Graft function and incidence of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in donation after circulatory-determined death heart transplant recipients.

Experience in donation after circulatory-determined death (DCD) heart transplantation (HTx) is expanding. There is limited information on the functional outcomes of DCD HTx recipients. We sought to evaluate functional outcomes in our cohort of DCD recipients. We performed a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study comparing outcomes in consecutive DCD and donation after brain death (DBD) HTx recipients between 2015 and 2019. Primary outcome was allograft function by echocardiography at 12 and 24 months. Secondary outcomes included incidence of cardiac allograft vasculopathy, treated rejection, renal function, and survival. Seventy-seven DCD and 153 DBD recipients were included. There was no difference in left ventricular ejection fraction at 12 months (59% vs 59%, P = .57) and 24 months (58% vs 58%, P = .87). There was no significant difference in right ventricular function at 12 and 24 months. Unadjusted survival between DCD and DBD recipients at 5 years (85.7% DCD and 81% DBD recipients; P = .45) was similar. There were no significant differences in incidence of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (odds ratio 1.59, P = .21, 95% confidence interval 0.77-3.3) or treated rejection (odds ratio 0.60, P = .12, 95% confidence interval 0.32-1.15) between DBD and DCD recipients. Post-transplant renal function was similar at 1 and 2 years. In conclusion, cardiac allografts from DCD donors perform similarly to a contemporary population of DBD allografts in the medium term.

A national pilot of donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantation within the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND: The United Kingdom (UK) was one of the first countries to pioneer heart transplantation from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors. To facilitate equity of access to DCD hearts by all UK heart transplant centers and expand the retrieval zone nationwide, a Joint Innovation Fund (JIF) pilot was provided by NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) and NHS England (NHSE). The activity and outcomes of this national DCD heart pilot program are reported. METHODS: This is a national multi-center, retrospective cohort study examining early outcomes of DCD heart transplants performed across 7 heart transplant centers, adult and pediatric, throughout the UK. Hearts were retrieved using the direct procurement and perfusion (DPP) technique by 3 specialist retrieval teams trained in ex-situ normothermic machine perfusion. Outcomes were compared against DCD heart transplants before the national pilot era and against contemporaneous donation after brain death (DBD) heart transplants, and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis, chi-square test, and Wilcoxon's rank-sum. RESULTS: From September 7, 2020 to February 28, 2022, 215 potential DCD hearts were offered of which 98 (46%) were accepted and attended. There were 77 potential donors (36%) which proceeded to death within 2 hours, with 57 (27%) donor hearts successfully retrieved and perfused ex situ and 50 (23%) DCD hearts going on to be transplanted. During this same period, 179 DBD hearts were transplanted. Overall, there was no difference in the 30-day survival rate between DCD and DBD (94% vs 93%) or 90 day survival (90% vs 90%) respectively. There was a higher rate of ECMO use post-DCD heart transplants compared to DBD (40% vs 16%, p = 0.0006), and DCD hearts in the pre pilot era, (17%, p = 0.002). There was no difference in length of ICU stay (9 DCD vs 8 days DBD, p = 0.13) nor hospital stay (28 DCD vs 27 DBD days, p = 0.46). CONCLUSION: During this pilot study, 3 specialist retrieval teams were able to retrieve DCD hearts nationally for all 7 UK heart transplant centers. DCD donors increased overall heart transplantation in the UK by 28% with equivalent early posttransplant survival compared with DBD donors.

Comparing Cardiac Mechanics and Myocardial Fibrosis in DBD and DCD Heart Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation (HTx) after donation after circulatory death (DCD) is an expanding practice but is associated with increased warm ischemic time. The impact of DCD HTx on cardiac mechanics and myocardial fibrosis has not been reported. We aimed to compare cardiac mechanics and myocardial fibrosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in donation after brain death (DBD) and DCD HTx recipients and healthy controls. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive HTx recipients between March 2015 and March 2021 who underwent routine surveillance CMR imaging were included. Cardiac mechanics were assessed using CMR feature tracking to compute global longitudinal strain, global circumferential strain, and right ventricular free-wall longitudinal myocardial strain. Fibrosis was assessed using late gadolinium enhancement imaging and estimation of extracellular volume. There were 82 (DBD n = 42, DCD n = 40) HTx recipients (aged 53 years, interquartile range 41-59 years, 24% female) who underwent CMR imaging at median of 9 months (interquartile range 6-14 months) after transplantation. HTx recipients had increased extracellular volume (29.7 ± 3.6%) compared with normal ranges (25.9%, interquartile range 25.4-26.5). Myocardial strain was impaired after transplantation compared with controls (global longitudinal strain -12.6 ± 3.1% vs -17.2 ± 1.8%, P < .0001; global circumferential strain -16.9 ± 3.1% vs -19.2 ± 2.0%, P = .002; right ventricular free-wall longitudinal strain -15.7 ± 4.5% vs -21.6 ± 4.7%, P < .0001). There were no differences in fibrosis burden (extracellular volume 30.6 ± 4.4% vs 29.2 ± 3.2%; P = .39) or cardiac mechanics (global longitudinal strain -13.1 ± 3.0% vs -12.1 ± 3.1%, P = .14; global circumferential strain -17.3 ± 2.9% vs -16.6 ± 3.1%, P = .27; right ventricular free-wall longitudinal strain -15.9 ± 4.9% vs -15.5 ± 4.1%, P = .71) between DCD and DBD HTx. CONCLUSIONS: HTx recipients have impaired cardiac mechanics compared with controls, with increased myocardial fibrosis. There were no differences in early CMR imaging characteristics between DBD and DCD heart transplants, providing further evidence that DCD and DBD HTx outcomes are comparable.

Coronary imaging of cardiac allograft vasculopathy predicts current and future deterioration of left ventricular function in patients with orthotopic heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) improve sensitivity of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) detection compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA), but their ability to predict clinical events is unknown. We determined whether severe CAV detected with ICA, IVUS, or OCT correlates with graft function. METHODS: Comparison of specific vessel parameters between IVUS and OCT on 20 patients attending for angiography 12-24 months post-orthotopic heart transplant. Serial left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was recorded prospectively. RESULTS: Analyzing 55 coronary arteries, OCT and IVUS correlated well for vessel CAV characteristics. A mean intimal thickness (MIT)OCT  > .25 mm had a sensitivity of 86.7% and specificity of 74.3% at detecting Stanford grade 4 CAV. Those with angiographically evident CAV had significant reduction in graft EF over 7.3 years follow-up (median ΔEF -2% vs +1.5%, P = .03). Patients with MITOCT  > .25 mm in at least one vessel had a lower median EF at time of surveillance (57% vs 62%, P = .014). Two MACEs were noted. CONCLUSION: Imaging with OCT correlates well with IVUS for CAV detection. Combined angiography and OCT to screen for CAV within 12-24 months of transplant predicts concurrent and future deterioration in graft function.

High-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Is Not Associated With Acute Cellular Rejection After Heart Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Acute cellular rejection (ACR) is common in the first year after cardiac transplantation, and regular surveillance endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is required. An inexpensive, simple noninvasive diagnostic test would be useful. Prior studies suggest cardiac troponin (cTn) has potential as a "rule-out" test to minimize the use of EMB. Our aim was to determine whether a new high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay would have utility as a "rule-out" test for ACR after heart transplantation. METHODS: Blood samples at patient follow-up visits were collected and stored over a period of 5 y. Serum cTnI concentrations were measured using the ARCHITECTSTAT hs-cTnI assay and compared with an EMB performed on the same day. Receiver-operator curve analysis based on mixed-effects logistic regression models that account for repeated measurements in individuals was performed to determine a serum troponin level below which ACR could be reliably excluded. RESULTS: One hundred seventy patients had 883 serum hs-cTnI results paired to a routine surveillance EMB. Fifty-one (6%) EMB showed significant ACR (grade ≥2R). Receiver-operator curve analysis approximated the null hypothesis area under the curve 0.509 (95% CI, 0.428-0.591). Sub-analysis including repeated hs-cTnI levels in a single individual, and early (<3 mo) EMB also showed no diagnostic utility of hs-cTnI measurement (area under the curve 0.512). CONCLUSIONS: In the largest published study to date, we found no association between hs-cTnI concentration and the presence of significant ACR on surveillance EMB. Measurement of hs-cTnI may not be a useful technique for diagnosis or exclusion of ACR after heart transplantation.

Heart transplantation in the UK during the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: We aim to evaluate practice and understand the impact of the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on heart transplantation in the UK. METHODS: A retrospective review of the UK Transplant Registry (UKTR) and a national survey of UK heart transplant centers have been performed. The early pandemic period is defined here as 1 March to 31 May 2020. RESULTS: There was geographic variation in the prevalence of COVID-19 across the UK. All centers reported adaptations to maintain the safety of their staff, candidate, and recipient populations. The number of donors fell by 31% during the early pandemic period. Heart utilization increased to 35%, compared to 26% during the same period of 2019. The number of heart transplants was well maintained, across all centers, with 38 performed, compared to 41 during the same period of 2019, with no change in 30-day survival. Twenty-seven heart transplant recipients with confirmed COVID-19 infection were reported during the study period. CONCLUSION: All UK heart transplant centers have successfully adapted their programs to overcome the challenges of staff redeployment and ICU and hospital resource limitation, associated with the pandemic, whilst continuing heart transplant activity. On-going evaluation of practice changes, with sharing of lessons learned, is required as the pandemic continues.

Size matching in heart transplantation: Is predicted heart mass the optimal method in a United Kingdom cohort?

Predicted heart mass (PHM) equations have been proposed as an alternative method for size matching in heart transplantation. We assessed association between donor-recipient size mismatch, defined using PHM equations, and survival post-heart transplant in the United Kingdom. Data from all adult patients who received a heart transplant between 1995 and 2017 were obtained from the United Kingdom Transplant Registry. PHM was calculated using published equations. Primary outcome was 1-year survival post-heart transplantation. Recipients of undersized organs had reduced 1-year survival (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.03-1.67, p = .03). Oversizing had no impact on survival (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.78-1.26, p = .96). Gender mismatching had no impact on survival in the cohort matched by PHM (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.86-1.47, p = .4). In recipients without pulmonary hypertension, undersizing by PHM had no impact on 1-year survival (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.61-1.49, p = .83). In recipients with pulmonary hypertension, oversizing donor RV by using PHM RV equation (PHMRV ) results in improved survival at 1 year (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.5-0.83, p = .001). In conclusion, receiving an organ undersized by PHM was associated with decreased 1-year survival. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that undersizing only impacted survival in recipients with pulmonary hypertension and that these recipients had improved outcomes if they received an organ with an RV oversized by >10% by PHMRV .

A 5-year single-center early experience of heart transplantation from donation after circulatory-determined death donors.

BACKGROUND: In an effort to address the increasing demand for heart transplantation within the United Kingdom (UK), we established a clinical program of heart transplantation from donation after circulatory-determined death (DCD) donors in 2015. After 5 years, we report the clinical early outcomes and impact of the program. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective, matched, observational cohort study comparing outcomes of hearts transplanted from DCD donors from March 1, 2015 to February 29, 2020 with those from matched donation after brain death (DBD) donors at Royal Papworth Hospital (RPH) (Cambridge, UK). DCD hearts were either retrieved using thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion or the direct procurement and perfusion technique. All DBD hearts were procured using standard cold static storage. The primary outcomes were recipient 30-day and 1-year survival. RESULTS: During the 5-year study, DCD heart donation increased overall heart transplant activity by 48% (79 for DCD and 164 for DBD). There was no difference in survival at 30 days (97% for DCD vs 99% for DBD, p = 1.00) or 1 year (91% for DCD vs 89% for DBD, p = 0.72). There was no difference in the length of stay in the intensive care unit (7 for DCD vs 6 for DBD days, p = 0.24) or in the hospital (24 for DCD vs 25 for DBD days, p = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: DCD heart donation increased overall heart transplant activity at RPH by 48%, with no difference in 30-day or 1-year survival in comparison with conventional DBD heart transplantations. DCD heart donation is set to make a dramatic difference in the number of patients who can benefit from heart transplantation.

Outcomes following cardiac transplantation in adults.

For a carefully selected group of patients with advanced heart failure where prognosis and quality of life remain poor, cardiac transplantation is the treatment of choice. Long-term survival and quality of life are now excellent in most patients post-transplantation, but important short- and long-term complications remain a significant concern. The mainstay of early and longer term post-transplant care is the surveillance for and treatment of these complications. This review article provides an overview of the contemporary outcomes after heart transplant, the more commonly encountered problems and their management in the early and late stages.

SARS-CoV-2 infection and early mortality of waitlisted and solid organ transplant recipients in England: A national cohort study.

Patients waitlisted for and recipients of solid organ transplants (SOT) are perceived to have a higher risk of contracting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and death; however, definitive epidemiological evidence is lacking. In a comprehensive national cohort study enabled by linkage of the UK transplant registry and Public Health England and NHS Digital Tracing services, we examined the incidence of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and subsequent mortality in patients on the active waiting list for a deceased donor SOT and recipients with a functioning SOT as of February 1, 2020 with follow-up to May 20, 2020. Univariate and multivariable techniques were used to compare differences between groups and to control for case-mix. One hundred ninety-seven (3.8%) of the 5184 waitlisted patients and 597 (1.3%) of the 46 789 SOT recipients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Mortality after testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 was 10.2% (20/197) for waitlisted patients and 25.8% (154/597) for SOT recipients. Increasing recipient age was the only variable independently associated with death after positive SARS-CoV-2 test. Of the 1004 transplants performed in 2020, 41 (4.1%) recipients have tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 with 8 (0.8%) deaths reported by May 20. These data provide evidence to support decisions on the risks and benefits of SOT during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Vasoplegia following heart transplantation and left ventricular assist device explant is not associated with inferior outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Vasoplegia has been associated with inferior outcomes following heart transplantation (HTx). This observational study was designed to investigate outcomes in recipients with vasoplegia following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) explant HTx. METHODS: Patients undergoing LVAD explant followed by HTx from 01/2013-12/2018 at our centre were included. Vasoplegia was defined as the requirement for high dose vasopressor [noradrenaline (>0.5 µg/kg/min) and vasopressin (>1 U/h)] over the first 24 hours following HTx. Demographic and outcome data were retrieved from the transplant unit database. RESULTS: During the study period 24 patients underwent LVAD explant HTx. Of these, 13 (54.2%) developed vasoplegia. Both groups had similar duration of LVAD support (median 684 vs. 620 days P=0.62). There was a higher incidence of driveline infection in patients developing vasoplegia (69.2% vs. 18.2% P=0.02). HTx following donation after circulatory death (DCD) occurred in 9 (37.5%) patients and was not associated with a higher incidence of vasoplegia (P=0.21). Vasoplegia developed early following reperfusion and intensive care unit admission vasopressor-inotrope scores were significantly higher in patients with vasoplegia (P=0.002). Patients developing vasoplegia had similar ICU (P=0.79) and hospital (P=0.93) lengths of stay. Survival was equivalent both at 30-day (92.3% vs. 100% P=0.99) and 1-year (67.7% vs. 74.7% P=0.70). Our overall HTx 1-year survival was 89.3% over this period. CONCLUSIONS: Vasoplegia is seen with a high incidence in HTx recipients bridged with an LVAD. This appears to be associated with the presence of driveline infections. Early aggressive management is advocated, resulting in equivalent 1-year survival to those patients not developing vasoplegia.

The introduction of a super-urgent heart allocation scheme in the UK: A 2-year review.

BACKGROUND: In response to a growing number of patients on the UK urgent heart transplant waiting list, the UK donor heart allocation scheme was revised in October 2016 with the introduction of a new super-urgent category. Patients with temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) became eligible for super-urgent registration. The aim of this study was to compare activity, indications, and outcomes before and after the change. METHODS: Data on adult (aged ≥16 years) heart transplant registrations and recipients in the 2 years before (Era 1: July 1, 2014-June 30, 2016) and after (Era 2: January 2017-December 2018) the introduction of the new scheme were extracted from the UK Transplant Registry and analyzed using competing risks analysis, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox proportional-hazards regression. RESULTS: There were 525 waiting-list registrations in Era 1 and 594 in Era 2, including 14% super-urgent registrations, with 90% having some form of tMCS. Median waiting time to transplant was 41 days for all urgent registrations in Era 1 compared with 17 days for super-urgent registrations and 71 days for urgent registrations in Era 2. Numbers of non-urgent transplants were not affected. Deaths on the waiting list significantly decreased from 5% to 2% at 6 months between Era 1 and Era 2 (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.13-0.62). In addition, total number of patients with tMCS were not different between both eras, suggesting no significant change in this area of clinical decision making. Post-transplant survival at 1 year for super-urgent recipients was not significantly different from post-transplant survival at 1 year for other categories. CONCLUSIONS: The Introduction of a super-urgent heart allocation scheme in the UK reduces waiting time to transplant for the sickest patients, with comparable post-transplant survival while reducing deaths on the waiting list.

Transfer of Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Using Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

OBJECTIVES: The authors describe the experience of patient transfer on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) used as a salvage therapy for refractory cardiogenic shock, examining feasibility and long-term outcomes. DESIGN: A retrospective case series. SETTING: A tertiary referral cardiothoracic transplantation center. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Since 2012, the authors' multidisciplinary team has traveled to the referring center of 15 patients referred with refractory cardiogenic shock. Of these, 13 were instituted on VA ECMO support (8 peripheral and 5 central) and subsequently transferred to the authors' center. A further 11 patients were transferred to the authors' institution by the referring team, already having been placed on VA-ECMO (8 peripheral and 3 central). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All patients were safely transferred. The distance travelled ranged from 16 to 341 miles. The median duration of support on VA-ECMO was 4 days, ranging from 1 to 24 days. The VA-ECMO support was weaned, or the patient underwent a definitive surgical management (including 4 undergoing cardiac transplantation and 3 pulmonary endarterectomy) in 15 (62.5%) patients. The median intensive care unit stay was 15 days (range 1-109). Overall 30-day survival for this patient cohort was 69.6% with 1-year survival of 59.8%. For patients who were weaned from VA-ECMO, the 30-day survival was 100% and 1-year survival 92.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' experience demonstrates the feasibility and survival benefit of a salvage VA-ECMO retrieval service for carefully selected patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. The authors suggest that a system based on the model of nationally commissioned severe respiratory failure services could be organized to support the transfer of these patients.

Effects of Acute GLP-1 Infusion on Pulmonary and Systemic Hemodynamics in Patients With Heart Failure: A Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: Cardiovascular-safety studies assessing glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors have provided inconsistent data on the risk for developing heart failure. Animal studies have shown that GLP-1 is a vasodilator; if confirmed in humans, this may ameliorate heart failure symptoms. METHODS: In a single-center, observational pilot study, we recruited 10 patients with advanced heart failure undergoing right heart catheterization, and we recorded pulmonary hemodynamic measures, including cardiac output calculated by thermodilution and the indirect Fick method before and after a 15-minute continuous infusion of native GLP-1 (7-36) NH2. FINDINGS: There was a neutral effect of GLP-1 on all pressure and hemodynamics indices as derived by cardiac output calculated by thermodilution. However, there was a small but consistent reduction in cardiac output as calculated by the indirect Fick method after GLP-1 infusion (baseline, 4.0 [1.1] L/min vs GLP-1, 3.6 [0.9] L/min; P = 0.003), driven by a consistent reduction in mixed venous oxygen saturation after GLP-1 infusion (baseline, 62.2% [7.0%] vs GLP-1, 59.3% [6.8%]; P < 0.001), whereas arterial saturation remained constant (baseline, 96.8% [3.3%] vs GLP-1, 97.0% [3.2%]; P = 0.34). This resulted in an increase in systemic vascular resistance by Fick (baseline, 1285 [228] dyn · s/cm5 vs GLP-1, 1562 [247] dyn · s/cm5; P = 0.001). IMPLICATIONS: Acute infusion of GLP-1 has a neutral hemodynamic effect, when assessed by thermodilution, in patients with heart failure. However, GLP-1 reduces mixed venous oxygen saturation. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02129179.

Durable left ventricular assist device support as a bridge to heart transplant candidacy†.

OBJECTIVES: Left ventricular assist devices are funded in the UK exclusively as a bridge to transplant (BTT). However, patients who potentially could receive a transplant may develop reversible contraindications to transplant. Bridge to candidacy (BTC) has sometimes been controversial, given the uncertain clinical efficacy of BTC and the risk that reimbursement could be denied. We analysed the UK ventricular assist device database to understand how common BTC was and to assess patient survival rates and incidences of transplants. METHODS: We identified BTC implants in patients with pulmonary hypertension, chronic kidney disease and obesity using the UK guidelines for heart transplants. RESULTS: A total of 306 of 540 patients had complete data and 157 were identified as BTC (51%). Overall, there was no difference in survival rates between patients designated as BTC and those designated at BTT (71.9 vs 72.9% at 1 year, respectively; P = 0.82). However, the survival rate was lower at all time points in those with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <40 and in patients with a body mass index (BMI) >32 up to 1-year postimplant. There were no significant differences in the incidence of transplant between patients who were BTC and BTT or for any subgroup up to 5 years. However, we noted a diverging trend towards a lower cumulative incidence of transplant for patients with a BMI >32. CONCLUSIONS: BTC is common in the UK and appears clinically effective, given that the survival rates and the incidence of transplants were comparable with those for BTT. Patients with a high BMI have a worse survival rate through to 1 year and a trend for a lower incidence of a transplant. Patients with a low eGFR also have a worse survival rate, but a similar proportion received transplants.

Patient survival and therapeutic outcome in the UK bridge to transplant left ventricular assist device population.

OBJECTIVE: To study the survival and patient outcome in a population of UK patients supported by an implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to heart transplantation. METHODS: Data on all adult patients (n=342) who received a HeartMate II or HVAD as a first long-term LVAD between January 2007 and 31 December 2013 were extracted from the UK Ventricular Assist Device (VAD) Database in November 2015. Outcomes analysed include survival on a LVAD, time to urgent listing, heart transplantation and complications including those needing a pump exchange. RESULTS: 112 patients were supported with the Thoratec HeartMate II and 230 were supported with the HeartWare HVAD. Median duration of support was 534 days. During the study period, 81 patients required moving to the UK urgent waiting list for heart transplantation. Of the 342 patients, 85 (24.8%) received a heart transplant, this included 63 on the urgent list. Thirty-day survival was 88.9%, while overall patient survival at 3 years from LVAD implant was 49.6%. 156 patients (46%) died during LVAD support; the most common cause of death on a VAD was a cerebrovascular accident. There was no significant difference between the two devices used in any outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In a population of patients with advanced heart failure, who have a very poor prognosis, support with an implantable LVAD allowed a quarter to receive a heart transplant in a 3-year period. Overall survival of the cohort was about 50%. With improvement in technology and in post-LVAD management, it is likely that outcomes will improve further.

The management of antibodies in heart transplantation: An ISHLT consensus document.

Despite the successes from refined peri-operative management techniques and immunosuppressive therapies, antibodies remain a serious cause of morbidity and mortality for patients both before and after heart transplantation. Patients awaiting transplant who possess antibodies against human leukocyte antigen are disadvantaged by having to wait longer to receive an organ from a suitably matched donor. The number of pre-sensitized patients has been increasing, a trend that is likely due to the increased use of mechanical circulatory support devices. Even patients who are not pre-sensitized can go on to produce donor-specific antibodies after transplant, which are associated with worse outcomes. The difficulty in managing antibodies is uncertainty over which antibodies are of clinical relevance, which patients to treat, and which treatments are most effective and safe. There is a distinct lack of data from prospective trials. An international consensus conference was organized and attended by 103 participants from 75 centers to debate contentious issues, determine the best practices, and formulate ideas for future research on antibodies. Prominent experts presented state-of-the-art talks on antibodies, which were followed by group discussions, and then, finally, a reconvened session to establish consensus where possible. Herein we address the discussion, consensus points, and research ideas.