Evaluating the Outcomes of Managing Displaced Clavicular Fractures by Using Precontoured Clavicular Plates.

Background and objective Midshaft clavicular fractures were managed conservatively in the past, with a significant incidence of nonunion and poor functional outcomes in displaced fractures. Anatomically precontoured clavicle plates, since their introduction, have proved to be a superior method for managing these fractures. While open reduction and internal fixation of displaced clavicular fractures with plates have produced successful functional outcomes, complications like plate prominence, scar, postoperative numbness, wound dehiscence, refracture, and infection continue to discourage surgeons from plating these fractures. This study aimed to evaluate whether the precontoured 3.5-mm locking compression plate (LCP) for the clavicle is effective in the management of displaced clavicular fractures with minimum risk of complications. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted among 26 patients with displaced clavicular fractures that were managed with 3.5-mm precontoured LCP. The functional outcome was assessed by using the Constant-Murley Score (CMS) and healing was assessed radiographically six months postoperatively. Results Twenty-five patients were available for the final follow-up at the end of 24 weeks. All of them achieved excellent functional scores. The mean CMS was 94.9. No complication was observed in 85% of the cases. Implant failure was observed in both fractures of a bilateral clavicle fracture patient within a month of surgery. Implant irritation without prominence was seen in one patient and another had a prominent postoperative scar. The mean time for the radiological union was 13.8 weeks with union time ranging from three to five months. Conclusions Based on our findings, employing 3.5-mm precontoured clavicular LCPs is a useful technique that can provide good functional outcomes in displaced clavicular fractures.

A Tertiary Care Centre Experience of Recurrent Giant Cell Tumor Around the Knee Joint.

INTRODUCTION: Giant cell tumor (GCT) is a benign but locally aggressive bone tumor. It has a peak incidence between 30-40 years with a predilection for the epiphyseal/metaphyseal region of bone. The most common locations for bone GCT are the distal femur, proximal tibia, distal radius, and sacrum in decreasing order. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 22 patients (13 females and nine males) with recurrent giant cell tumors around the knee joint between 2009-2022, with a mean age of 30.2 years (range: 18-55) were included. The patients were followed up monthly for three months, three-monthly for the next two years, six-monthly for the next five years, and thereafter, yearly. The mean follow-up period was 36.97 months (range 23-120 months). RESULTS: There were 19 recurrences after curettages and three after resections. Re-extended curettage was done in 17 cases and the resultant cavities were filled with autologous bone grafts in six and with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) cement in the other 11 cases. Reconstruction with megaprosthesis was done in two patients whereas knee arthrodesis was done in two patients after wide resection. The average Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score of our series of 22 patients was 23.1 (Range: 19-30). CONCLUSION: Campanacci grade 1 and 2 lesions can be successfully treated with extended curettage and bone grafting/bone cementing. For patients with grade 3 lesions, there are two options available according to the financial status of the patient; the first option is reconstruction with prosthesis and the other option is arthrodesis.

Intercalary Elbow Resection and Arthrodesis for Giant Cell Tumor of Distal Humerus: Something Is Better Than Nothing.

Giant cell tumor (GCT) of the bone is a benign, locally aggressive neoplasm of epiphyseal origin. Most common sites for GCTs include the distal femur, proximal tibia, and the distal end of radius with the distal humerus being involved rarely. GCT is predominantly managed by extended curettage followed by adjuvant therapy to reduce recurrence. Juxta-articular GCTs are difficult to manage due to the destruction of the articular cartilage and subchondral bone which necessitates the need for joint reconstruction or fusion to salvage the joint. Aggressive and recurrent GCTs can be managed by wide resection of the tumor to reduce local recurrence followed by joint reconstruction or fusion. Joint reconstruction using a total elbow arthroplasty has been described for limb salvage as it provides a good functional outcome. We present a case of an aggressive GCT of the distal humerus that was treated using wide resection with humero-ulnar arthrodesis as an alternative in situations where joint reconstruction is not possible due to the unavailability of the prosthesis or socio-economic factors. The patient was asymptomatic after two years of follow-up, had no signs of recurrence, and had good hand functions.