Appropriate antimicrobial prescribing for bacteriuria before urological procedures: a room for improvement.

In the presence of a positive pre-operative urine culture, the prescription of a pre-operative antibiotic therapy is recommended. The choice of antibiotic therapy and prescription are usually made by the urologist or the general practitioner (GP). The objective of the treatment is urinary sterilization rather than parenchymal treatment, and the treatment choice is key to reduce selective pressure and antimicrobial resistance. The objective of this study was to evaluate prescription patterns made by urologists and GPs, then to compare the antibiotics chosen by urologists or GPs to the "ideal" treatment defined by infectious diseases specialists. We retrospectively reviewed all positive pre-operative urine cultures obtained between November 2022 and July 2023. Data pertaining to antibiotic prescriptions, including the duration of treatment, antibiotic class, and prescriber were collected. An infectious disease specialist conducted a blind review of each urine culture, providing recommendations for the most appropriate antibiotic based on their assessment. In cases of disagreement, a second infectious disease specialist conducted a similar evaluation. Out of 196 pre-operative antibiotic prescriptions, 40 (20%) differed from the recommendations provided by the infectious disease specialist, with 39 involving the use of overly broad-spectrum antibiotics. Both infectious disease specialists yielded congruent recommendations in all cases. Notably, in 50% of these instances, the pre-operative antibiotic treatment duration unduly exceeded 48 hours. A statistically significant increase (4.84 days vs 2.99 days) in pre-operative treatment duration was observed when a GP was the prescriber (p<0.001). There is room for improvement of urologists' antibiotic prescription practices to reduce the ecological impact on the patient's microbiota and on a global scale. The delegation to GPs resulted in unjustified longer treatment durations and should be avoided without dedicated training. Level of evidence : 4.

H2 inhalation therapy in patients with moderate COVID-19 (H2COVID): a prospective ascending-dose phase I clinical trial.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has triggered a serious global health crisis, resulting in millions of reported deaths since its initial identification in China in November 2019. The global disparities in immunization access emphasize the urgent need for ongoing research into therapeutic interventions. This study focuses on the potential use of molecular dihydrogen (H2) inhalation as an adjunctive treatment for COVID-19. H2 therapy shows promise in inhibiting intracellular signaling pathways associated with inflammation, particularly when administered early in conjunction with nasal oxygen therapy. This phase I study, characterized by an open-label, prospective, monocentric, and single ascending-dose design, seeks to assess the safety and tolerability of the procedure in individuals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Employing a 3 + 3 design, the study includes three exposure durations (target durations): 1 day (D1), 3 days (D2), and 6 days (D3). We concluded that the maximum tolerated duration is at least 3 days. Every patient showed clinical improvement and excellent tolerance to H2 therapy. To the best of our knowledge, this phase I clinical trial is the first to establish the safety of inhaling a mixture of H2 (3.6%) and N2 (96.4%) in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The original device and method employed ensure the absence of explosion risk. The encouraging outcomes observed in the 12 patients included in the study justify further exploration through larger, controlled clinical trials. CLINICAL TRIALS: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04633980.

Clinical impact and cost-consequence analysis of ePlex® blood culture identification panels for the rapid diagnosis of bloodstream infections: a single-center randomized controlled trial.

To assess clinical impact and perform cost-consequence analysis of the broadest multiplex PCR panels available for the rapid diagnosis of bloodstream infections (BSI). Single-center, randomized controlled trial conducted from June 2019 to February 2021 at a French University hospital with an institutional antimicrobial stewardship program. Primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with optimized antimicrobial treatment 12 h after transmission of positivity and Gram stain results from the first positive BC. This percentage was significantly higher in the multiplex PCR (mPCR) group (90/105 = 85.7% %, CI95% [77.5 ; 91.8] vs. 68/107 = 63.6%, CI95% [53.7 ; 72.6]; p < 10- 3) at interim analysis, resulting in the early termination of the study after the inclusion of 309 patients. For patients not optimized at baseline, the median time to obtain an optimized therapy was much shorter in the mPCR group than in the control group (6.9 h, IQR [2.9; 17.8] vs. 26.4 h, IQR [3.4; 47.5]; p = 0.001). Early optimization of antibiotic therapy resulted in a non-statistically significant decrease in mortality from 12.4 to 8.8% (p = 0.306), with a trend towards a shorter median length of stay (18 vs. 20 days; p = 0.064) and a non-significant reduction in the average cost per patient of €3,065 (p = 0.15). mPCR identified all the bacteria present in 88% of the samples. Despite its higher laboratory cost, the use of multiplex PCR for BSI diagnosis leads to early-optimised therapy, seems cost-effective and could reduce mortality and length of stay. Their impact could probably be improved if implemented 24/7.

ANTIFON-CLIC®, a new clinical decision support system for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis: is it clinically relevant?

BACKGROUND: Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is increasing especially in new groups of patients. Despite advances in management, morbidity and mortality related to IA remain high. Thus, Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) dedicated to IA are needed to promote the optimal antifungal for each group of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter cohort study involving intensive care units and medical units. Adult patients who received caspofungin, isavuconazole, itraconazole, liposomal amphotericin B, posaconazole, or voriconazole, for the treatment of IA were eligible for enrollment. The primary objective was the concordance between the clinician's prescription and the prescription recommended by the CDSS. The secondary objective was the concordance according to different hospitals, departments, and indications. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients (n=88) from three medical hospitals were included. The overall concordance was 97% (85/88) including 100% (41/41) for center A, 92% (23/25) for center B, and 95% (21/22) for center C. There was no significant difference in concordance among the hospitals (P=0.973), the departments (P=1.000), and the indications (P=0.799). The concordance was 70% (7/10) for isavuconazole due to its use as an empirical treatment and 100% (78/78) for the other antifungals. DISCUSSION: The concordance rate was high whatever the hospital, the department, and the indication. The only discrepancy was attributed to the use of isavuconazole as an empirical treatment which is a therapeutic option not included in the CDSS. CONCLUSIONS: This new CDSS dedicated to IA is meeting the clinical practice. Its implementation in routine will help to support antifungal stewardship.

Survey on infectious disease telephone hotlines in primary care: General practitioners' satisfaction and compliance with advice.

OBJECTIVES: Infectious disease (ID) advice is a major part of antimicrobial stewardship programs. The objective of this study was to assess general practitioners' (GPs)' opinions and compliance with advice given by ID hotlines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter survey was based on the 7-day assessment of initial advice requested by GPs to a hotline set up by volunteer hospital ID teams to record advice for 3 years. The primary endpoint was the GPs' satisfaction with the advice given by ID specialists. RESULTS: Ten ID teams participated in the study and recorded 4138 requests for advice, of which 1325 requests included a proposal for antibiotic therapy and justified a follow-up call at seven days. Only 398 follow-up calls (30%) were carried out because many GPs were not reachable. GPs were very satisfied with ID hotlines: 58% considered them indispensable and 38% very useful. The recommendations provided by ID specialists were followed by GPs in more than 80% of cases. The two main motivations for GPs to call the hotline were to get quick advice (86%) and to receive help in managing a patient (76%). CONCLUSIONS: The ID telephone consultations and advice systems for GPs are highly appreciated and are effective in terms of following the recommendations.

SPILF update on bacterial arthritis in adults and children.

In 2020 the French Society of Rhumatology (SFR) published an update of the 1990 recommendations for management of bacterial arthritis in adults. While we (French ID Society, SPILF) totally endorse this update, we wished to provide further information about specific antibiotic treatments. The present update focuses on antibiotics with good distribution in bone and joint. It is important to monitor their dosage, which should be maximized according to PK/PD parameters. Dosages proposed in this update are high, with the optimized mode of administration for intravenous betalactams (continuous or intermittent infusion). We give tools for the best dosage adaptation to conditions such as obesity or renal insufficiency. In case of enterobacter infection, with an antibiogram result "susceptible for high dosage", we recommend the requesting of specialized advice from an ID physician. More often than not, it is possible to prescribe antibiotics via the oral route as soon as blood cultures are sterile and clinical have symptoms shown improvement. Duration of antibiotic treatment is 6 weeks for Staphylococcus aureus, and 4 weeks for the other bacteria (except for Neisseria: 7 days).

SARS-CoV-2 nosocomial infection acquired in a French university hospital during the 1st wave of the Covid-19 pandemic, a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: In healthcare facilities, nosocomial transmissions of respiratory viruses are a major issue. SARS-CoV-2 is not exempt from nosocomial transmission. Our goals were to describe COVID-19 nosocomial cases during the first pandemic wave among patients in a French university hospital and compliance with hygiene measures. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study in Grenoble Alpes University Hospital from 01/03/2020 to 11/05/2020. We included all hospitalised patients with a documented SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Nosocomial case was defined by a delay of 5 days between hospitalisation and first symptoms. Hygiene measures were evaluated between 11/05/2020 and 22/05/2020. Lockdown measures were effective in France on 17/03/2020 and ended on 11/05/2020. Systematic wearing of mask was mandatory for all healthcare workers (HCW) and visits were prohibited in our institution from 13/03/2021 and for the duration of the lockdown period. RESULTS: Among 259 patients included, 14 (5.4%) were considered as nosocomial COVID-19. Median time before symptom onset was 25 days (interquartile range: 12-42). Eleven patients (79%) had risk factors for severe COVID-19. Five died (36%) including 4 deaths attributable to COVID-19. Two clusters were identified. The first cluster had 5 cases including 3 nosocomial acquisitions and no tested HCWs were positive. The second cluster had 3 cases including 2 nosocomial cases and 4 HCWs were positive. Surgical mask wearing and hand hygiene compliance were adequate for 95% and 61% of HCWs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The number of nosocomial COVID-19 cases in our hospital was low. Compliance regarding mask wearing, hand hygiene and lockdown measures drastically reduced transmission of the virus. Monitoring of nosocomial COVID-19 cases during the first wave enabled us to determine to what extent the hygiene measures taken were effective and patients protected. Trial registration Study ethics approval was obtained retrospectively on 30 September 2020 (CECIC Rhône-Alpes-Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, IRB 5891).

Should we expand the indications for the DAIR (debridement, antibiotic therapy, and implant retention) procedure for Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infections? A multicenter retrospective study.

To evaluate factors associated with failure in patients treated with DAIR (debridement, antibiotic therapy, and implant retention) for Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with stable PJI due to S. aureus treated with DAIR at six hospitals between 2010 and 2014. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to study factors associated with treatment failure at 2 years. Of 154 eligible patients, 137 were included (mean age 73 ± 13 years; male 56%). The estimated success rate according to the Kaplan-Meier method was 76.2 [95% CI 68-83] at 2 years of follow-up. In multivariate analysis, longer duration of treatment (hazard ratio (HR) 0.78 [0.69-0.88]; p < 0.001) and combination therapy including rifampin (HR 0.08 [0.018-0.36]; p = 0.001) were independently associated with success, whereas active smoking was independently associated with failure (HR 3.6 [1.09-11.84]; p = 0.036). When the analysis was restricted to patients with early infection onset (< 3 months), early acute infection was also predictive of a better prognosis (HR 0.25 [0.09-0.7]; p = 0.009). Failure was not associated with time from prosthesis insertion to debridement, nor with duration of symptoms > 3 weeks and type of prosthesis (hip or knee). These results remained unchanged when the 14 patients under immunosuppressive therapy were removed from analysis. These data suggest that DAIR can be performed even if infection and symptoms are delayed but reserved to patients who are able to follow rifampin-based combination therapy for a prolonged duration that should not be different for hip and knee PJI.

Incidence and prevention of infective endocarditis and bacteraemia after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a French university hospital: a retrospective study.

Infective endocarditis (IE) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a rare but severe complication. Among 326 patients who underwent TAVI at Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, six (1.8%) cases of IE and 11 (3.4%) cases of bacteraemia were identified. No cases of IE were linked to the intervention; one was due to Staphylococcus aureus despite a screening and targeted decolonization strategy. This underscores the need for randomized studies to evaluate the benefit and cost-effectiveness of this policy.

[Screening program for tuberculosis among international exchange students in the Department of Isère]. / Dépistage de la tuberculose chez les étudiants étrangers en échange international en Isère.

INTRODUCTION: France is a low-incidence country for tuberculosis (TB). Consequently screening is focused on high-risk populations, in particular migrants. The aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology of TB among international exchange students in the Department of Isère and the screening programs used. METHODS: We carried out an organizational audit based on interviews with physicians involved in the management of TB in Isère. We conducted a retrospective descriptive study based on a case series of foreign students treated for TB from 2003 to 2013 inclusively. RESULTS: Forty-six international exchange students were treated for active TB during this time, representing an average incidence of 284/100,000. Two thirds of our studied population were Africans, 72% were asymptomatic at the time of screening. A quarter of our cohort developed TB after the initial screening. Thirty-one cases were confirmed bacteriologically, mainly through bronchoscopy. Outcome (radiological and clinical) on quadruple therapy was satisfactory in all patients. Two patients relapsed, one of them with multi-drug resistant TB. CONCLUSION: Our work confirms that international exchange students are a population at high risk of TB and that screening of this population is essential. The significant number of active TB cases diagnosed after the initial screening stresses the importance of diagnosis and follow up of patients with latent TB infection.

Assessment of linezolid prescriptions in three French hospitals.

The use of linezolid to treat gram-positive cocci infections is increasing in France. Linezolid is approved in pneumonia and complicated skin and soft tissue infections. Overuse and misuse of linezolid can favor the emergence and spreading of linezolid-resistant strains. We aimed to assess the appropriateness of linezolid use in French hospitals. This is a multicenter, retrospective study conducted in three tertiary care hospitals. Appropriateness of linezolid indications and adequacy (composite score concerning dosage, route of administration and blood monitoring) were assessed. Over a three-month period, all prescriptions of linezolid were extracted and analyzed by two independent infectious disease experts. Among the 81 initial prescriptions that were evaluated, indication was appropriate in 48% of cases. Among those, 51% complied with international guidelines. Fifty-seven percent of the prescriptions were adequate regarding dosage, route of administration and blood monitoring. Overall, 23% of prescriptions combined both appropriateness and adequacy. The most frequent reasons for inappropriateness were the possibility of choosing narrower-spectrum antibiotics and the empirical use of linezolid in severe sepsis or septic shock. Initial treatment was the most frequently appropriate in bone and joint infection cases (p = 0.001). Our study shows that even if modalities of use were mostly correct, appropriateness of linezolid indications is low. Educational programs are mandatory to improve practices, as well as clinical studies to better assess the efficacy and safety of linezolid in clinical situations other than pneumonia or complicated skin and soft tissue infections.

Lactobacillus bacteremia: Pathogen or prognostic marker?

OBJECTIVE: Lactobacillus bacteremia is a rare event and its epidemiology is poorly known. Whether Lactobacillus bacteremia is a contaminant, a risk factor, or a risk marker of death remains an open question. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients presenting with Lactobacillus bacteremia (LB), between January 2005 and December 2014, at the Grenoble University Hospital. RESULTS: LB was observed in 38 patients (0.34% of all positive blood cultures). Cancer (40%), immunosuppression (37%), and use of central venous devices (29%) were frequently associated with LB. We observed a significant increase with time in the number of Lactobacillus positive blood cultures among all blood cultures performed (P=0.04). LBs were divided into two clinical-biological presentations: secondary bacteremia with a known portal of entry (n=30) and isolated bacteremia (n=8). Case fatality was 31% at D28, 55.2% at 1 year in the secondary bacteremia group, and 12.5% (both at D28 and 1 year) in the isolated bacteremia group. Secondary bacteremia with a known portal of entry was significantly associated with case fatality after adjustment for age, co-infection, cancer, immunosuppression, diabetes, and sex (OR 14.9 [1.04-216] P=0.047) for fatality at one year, but not for D28 fatality (P=0.14). CONCLUSION: Lactobacillus bacteremia may be an important marker of disease severity rather than a pathogen, suggesting comorbidities. It should not be considered a contaminant, but should lead physicians to screen for associated infections and underlying diseases.

Is brain angio-MRI useful in infective endocarditis management?

In infective endocarditis (IE), brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is helpful to diagnose clinically silent neurological events. We assessed the usefulness of systematic early brain MRI in IE diagnosis and medico-surgical management. Over a period of 1 year, all patients admitted in one of the three hospitals participating in and fulfilling the Duke criteria for definite or possible IE underwent cerebral MRI within 7 days of IE suspicion. Eight panels of experts analyzed the records a posteriori. For each case, one record with and one record without the MRI results were randomly assigned to two panels, which determined the theoretical diagnosis and treatment. Paired comparisons were performed using a symmetry test. Thirty-seven brain MRIs were performed within a median of 5 days after inclusion. MRI was pathological in 26 patients (70 %), showing 62 % microischemia and 58 % microbleeds. The expert advice did not differ significantly between the two evaluations (with or without the MRI results). The therapeutic strategies determined diverged in five cases (13.5 %). Diagnosis differed in two cases (5.4 %), with an upgrading of diagnosis from possible to definite IE using MRI results. Early brain MRI did not significantly affect the IE diagnosis and medico-surgical treatment plan. These results suggest that systematic use of early brain MRI is irrelevant in IE. Further studies are necessary to define whether MRI is mandatory in IE management within a multidisciplinary approach, with particular attention paid to better timing and the subset of patients in whom this imaging examination could be beneficial.

Impact of systemic antifungal therapy on the detection of Candida species in blood cultures in clinical cases of candidemia.

The diagnosis and follow-up of candidemia still rely on blood cultures (BCs). In vitro studies show that antifungals can significantly modify the result of blood culture not containing adsorbing agents. We aimed to evaluate, under clinical conditions, the impact on BC yeast detection of systemic antifungal therapy (SAT). Patients (n = 125) experiencing candidemia at Grenoble University Hospital (France) were included in a 4-year retrospective study. The Plus Aerobic/F (Aerobic) and Plus Anaerobic/F (Anaerobic) bottles, which both contain adsorbing resins and the non-resin selective Mycosis IC/F (Mycosis) bottles, were compared using multivariate hierarchical models adjusted for clinical characteristics. The positivity rate (PR) is decreased in patients with SAT (p < 0.01), abdominal surgery (p = 0.01), and hemodialysis (p = 0.02). In all bottles, SAT reduces PR by a factor of 0.16 (95 % CI: [0.08; 0.32]) and increases the time to positivity (TTP) by a factor of 1.76 ([1.30; 2.40]; p < 0.01). In the presence of SAT, TTP is higher in non-resin bottles (Mycosis) than in resin bottles (RR = 1.76, [1.30; 2.40]); however, the TTP in nonresin and resin bottles remains comparable. Although discordant results are observed with and without SAT (37 and 58 % respectively), we showed that the presence of SAT decreases significantly the agreement rate by a factor of 0.29 (CI: [0.12; 0.68]). The combination of Anaerobic and Mycosis bottles allowed a 100 % positivity rate for C. glabrata. SAT significantly affects BC results. Because they provide additional and complementary results, this study supports the concomitant use of resin and selective bottles, especially in patients receiving SAT.

Compliance with carbapenem guidelines in a university hospital.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate carbapenem prescription compliance with guidelines for nosocomial and community-acquired infections. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective study over a four-month period at our university hospital. We included all adult and pediatric hospitalized patients who had received at least one dose of carbapenem. Data was collected from patients' medical records (hard copy and computerized data; CristalLink software). Compliance with guidelines was assessed by two infectious disease specialists. Assessment criteria included indication, antibiotic choice, dosage, and treatment duration. RESULTS: We included 152 patients in the study (65.4% of men). Carbapenem prescription was appropriate for 76.3% of prescriptions. The use of carbapenems was considered appropriate for 73.9% of empirical prescriptions and for 77.8% of documented prescriptions. Non-compliance with guidelines was mainly due to prescriptions for community-acquired infections. Antibiotic de-escalation could not be initiated in 40.3% of patients and was only initiated in 51.7% of patients for whom it could be considered. Although the average treatment duration was 7.5 days, 23.7% of patients received carbapenems for more than 10 days. CONCLUSION: These results highlight the need for a strong carbapenem stewardship program in our hospital.