Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Front Neurol ; 15: 1461320, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39296954

RESUMO

Background: FNDs mimicking a stroke represent a growing challenge in the emergency department (ED). A comprehensive diagnostic approach involving clinical evaluation and neuroimaging is essential to differentiate stroke from mimics. The safety profile of thrombolysis justifies its use where FNDs cannot be ruled out. This approach highlights the need for more precise diagnostic tools and protocols to improve patient care and reduce unnecessary treatments. Distinguishing FNDs from actual cerebrovascular events is critical yet difficult, particularly under time constraints. Given the urgency and potential severity of strokes, intravenous thrombolysis is frequently administered even when FNDs cannot be definitively excluded. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data of participants admitted to the Trieste University Hospital Stroke Unit between January 2018 and December 2022, focusing on those presenting with sudden-onset focal neurological deficits mimicking a stroke, with some presenting within the reperfusion treatment window (<4.5 h from symptoms onset). We obtained detailed clinical evaluations and neuroimaging, and administered thrombolytic therapy in selected cases. Results and discussion: We included 84 participants presenting with stroke mimics (average age of 45 yo) predominantly female (65.5%). Most common presentations: hemiparesis or hemisensory loss (75%), speech disorder (10.7%), vertigo/gait disorders (4.8%). History of psychiatric disorders was found in 32.1% of cases, and 48.8% had prior neurological disease or stroke risk factors. Advanced neuroimaging was performed in 43 cases yielding normal or non-specific results. Thrombolysis was safely administered in 31%. Patients mostly recovered within the first 24 h from admission (44.7%). We compared this FND's sample with 291 patients with mild ischemic stroke (NIHSS ≤7).

2.
Seizure ; 106: 80-84, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36803830

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Status epilepticus (SE) is a time-dependent neurological emergency. The current study evaluated the prognostic value of admission neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with status epilepticus. METHODS: In this retrospective observational cohort study we included all consecutive patients discharged from our neurology unit with the clinical or EEG diagnosis of SE from 2012 to 2022. Stepwise multivariate analysis was conducted to test the association of NLR with length of hospitalization, need for Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission and 30 days mortality. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify the best cutoff for NLR to identify patients who will need ICU admission. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were enrolled in our study. NLR was correlated with length of hospitalization (p = 0.020) and need for ICU admission ( p = 0.046). In addition, the risk of ICU admission increased in patients with intracranial hemorrhage and length of hospitalization was correlated with C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CRP/ALB). ROC analysis identified a NLR of 3.6 as best cutoff value to discriminate need of ICU admission (area under the curve [AUC]=0.678; p = 0.011; Youden's index=0.358; sensitivity, 90.5%, specificity, 45.3%). DISCUSSION: In patients with SE admission NLR could be a predictor of length of hospitalization and need for ICU admission.


Assuntos
Linfócitos , Neutrófilos , Humanos , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Hospitalização , Curva ROC , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA