Efficiency and Target Derepression of Anti-miR-92a: Results of a First in Human Study.

MicroRNA (miRNA) inhibition is a promising therapeutic strategy in several disease indications. MRG-110 is a locked nucleic acid-based antisense oligonucleotide that targets miR-92a-3p and experimentally was shown to have documented therapeutic effects on cardiovascular disease and wound healing. To gain first insights into the activity of anti-miR-92a in humans, we investigated miR-92a-3p expression in several blood compartments and assessed the effect of MRG-110 on target derepression. Healthy adults were randomly assigned (5:2) to receive a single intravenous dose of MRG-110 or placebo in one of seven sequential ascending intravenous dose cohorts ranging from 0.01 to 1.5 mg/kg body weight. MiR-92a-3p whole blood levels were time and dose dependently decreased with half-maximal inhibition of 0.27 and 0.31 mg/kg at 24 and 72 h after dosing, respectively. In the high-dose groups, >95% inhibition was detected at 24-72 h postinfusion and significant inhibition was observed for 2 weeks. Similar inhibitory effects were detected in isolated CD31+ cells, and miR-92a-3p expression was also inhibited in extracellular vesicles in the high-dose group. Target derepression was measured in whole blood and showed that ITGA5 and CD93 were increased at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg. Single-cell RNA sequencing of peripheral blood cells revealed a cell type-specific derepression of miR-92a targets. Together this study demonstrates that systemic infusion of anti-miR-92a efficiently inhibits miR-92a in the peripheral blood compartment and derepresses miR-92a targets in humans.

A Novel Somatostatin-Dopamine Chimera (BIM23B065) Reduced GH Secretion in a First-in-Human Clinical Trial.

Context: A somatostatin-dopamine chimera (BIM23B065) was under investigation to reduce GH secretion for the treatment of pituitary adenomas. Objective: To determine pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability and to monitor hormonal changes after single and multiple subcutaneous BIM23B065 administrations. Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design with five single and three 13-day multiple ascending-dose cohorts. Patients: A total of 63 healthy male white volunteers were enrolled (47 active, 16 placebo). Main Outcome Measures: Pharmacokinetics, GH, prolactin (PRL), IGF-1, GH after GHRH administration, and general clinical safety criteria. Results: The maximum dosage of BIM23B065 administered in this study was 1.5 mg. BIM23B065 reduced the mean GH concentrations after 8 and 13 days of treatment. A decrease in GH release after GHRH administration indicated inhibition of the hypothalamic-pituitary-somatotropic axis. IGF-1 was not altered after single doses but showed a significant change from baseline after multiple dosing. PRL secretion was reduced in all subjects who were treated. Orthostatic hypotension and injection site reactions were commonly observed at high dosages. A 6-day uptitration period was included to successfully lower the cardiovascular effects in the multiple ascending dose part of the study. Conclusions: Proof of pharmacology of BIM23B065 was shown by a reduction in GH, IGF-1, and PRL concentrations in healthy male volunteers, supporting activity of the somatostatin analog and dopamine agonist moieties. The safety and tolerability of the higher dosing regions was limited mainly by orthostatic hypotension.

Bioequipotency of idraparinux and idrabiotaparinux after once weekly dosing in healthy volunteers and patients treated for acute deep vein thrombosis.

AIM: To assess the bioequipotency of equimolar doses of idraparinux (2.5 mg) and idrabiotaparinux (3.0 mg). METHOD: In a phase I study, 48 healthy male volunteers were randomized to a single subcutaneous injection of idrabiotaparinux or idraparinux, followed by plasma sampling over 27 days. In a prospective substudy of the phase III EQUINOX trial, 228 patients treated for acute symptomatic deep vein thrombosis received idrabiotaparinux or idraparinux once weekly for 6 months. Plasma sampling was performed within 5 days following the last injection. The primary pharmacodynamic endpoint was the inhibition of activated factor X (FXa) activity. Maximal anti-FXa activity (Amax) and area under anti-FXa activity vs. time curve (AAUC) were calculated. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: In both studies, pharmacodynamic anti-FXa vs. time profiles of idrabiotaparinux and idraparinux were superimposable. Ratio estimates (90% confidence intervals [CIs]) for idrabiotaparinux : idraparinux were 0.96 (0.89, 1.04) for Amax and 0.95 (0.87, 1.04) for AAUC in the phase I study, and 1.11 (1.00, 1.22) for Amax and 1.06 (0.96, 1.16) for AAUC at month 6 in the EQUINOX substudy. Idrabiotaparinux and idraparinux were considered bioequipotent because 90% CIs were within the pre-specified interval (0.80, 1.25). Study treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Pharmacodynamic parameters reported after single dose in healthy volunteers and after repeated once weekly dosing in patients demonstrated the bioequipotency of idrabiotaparinux and idraparinux based on FXa inhibition. These outcomes support the use of an idrabiotaparinux dose bioequipotent to an idraparinux dose in large clinical trials, and the possibility to substitute idrabiotaparinux to idraparinux for the treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Residual effects of middle-of-the-night administration of zaleplon and zolpidem on driving ability, memory functions, and psychomotor performance.

Thirty healthy volunteers participated in this two-part study. Part 1 was a single-blind, two-period crossover design to determine the effects of a single dose of ethanol (0.03% < BAC < 0.05%) or ethanol-placebo on driving ability, memory, and psychomotor performance. Part 2 was a double-blind, five-period crossover design to measure the effects of a middle-of-the-night administration of zaleplon 10 or 20 mg, zolpidem 10 or 20 mg, or placebo on driving ability 4 hours after administration and memory and psychomotor performance 6 hours after administration. The on-the-road driving test consisted of operating an instrumented automobile over a 100-km highway circuit at a constant speed (95 km/h) while maintaining a steady lateral position between the right lane boundaries. The standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP) was the primary performance parameter of the driving test. The psychomotor and memory test battery consisted of the Word Learning Test, the Critical Tracking Test, the Divided Attention Test, and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test. Data for each part were analyzed separately using ANOVA for crossover designs. Zaleplon 10 and 20 mg did not significantly impair driving ability 4 hours after middle-of-the-night administration. Relative to placebo, after zolpidem 10 mg, SDLP was significantly elevated, but the magnitude of the difference was small and not likely to be of clinical importance. Memory and psychomotor test performance was unaffected after both doses of zaleplon and zolpidem 10 mg. In contrast, zolpidem 20 mg significantly increased SDLP and speed variability. Further, zolpidem 20 mg significantly impaired performance on all psychomotor and memory tests. Finally, driving performance, Digit Symbol Substitution Test, Divided Attention Test, and immediate and delayed free recall of the Word Learning Test were significantly impaired after ethanol. The results show that zaleplon (10 and 20 mg) is a safe hypnotic devoid of next-morning residual impairment when used in the middle of the night.

Differential residual effects of zaleplon and zopiclone on actual driving: a comparison with a low dose of alcohol.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare residual effects of zaleplon 10 mg, zopiclone 7.5 mg, and placebo, and a social dose of alcohol on car driving, memory, and psychomotor performance. DESIGN: Two-part placebo controlled, crossover study. Part 1 was single blind, Part 2 double blind. SETTING: University research institute. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty healthy volunteers (15 men and 15 women, mean age 32 +/- 7 years) INTERVENTIONS: In Part 1 alcohol and alcohol-placebo drinks were administered around noon. In Part 2 single oral doses of zaleplon 10 mg, zopiclone 7.5 mg and placebo were administered at bedtime. MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS: A highway driving test, laboratory tests of word learning, critical tracking and divided attention, and subjective assessments of sleep, mood, and effects of treatments on driving. Driving started 40 minutes after a second alcohol dose in Part 1, and 10 hours after drug intake in Part 2. The results demonstrated that alcohol, at average plasma concentrations of approximately 0.030 g/dl, significantly impaired performance in all tests. Zaleplon's residual effects did not differ significantly from those of placebo in any test. In contrast, zopiclone had significant residual effects on driving, divided attention, and memory. The magnitude of impairment in the driving test observed the morning after zopiclone 7.5 mg was twice that observed with alcohol. CONCLUSION: Zaleplon 10 mg has no residual effects on driving when taken at bedtime, 10 hours before driving. In contrast, zopiclone 7.5 mg can cause marked residual impairment. Patients should be advised to avoid driving the morning after zopiclone administration.

Noise-induced sleep maintenance insomnia: hypnotic and residual effects of zaleplon.

AIMS: The primary objective of the study was to assess the residual effects of zaleplon in the morning, 4 h after a middle-of-the-night administration. The secondary objective was to investigate the effectiveness of zaleplon in promoting sleep in healthy volunteers with noise-induced sleep maintenance insomnia. METHODS: Thirteen healthy male and female volunteers (aged 20-30 years) with normal hearing, who were sensitive to the sleep-disrupting effects of noise, participated in a double-blind, placebo- and active-drug controlled, four-period cross-over study. The subjects were permitted to sleep for 5 h (22.45-03.45 h) in a quiet environment before they were awoken. At 04.00 h they ingested 10 mg zaleplon, 20 mg zaleplon, 7.5 mg zopiclone (active control), or placebo before a second period of sleep (04.00-08.00 h), during which they were exposed to an 80 dB(A) 1 kHz pure tone pulse with an inter-tone interval of 1 s and a duration of 50 ms. The sound stimulus was stopped after 10 min of persistent sleep or after 2 h if the subject had not fallen asleep. Residual effects were assessed at 08.00 h (4 h after drug administration) using the digit symbol substitution test (DSST), choice reaction time (CRT), critical flicker fusion (CFF), and immediate and delayed free recall of a 20 word list. The data were analysed by analysis of variance. A Bonferroni adjustment was made for the three active treatments compared with placebo. RESULTS: There were no residual effects of zaleplon (10 and 20 mg) compared with placebo. Zopiclone impaired memory by delaying the free recall of words (P = 0.001) and attenuated performance on DSST (P = 0.004) and CRT (P = 0.001), compared with placebo. Zaleplon reduced the latency to persistent sleep (10 mg, P = 0.001; 20 mg, P = 0.014) and the 20 mg dose reduced stage 1 sleep (P = 0.012) compared with placebo. Zopiclone reduced stage 1 sleep (P = 0.001), increased stage 3 sleep (P = 0.0001) and increased total sleep time (P = 0.003), compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Zaleplon (10 mg and 20 mg), administered in the middle of the night 4 h before arising, shortens sleep onset without impairing next-day performance.

Pharmacodynamic profile of Zaleplon, a new non-benzodiazepine hypnotic agent.

The challenge in developing hypnotic agents for the treatment of insomnia is to balance the sedative effect needed at bedtime with the residual sedation on awakening. Zaleplon is a novel pyrazolopyrimidine hypnotic agent that acts as a selective agonist to the brain omega(1) receptor situated on the alpha(1) subunit of the GABA(A) receptor complex. Zaleplon was proven to be an effective hypnotic drug as it consistently and significantly reduced latency to persistent sleep in insomniac patients for doses of 10 mg and above in polysomnography studies. The pharmacodynamic profile of zaleplon on psychomotor performance, actual driving and cognitive function, including memory, was assessed in several randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in healthy young subjects as well as insomniac patients by using various positive controls (zolpidem, zopiclone, triazolam and flurazepam). The recommended hypnotic dose of zaleplon in young adults (10 mg) produced minimal or no impairment of psychomotor and memory performance even when administered during the night as little as 1 h before waking. No impairment of actual driving was observed when zaleplon 10 mg was administered either at bedtime or in the middle of the night as little as 4 h before waking. Zaleplon 20 mg, twice the recommended dose, generally produced significant impairment of performance and cognitive functions when these functions were measured at the time of peak plasma concentration, i.e. 1 h after dose administration, and no impairment of driving abilities was observed 4 h after a middle-of-the-night administration. In contrast, consistent detrimental residual effects on various aspects of psychomotor and cognitive functions were observed with the therapeutic doses of the various commonly prescribed hypnotic agents used as comparators, e.g. zolpidem 10 mg up to 5 h after dose administration, zopiclone 7.5 mg up to 10 h after, flurazepam 30 mg up to 14 h after and triazolam 0.25 mg up to 6 h after. Also, zolpidem 10 mg and zopiclone 7.5 mg were also shown to significantly impair driving ability the next morning when this was measured 4 h and up to 10 h after dose administration, respectively. The present review shows that zaleplon 10 mg has little or no residual effect when administered in the middle of the night, as late as 1 h before waking, and is devoid of impairment of driving abilities as assessed by actual driving 4 h after dose administration. The lack of clinically significant or minimally statistically significant residual effects of zaleplon even at its peak concentration may be explained by its unique pharmacokinetic (rapid elimination half-life) and pharmacodynamic (low affinity, and specific binding profile to various subunits of the GABA(A)receptor) profiles. These properties allow zaleplon to be used for treatment of symptoms only when they occur, either at bedtime or later in the night, without incurring significant risk of developing next-day impairment of psychomotor and cognitive functioning. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Residual effects of zaleplon and zolpidem following middle of the night administration five hours to one hour before awakening.

The objective was to assess residual effects of zaleplon and zolpidem after a middle of the night administration. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, conducted in 40 healthy young male and female subjects. Subjects were awakened in the middle of the night and administered either placebo or zaleplon 10 or 20 mg or zolpidem 10 mg. A battery of objective tests exploring psychomotor and cognitive functions such as critical flicker fusion (CFF), choice reáction time (CRT), digit symbol substitution test (DSST), and memory tests (Sternberg memory scanning and a word list) were administered immediately after morning waking. Zaleplon 10 mg was devoid of residual effects whatever - the time of dosing - except a minimal but significant decrease in DSST scores when administered 1 h before awakening. Zaleplon 20 mg produced significant residual effects on performance (increase in CRT, and decrease in CFF threshold and in DSST scores) and memory (decrease in immediate and delayed free recall of words) only when administered 1 h before awakening. In contrast, zolpidem 10 mg produced significant detrimental residual effects on CRT and delayed free recall of words, when administered up to 5 h before waking, on DSST and Sternberg when administered up to 3 h before awakening and on CFF when administered 1 h before awakening. The residual effects of zolpidem 10 mg were more marked than those observed after zaleplon 20 mg. The present results demonstrate that zaleplon 10 mg has no or minimal residual effects when administered in the middle of the night as little as 1 h before waking. The lack of clinically significant residual effects with zaleplon may be explained by its unique pharmacokinetic (rapid elimination half-life) and pharmacodynamic (selective binding for GABA(A) receptors with the alpha(1) subunit, dissociation between sleep inducing properties and impairment of cognitive functions) profiles. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.