Magnetic resonance imaging in boys with severe hemophilia A: Serial and end-of-study findings from the Canadian Hemophilia Primary Prophylaxis Study.

BACKGROUND: This study examined the structural outcomes for joints of boys with severe hemophilia A receiving frequency/dose-escalated primary prophylaxis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the importance of interval MRI changes. METHODS: Forty-six subjects (27 with interval studies) were evaluated by radiographs (X-rays) and mid- and end-of-study MRIs (using the International Prophylaxis Study Group scale), as part of the Canadian Hemophilia Prophylaxis Study. The primary outcome was the presence of MRI osteochondral findings. RESULTS: The median (range) time on study at the end-of-study MRI examination was 9.6 (4.8-16.0) years, during which 18 of 46 subjects (39%) had osteochondral changes in at least one joint. An interval change in MRI score of at least 1 point was observed in 44% of joints (43 ankles, 21 elbows, 4 knees); at least one joint showed this change in all 27 subjects. Self-reported interval hemarthrosis was associated with a higher likelihood of interval osteochondral change (odds ratio [OR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08-2.06). Presence of synovial hypertrophy or hemosiderin on interval MRIs was associated with an OR of 4.71 (95% CI, 1.92-11.57) and 5.25 (95% CI, 2.05-13.40) of later osteochondral changes on MRI. DISCUSSION: MRI changes were seen in 39% of subjects. Interval index joint bleeding was associated with an increased risk of later MRI changes, and earlier soft-tissue changes were associated with subsequent osteochondral changes.

Patterns of joint damage in severe haemophilia A treated with prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to assess whether there are different patterns (classes) of joint health in young boys with severe haemophilia A (SHA) prescribed primary tailored prophylaxis. We also assessed whether age at first index joint bleed, blood group, FVIII gene abnormality variant, factor VIII trough level, first-year bleeding rate and adherence to the prescribed prophylaxis regimen significantly predicted joint damage trajectory, and thus class membership. METHODS: Using data collected prospectively as part of the Canadian Hemophilia Primary Prophylaxis Study (CHPS), we implemented a latent class growth mixture model technique to determine how many joint damage classes existed within the cohort. We used a multinomial logistic regression to predict the odds of class membership based on the above predictors. We fitted a survival model to assess whether there were differences in the rate of dose escalation across the groups. RESULTS: We identified three distinct classes of trajectory: persistently low, moderately increasing and rapidly increasing joint scores. By multinomial regression, we found that only age at first index joint bleed predicted rapidly increasing joint scores. The rapidly increasing joint score class group moved through dose escalation significantly faster than the other two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Using tailored prophylaxis, boys with SHA follow one of three joint health trajectories. By using knowledge of disease trajectories, clinicians may be able to adjust treatment according to a subject's predicted long-term joint health and institute cost-effective programmes of prophylaxis targeted at the individual subject level.

Hemophilia prophylaxis adherence and bleeding using a tailored, frequency-escalated approach: The Canadian Hemophilia Primary Prophylaxis Study.

BACKGROUND: Standard of care for persons with severe hemophilia A includes regular replacement of factor VIII (FVIII). Prophylaxis regimens using standard half-life (SHL) FVIII concentrates, while effective, are costly and require frequent intravenous infusions. AIM: This study evaluated the adherence of 56 boys with severe hemophilia A to tailored, frequency-escalated prophylaxis with an SHL recombinant FVIII concentrate. METHODS: We reviewed the factor infusion and bleeding logs of study subjects. Adherence to the prescribed regimen was calculated on a weekly basis, and bleeding rates were determined from self/proxy-reported bleeding logs. The primary outcome was adherence to the prescribed prophylaxis regimen. RESULTS: The median (range of values [ROV]) weekly adherence to prophylaxis was 85.7% (37.4%-99.8%). The median (ROV) adherent weeks on steps 1 (weekly), 2 (twice weekly), and 3 (alternate-day) were 92.9% (50%-100%), 80.3 (32%-96%), and 72.6% (14%-98%); relative to step 1, subjects were less likely to be adherent on steps 2 and 3 (P < 0.00). On step 1, our cohort had higher adherence than previously reported rates. The median (ROV) adherence to the breakthrough bleeding protocol was 47.1% (0%-100%). At any given time, bleeding risk was reduced by 15% for each 10% increase in adherence during the preceding 12 weeks (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.90). CONCLUSION: This cohort had high rates of adherence to the prescribed prophylaxis regimen. Initiating prophylaxis with once-weekly infusions facilitated adherence to the prophylaxis regimen in this cohort of boys with severe hemophilia A started on primary prophylaxis at a very young age.