Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 20(5): 206, 2019 May 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31147791

RESUMO

The multi-stage cascade impactor (CI) is the mainstay method for the determination of the aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) of aerosols emitted from orally inhaled products (OIPs). CIs are designed to operate at a constant flow rate throughout the measurement process. However, it is necessary to mimic an inhalation maneuver to disperse the powder into an aerosol when testing passive dry powder inhalers (DPIs), which constitute a significant portion of available products in this inhaler class. Methods in the pharmacopeial compendia intended for product quality assurance initiate sampling by applying a vacuum to the measurement apparatus using a timer-operated solenoid valve located downstream of the CI, resulting in a period when the flow rate through the impactor rapidly increases from zero towards the target flow rate. This article provides recommendations for achieving consistent APSD measurements, including selection of the CI, pre-separator, and flow control equipment, as well as reviewing considerations that relate to the shape of the flow rate-sampling time profile. Evidence from comparisons of different DPIs delivering the same active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) is indicative that the compendial method for APSD measurement is insensitive as a predictor of pharmacokinetic outcomes. Although inappropriate for product quality testing, guidance is therefore provided towards adopting a more clinically realistic methodology, including the use of an anatomically appropriate inlet and mimicking patient inhalation at the DPI while operating the CI at constant flow rate. Many of these recommendations are applicable to the testing of other OIP classes.


Assuntos
Aerossóis/normas , Inaladores de Pó Seco/métodos , Desenho de Equipamento/métodos , Tamanho da Partícula , Controle de Qualidade , Administração por Inalação , Aerossóis/administração & dosagem , Aerossóis/química , Inaladores de Pó Seco/instrumentação , Desenho de Equipamento/instrumentação , Humanos , Pós , Medicamentos para o Sistema Respiratório/administração & dosagem , Medicamentos para o Sistema Respiratório/química , Medicamentos para o Sistema Respiratório/normas , Tecnologia Farmacêutica/métodos
3.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 18(8): 3296-3306, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28589305

RESUMO

This article reports on results from a two-lab, multiple impactor experiment evaluating the abbreviated impactor measurement (AIM) concept, conducted by the Cascade Impaction Working Group of the International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS). The goal of this experiment was to expand understanding of the performance of an AIM-type apparatus based on the Andersen eight-stage non-viable cascade impactor (ACI) for the assessment of inhalation aerosols and sprays, compared with the full-resolution version of that impactor described in the pharmacopeial compendia. The experiment was conducted at two centers with a representative commercially available pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) containing albuterol (salbutamol) as active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). Metrics of interest were total mass (TM) emitted from the inhaler, impactor-sized mass (ISM), as well as the ratio of large particle mass (LPM) to small particle mass (SPM). ISM and the LPM/SPM ratio together comprise the efficient data analysis (EDA) metrics. The results of the comparison demonstrated that in this study, the AIM approach had adequate discrimination to detect changes in the mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of the ACI-sampled aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD), and therefore could be employed for routine product quality control (QC). As with any test method considered for inclusion in a regulatory filing, the transition from an ACI (used in development) to an appropriate AIM/EDA methodology (used in QC) should be evaluated and supported by data on a product-by-product basis.


Assuntos
Albuterol/análise , Inaladores Dosimetrados/normas , Tamanho da Partícula , Tecnologia Farmacêutica/métodos , Tecnologia Farmacêutica/normas , Administração por Inalação , Aerossóis , Albuterol/química , Broncodilatadores/análise , Broncodilatadores/química , Desenho de Equipamento/métodos , Desenho de Equipamento/normas , Inaladores Dosimetrados/tendências , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores/normas , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores/tendências , Controle de Qualidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA