OPERATIONALIZING ORAL HEALTH OUTCOME MEASURES TO IMPROVE THE ORAL HEALTH OF PERSONS WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES.

Individuals with intellectual disability (ID) face significant challenges in preventing oral diseases. They also lack access to high-quality oral health care in professional settings. To understand the effects of oral conditions on their lives and health, it is necessary to assess their oral health outcome measures. For those with mild ID, who possess adequate linguistic and cognitive abilities, accessibility features should be incorporated in the dental patient reported outcome (dPRO) measures. But many other individuals often lack the linguistic and cognitive ability to self-report through dPRO measures. While self-reported measures are preferable, requiring dPROs in this population would result in a high amount of missing data and the inability to assess interventions for improving their dental health. Thus, there is a need to use proxy-reported outcome (ProxRO) measures, observer reported outcome (ObsRO) measures, and clinician reported outcome (ClinRO) measures among those with ID. This is also a common approach taken by other specialties that work closely with those with ID, where the measures for activities of daily living and adaptive behavior measures use reporting by caregivers. ProxRO measures in dentistry that were created for infants and young children provide a structure for appropriate adaptations and the creation of relevant outcome measures. Including input from the intensely multidisciplinary teams that provide supports for those with ID is key to creating high-quality measures and oral health interventions for those with ID.

Quality of life and costs of patients prior to colorectal surgery.

Objective: To assess the quality of life and societal costs of patients prior to colorectal surgery in the Netherlands.Methods: This study is embedded in a previous randomized controlled trial (SANICS II). The quality of life was measured using EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. The iMTA medical consumption questionnaire (iMCQ) and the iMTA productivity costs questionnaire (iPCQ) were used to identify and measure healthcare and productivity costs. Subgroup analyses were performed based on age and gender.Results: A total of 178 patients were included in the cost analysis and a total of 161 patients in the quality of life analysis. The three-month mean societal cost per patient amounted to €3,211 of which €1,459 was due to productivity losses. The mean utility was 0.88 per patient. Gender was an important predictor in quality of life with men scoring significantly higher than women (0.92 versus 0.82) at p < 0.0001.Conclusion: Colorectal cancer represents a high economic burden in the Netherlands. Further research with repeated cost and quality of life measurements would be needed to explore the change over time and the effects of surgery.