RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Heavy workload in hospital transfusion services and blood centers necessitates the implementation of automated platforms. We evaluated the performance of Erytra Eflexis (Diagnostic Grifols), a recently developed midsize automated instrument for pretransfusion testing, in comparison with a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared device (Erytra). Reproducibility and repeatability of the results were also investigated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Studies were conducted using the same card technology and reagents at three US sites. Tests were performed on 9174 specimens from hospital patients (55.61%) and blood donors (43.39%). Evaluations included 18,413 ABO/D/reverse typing; 9084 Rh phenotypes, 4640 K phenotypes, 2052 antibody screenings, 1232 antibody identifications, 469 direct antiglobulin tests, 612 IgG crossmatches, and 700 ABO-compatibility crossmatches. A reference blood panel was also sent to each center, for a total of 3900 replicate tests. Concordance between results with the two instruments and performance among the different centers were statistically evaluated. RESULTS: Agreement between instruments was 99.84% for 37,202 test results, with 61 discrepancies (0.16%). Percentages of positive and negative agreement were 99.82% and 99.85%, respectively. No discrepancies were observed in 12,276 tests for direct ABO/D grouping. Discrepancies were observed during antibody identification (n = 19), antibody screening (n = 15), and reverse grouping (n = 10). Investigations of the discrepancies were resolved in favor of the study instrument in 55.73% of the cases. Erytra Eflexis obtained the expected results in the reproducibility analysis. CONCLUSION: This multicenter study demonstrates that Erytra Eflexis with its gel card technology and reagents is reliable and substantially equivalent to the FDA-cleared instrument used as the reference.