Predictors of outcome in diabetic patients undergoing infrapopliteal endovascular revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of chronic limb-threatening ischemia in diabetic patients is increasing. The factors influencing outcome after infrapopliteal revascularization in these patients are largely unknown. Therefore, this study aims to identify the impact of perioperative glucose control on the long-term outcomes in this patient cohort, and furthermore to identify other factors independently associated with outcome. METHODS: Consecutive diabetic patients undergoing infrapopliteal endovascular revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia were identified. Patients' demographics, procedural details, daily capillary blood glucose, and hemoglobin A1C levels were collected and analyzed against the study end points using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 437 infrapopliteal target vessels were successfully crossed in 203 patients. Amputation-free survival by Kaplan-Meier (estimate (standard error)%) was 74 (3.3)% and 63 (3.7)%, primary patency was 61 (4.2)% and 50 (4.9)%, assisted primary patency was 69 (5.2)% and 55 (6.1)%, and secondary patency was 71 (3.8)% and 59 (4.1)% at 1 year and 2 years, respectively. Cox regression analysis showed high perioperative capillary blood glucose levels to be an independent predictor of binary restenosis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-1.1.78; P = .015). Postprocedural dual-antiplatelet therapy was found to be an independent predictor of amputation-free survival (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.04-2.75; P = .033), and freedom from major adverse limb events (HR: 1.96; 95% CI, 1.16-3.27; P = .023) and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly associated with better amputation-free survival (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.31-0.87; P = .014). CONCLUSIONS: Poor perioperative glycemic control is associated with a higher incidence of restenosis after infrapopliteal revascularization in diabetic patients. Dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with better outcomes in this group.

Outcomes of open and hybrid treatments in below the knee pathology for critical limb threatening ischemia.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal management of below the knee pathology remains one of the most challenging areas for revascularization in patients presenting with critical limb threatening ischemia. Patients commonly have multilevel lesions and have a high amputation rate and associated mortality. This review aimed to assess the outcomes of below the knee revascularization strategies. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: An online literature search of medical databases for original articles or review articles was conducted using mesh terms. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Bypass surgery remains the gold standard for revascularization with good long-term outcomes with regards to patency, limb salvage, and quality of life but is associated with a higher morbidity than the endovascular approach. Given the increasing frailty of our patients, endovascular treatments have become the preferred strategy with results that are now equal to bypass. Hybrid surgery is an increasingly popular option as it combines the benefits of both endovascular and open surgery and although the evidence base is small the outcomes are encouraging. CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid surgery offers promising results and could be considered in the treatment of multi-level lower limb arterial disease especially in high-risk patients or those who are not suitable for either open or endovascular techniques as a sole treatment modality.

Complex infrapopliteal revascularization in elderly patients with critical limb ischemia: impact of multidisciplinary integrated care on mid-term outcome.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of critical limb ischemia (CLI) is exponentially rising among our aging population. There is a paucity of scientific evidence on best management and clinical outcome of infra-popliteal (IP) revascularizations in elderly CLI patients. METHODS: A prospectively collected database was analyzed to identify consecutive octogenarian and nonagenarian patients who underwent IP revascularizations (bypass or angioplasty) for CLI (Rutherford 4-6) in a single center between 2010-2014. The primary end points were overall amputation-free-survival (AFS) and overall survival (OS) at 1 and 2 years. Secondary endpoints were primary, assisted-primary, secondary patency and limb-salvage (LS) rates by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to find factors predicting outcome. RESULTS: A total of 129 limbs in 120 patients were treated with IP bypass (N.=42) and endovascular (N.=87) revascularizations with a mean age of 85(±5) years. The overall primary patency, assisted-primary patency and secondary patency were 58%, 65% and 70%, respectively at 12 months and 34%, 48% and 59% at 24 months. Primary, assisted-primary and secondary patency analyzed by treatment method (endovascular vs. bypass) was 54% vs. 52%, 61% vs. 70%, 69% vs. 75% at 1 year and 21% vs. 36%, 24% vs. 62%, 31% vs. 72% at 2 years. The overall AFS at 12 and 24 months was 62% and 46% respectively; AFS was 71%-68% in the bypass group and 53-21% in the Endovascular group (P<0.001). LS was 89% at 12 months and 84% at 24 months, with no significant difference between the bypass and endovascular groups (P=0.24). The overall perioperative mortality rate was 2%. OS by Kaplan-Meier was 68% and 54% at 1 and 2 years respectively. Diabetes (P=0.046) and low eGFR (P=0.041) were predictors of worse AFS and OS, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IP revascularizations (either endovascular or surgical) is feasible and effective in octogenarians and nonagenarians with CLI. By adopting a patient-tailored approach, both revascularizations strategies have satisfactory technical and clinical outcomes in this high-risk group. Subgroup analysis suggests that bypass surgery may have better mid-term secondary patency and AFS rates.

Results of complex aortic stent grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms stratified according to the proximal landing zone using the Society for Vascular Surgery classification.

BACKGROUND: Advances in endovascular technology have led to the successful treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms. However, there is currently no consensus on what constitutes a juxtarenal, pararenal, or suprarenal aneurysm. There is emerging evidence that the extent of the aneurysm repair is associated with outcome. We compare the outcomes of 150 consecutive patients treated with a fenestrated or branched stent graft and present the data stratified according to the Society for Vascular Surgery classification based on proximal anatomic landing zones. METHODS: A prospectively collected database of consecutive patients undergoing fenestrated or branched stent graft insertion in a tertiary center between 2008 and 2013 was retrospectively analyzed. Aneurysms were subdivided into zones according to where the area of proximal seal could be achieved in relation to the visceral arteries. Zone 8 covers the renal arteries, zone 7 covers the superior mesenteric artery, and zone 6 covers the celiac axis. Patient demographics, operative variables, mortality, and major morbidity were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis to assess for differences between zones. RESULTS: During the study period, 150 patients were treated. There were 49 in zone 8, 76 in zone 7, and 25 in zone 6. Prior aortic surgery had been performed in 19 patients, which included 11 patients with previous endovascular aneurysm repairs. There was significantly increased blood loss (P < .001), operative time (P < .0001), total hospital stay (P = .018), and intensive care unit stay (P < .0001) as the zones ascended the aorta. There were 14 inpatient deaths recorded across all zones with a 30-day mortality rate of 8%. Logistic regression analysis for 30 day mortality showed a significant increase as the zones ascended (P = .007). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that 5-year survival significantly deteriorated as the zones ascended (P = .039), with no significant difference in the freedom from reintervention curves between zones (P = .37). CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that the extent of the aneurysm repair as determined by the proximal sealing zone is associated with outcome. Mortality, operative duration, blood loss, and hospital stay all significantly increased as the zones ascended. These data also validate the use of the proposed new classification based on aortic anatomy.

Medium-Term Outcomes Following Endovascular Repair of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms with an Unfavourable Proximal Neck.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate medium-term outcomes following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR) with unfavourable neck anatomy using stent grafts with a 36 mm or larger proximal diameter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 27 patients who underwent elective EVAR between 2006 and 2008 using a stent graft with a 36 mm or larger proximal diameter was carried out. All patients had computed tomography angiography (CTA) for procedure planning, and detailed assessment of the aneurysm neck was performed using a three-dimensional CTA workstation. Patients were followed up with CTA at 3 and 12 months and annual duplex thereafter. RESULTS: The median aneurysm diameter was 7 cm, and the median aneurysm neck diameter was 31 mm. Cook Zenith stent grafts were used in all patients, with a proximal diameter of 36 mm (n = 25) and 40 mm (n = 2). Primary and assisted primary technical success rates were 74 and 93%, respectively. The follow-up period ranged from 62 to 84 months, with a median of 72 months. 15 patients died during follow-up. Two patients died from aortic rupture, and the remaining patients died from cardiac disease (n = 4), chest sepsis (n = 6), cancer (n = 2) and renal failure (n = 1). Complications included type I endoleak (n = 5), limb occlusion (n = 2), limb stenosis (n = 2), limb kinking (n = 1), dissection of an artery (n = 1), occlusion of a femorofemoral cross-over graft (n = 1) and poor attachment of a distal limb (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: EVAR using stent grafts in the presence of an unfavourable neck has a high risk of complications. Medium-term survival in this group is low but mainly due to patient co-morbidities.

Cystic adventitial disease of the common femoral artery presenting with acute limb ischemia.

Cystic adventitial disease (CAD) is a recognized cause of chronic lower limb ischemia. We present a case of CAD presenting as acute lower limb ischemia. A 54-year-old woman presented with a 48-hr history of sudden-onset right leg and foot pain associated with paresthesia and weakness. Duplex ultrasound and computed tomography angiogram showed acute occlusion of the common, superficial, and profunda femoral arteries. On surgical exploration, a mucinous cystic structure was found occluding the common femoral artery (CFA), which was later confirmed on histology as CAD. Because of the extent of the cyst, we treated this with an interposition graft, and the patient initially made a good recovery. However, 2 months later, she presented again with acute lower limb ischemia, and investigation and surgical exploration confirmed further cystic degeneration of the remaining part of the CFA. This case highlights a rare presentation and shows the importance of a high index of suspicion when investigating and treating young patients with lower limb symptoms, particularly when interpreting imaging.

Hematopoietic progenitor cells and restenosis after carotid endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) may attenuate the response to vascular injury by maintaining endothelial integrity and function. Our aim was to determine whether circulating HPC number and function correlate with restenosis after carotid endarterectomy. METHODS: HPC number (CD34(+)/CD133(+) cells), early colony-forming units, migratory capacity, and senescence were analyzed in blood collected preoperatively, 1 day, and 6 weeks postoperatively. Mobilizing cytokine levels were also measured. Stenosis was assessed by duplex scanning. RESULTS: HPC numbers (P<0.001) and early colony-forming unit count (P=0.001) fell rapidly 24 hours postoperatively. Restenosis at 6 months correlated negatively with the magnitude of postoperative falls in HPC numbers (R=-0.38, P=0.013) and early colony-forming unit counts (R=-0.42, P=0.008). The migratory capacity of preoperative HPCs correlated negatively with restenosis (R=-0.48, P=0.007). Preoperative SDF1 levels correlated with falls in HPC number (R=0.42, P=0.044) and early colony-forming unit counts (R=0.56, P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: HPC function appears to be linked to the development of carotid artery restenosis after endarterectomy. These data support the concept that HPCs have a role in regulating remodeling of the injured arterial wall.

Medium-term results of anal advancement flap compared with lateral sphincterotomy for the treatment of anal fissure.

INTRODUCTION: Anal fissure is associated with anal pain and bleeding. Lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) has been a common form of surgical management. This can however cause incontinence and hence an equally effective alternative without this risk would be ideal. Anal fissurectomy and an anal advancement flap (AAF) have been used as an alternative to LIS. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of the results of AAF and LIS for the treatment of anal fissure. Fifty patients underwent AAF and a further 50 cases were chosen who had undergone LIS over the same time period. Patient and procedural data were collected including post-operative course. RESULTS: Presenting symptoms included anal pain (94%), rectal bleeding (77%) and constipation (15%). Mean (±SD) follow-up was 20 ± 12 months in the AAF group vs 22 ± 12.5 months in the LIS group. Healing of fissure was achieved in 96% of patients after AAF and 88% after LIS (p = 0.27). Resolution of symptoms was achieved in 90% after AAF and 72% of patients after LIS (p = 0.04). LIS was associated with an increased incidence of readmission with infection and pain (8% vs 4%, p = 0.35). Seven patients whom had undergone successful AAF with complete resolution of symptoms had previously had LIS with failure of symptom relief. There was no incidence of faecal incontinence in either group. CONCLUSION: AAF is associated with a higher incidence of symptomatic relief and fissure healing and lower incidence of complications when compared with LIS. AAF is effective at healing fissures which are refractory to LIS.