Combined Radial Incision and Steroid Injection for Refractory Colorectal Stenosis After Pull-Through Surgery in Hirschsprung Disease: An Innovative Conservative Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic stenosis after pull-through surgery remains a challenge in the management of Hirschsprung disease. Based on the management of esophageal stenosis, we evaluated the efficacy of combined radial incision and steroid injection for the treatment of refractory colorectal anastomotic stenosis after pull-through. IMPACT OF INNOVATION: Combined radial incision and steroid injection is an alternative conservative treatment of refractory anastomotic stenosis after pull-though for Hirschsprung disease, avoiding a potential complicated redo pull-though surgery. TECHNOLOGY MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included patients with recto-sigmoid Hirschsprung disease that developed a refractory anastomotic stenosis after a laparoscopic-assisted Swenson pull-through at Robert-Debré Children University Hospital, Paris, France. Refractory stenosis was defined as obstructive symptoms associated with an anastomotic stenosis upon rectal exam without improvement after serial anal dilatations. Under general anesthesia, an injection of 10mg delayed-action steroid per quadrant was combined with a radial incision of the stenosis using monopolar cautery. PRELIMINARY RESULTS: Combined radial incision and steroid injection was performed in 4 children, for either early or late refractory stenosis. This resulted in improvement of refractory anastomotic stenosis, avoiding a redo pull-through in 75% of patients. One child presented with transient improvement after combined radial incision and steroid injection but developed recurrent stenosis despite additional combined radial incision and steroid injection and redo pull-through. The median follow-up was 29 months. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS: We observed a clinical improvement in all the patients after combined radial incision and steroid injection. Steroids injection should be considered as a potential alternative therapy for anastomotic stenosis.

Benefits of a spine team for the surgical management of paediatric scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: For many years, blood-saving techniques and the enhanced recovery after surgery approach have been used to optimise the quality of care and shorten hospital stays. The creation of dedicated spine teams combining surgeons and anaesthesiologists specialised in spine surgery has been proven beneficial in adults. The objective of this study was to determine whether involving a spine team in the management of paediatric patients with scoliosis treated by posterior spinal fusion was associated with shorter hospital stays. HYPOTHESIS: The hospital stay would be shorter in patients managed by a spine team. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-centre, non-randomised, comparative study was initiated after approval by the local ethics committee. One group of patients was managed by a spine team composed of an anaesthesiologist and a surgeon with over 10 years of experience and the control group by an anaesthesiologist and a surgeon with less than 5 years of experience. The primary outcome was hospital stay length (median [interquartile range]). RESULTS: The study included 157 paediatric patients who underwent spinal fusion in 2021 for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS, n = 106) or secondary scoliosis (n = 51). The spinal team was involved for 48 (45%) AIS procedures and 38 (74.5%) secondary-scoliosis procedures. Both operative time and anaesthesia time were significantly shorter in the spinal-team group, by 10% and 15% (p < 0.001 for both comparisons), respectively, for SIA and by 20% (p = 0.002) and 25% (p < 0.001), respectively, for secondary scoliosis. The spinal-team group had a shorter median hospital stay, the difference being significant for AIS (in days, 5 [4-7] versus 7.1 [5-10], p = 0.03) and nearly significant for secondary scoliosis (6.9 [5-10] versus 9 [6-23], p = 0.07). Fewer patients required blood transfusion in the spine-team group than in the control group (AIS: 0% versus 8.8%, p = 0.05; and secondary scoliosis, 28% versus 58%, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Involvement of a spine team optimises the peri-operative management of patients with AIS, thus shortening the hospital stay. Further work is needed to assess the potential associations of spine team involvement with complication rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; non-randomised comparative study.

Intravenous lidocaine for postoperative analgesia management in paediatrics: A systematic review with meta-analysis of published studies.

BACKGROUND: The administration of intravenous lidocaine during the peri-operative period may improve pain management after paediatric surgery. OBJECTIVE: To explore the decrease in postoperative pain intensity and opioid consumption associated with peri-operative lidocaine administration in the paediatric population. DESIGN: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and a Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) analysis. DATA SOURCES: Extensive literature review. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: This study includes clinical trials conducted during surgery that examined the effect of intravenous lidocaine compared with placebo on postoperative pain management. RESULTS: Lidocaine administration decreased pain intensity in PACU (standardised mean difference (SMD) = -1.89 [-3.75, -0.03], I2 = 97%, P of I2 < 0.001) and on postoperative day 1 (SMD = -2.02 [-3.37, -0.66], I2 = 96%, P of I2 < 0.001, number of studies = 5). Lidocaine was associated with a decrease in opioid consumption on postoperative day 1 (SMD = -1.2 [-2.19, -0.2], I2 = 93%, P of I2 < 0.001) but not on postoperative day 2 (SMD = -1.73 [-3.9, 0.44], I2 = 96%, P of I2 < 0.001). GRADE analyses resulted in low-quality results. Subgroup analyses revealed that pain intensity in PACU and opioid consumption on postoperative day 1 decreased when lidocaine was administered during both the intra-operative and postoperative periods. CONCLUSIONS: The use of lidocaine is associated with improved pain management. However, further studies are needed to increase the level of evidence and determine the optimal administration regimen for pain management.

The potentiating effect of intravenous dexamethasone upon preemptive pudendal block analgesia for hypospadias surgery in children managed with Snodgrass technique: a randomized controlled study : Dexamethasone for pain management in children.

INTRODUCTION: Evidence regarding the potentiating effects of intravenous dexamethasone on peripheral regional anesthesia in children is sparse. The objective of the current study was to investigate the potentiating effect of intravenous dexamethasone upon pudendal block during surgical correction of hypospadias using Snodgrass technique. METHODS: The study consisted of a monocentric, randomized controlled, double-blinded study. Patients were randomized to receive either intravenous dexamethasone 0.15 mg.kg- 1 (D group) or a control solution (C group). Both groups received standardized anesthesia including a preemptive pudendal block performed after the induction of anesthesia. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients needing rescue analgesia. Secondary outcomes were other pain outcomes over the first 24 postoperative hours. RESULTS: Overall, 70 patients were included in the study. Age were 24 [24; 36] and 26 [24; 38] months in the D and C groups, respectively (p = 0.4). Durations of surgery were similar in both groups (60 [30; 60], p = 1). The proportion of patients requiring rescue analgesia was decreased in the D group (23% versus 49%, in D and C groups respectively, p = 0.02). The first administration of rescue analgesia was significantly delayed in the D group. Postoperative pain was improved in the D group between 6 and 24 h after surgery. Opioid requirements and the incidence of vomiting did not significantly differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Associating intravenous dexamethasone (0.15 mg.kg- 1) to pudendal block during hypospadias surgery improves pain control over the first postoperative day. Further studies are needed in order to confirm these results. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03902249. A. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN: dexamethasone has been found to potentiate analgesia obtained with regional anesthesia in children. B. WHAT THIS ARTICLE ADDS: intravenous dexamethasone was found to improve analgesia with a preemptive pudendal block during hypospadias surgery. C. IMPLICATIONS FOR TRANSLATION: results of this study indicate that intravenous dexamethasone could be used as an adjunct to pudendal block.

The association between intraoperative fluid management and perioperative allogenic blood transfusion during adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Bleeding and transfusion remain important concerns during surgical correction of scoliosis even when multiple conservative strategies, such as preoperative recombinant erythropoietin and/or antifibrinolytic agents, are used. The current work aimed to determine the impact of other potential risk factors, especially the volume of intraoperative fluid intake, on the perioperative risk of allogenic transfusion during surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. METHODS: This prospective study included all cases of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis operated in a single center during 2 years (2018-2020). Predictors analyzed were as follows: body mass index, preoperative hemoglobin concentration, thoracoplasty, preoperative halo-gravity, volume of intraoperative crystalloid administration, use of esophageal Doppler (for goal-directed fluid therapy), and duration of surgery. Statistical analyses were performed using a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were included in the analysis. Multivariable analysis found: an increased volume of intraoperative crystalloid administration as a significant predictor of allogenic blood transfusion. Receiving operator characteristics analysis found the model exhibiting an area under the curve of 0.85 (95% confidence interval: 0.75-0.95). Optimizing stroke volume using esophageal Doppler was associated with a decrease in intraoperative crystalloid intake. CONCLUSION: These results indicate a statistical association between the increase in crystalloid intake and the risk of allogenic blood transfusion during surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Controlled studies are needed to address the causative relation between intraoperative fluid intake and the risk of allogenic transfusion.