[Nutritional diet therapy in the management of the patient with Chronic Kidney Disease in advanced phase to delay the beginning and reduce the frequency of dialysis. An option also in the pre-emptive transplant program].

The Italian nephrology has a long tradition and experience in the field of dietetic-nutritional therapy (DNT), which is an important component in the conservative management of the patient suffering from a chronic kidney disease, which precedes and integrates the pharmacological therapies. The objectives of DNT include the maintenance of an optimal nutritional status, the prevention and / or correction of signs, symptoms and complications of chronic renal failure and, possibly, the delay in starting of dialysis. The DNT includes modulation of protein intake, adequacy of caloric intake, control of sodium and potassium intake, and reduction of phosphorus intake. For all dietary-nutritional therapies, and in particular those aimed at the patient with chronic renal failure, the problem of patient adherence to the dietetic-nutritional scheme is a key element for the success and safety of the DNT and it can be favored by an interdisciplinary and multi-professional approach of information, education, dietary prescription and follow-up. This consensus document, which defines twenty (20) essential points of the nutritional approach to patients with advanced chronic renal failure, has been written, discussed and shared by the Italian nephrologists together with representatives of dietitians (ANDID) and patients (ANED).

Nutritional treatment of advanced CKD: twenty consensus statements.

The Italian nephrology has a long tradition and experience in the field of dietetic-nutritional therapy (DNT), which is an important component in the conservative management of the patient suffering from a chronic kidney disease, which precedes and integrates the pharmacological therapies. The objectives of DNT include the maintenance of an optimal nutritional status, the prevention and/or correction of signs, symptoms and complications of chronic renal failure and, possibly, the delay in starting of dialysis. The DNT includes modulation of protein intake, adequacy of caloric intake, control of sodium and potassium intake, and reduction of phosphorus intake. For all dietary-nutritional therapies, and in particular those aimed at the patient with chronic renal failure, the problem of patient adherence to the dietetic-nutritional scheme is a key element for the success and safety of the DNT and it can be favored by an interdisciplinary and multi-professional approach of information, education, dietary prescription and follow-up. This consensus document, which defines twenty essential points of the nutritional approach to patients with advanced chronic renal failure, has been written, discussed and shared by the Italian nephrologists together with representatives of dietitians (ANDID) and patients (ANED).

"Dietaly": practical issues for the nutritional management of CKD patients in Italy.

Evidence exists that nutritional therapy induces favorable metabolic changes, prevents signs and symptoms of renal insufficiency, and is able to delay the need of dialysis. Currently, the main concern of the renal diets has turned from the efficacy to the feasibility in the daily clinical practice.Herewith we describe some different dietary approaches, developed in Italy in the last decades and applied in the actual clinical practice for the nutritional management of CKD patients.A step-wise approach or simplified dietary regimens are usually prescribed while taking into account not only the residual renal function and progression rate but also socio-economic, psychological and functional aspects.The application of the principles of the Mediterranean diet that covers the recommended daily allowances for nutrients and protein (0.8 g/Kg/day) exert a favorable effect at least in the early stages of CKD. Low protein (0.6 g/kg/day) regimens that include vegan diet and very low-protein (0.3-0.4 g/Kg/day) diet supplemented with essential amino acids and ketoacids, represent more opportunities that should be tailored on the single patient's needs.Rather than a structured dietary plan, a list of basic recommendations to improve compliance with a low-sodium diet in CKD may allow patients to reach the desired salt target in the daily eating.Another approach consists of low protein diets as part of an integrated menu, in which patients can choose the "diet" that best suits their preferences and clinical needs.Lastly, in order to allow efficacy and safety, the importance of monitoring and follow up of a proper nutritional treatment in CKD patients is emphasized.

The Effect of Psychological Intervention on Thirst and Interdialytic Weight Gain in Patients on Chronic Hemodialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Patients on hemodialysis (HD) are unable to eliminate excess fluid and must adhere to a regimen of dietary fluid restriction to prevent volume overload. Thirst represents a major obstacle to the achievement of such a goal. The aim of our study was (1) to assess the association of thirst and xerostomia, measured by validated questionnaires, Dialysis Thirst Inventory and Xerostomia Inventory with interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) and (2) to evaluate in a randomized controlled trial (RCT), the effect of psychological intervention on IDWG and thirst. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional evaluation of association of thirst and IDWG and single-blind RCT of psychological intervention on IDWG management. SETTING: Outpatient dialysis unit. SUBJECTS: The cross-sectional evaluation included 117 patients on HD (age, 71 ± 13 years); among these, 54 were selected for the RCT. INTERVENTION: The questionnaires were administered to all the participating patients; IDWG (4-week average), Kt/V, predialysis blood pressure, dialyzate sodium, hematocrit, serum electrolytes, parathyroid hormone, and patients' medications were recorded. Fifty-four patients were randomized on a 1:1 basis to usual treatment (including dietary advice) or psychological intervention, consisting of group sessions, held once a week for 5 weeks; IDWG and all the other parameters were rechecked after 6 weeks and 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: IDWG change from baseline. RESULTS: Dialysis Thirst Inventory score was correlated with IDWG (ρ = 0.575; P < .001), body mass index (ρ = 0.257; P = .005), and inversely with age (ρ = -0.344; P < .001). A small but significant decrease of IDWG compared to baseline was observed in the intervention group (baseline 1332 ± 338 g/day; at 6 weeks, 1183 ± 258 g/day; at 6 months, 1203 ± 284 g/day; P < .001). No IDWG changes with respect to baseline occurred in controls (baseline 1310 ± 333 g/day; at 6 weeks, 1336 ± 340 g/day; at 6 months, 1323 ± 328 g/day; P = .57). The secondary outcomes were not affected by the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our study show that a psychological support may help managing IDWG in HD patients.

Nutritional management of stage 5 chronic kidney disease.

Nutrition is a critical issue in the management of patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD). Malnutrition is common among these patients and affects their survival and quality of life. A basic knowledge of the nutritional management of stage 5 CKD is essential for all members of the nephrology team to improve patient care. This paper demonstrates that the needs of haemodialysis patients are more complex than those receiving peritoneal dialysis.

Effects of short daily hemodialysis and extended standard hemodialysis on blood pressure and cardiac hypertrophy: a comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Causes of hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy in hemodialysis (HD) patients are multiple, but the role of fluid overload appears to be crucial. Short daily HD (sDHD = 2 hr x 6/week) seems to allow reductions in left ventricular mass (LVM) through the reduction of extracellular water (ECW). Better cardiovascular stability during HD can be obtained with short, but more frequent HD sessions, but also by increasing the session length accompanied with a reduction in ultrafiltration (UF)/hr. Regardless of the method, the adequate reduction in extracellular volume should permit better control of hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). This study aimed to compare sDHD with an extended form of standard HD (eSHD = 4.5-5 hr x 3/week) on the reduction of fluid overload, blood pressure (BP) and LVM index (LVMi). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four HD patients with hypertension and LVH were enrolled in a prospective non-randomized study. After a 3-month run-in period they were divided in two comparable groups: 12 patients treated with sDHD, and 12 patients treated with eSHD for 6 months. LVMi, 24 hr BP monitoring, ECW, determined with electrical bio-impedance, biochemical correlates and spKT/V were studied at the beginning of the study and 6 months later. RESULTS: The weekly session length was increased in eSHD from 722.9 +/- 7.5 to 877.3 +/- 35.5 min. ECW% was reduced similarly in the two groups (Delta ECW: eSHD = 4.6 +/- 2.4 L; sDHD = 4.1 +/- 2.3 L); 24 hr BP decreased significantly from 157/81 to 137/75 mmHg in eSHD, and from 149/79 to 128/72 mmHg in sDHD. The reduction in systolic BP was similar in the two groups (eSHD = 20.1 +/- 15.3 mmHg, sDHD = 21.2 +/- 16.7 mmHg). Finally, LVMi was similarly reduced (eSHD = 55 +/- 30.3 g/m(2), sDHD = 54.4 +/- 21.3 g/m(2). The number of antihypertensive drugs decreased significantly after ECW% reduction: only 2/10 patients on eSHD and 4/12 patients on sDHD were maintained on therapy (p = ns). Intra-dialysis hypotension episodes did not differentiate between SHD and DHD. The reduction in LVMi was significantly correlated to fluid volume changes when these were measured as phase angle (PA) with bio-impedance (r = -0.43, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In hypertensive HD patients with LVH, fluid overload is invariably present and its reduction allows the decrease of BP and LVM. These results can be obtained by forcing UF with eSHD and sDHD, but patients maintained on x 3/week schedules need longer dialysis sessions to avoid intra-dialysis symptoms.

Association between brain natriuretic peptide and extracellular water in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a hormone released by the left ventricle (LV) as a consequence of pressure or volume load. BNP increases in left ventricle hypertrophy (LVH), LV dysfunction, and it can also predict cardiovascular mortality in the general population as well as those undergoing hemodialysis (HD). We investigated the association between BNP and volume load in HD patients. METHODS: We studied 32 HD patients (60 +/- 17.1 years) treated thrice-weekly for at least 6 months. Exclusion criteria were: LV dysfunction, atrial fibrillation, malnutrition. Blood chemistries and BNP were determined on mid-week HD day. Blood pressure (BP) and cardiac diameters were determined on mid-week inter-HD day by using 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and echocardiography. Bioimpedance was performed after HD and extracellular water (ECW%), calculated as a percentage of total body water, was considered as the index of volume load. RESULTS: Patients were divided into quartiles of 8 patients depending on the BNP value: 1st qtl BNP < or =45.5 pg/ml (28.4 +/- 10.9 pg/ml), 2nd qtl BNP > 45.5 pg/ml and < or =99.1 pg/ml (60.9 +/- 15.8 pg/ml), 3rd qtl BNP > 99.1 pg/ml and < or =231.8 pg/ml (160.5 +/- 51.8 pg/ml), 4th qtl BNP > 231.8 pg/ml (664.8 +/- 576.6 pg/ml). No inter-quartile differences were reported in age, HD age, body mass index spKt/V, or blood chemistries. As expected patients in the 4th BNP quartile showed the highest values of 24-hour pulse pressure (PP) and LV mass index (LVMi). The study of body composition revealed significant differences in ECW%, which was higher in the 4th quartile when compared to the others (4th q: 50 +/- 9.6%, vs 1st q. 40.1 +/- 2.4%, 2nd q. 41.9 +/- 5%, 3rd q. 42.8 +/- 6.9%). Using multiple stepwise linear regression where BNP was the dependent variable, and PP and ECW% the independent variables, only ECW% maintained statistical significance as a predictor of BNP levels (PP: Beta = 0.86, p = 0.58; ECW%: Beta = 0.64, p < 0.001 p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Few studies have investigated the relationship between plasma BNP and volume load, and direct evidence is lacking. We used bioimpedance and the determination of ECW% to assess volume state in HD patients finding an association between BNP and ECW. The increased synthesis and release of BNP from the LV in HD patients appear to be mainly related to volume stress rather than to pressure load.

Association between extracellular water, left ventricular mass and hypertension in haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) are present in the majority of patients undergoing haemodialysis (HD). These two pathologies persist after dialysis onset, and pharmacological therapy is often required for adequate control of blood pressure (BP). Although fluid overload is a determinant of hypertension, clinical assessment of this parameter remains difficult and unsatisfactory. Bioimpedance analysis (BIA) spectroscopy and the relative determination of extracellular water (ECW%) may provide a simple and inexpensive tool for investigating fluid overload. We studied 110 patients on thrice-weekly HD to determine whether ECW body content correlates with hypertension and LVH in this patient population. METHODS: Hypertension was determined according to the WHO criteria (office BP >/= 140/90 and/or the use of antihypertensive therapy). Twenty-four hour BP monitoring and echocardiography were performed on midweek inter-HD days. Blood chemistries, dialysis dose (spKt/V) and bioimpedance were analysed on midweek HD days. RESULTS: Hypertension was present in 74.5% of patients. There were no differences for age, spKt/V, haemoglobin, serum creatinine and residual renal function between normotensive and hypertensive patients. Twenty-four hour systolic BP (SBP), 24 h diastolic BP and 24 h pulse pressure were higher in hypertensive patients, in spite of antihypertensive therapy. LVH was present in 61.8% of patients. BIA revealed that ECW% was increased in LVH+ patients (LVH+ = 47.5 +/- 7.9%, LVH- = 42.4 +/- 6.2%, P = 0.01) and in hypertensive patients compared with normotensives (46.5 +/- 7.7% vs 43 +/- 7.2%, P = 0.02). Dry body weights and inter-HD body weight increases did not differ between hypertensive and normotensive patients nor between patients with or without LVH. ECW was correlated with SBP (r = 0.35, P < 0.01) and with left ventricular mass index (LVMi(g/sqm)) (r = 0.49, P < 0.001). A stepwise multiple linear regression model revealed that LVMi(g/sqm) was significantly correlated with ECW%, SBP and male gender (r = 0.65, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LVH and hypertension are present in a majority of HD patients and they are closely correlated with one another. We found associations between fluid load, measured by BIA and expressed as ECW, and BP and LVM.

Blunted nocturnal blood pressure decrease and left-ventricular mass in hypertensive hemodialysis patients.

Left-ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) represents a frequent complication in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Hypertension is a well-known risk factor of cardiac morbidity which is present in 2 of 3 patients: among them about 60% have a blunted nocturnal decrease of blood pressure (BP). Although some large studies on essential hypertensives have documented that non-dipper patients have a higher number of cardiac events and a higher left ventricle (LV) mass than dipper ones, conflicting results have been reported for dialysis patients. Therefore, the aim of our study was to assess differences in LV mass between dipper and non-dipper hypertensive HD patients. We studied 66 patients with 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring performed on HD and on inter-HD day. They were classified as dipper when a decrease of at least 10% of nocturnal systolic blood pressure on the inter-HD day was present. Echocardiography and bioimpedance were performed. 29% of the patients were classified as dippers and 71% as non-dippers. The 48-hour systolic and diastolic BP were not significantly different between the two groups (SBP: dipper = 144 +/- 12.9 mm Hg, non-dipper = 149 +/- 17.8 mm Hg; DBP: dipper = 80 +/- 9.9 mm Hg, non-dipper = 81 +/- 10.6 mm Hg). LV mass index (LVMi) did not differ between the two groups (dipper = 143.1 +/- 40.7 g/m(2); non-dipper = 159.4 +/- 46.3 g/m(2)). No differences were reported between dipper and non-dipper patients regarding extracellular water distribution (ECW: 48.1 +/- 7.7 vs. 49.8 +/- 10.8%). SBP night/day ratio and 48-hour SBP were not correlated to LVMi. A strong correlation was reported between ECW% and LVMi (r = 0.53, p < 0.001). In conclusion, 2 of 3 hypertensive HD patients are non-dipper, and this condition does not seem to be associated with significant differences in 48-hour blood pressure and LV mass. Volume overload appears to be the main independent determinant of LVH in these patients.