Predicting Complications in 153 Lumbar Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomies by a Single Surgeon Over a 6-Year Period.

INTRODUCTION: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is a complex surgical procedure that provides correction of moderate sagittal imbalance. Surgical complications have adverse effects on patient outcomes and healthcare costs, making it imperative for clinical researchers to focus on minimizing complications. However, when it comes to risk modeling of PSO surgery, there is currently no consensus on which patient characteristics or measures should be used. This study aimed to describe complications and compare the performance of various sociodemographic characteristics, surgical variables, and established risk indices in predicting postoperative complications, infections, and readmissions after lumbar PSO surgeries. METHODS: A review was conducted on 191 patients who underwent PSO surgery at a single institution by a single fellowship-trained orthopaedic spine surgeon between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data within 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years of the index procedure were evaluated. Descriptive statistics, t-test, chi-squared analysis, and logistic regression models were used. RESULTS: Intraoperative complications were significantly associated with coronary artery disease (odds ratios [OR] 3.95, P = 0.03) and operating room time (OR 1.01, P = 0.006). 30-day complications were significantly cardiovascular disease (OR 2.68, P = 0.04) and levels fused (OR 1.10, P = 0.04). 2-year complications were significantly associated with cardiovascular disease (OR 2.85, P = 0.02). 30-day readmissions were significantly associated with sex (4.47, 0.04) and length of hospital stay (χ2 = 0.07, P = 0.04). 2-year readmissions were significantly associated with age (χ2 = 0.50, P = 0.03), hypertension (χ2 = 4.64, P = 0.03), revision surgeries (χ2 = 5.46, P = 0.02), and length of hospital stay (χ2 = 0.07, P = 0.03). DISCUSSION: This study found that patients with coronary vascular disease and longer fusions were at higher risk of postoperative complications and patients with notable intraoperative blood loss were at higher risk of postoperative infections. In addition, physicians should closely follow patients with extended postoperative hospital stays, with advanced age, and undergoing revision surgery because these patients were more likely to be readmitted to the hospital.

Does Surgical Day of the Week Affect Hospital Course and Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort Analysis. OBJECTIVES: Extended hospital length of stay (LOS) poses a significant cost burden to patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between late-week surgery and LOS in patients undergoing ASD surgery. METHODS: 256 patients who underwent ASD surgery between January 2018 and December 2021 by a single fellowship-trained orthopedic spine surgeon comprised the patient sample. Demographics, intraoperative, and perioperative data were collected for the 256 patients who underwent ASD surgery. Patients were divided into two groups based on surgical day of the week: (1) Early-week (Monday/Tuesday) n = 126 and (2) Late-week (Thursday/Friday) n = 130. Descriptive statistics, T-tests, and linear and logistic regression models were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Surgical details and sociodemographic characteristics did not differ between the groups. When controlling for TLIF/DLIF status and PSO status there was no difference in mean length of stay between the groups. The late-week group was associated with a greater risk of 30-day readmission, but there was no difference in complications, infections, or intraoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in mean length of stay between surgeries performed early in the week vs late in the week. Although late-week surgeries had higher 30-day readmission risk, all other outcomes, including complication rates, showed no significant differences. When adequate weekend post-operative care is available, we do not advise restricting ASD surgeries to specific weekdays.

The Surgical Outcomes of Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy per Different First Assistant: Retrospective Analysis of 312 Cases.

INTRODUCTION: Pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSOs) are complex spinal deformity surgeries that are associated with high complication rates. They are typically done by an experienced spine surgeon with another attending, resident, or physician assistant serving as the first assistant. The purpose of this study was to determine whether selecting a surgical team for single-level PSO based on case difficulty and fusion length could equalize intraoperative and perioperative outcomes among three groups: dual-attending (DA), attending and orthopaedic resident (RS), and attending and physician assistant (PA). METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort analysis of 312 patients undergoing single-level thoracic or lumbar PSO from January 2007 to December 2020 by a fellowship-trained orthopaedic spine surgeon. Demographic, intraoperative, and perioperative data within 30 days and 2 years of the index procedure were analyzed. RESULTS: Patient demographics did not markedly differ between surgical groups. The mean cohort age was 64.5 years with BMI 31.9 kg/m 2 . Patients with the DA approach had a significantly longer surgical time (DA = 412 min vs. resident = 372 min vs. physician assistant = 323 min; P < 0.001). Patients within the DA group experienced a significantly lower rate of infection (DA = 2.1% [3/140] vs. RS = 7.9% [9/114] vs. PA = 1.7% [1/58], P = 0.043), surgical complication rate (DA = 26% [37/140] vs. RS = 41% [47/114] vs. PA = 33% [19/58], P < 0 .001), and readmission rate (DA = 6.4% [9/140] vs. RS = 12.3% [14/114] vs. PA = 19% [11/58] P = 0.030) within 30 days of surgery. No notable differences were observed among groups in 2-year complication, infection, readmission, or revision surgery rates. CONCLUSIONS: These study results support the DA surgeon approach. Resident involvement, even in less complex cases, can still negatively affect perioperative outcomes. Additional selection criteria development is needed.

Hospital Course and Complications of Subaxial Cervical Trauma Patients With Tetraplegia or Paraplegia: A Case Series and Literature Review.

STUDY DESIGN: A single-institution, retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to present demographic characteristics, mechanism of injuries, lengths of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) days, discharge locations, and causes of 90-day readmission for patients with subaxial spinal cord injuries resulting in paraplegia or tetraplegia. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal cord injuries resulting in paraplegia or tetraplegia are rare injuries with debilitating outcomes. Numerous advances have occurred in caring for these patients, but patients still experience multiple complications. The severity of these injuries and numerous complications result in prolonged hospital stays and the need for extensive rehabilitation. METHODS: Twelve patients with subaxial spinal cord injury resulting in paraplegia or tetraplegia from a level 1 adult trauma center were reviewed. The primary outcomes included hospital length of stay, ICU days, intrahospital complications, 90-day readmission rates, and discharge location. We reviewed the literature for these outcomes in spinal cord injuries. RESULTS: For patients with subaxial spinal cord injuries resulting in paraplegia and tetraplegia, the average age was 36.0 years, and most were male [91.7% (11/12)]. The most common mechanism of injury was gunshot wounds[41.7% (5/12)]. Patients spent an average of 46.3 days in the hospital and 30.7 days in the ICU. Respiratory complications were the most common (9 patients). Fifty percent of patients (6/12) were discharged to the inpatient spinal cord rehab center, and 16.7% (2/12) expired while in the hospital. Two patients (20.0%) were readmitted within 90 days of discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with subaxial spinal cord injuries resulting in paraplegia or tetraplegia were young males with high-energy traumas. Many patients had intrahospital complications, and most were discharged to the hospital spinal rehab center. These findings likely stem from the severity of paraplegia and tetraplegia injuries and the need for rehabilitation.

Differences in Financial Conflicts of Interest Among Participants in a National Spine Conference.

STUDY: Retrospective Study. OBJECTIVE: At the North American Spine Society (NASS) conference, participants may influence spine surgery practices and patient care through their contributions. Therefore, their financial conflicts of interest are of notable interest. This study aims to compare the demographics and payments made to participating surgeons. METHODS: A list of 151 spine surgeons was created based on those who participated in the 2022 NASS conference. Demographic information was obtained from public physician profiles. General payments, research payments, associated research funding, and ownership interest were collected for each physician. Descriptive statistics and two-tailed t-tests were used. RESULTS: In 2021, 151 spine surgeon participants received industry payments, totaling USD 48 294 115. The top 10% of orthopedic surgeons receiving payments accounted for 58.7% of total orthopedic general value, while the top 10% of neurosurgeons accounted for 70.1%. There was no significant difference between these groups' general payment amounts. Surgeons with 21-30 years of experience received the most general funding. There was no difference in funding between surgeons in academic or private settings. For all surgeons, royalties accounted for the largest percentage of the general value exchanged, while food/beverage accounted for the largest percentage of transactions. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that only years of experience had a positive association with general payments, and most monetary value belonged to a small handful of surgeons. These participants receiving significant money may promote techniques requiring products of companies providing their compensation. Future conferences may require disclosure policy changes so attendees understand the degree of funding participants receive.

In-Hospital Morbidity and Mortality of Traumatic Lower-Extremity Amputations.

Traumatic lower-extremity amputations often result in complications and surgical revisions. The authors report the in-hospital morbidity and mortality of traumatic lower-extremity amputations at a metropolitan level I trauma center for a large rural region and compare below-knee (BK) vs higher-level amputation complications. They retrospectively reviewed 168 adult patients during a 10-year period (2005 to 2015) who had a traumatic injury to the lower extremity that required an amputation. Main outcome measurements included amputation level, complication rates, intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates, length of stay, total trips to the operating room (OR), and Injury Severity Score (ISS). A total of 95 patients had through-knee/above-knee (TK/AK) amputations, and 73 patients had BK amputations. The majority of injuries occurred in the non-urban setting. The TK/AK group had higher ICU admission rates (76% vs 35%, P<.0001), longer overall hospital length of stay (22.0 vs 15.5 days, P=.01), more total OR trips (6.5 vs 5.0, P=.04), and higher ISS (17.0 vs 11.5, P<.0001). A complication was experienced by 64% of all patients during the initial hospitalization. The TK/AK group had higher complication rates than the BK group, including wound infection, pulmonary embolus, rhabdomyolysis, compartment syndrome, and death. Patients with TK/AK traumatic amputations have a greater burden of injury with higher complication rates, increased ICU admissions, increased length of stay, and increased ISS and require more return trips to the OR compared with patients with BK amputations. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(6):e561-e566.].

Demographic and Perioperative Factors Associated With Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Survey Completion.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate independent demographic and perioperative factors associated with lower Patient-reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS PF) survey completion rates after spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There has not been a study evaluating factors related to PROMIS PF survey completion following spine surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing spine procedures were retrospectively reviewed. The number of PROMIS PF surveys that were completed at each time period and the number of surveys that were completed in succession starting with the first survey were tabulated and reported using descriptive statistics. Independent preoperative and perioperative factors associated with full survey completion up to the 12-month period were identified using χ analysis and Poisson regression with robust error variance. A final multivariate model was created using a backward, stepwise multivariate regression. RESULTS: A total of 713 patients were included. Variables positively associated with PROMIS survey completion were aged above 60 years and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9≥10. African Americans and Hispanics were negatively associated with survey completion. Postoperative day 0 narcotic use ≥50 oral morphine equivalents was positively associated with survey completion, while outpatient surgical setting and high preoperative radicular arm/leg pain were negatively associated with survey completion. In the final multivariate model, depression was the only variable that was positively associated, while both outpatient surgical setting and high preoperative radicular arm/leg pain were negatively associated with survey completion. CONCLUSION: This study identified demographic and perioperative variables associated with PROMIS survey completion and response rates. Patients who underwent surgery in the outpatient setting and those with high preoperative radicular limb pain were less likely to complete surveys. Interestingly, patients with clinical signs of depression were more likely to fill out surveys. Understanding variables associated with survey completion may provide the clinician with insight into which demographic groups are the most at-risk for not responding to surveys.

Patient Perceptions of Physician Ownership in Spine Care.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective study. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the perspectives of patients seeking spine care in regard to physician ownership of surgical facilities and to understand the importance of disclosing financial conflicts. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There has been limited investigation regarding patient perceptions of the proprietary structure of surgical facilities. METHODS: Patients seeking treatment for spine pathology completed an 8-item survey. The questions assessed if patients acknowledged the owners of surgical facilities, if the patient thought knowledge of ownership is important, who they perceived as most qualified to own surgical facilities, preference of communication of ownership, and impact of facility ownership on care. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients completed the survey. When patients were asked whom they thought owned the hospital, most reported private hospital corporations followed by universities/medical schools and insurance companies. With regard to whom patients thought owned an ambulatory surgical center, most reported physicians, followed by private hospital corporations and individual investors. When asked how important it is to know the financial stakeholders of a surgical facility, 73.5% of patients stated "very important" or "somewhat important." Most patients reported they were not aware of who owned the facility. Regarding how facility owners should be communicated, 31.0% answered "written document," whereas 25.0% preferred verbal communication with the staff/surgeon. When asked how much impact the owner of a surgical facility has on their care, 38.0% of patients responded, "strong impact," followed by "moderate impact," (43.0%), and "little or no impact" (19.0%). Patients thought that physicians were the most qualified to own an ambulatory surgical center, followed by universities/medical schools and private hospital corporations. CONCLUSIONS: The pretreatment perception of patients referred to a spine clinic favored the opinion that physicians were the most qualified to own and manage surgical facilities. Therefore, physicians should be encouraged to share disclosures with patients as their ownership of surgical facilities is viewed favorably.

Static Versus Expandable Devices Provide Similar Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have analyzed differences in radiographic parameters and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between expandable and static interbody devices in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: To evaluate differences in radiographic parameters and PROs following MIS TLIF between static and expandable interbody devices. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary, single-level MIS TLIF between 2014 and 2017 were retrospectively identified. Radiographic measurements including lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), disc height (DH), and foraminal height (FH) were performed on lateral radiographs before and after MIS TLIF with a static or expandable articulating interbody device. Radiographic outcomes and PROs were compared using paired and unpaired Student's t test. RESULTS: Thirty patients received expandable interbody devices and 30 patients received static interbody devices. The expandable device cohort exhibited significantly greater improvement in DH and FH at final follow-up compared with those receiving a static device. Both device cohorts experienced significant improvements in PROs at 6 months post-operatively. CONCLUSION: MIS TLIF with an expandable interbody device led to a greater increase of DH and FH than with a static interbody device. Patients undergoing MIS TLIF can expect similar improvements in PROs whether receiving a static or an expandable interbody device. Further studies are required to better understand improvements in clinical outcomes afforded by expandable interbody devices.

Improvements in Back and Leg Pain After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have quantified clinical improvement following minimally invasive lumbar decompression based on predominant back pain or leg pain. PURPOSE: To quantify improvement in patient-reported outcomes following minimally invasive lumbar decompression and determine the degree of improvement in back pain, leg pain, and disability in patients who present with predominant back pain or predominant leg pain. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary, one-level minimally invasive lumbar decompression for degenerative pathology were retrospectively reviewed. Comparisons of visual analog scale (VAS) back and leg pain scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and Short Form-12 (SF-12) mental and physical component scores from pre-operative to 6-week, 12-week, 6-month, and 1-year follow-up. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with predominant back pain or predominant leg pain. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were identified. Scores on VAS back and leg pain, ODI, and SF-12 physical component improved from pre-operative to all post-operative time points. After 1 year, patients reported a 2.8-point (47%) reduction in back pain and a 4-point (61.1%) reduction in leg pain scores; 52 patients with predominant back pain and 50 patients with predominant leg pain reported reductions in pain throughout the year following surgery. In both the back and leg pain cohorts, patients experienced reductions in ODI during the first 6 months and throughout 1-year follow-up, respectively. The majority of patients achieved minimum clinically important difference, regardless of predominant symptom. CONCLUSIONS: Patients reported improvements in back and leg pain following minimally invasive lumbar decompression regardless of predominant presenting symptom; however, patients with predominant leg pain may experience greater improvement than those with predominant back pain.

Patient Perceptions of Iliac Crest Bone Grafting in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine patients' perception of iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) harvesting and donor site pain following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The incidence of donor site pain has been debated in the literature because of the varying techniques associated with its harvest. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary, single-level MIS TLIF with ICBG were retrospectively identified. ICBG harvesting was performed using a percutaneous technique with a tubular retractor. A survey was administered to assess if patients could accurately describe which side of their iliac crest they believed was harvested, and if they were experiencing any pain perceived to be originating from the donor site. Patient characteristics were compared using χ analysis and independent t test. RESULTS: In total, 82 patients were included. The majority of patients had the ICBG harvested from the left iliac crest (97.5%). Approximately half of the patients correctly identified the side of harvest (50.6%). 48.1% of patients reported they were not confident or had guessed on their response. Patients that reported pain from the ICBG were more likely to feel confident or somewhat confident in their harvest site identification (57.9% vs. 46.3%) but less likely to be correct (36.8% vs. 63.4%) than patients without pain. 22 patients (27.8%) correctly identified the side of harvest without guessing. Of these, 11 (13.9%) reported pain. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of patients undergoing MIS TLIF with ICBG are able to correctly identify which side of their iliac crest was harvested. However, the majority of patients reporting pain were unable to correctly identify the side of harvest. This suggests that most patients are likely attributing other sources of pain to their ICBG. Therefore, rates of donor site pain may be over-reported in the current literature with contemporary harvesting techniques.

Comparison of Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Performed in an Inpatient Versus Outpatient Setting.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate differences in patient factors, procedural factors, early outcomes and safety in mutlilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the inpatient versus outpatient setting. METHODS: Patient demographics, operative factors, and outcomes of multilevel ACDF performed in an inpatient and outpatient setting were compared using Fisher's exact test for categorical and Student's t test for continuous variables. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients had surgery on an outpatient and 46 on an inpatient basis. Inpatients were older (56.7 vs 52.2 years, P = .012) and had a higher ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) class (P = .002). Sixty percent of 2-level cases were outpatient surgeries, compared with 35% of 3-level cases (P = .042). Outpatients had shorter operative times (71.26 vs 83.59 minutes, P < .0001) and shorter lengths of stay (8.51 vs 35.76 hours, P < .0001), lower blood loss (33.04 vs 45.87 mL, P = .003), and fewer in-hospital complications (5.3% vs 37.0%, P < .0001). Outpatients had better early outcomes in terms of 6-week Neck Disability Index (NDI) (27.97 vs 37.59, P = .014), visual analogue scale (VAS) neck (2.92 vs 4.02, P = .044), and Short Form-12 Physical Health Score (SF-12 PHS) (35.66 vs 30.79, P = .008). However, these differences did not persist at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that multilevel ACDF can be performed safely in the outpatient setting without an increased risk of complications compared with the inpatient setting in an appropriately selected patient. Specifically, patients' age, ASA class, and number of levels being fused should be taken into consideration. At our institution, ASA class 3, body mass index >40 kg/m2, age >80 years, intubation time >2.5 hours, or not having a responsible adult with the patient warrant inpatient admission. Importantly, the setting of the surgery does not affect patient-reported outcomes.

Opioid Consumption Patterns After Lumbar Microdiscectomy or Decompression.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study OBJECTIVE.: The aim of this study was to record daily opioid use and pain levels after 1-level lumbar decompression or microdiscectomy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The standardization of opioid-prescribing practices through guidelines can decrease the risk of misuse and lower the number of pills available for diversion in this high-risk patient population. However, there is a paucity of quantitative data on the "minimum necessary amount" of opioid appropriate for post-discharge prescriptions. METHODS: At two institutions between September 2017 and 2018, we prospectively enrolled 85 consecutive adult patients who underwent one-level lumbar decompression or microdiscectomy. Patients with a history of opioid dependence were excluded. Daily opioid consumption and pain scores were collected using an automated text-messaging-based platform for 6 weeks or until consumption ceased. Refills during the study period were monitored. Patients were asked for the number of pills left over and the method of disposal. Opioid use was converted to oral morphine equivalents (OMEs). Results are also reported in terms of "pills" (oxycodone 5 mg equivalents) to facilitate clinical applications. Risk factors were compared between patients in the top and bottom half of opioid consumption. RESULTS: Total opioid consumption ranged from 0 to 118 pills, with a median consumption of 32 pills (236.3 OME). Seventy-five percent of patients consumed ≤57 pills (431.3 OME). Mean Numeric Rating Scale pain scores declined steadily over the first 2 weeks. By postoperative day 7 half of the study population had ceased taking opioids altogether. Only 22.4% of patients finished their initial prescription, and only 9.4% of patients obtained a refill. CONCLUSION: These data may be used to formulate evidence-based opioid prescription guidelines, establish benchmarks, and identify patients at the higher end of the opioid use spectrum. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Minimally invasive lumbar decompression in an ambulatory surgery center.

BACKGROUND: There is limited data regarding clinical and surgical outcomes of minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MIS LD) as an outpatient procedure. In this context, our purpose is to evaluate a single surgeon's experience with performing MIS LD in the outpatient versus inpatient setting and determining if there are differences in surgical and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary, one- to three-level MIS LD were retrospectively reviewed and stratified by surgical setting: ambulatory surgical center (ASC) versus hospital. The cohorts were compared with respect to demographics, perioperative characteristics, complications, postoperative pain and narcotics consumption, and improvements in patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Five hundred and nine patients were included: 332 patients underwent surgery at an ASC and 177 patients underwent surgery at a hospital. The ASC patients were younger, more likely to be male, and carry Workers' Compensation insurance. The hospital patients were older, more likely to be diabetic, and had a greater comorbidity burden. Patients undergoing MIS LD in an ASC were less likely to have multi-level procedures and more likely to have decompression with discectomy compared to patients in the hospital cohort. There were two cases of superficial wound infection in the ASC cohort and a single case of a pulmonary embolus in the hospital cohort. Additionally, a total of 28 patients had recurrent herniated nucleus pulposus in the ASC cohort compared to 12 patients in the hospital cohort. There was one case of residual stenosis in the ASC cohort compared to eight cases in the hospital cohort. Both cohorts demonstrated similar preoperative ODI, VAS back pain, and VAS leg pain scores through 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: MIS LD is a safe and effective procedure in an ASC, however, appropriate patient selection and postoperative protocols are imperative in minimizing complications and optimizing safety and efficacy in the outpatient setting.

The Influence of Conflicts of Interest on Outcomes in the Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty Literature: A Systematic Review.

STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the association between study outcomes and the presence of a conflict of interest (COI) in the lumbar disc arthroplasty (LDA) literature. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies have evaluated the efficacy of LDA as a surgical alternative to arthrodesis. As investigators may have financial relationships with LDA device companies, it is important to consider the role of COI on study outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify articles reporting clinical outcomes of LDA. Any financial COIs disclosed were recorded and confirmed through Open Payments and ProPublica databases. Study outcomes were graded as favorable, unfavorable, or equivocal. Pearson Chi-squared analysis was used to determine an association between COI and study outcomes. Favorable outcomes were tested for an association with study characteristics using Poisson regression with robust error variance. RESULTS: Fifty-seven articles were included, 30 had a financial COI, while 27 did not. Ninety percent of the conflicted studies disclosed their COI in the article. Studies with United States authors were more likely to be conflicted (P = 0.019). A majority of studies reported favorable outcomes for LDA (n = 39). Conflicted studies were more likely to report favorable outcomes than nonconflicted studies (P = 0.020). Articles with COIs related to consultant fees (P = 0.003), research funding (P = 0.002), and stock ownership (P < 0.001) were more likely to report favorable outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance for authors to accurately report conflicting relationships with industry. As such, orthopedic surgeons should critically evaluate study outcomes with regard to potential conflicts before recommending LDA as a surgical option to their patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Interbody options in lumbar fusion.

Interbody devices have revolutionized lumbar fusion surgery by enhancing mechanical stability, optimizing sagittal parameters, and maximizing fusion potential. There are several lumbar interbody fusion approaches available for varying pathologic etiologies, surgical index levels, or due to surgeon preference. With the advancement of spinal instrumentation and interbody devices, a variety of cage materials and dimensions have been engineered to accommodate various lumbar fusion approaches. The efficacy of a fusion is dependent on the shape, size, and material makeup of that interbody device. Since there are numerous cages available in today's market, it is important to find the optimal cage to best accommodate specific lumbar fusion cases. This review will explain the properties and future advancements of various interbody devices available for lumbar fusions.

Risk Factors Associated With Failure to Reach Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

BACKGROUND: The minimum clinically importance difference (MCID) represents a threshold for improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) that patients deem important. No previous study has comprehensively examined risk factors for failure to achieve MCID after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures for radiculopathic symptomatology. The purpose of this study is to determine risk factors for failure to reach MCID for Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) neck pain, and VAS arm pain in patients undergoing 1- or 2-level ACDF procedures. METHODS: A surgical registry of patients who underwent primary, 1- or 2-level ACDF from 2014 to 2016 was reviewed. Rates of MCID achievement for NDI, VAS neck pain, and VAS arm pain at final follow-up were calculated based on published MCID values. Patients were then categorized into demographic and procedural categories. Bivariate regression was used to test for association of demographic and procedural characteristics with failure to reach MCID for each PRO. The final multivariate model including all demographic and procedural categories as controls was created using backward stepwise regression. RESULTS: Eighty-three, 84, and 77 patients were included in the analysis for VAS neck, VAS arm, and NDI, respectively. Rates of MCID achievement for VAS neck, VAS arm, and NDI were 55.4%, 36.9%, and 76.6%, respectively. On bivariate analysis, patients with Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 2 were less likely to achieve MCID for NDI than patients with CCI < 2 (P = .025). On multivariate analysis, CCI ≥ 2 (P = .025) was further associated with failure to reach MCID for NDI. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the majority of patients do not reach MCID for arm pain. Additionally, higher comorbidity burden as evidenced by higher CCI scores is a negative predictive factor for the achievement of MCID in neck disability following ACDF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Does the Day of the Week Affect Length of Stay and Hospital Charges Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?

BACKGROUND: To reduce the economic impact of excessive costs, risk factors for increased length of stay (LOS) must be identified. Previous literature has demonstrated that surgeries later in the week can affect the LOS and costs following joint arthroplasty. However, few investigations regarding the day of surgery have been performed in the spine literature. The present study attempts to identify the association between day of surgery on LOS and hospital charges following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures. METHODS: A prospectively maintained surgical database of primary, level 1-2 ACDF patients between 2008 and 2015 was retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified by surgery day: early week (Tuesday) or late week (Friday) ACDF. Differences in patient demographics and preoperative characteristics were compared between cohorts using chi-square analysis or Student t test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Direct hospital costs were obtained using hospital charges for each procedure and subsequent care prior to discharge. Associations between date of surgery and costs were assessed using multivariate linear regression controlled for. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-five patients were included in the analysis. One hundred and fifty-three patients underwent early week ACDF, and 142 underwent late week ACDF. Surgery day cohorts reported similar baseline characteristics. There were no differences in operative characteristics or hospital LOS between cohorts. Additionally, no differences in total or subcategorical hospital costs were identified between surgery day cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing ACDF later in the week exhibit similar LOS and hospital costs compared to those undergoing ACDF early in the week. These results suggest that outpatient procedures with short postoperative stays are likely not affected by the changes in hospital work efficiency that occur during the transition to the weekend. As such, hospitals should not restrict outpatient procedures to specific days of the week. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Impact of Iliac Crest Bone Grafting on Postoperative Outcomes and Complication Rates Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: The relationship between bone graft technique and postoperative outcomes for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) has not been well-defined. This study aims to determine the effect of iliac crest bone grafting (ICBG) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and complication rates following MIS TLIF. METHODS: Primary, single-level MIS TLIF patients were consecutively analyzed. Patients that prospectively received a percutaneous technique of ICBG were compared to patients that retrospectively received bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2). Complication rates were assessed perioperatively and up to 1 year postoperatively. Changes in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS) back, and VAS leg pain were compared. Rates of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement at final follow-up for ODI, VAS back, and VAS leg scores were compared. RESULTS: One hundred forty-nine patients were included: 101 in the BMP-2 cohort and 48 in the ICBG cohort. The ICBG cohort demonstrated increases in intraoperative blood loss and shorter lengths of stay. ICBG patients also experienced longer operative times, though this did not reach statistical significance. No significant differences in complication or reoperation rates were identified. The ICBG cohort demonstrated greater improvements in VAS leg pain at 6-week and 12-week follow-up. No other significant differences in PROs or MCID achievement rates were identified. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing MIS TLIF with ICBG experienced clinically insignificant increases in intraoperative blood loss and did not experience increases in postoperative pain or disability. Complication and reoperation rates were similar between groups. These results suggest that ICBG is a safe option for MIS TLIF.