Spillover effects from a type 2 diabetes integrated model of care in 22,706 Australians: an open cohort stepped wedge trial.

BACKGROUND: Many Australian adults are not receiving timely or effective diabetes management to prevent or delay the onset of diabetes related complications. Integrated care, a worldwide trend in healthcare reform, aims to reduce the fragmented delivery of health services and improve outcomes. This study aimed to test whether a specialist-led integrated model of care provided to a small subset of patients in general practices leads to spillover clinical improvements in all patients of the practice with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Seventy-two general practice sites (clusters) in New South Wales, Australia received the Diabetes Alliance intervention, creating a non-randomised open cohort stepped wedge trial. The intervention comprised of case conferencing, delivered directly to a small proportion of adults with type 2 diabetes (n = 1,072) of the general practice sites; as well as practice feedback, education and training. Spillover clinical improvements were assessed on all adults with type 2 diabetes within the general practice sites (n = 22,706), using practice level data recorded in the MedicineInsight electronic database, compared before and after the intervention. Outcome measures included frequency of diabetes screening tests in line with the Annual Cycle of Care, and clinical results for weight, blood pressure, HbA1c, lipids, and kidney function. RESULTS: Compared to before Diabetes Alliance, the odds of all practice patients receiving screening tests at or above the recommended intervals were significantly higher for all recommended tests after Diabetes Alliance (odds ratio range 1.41-4.45, p < 0.0001). Significant improvements in clinical outcomes were observed for weight (absolute mean difference: -1.38 kg), blood pressure (systolic - 1.12 mmHg, diastolic - 1.18 mmHg), HbA1c (-0.03% at the mean), total cholesterol (-0.11 mmol/L), and triglycerides (-0.02 mmol/L) (p < 0.05). There were small but significant declines in kidney function. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated care delivered to a small subset of patients with type 2 diabetes across a large geographic region has spillover benefits that improve the process measures and clinical outcomes for all practice patients with type 2 diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12622001438741; 10th November 2022, retrospectively registered: https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12622001438741.aspx .

Australian general practitioners' perspectives on integrating specialist diabetes care with primary care: qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Improving the coordination and integration of health services is recognised nationally and internationally as a key strategy for improving the quality of diabetes care. The Australian Diabetes Alliance Program (DAP) is an integrated care model implemented in the Hunter New England Local Health District (HNELHD), New South Wales (NSW), in which endocrinologists and diabetes educators collaborate with primary care teams via case-conferencing, practice performance review, and education sessions. The objective of this study was to report on general practitioners' (GPs) perspectives on DAP and whether the program impacts on their skills, knowledge, and approach in delivering care to adult patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Four primary care practices with high rates of monitoring haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels (> 90% of patients annually) and five practices with low rates of monitoring HbA1c levels (< 80% of patients annually) from HNELHD, NSW provided the sampling frame. A total of nine GPs were interviewed. The transcripts from the interviews were reviewed and analysed to identify emergent patterns and themes. RESULTS: Overall, GPs were supportive of DAP. They considered that DAP resulted in significant changes in their knowledge, skills, and approach and improved the quality of diabetes care. Taking a more holistic approach to care, including assessing patients with diabetes for co-morbidities and risk factors that may impact on their future health was also noted. DAP was noted to increase the confidence levels of GPs, which enabled active involvement in the provision of diabetes care rather than referring patients for tertiary specialist care. However, some indicated the program could be time consuming and greater flexibility was needed. CONCLUSIONS: GPs reported DAP to benefit their knowledge, skills and approach for managing diabetes. Future research will need to investigate how to improve the intensity and flexibility of the program based on the workload of GPs to ensure long-term acceptability of the program.

Using the AUSDRISK score to screen for pre-diabetes and diabetes in GP practices: a case-finding approach.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the optimal AUSDRISK threshold score to screen for pre-diabetes and diabetes. METHODS: A total of 406 adult patients not diagnosed with diabetes were screened in General Practices (GP) between May and October 2019. All patients received a point of care (POC) HbA1c test. HbA1c test results were categorised into diabetes (≥6.5% or ≥48 mmol/mol), pre-diabetes (5.7-6.4% or 39-47 mmol/mol), or normal (<5.7% or 39 mmol/mol). RESULTS: Of these patients, 9 (2%) had undiagnosed diabetes and 60 (15%) had pre-diabetes. A Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to predict the presence of pre-diabetes and diabetes; the area under the ROC curve was 0.72 (95%CI 0.65-0.78) indicating modest predictive ability. The optimal threshold cut point for AUSDRISK score was 17 (sensitivity 76%, specificity 61%, + likelihood ratio (LR) 1.96, - likelihood ratio of 0.39) while the accepted cut point of 12 performed less well (sensitivity 94%, specificity 23%, +LR=1.22 -LR+0.26). CONCLUSIONS: The AUSDRISK tool has the potential to be used as a screening tool for pre-diabetes/diabetes in GP practices. A cut point of ≥17 would potentially identify 75% of all people at risk and three in 10 sent for further testing would be positive for prediabetes or diabetes. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: Routine case-finding in high-risk patients will enable GPs to intervene early and prevent further public health burden from the sequelae of diabetes.

"They were all together discussing the best options for me": Integrating specialist diabetes care with primary care in Australia.

Over one-third of diabetes-related encounters with healthcare providers in Australia fail to meet clinical guidelines. Evidence is mounting that care provision within an integrated framework may facilitate greater adherence to clinical guidelines and improved outcomes for patients. The Diabetes Alliance Program was implemented across a large healthcare district to enhance diabetes care capacity at the primary care level through intensive case-conferencing involving the primary care team, patients and visiting specialist team, whole practice performance review and regular diabetes education for practitioners. Here, we provide an in-depth patient assessment of the case-conferencing process and impact on diabetes management. Two practices with high pre-intervention HbA1c monitoring and three practices with low HbA1c monitoring provided the sampling frame. Patients were selected according to their score on the Patient Activation MeasureTM to achieve maximum variation, with up to two patients with high scores and three with low scores, selected from each practice. Patients were sampled until data saturation was achieved and then subjected to thematic content analysis (n = 19). Patients mostly described the model of care as a positive experience, reporting a boost in confidence in diabetes self-management (particularly around nutrition). The program was also seen to be helpful in providing an opportunity to refocus when "life gets in the way". Other valued aspects of the program included the holistic approach to healthcare, reduced travel time, familiarity in environment and clinical care, top-down knowledge transfer as well as mutual learning by the patient and their primary care team. Despite this, difficulties in coping with diabetes and adherence to treatment recommendations remained for a minority of patients. Integrating specialist teams within primary care has the ability to provide efficient healthcare delivery, better patient experience and health outcomes. Investment in such approaches will be critical to navigating healthcare provision in order to meet the demands of an ageing population.

Hunter and New England Diabetes Alliance: innovative and integrated diabetes care delivery in general practice.

Evidence-based standardised diabetes care is difficult to achieve in the community due to resource limitations, and lack of equitable access to specialist care leads to poor clinical outcomes. This study reports a quality improvement program in diabetes health care across a large health district challenged with significant rural and remote geography and limited specialist workforce. An integrated diabetes care model was implemented, linking specialist teams with primary care teams through capacity enhancing case-conferencing in general practice supported by comprehensive performance feedback with regular educational sessions. Initially, 20 practices were recruited and 456 patients were seen over 14 months, with significant improvements in clinical parameters. To date 80 practices, 307 general practitioners, 100 practice nurses and 1400 patients have participated in the Diabetes Alliance program and the program envisages enrolling 40 new practices per year, with a view to engage all 314 practices in the health district over time. Diabetes care in general practice appears suboptimal with significant variation in process measures. An integrated care model where specialist teams are engaged collaboratively with primary care teams in providing education, capacity enhancing case-conferences and performance monitoring may achieve improved health outcomes for people with diabetes.