose comparison, parallel assignment, multicentre trials conducted in Australia, healthy adult volunteers received two doses of 7.5 microg or 15 microg H5 haemagglutinin (HA) vaccine+/-AlPO4 adjuvant (phase I trial; N=400) or two doses of 30 microg or 45 microg H5 HA with AlPO4 adjuvant (phase II trial; N=400). Revaccination with a booster dose was offered 6 months after dose 2 (phase I trial only). Main outcome measures were the change in immunogenicity at each follow-up visit from baseline, measured using HA inhibition (HI) and virus microneutralisation (MN) assays, and the frequency and nature of adverse events (AEs). Computer generated tables were used to randomly allocate treatments; participants and investigators were blinded to treatment allocation. FINDINGS: All formulations were well-tolerated; no unexpected serious adverse events were reported. Two doses of 30 microg or 45 microg H5 HA adjuvanted formulations elicited the highest immune responses, with considerable MN antibody (>or=1:20) persistence up to 6 months post-vaccination. The 7.5 and 15 microg formulations (+/-adjuvant) were less immunogenic than the higher dose formulations; HI and MN antibody titres decreased to near pre-vaccination levels at 6 months but were restored to post-dose 2 levels after the booster dose. Immune responses in the phase I trial demonstrated modest levels of cross-protective MN antibodies against two currently circulating, distinct clade 2 H5N1 strains. INTERPRETATION: Two doses of prototype 30 microg or 45 microg aluminium-adjuvanted, clade 1 H5N1 vaccines were immunogenic and well-tolerated with considerable 6-month antibody persistence. The prototype H5N1 vaccine also elicited modest levels of cross-protective MN antibodies against variant clade 2 H5N1 strains [ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00136331, NCT00320346; FUNDING: CSL Limited, Australia].


Assuntos
Virus da Influenza A Subtipo H5N1/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Compostos de Alúmen/administração & dosagem , Compostos de Alúmen/farmacologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Austrália , Feminino , Testes de Inibição da Hemaglutinação , Glicoproteínas de Hemaglutininação de Vírus da Influenza/administração & dosagem , Glicoproteínas de Hemaglutininação de Vírus da Influenza/efeitos adversos , Glicoproteínas de Hemaglutininação de Vírus da Influenza/imunologia , Humanos , Imunização Secundária , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes de Neutralização , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/efeitos adversos , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/imunologia , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas/imunologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA