Tocilizumab for the management of immune mediated adverse events secondary to PD-1 blockade.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are poised to revolutionize the management of a growing number of malignancies. Unfortunately, the management of steroid-refractory immune mediated adverse events is based on a paucity of randomized data and limited to single center experiences. Our initial experience with the IL-6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab showed clinical improvement in a wide variety of irAEs. As a result, we adopted the use of tocilizumab for the management of steroid refractory irAEs. METHODS: The character and clinical course of irAEs were abstracted from the medical record and analyzed. The dose of tocilizumab was 4 mg/kg given IV over one hour. C-reactive protein was drawn at first nivolumab infusion and at q two weeks (and with irAEs) thereafter. Clinical improvement was defined as either: documentation of resolution of symptoms or hospital discharge within seven days. RESULTS: Of the initial 87 patients that were treated with nivolumab, 34 required tocilizumab (39.1%). All patients were on corticosteroids. The majority (88.2%) were lung cancer patients. The index grade 3/4 irAE was pneumonitis in 35.3%, serum sickness/SIRS in 35.3%, cerebritis in 14.7% and one case each of hypophysitis, colitis, pancreatitis, hepatitis and immune mediated coagulopathy. Median time between first nivolumab and initiation of tocilizumab was 76 days (range 1-429). There was a statistically significant increase in C-reactive protein from a median of 23 mg/L (range 0.1-238.5) at baseline to 109.3 mg/L (21.5-350.4) at the time of index irAE, followed by a decrease to 19.2 mg/L (0.25-149) after tocilizumab ( p < 0.00001). Clinical improvement was noted in 27/34 patients (79.4%). Some patients (52.9%) required a single dose, while 38.2% required two, 8.8% required three and 1 patient required four doses. Twenty-seven doses were given in the inpatient setting (49.1%). Median time to discharge was four days (range 1-27). Seventy-four percent of patients were discharged home. For the 53 doses of tocilizumab that were delivered when infliximab was an option, there was a cost savings of $141,048.72 (WAC) during the 18 month study period. CONCLUSIONS: Tocilizumab may be a therapeutic option for the management of steroid refractory irAEs secondary to immune checkpoint blockade. However, randomized trials are needed to better elucidate the relative efficacy and safety of these agents.

Response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST/RECIST) and SUVmax in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and of pre- and post-treatment maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax) in regards to survival and tumor control for patients treated for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC) with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients with ES-NSCLC treated at our institution using SBRT. Lobar, locoregional, and distant failures were evaluated based on PERCIST/RECIST and clinical course. Univariate analysis of the Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), lobar control (LC), locoregional control (LRC), and distant control (DC) was conducted using the log-rank test. Pre- and post-treatment SUVmax were evaluated using cutoffs of < 5 and ≥ 5, < 4 and ≥ 4, and < 3 and ≥ 3. ∆SUVmax was also evaluated at various cutoffs. Cox regression analysis was conducted to evaluate survival outcomes based on age, gender, pre-treatment gross tumor volume (GTV), longest tumor dimension on imaging, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). RESULTS: This study included 95 patients (53 female, 42 male), median age 75. Lung SBRT was delivered in 3-5 fractions to a total of 48-60 Gy, with a BEDα/ß = 10Gy of at least 100 Gy. Median OS and PFS from the end of SBRT was 15.4 and 11.9 months, respectively. On univariate analysis, PERCIST/RECIST response correlated with PFS (p = 0.039), LC (p = 0.007), and LRC (p = 0.015) but not OS (p = 0.21) or DC (p = 0.94). Pre-treatment SUVmax and post-treatment SUVmax with cutoff values of < 5 and ≥ 5, < 4 and ≥ 4, and < 3 and ≥ 3 did not predict for OS, PFS, LC, LRC, or DC. ∆SUVmax did not predict for OS, PFS, LC, LRC, or DC. On multivariate analysis, pre-treatment GTV ≥ 30 cm3 was significantly associated with worse survival outcomes when accounting for other confounding variables. CONCLUSIONS: PERCIST/RECIST response is associated with improved LC and PFS in patients treated for ES-NSCLC with SBRT. In contrast, pre- and post-treatment SUVmax is not predictive of disease control or survival.

Phase II study of low-dose paclitaxel with timed thoracic radiotherapy followed by adjuvant gemcitabine and carboplatin in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the proposed study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of low-dose paclitaxel with timed thoracic radiotherapy (TTR) for local control by inducing maximum radiosensitization through G2-M phase cell cycle arrest, followed by full dose adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and carboplatin for eradication of possible micrometastasis in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-center, non-randomized prospective phase II study. Patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC were treated with paclitaxel 15 mg/m(2) IV, followed by TTR 6 h later on Monday/Wednesday/Friday, and TTR only on Tuesday/Thursday mornings (total 55 Gy). Full dose adjuvant chemotherapy consisted of intravenous carboplatin (AUC 5) on day 1, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, every 21 days for 4 cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), and toxicities. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were eligible for the study. Patient characteristics were: 19 males (70%); median age 67 years (range 39-82); 15 (56%) stage IIIB; 89% with ECOG performance status ≥1. Three-year OS was 16.7% in all patients, and 27.3% in patients received three or more cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy, respectively. ORR was 63%. Grade 3 toxicities during paclitaxel plus concurrent TTR phase were radiation esophagitis (11%) and radiation pneumonitis (4%), no grade 4 toxicities occurred. One grade 5 hemoptysis. Grade 3/4 toxicities during adjuvant gemcitabine/carboplatin were pneumonitis (22%), anemia (30%), neutropenia (22%), and thrombocytopenia (33%), one grade 5 neutropenic fever. CONCLUSION: Low-dose paclitaxel with concurrent TTR is an effective chemoradiotherapy regimen in unresectable stage III NSCLC. Improved survival benefit was observed in patients who have received three or more cycles of full dose adjuvant chemotherapy, yet, gemcitabine related radiation pneumonitis and hematological toxicities limited adjuvant chemotherapy delivery.

Physical activity promotion among oncology nurses.

BACKGROUND: Oncology nurses may be influential for providing physical activity guidance to cancer patients. OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to examine physical activity promotion practices of oncology nurses and to explore nurses' perceived benefits of physical activity for cancer patients and barriers to physical activity promotion. METHODS: Two thousand e-mails were sent by a data service company to a random selection of oncology nurses throughout the United States with a link to a Web-based survey. To be eligible, nurses had to be currently seeing patients. RESULTS: Completed surveys were received from 274 oncology nurses. Most participants inquired about physical activity on at least some office visits (74.9%) and gave physical activity recommendations to 65.7% and 66.9% of on-treatment and posttreatment patients. "Lack of time" and that "patients are not interested" were the most prominent barriers identified by nurses, whereas perceived benefits for patients were rated favorably, with the exception of "reducing risk of recurrence." Almost all perceived benefits and barriers were correlated with physical activity promotion, with the strongest correlates being "unsure what to recommend" and "unsure that physical activity is safe." CONCLUSIONS: Although most oncology nurses frequently inquire about patient physical activity, they may be less apt to provide recommendations. A number of barriers and perceived benefits may influence physical activity promotion, especially concerning what to recommend and patient safety. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Oncology nurses would benefit from education opportunities about the benefits of physical activity for survival outcomes and types of physical activity to recommend.

Results of combined photodynamic therapy (PDT) and high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR) in treatment of obstructive endobronchial non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

INTRODUCTION: We reviewed the outcome of combined photodynamic therapy (PDT) and high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR) for patients with symptomatic obstruction from endobronchial non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: Nine patients who received combined PDT and HDR for endobronchial cancers were identified and their charts reviewed. The patients were eight males and one female aged 52-73 at diagnosis, initially presenting with various stages of disease: stage IA (N=1), stage IIA (N=1), stage III (N=6), and stage IV (N=1). Intervention was with HDR (500 cGy to 5 mm once weekly for 3 weeks) and PDT (2 mg/kg Photofrin, followed by 200 J/cm(2) illumination 48 h post-infusion). Treatment group 1 (TG-1, N=7) received HDR first; Treatment group 2 (TG-2, N=2) received PDT first. Patients were followed by regular bronchoscopies. RESULTS: Treatments were well tolerated, all patients completed therapy, and none were lost to follow-up. In TG-1, local tumor control was achieved in six of seven patients for: 3 months (until death), 15 months, 2+ years (until death), 2+ years (ongoing), and 5+ years (ongoing, N=2). In TG-2, local control was achieved in only one patient, for 84 days. Morbidities included: soft-tissue contraction and/or other reversible benign local tissue reactions (N=8) and photosensitivity reactions (N=2). CONCLUSIONS: Combined HDR/PDT treatment for endobronchial tumors is well tolerated and can achieve prolonged local control with acceptable morbidity when PDT follows HDR and when the spacing between treatments is 1 month or less. This treatment regimen should be studied in a larger patient population.