Adverse events and costs among non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Limited real-world evidence exists on the economic burden of adverse events (AEs) to the healthcare system among patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) treated with second-generation androgen receptor antagonists (ARAs). Current data is needed to understand real-world clinical event rates among ARAs and the cost of these events. OBJECTIVES: Describe the incidence of non-central nervous system (CNS)-related AEs and CNS-related AEs among nmCRPC patients treated in the United States with second-generation ARAs (apalutamide and enzalutamide) and evaluate healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs for these patients. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective observational cohort study using claims data from Optum Clinformatics Data Mart to identify adult males with prostate cancer, castration, no metastases, and >1 claim for apalutamide or enzalutamide. The study was conducted from January 2017 to March 2020, with a patient index identification period from January 2018 to December 2019. AEs were classified as CNS-related or non-CNS-related. RESULTS: Of 605 patients (156 apalutamide and 449 enzalutamide), most were ≥65 years (94%) and had ≥1 non-CNS-related AE (55%). Many had ≥1 CNS-related AE (32%). Pain (12%) and arthralgia (11%) were the most frequently reported non-CNS-related AEs. Fatigue/asthenia (14%) and dizziness (7%) were the most frequently reported CNS-related AEs. Among patients with versus without non-CNS-related AEs, 34% versus 8% had emergency room (ER) events, and 25% versus 2% had inpatient events. Among patients with versus without CNS-related AEs, 41% versus 14% had ER events, and 38% versus 4% had inpatient events. Adjusted per-patient per-year cost (in 2020 USD) differences were significant between patients with and without non-CNS-related AEs ($30,765, p = 0.0018) and between patients with and without CNS-related AEs ($40,689, p = 0.0017). CONCLUSION: There is significant HCRU and cost burden among nmCRPC patients treated with ARAs developing AEs, highlighting the need for treatments with improved tolerability. Additional studies are warranted to include recently approved agents.

Leflutrozole in male obesity-associated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: Ph 2b double-blind randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of the efficacy and safety/tolerability of the aromatase inhibitor leflutrozole to normalise testosterone in Obesity-associated Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism (OHH). DESIGN: Placebo-controlled, double-blind, RCT, in 70 sites in Europe/USA. METHODS: Patient inclusion criteria: men with BMI of 30-50 kg/m2, morning total testosterone (TT) < 10.41 nmol/L, and two androgen deficiency symptoms (at least one of sexual dysfunction). Patients randomised to weekly leflutrozole (0.1/0.3/1.0 mg) or placebo for 24 weeks. Primary endpoint: normalisation of TT levels in ≥75% of patients after 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints (included): time to TT normalisation and change in LH/FSH. Safety was assessed through adverse events and laboratory monitoring. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Of 2103 screened, 271 were randomised, 81 discontinued. Demographic characteristics were similar across groups. Mean BMI was 38.1 kg/m2 and TT 7.97 nmol/L. The primary endpoint was achieved in all leflutrozole-treated groups by 24 weeks with a dose-tiered response; mean TT 15.89; 17.78; 20.35 nmol/L, for leflutrozole 0.1 mg, 0.3 mg, and 1.0 mg groups respectively, vs 8.04 nmol/L for placebo. LH/FSH significantly increased in leflutrozole vs placebo groups. No improvements in body composition or sexual dysfunction were observed. Semen volume/total motile sperm count improved with leflutrozole vs placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events, more common in leflutrozole-treated groups included, raised haematocrit, hypertension, increased PSA, and headache. Some reduction in lumbar bone density was observed with leflutrozole (mean -1.24%, -1.30%, -2.09%) and 0.66% for 0.1 mg, 0.3 mg, 1.0 mg, and placebo, respectively, without change at the hip. This RCT of leflutrozole in OHH demonstrated normalisation of TT in obese men. FSH/LH and semen parameter changes support that leflutrozole may preserve/improve testicular function. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02730169.

Efficacy and safety of darolutamide in Black/African-American patients from the phase III ARAMIS study.

Aim: Darolutamide significantly improved metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) versus placebo in the phase III ARAMIS study. We evaluated outcomes in Black/African-American patients in ARAMIS. Materials & methods: Patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer were randomized 2:1 to darolutamide (n = 955) or placebo (n = 554) plus androgen-deprivation therapy. The primary end point was MFS. Secondary end points included OS and safety. Results: In 52 (3.4%) Black/African-American patients, darolutamide improved MFS (median: not reached vs 12.4 months) and OS (3-year survival rates: 100 vs 71%) versus placebo. The safety profile of darolutamide in Black/African-American patients was consistent with that of all ARAMIS patients. Conclusion: In Black/African-American patients, darolutamide improved MFS and OS and was well tolerated, consistent with the overall ARAMIS population.

In patients with prostate cancer that has stopped responding to androgen-deprivation therapy, or 'ADT,' and has not spread to other parts of the body (known as nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, or 'nmCRPC'), darolutamide is an oral treatment option. Darolutamide added to ADT was tested in patients with nmCRPC in a large international study called ARAMIS and was found to prolong the time that patients were free from their cancer spreading compared with patients who received ADT alone. This report provides information on the effect of darolutamide in the 52 Black/African­American patients who took part in ARAMIS. In these patients, darolutamide showed similar effects on lowering the risk of their cancer spreading and was well tolerated.

A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model to Predict Potential Drug-Drug Interactions and Inform Dosing of Acumapimod, an Oral p38 MAPK Inhibitor.

Acumapimod, an investigational oral p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor for treatment during severe acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, is metabolized primarily by cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and is a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrate. Concerns about drug-drug interactions (DDIs) have meant patients receiving drugs that inhibit CYP3A4 were ineligible for acumapimod trials. We report on how 2 acumapimod clinical DDI studies and a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model assessing how co-administration of a weak (azithromycin) and strong (itraconazole) CYP3A4 inhibitor affected acumapimod systemic exposure, informed decision making and supported concomitant use of CYP3A4 and P-gp inhibitors. Studies MBCT102 and MBCT103, respectively, demonstrated that co-administration of azithromycin or itraconazole had no clinically meaningful impact on acumapimod pharmacokinetics. Findings were consistent with PBPK model results. Safety profiles were similar when acumapimod was co-administered with azithromycin or itraconazole. These studies highlight the value of PBPK modeling in drug development, and its potential to inform DDI investigations.

Phase II Study of Single/Repeated Doses of Acumapimod (BCT197) to Treat Acute Exacerbations of COPD.

Mitogen-activated protein kinase p38 is a key regulator in the inflammation pathway and is activated in the lungs of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Acumapimod is a potent, selective, oral, p38 inhibitor under investigation for treatment of acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD). In this Phase II, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled dose-exploration study of acumapimod in patients with moderate or severe AECOPD (NCT01332097), patients presenting with AECOPD were randomized to receive single-dose acumapimod (20 mg or 75 mg) on Day 1, repeated single-dose acumapimod (20 mg or 75 mg) on Days 1 and 6, oral prednisone 40 mg (10 days), or placebo. Primary outcome: improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) versus placebo at Day 5 (single doses) and Day 10 (repeated doses). N = 183 patients were randomized; 169 (92%) patients completed the study. Although the primary endpoint (FEV1 at Day 10) was not met (p = 0.082), there was a significant improvement in FEV1 with acumapimod repeat-dose 75 mg versus placebo at Day 8 (p = 0.022) which, though not a prespecified endpoint, was part of an overall trend. Differences at lower doses did not achieve significance. Mean change in FEV1 AUC from baseline to Day 14 in the 75 mg repeat-dose group was significantly higher versus placebo (p = 0.02), prednisone (p = 0.01), and 20 mg single-dose groups (p = 0.015) (post-hoc analysis). EXACT-PRO showed numerical differences versus placebo that did not reach significance. Acumapimod was well tolerated. In conclusion, repeated single-dose acumapimod showed a clinically relevant improvement in FEV1 over placebo at Day 8, along with consistent numerical differences in EXACT-PRO. These data can be used to determine dose regimens for a proof-of-clinical-concept trial.

Treatment of patients with the hypereosinophilic syndrome with mepolizumab.

BACKGROUND: The hypereosinophilic syndrome is a group of diseases characterized by persistent blood eosinophilia, defined as more than 1500 cells per microliter with end-organ involvement and no recognized secondary cause. Although most patients have a response to corticosteroids, side effects are common and can lead to considerable morbidity. METHODS: We conducted an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of an anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, mepolizumab, in patients with the hypereosinophilic syndrome. Patients were negative for the FIP1L1-PDGFRA fusion gene and required prednisone monotherapy, 20 to 60 mg per day, to maintain a stable clinical status and a blood eosinophil count of less than 1000 per microliter. Patients received either intravenous mepolizumab or placebo while the prednisone dose was tapered. The primary end point was the reduction of the prednisone dose to 10 mg or less per day for 8 or more consecutive weeks. RESULTS: The primary end point was reached in 84% of patients in the mepolizumab group, as compared with 43% of patients in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 2.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59 to 5.26; P<0.001) with no increase in clinical activity of the hypereosinophilic syndrome. A blood eosinophil count of less than 600 per microliter for 8 or more consecutive weeks was achieved in 95% of patients receiving mepolizumab, as compared with 45% of patients receiving placebo (hazard ratio, 3.53; 95% CI, 1.94 to 6.45; P<0.001). Serious adverse events occurred in seven patients receiving mepolizumab (14 events, including one death; mean [+/-SD] duration of exposure, 6.7+/-1.9 months) and in five patients receiving placebo (7 events; mean duration of exposure, 4.3+/-2.6 months). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that treatment with mepolizumab, an agent designed to target eosinophils, can result in corticosteroid-sparing for patients negative for FIP1L1-PDGFRA who have the hypereosinophilic syndrome. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00086658 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).