Prevalence of oral diseases in patients under palliative care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Oral alterations are frequently observed in patients undergoing palliative care and are linked to the direct or indirect effects of the primary medical condition, comorbidities and medical management, leading to oral pain, impacting oral intake, and affecting quality of life. This systematic review aims to assess the prevalence of oral disease in palliative care patients. METHODS: The protocol was registered at the PROSPERO database, and a systematic review of the literature was performed based on the PRISMA statement. A thorough evaluation of studies from five databases and gray literature was conducted. The risk of bias in each study was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for cross-sectional and case-control studies. A quantitative analysis was conducted on five studies using meta-analysis, and the degree of certainty in the evidence was determined using the GRADE tool. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 2,502 patients, with a slight male predominance (50.43%). The average age was 66.92 years. The prevalence of oral diseases among palliative care patients was as follows: caries 32% (95% CI, 0.11-0.56; I2 = 93%), and oral candidiasis 17% (95% CI,0.11-0.25; I2 = 74%). Gingivitis and stomatitis were also reported, but with less frequency. CONCLUSION: Dental intervention should take place as early as possible, ideally from the time of the patient's initial admission to palliative care, with regular monitoring of oral health. This approach can enhance the patient's comfort and quality of life and help prevent more severe complications in the future.

Surgical protocols for oral leukoplakia and precancerous lesions across three different anatomic sites.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the risk of recurrence and cancer progression after surgical treatment for oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD) and precancerous lesions in different anatomical sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in nine databases and grey literature. We included randomized controlled trials assessing surgical treatment efficacy for OPMD and precancerous lesions of cervical, vaginal, anal, and penile sites. Excision or ablation surgical treatments were considered. RESULTS: Overall, 12 studies met the eligibility criteria for oral leukoplakia (OL), proliferative verrucous leukoplakia, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia, and anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN). In qualitative analysis of surgical protocols, the lack of margin description impacts the clinical outcomes of OL and AIN, and the ablative protocols were heterogeneous in both OPMD and precancerous lesions. No significant difference in OL (risk ratio 0.82 [95% CI: 0.59-1.15]) and CIN (risk ratio 0.31 [95% CI: 0.09-1.09]) for recurrence was observed when cold-knife was compared with ablative protocols. OL exhibited higher recurrence and cancer progression rates compared to CIN and AIN. CONCLUSION: There is no difference in recurrence risk post-surgical treatment for OL and CIN. Surgical protocols for oral leukoplakia and CIN/AIN lack standardized approaches.

Histopathological risk assessment in multisite epithelial dysplasia: A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Histopathological grading of oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) is the current standard for stratifying cancer progression risk but is associated with subjectivity and variability. This problem is not commonly seen regarding the grading of epithelial dysplasia in other sites. This systematic review aims to compare grading systems for oral, anal, penile, and cervical epithelial dysplasia to determine their predictive accuracy for recurrence and malignant transformation (MT) outcomes. METHODS: The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023403035) and was reported according to the PRISMA checklist. A comprehensive search was performed in the main databases and gray literature. The risk of bias in individual studies was analyzed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for each study design. RESULTS: Forty-six studies were deemed eligible and included in this systematic review, of which 45 were included in the quantitative analysis. Meta-analysis revealed that the binary system demonstrated a higher predictive ability for MT/recurrence of OED compared to multilevel systems. Higher predictive accuracy of MT was also observed for binary grading systems in anal intraepithelial neoplasia. CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference was found between the current grading systems of epithelial dysplasia in different body parts. However, binary grading systems have shown better clinical outcomes.

Mapping the legacy of the World Workshop on Oral Medicine: a 35-year global bibliometric analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study utilized bibliometric methodologies to explore the body of research presented at the World Workshop on Oral Medicine (WWOM) over the past 35 years. METHODS: A systematic tracking of articles across 8 editions of WWOM was conducted using databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed. Comprehensive bibliographic analysis and data visualization were executed through Bibliometrix, Rstudio, and VOSviewer, facilitating an in-depth examination of citation metrics and collaborative networks. RESULTS: The investigation revealed that WWOM, held in 6 cities spanning four countries and addressing 33 distinct topics, demonstrated an annual citation growth rate of 8.29%, with an average of 49.31 citations per article. Notably, WWOM IV garnered the highest number of citations (1,342), reaching its peak in 2021 with 365 citations. Key contributors to the most-cited articles include Al-Hashimi, Dawes, and Syrjänen et al. Since its inception, the workshops have engaged 505 faculty members from 37 nations, with significant participation from the Americas and Europe, notably the United States and the United Kingdom, which also led in terms of publications. Network analysis delineated 6 country clusters, underscoring robust connections between the US and the UK. Co-authorship analysis revealed 18 clusters involving 267 authors. CONCLUSION: The influence of the WWOM on the field of oral medicine is clearly demonstrated by the outcomes of its publications, reflecting a collaborative effort to enhance comprehension and treatment modalities for patients with oral diseases. The study's findings provide insights into future research directions within the WWOM legacy.

The impact of radiation caries on morbidity and mortality outcomes of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.

AIMS: Radiation caries (RC) is a highly prevalent and chronic complication of head and neck radiotherapy (HNRT) and presents a challenge for clinicians and patients. The present study aimed to assess the impact of RC on the morbidity and mortality outcomes of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were divided into three groups: (1) RC (n = 20), (2) control (n = 20), and (3) edentulous (n = 20). Information regarding the number of appointments, dental procedures, osteoradionecrosis (ORN), prescriptions, and hospital admissions were collected. Mortality outcomes were assessed through disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates. RC patients required more dental appointments (p < .001), restorations (p < .001), extractions (p = .001), and antibiotic and analgesic prescriptions (p < .001). Kaplan-Meier subgroup analyses showed a significantly increased risk of ORN in RC compared to edentulous patients (p = .015). RC patients presented lower DFS rates (43.2 months) than the control and edentulous groups (55.4 and 56.1 months, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: RC impacts morbidity outcomes among cancer survivors due to increased demand for medication prescriptions, multiple specialized dental appointments, invasive surgical treatments, increased risk of ORN, and increased need for hospital admissions.

Performance of panoramic radiography compared with computed tomography in the evaluation of pathological changes in the maxillary sinuses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: A systematic review was performed to evaluate the performance of panoramic radiography (PR) vs CT or cone beam CT (CBCT) in the diagnosis of pathological maxillary sinuses. METHODS: This review was registered in the PROSPERO database under the number CRD42020211766. Observational studies that compared PR with CT/CBCT were used to evaluate pathological changes in the maxillary sinuses. A complete search of seven primary databases and gray literature was carried out. The risk of bias was assessed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa tool, and the GRADE tool was used to assess the quality of evidence. A binary meta-analysis was performed to assess the effectiveness of evaluating pathological alterations in the maxillary sinuses in PR and CT/CBCT. RESULTS: Seven studies were included in our study, out of which four were included in a quantitative analysis. All studies were classified as low risk of bias. Five studies compared PR with CBCT and two studies compared PR to CT. The most common pathological alteration in maxillary sinuses reported was mucosal thickening. CT/CBCT was seen to be the most effective method for assessing pathological changes in the maxillary sinus when compared to PR (RR = 0.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.05 to 0.70, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: CT/CBCT are the most appropriate imaging methods to evaluate pathological changes in the maxillary sinuses, while PR is still limited in the evaluation of these changes being considered only for initial diagnosis.

Pan-American prevalence of smokeless tobacco use and association with oral potentially malignant disorders and head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of smokeless tobacco (SLT) use and its association with oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) and head and neck cancer (HNC) in the Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO) region. STUDY DESIGN: A literature search was conducted across 9 databases and other sources. The eligibility criteria were pediatric (0-18 years old) and adult (19 years and older) populations consuming any type of SLT. Meta-analysis was performed to determine the prevalence of SLT and the association between its use and OPMDs/HNC in the PAHO region; the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool was used to verify the certainty of evidence. RESULTS: Fifty-nine studies from 6 PAHO countries were included, of which 51 were also subjected to quantitative analysis. The pooled SLT prevalence of use was 15% (95%CI: 11.93-18.69) overall, 17% (95%CI: 13.25-22.65) in adults, and 11% (95%CI: 8.54-14.78) in the pediatric population. The highest reported SLT prevalence of use was 33.4% (95%CI: 27.17-39.93) in Venezuela. HNC was positively associated with SLT use (OR = 1.98, 95%CI: 1.54-2.55), with a moderate certainty of evidence. Among OPMDs, only leukoplakia reported a positive association with SLT use (OR = 8.38; 95%CI: 1.05-67.25). However, the quality of the evidence was very low. CONCLUSION: A high consumption of SLT use, chewing tobacco and snuff, is reported among the adult population residing in the PAHO region with a positive association with the development of oral leukoplakia and HNC.

Machine learning for the prediction of toxicities from head and neck cancer treatment: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present systematic review (SR) is to summarize Machine Learning (ML) models currently used to predict head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment-related toxicities, and to understand the impact of image biomarkers (IBMs) in prediction models (PMs). The present SR was conducted following the guidelines of the PRISMA 2022 and registered in PROSPERO database (CRD42020219304). METHODS: The acronym PICOS was used to develop the focused review question (Can PMs accurately predict HNC treatment toxicities?) and the eligibility criteria. The inclusion criteria enrolled Prediction Model Studies (PMSs) with patient cohorts that were treated for HNC and developed toxicities. Electronic database search encompassed PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, LILACS, and Gray Literature (Google Scholar and ProQuest). Risk of Bias (RoB) was assessed through PROBAST and the results were synthesized based on the data format (with and without IBMs) to allow comparison. RESULTS: A total of 28 studies and 4,713 patients were included. Xerostomia was the most frequently investigated toxicity (17; 60.71 %). Sixteen (57.14 %) studies reported using radiomics features in combination with clinical or dosimetrics/dosiomics for modelling. High RoB was identified in 23 studies. Meta-analysis (MA) showed an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.82 for models with IBMs and 0.81 for models without IBMs (p value < 0.001), demonstrating no difference among IBM- and non-IBM-based models. DISCUSSION: The development of a PM based on sample-specific features represents patient selection bias and may affect a model's performance. Heterogeneity of the studies as well as non-standardized metrics prevent proper comparison of studies, and the absence of an independent/external test does not allow the evaluation of the model's generalization ability. CONCLUSION: IBM-featured PMs are not superior to PMs based on non-IBM predictors. The evidence was appraised as of low certainty.

Patient's perceptions of oral and oropharyngeal cancer diagnosis disclosure: communication aspects based on SPIKES protocol.

OBJECTIVE: Breaking bad medical news is a complex task of clinical practice. The manner in which this is done has a significant impact on patients. This study aimed to assess patient's perceptions regarding oral and oropharyngeal cancer diagnosis disclosure according to the "SPIKES" protocol. STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional study used a questionnaire with 21 SPIKES-based items. The questionnaire was administered to 100 patients with recently diagnosed oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma who evaluated each item according to their preference and experience. RESULTS: Nineteen items showed a significant difference between patient's preference and recalled experience. Eighteen of these items showed lower experience scores primarily related to the amount of information desired by patients, presence of a companion, time to express feelings, and summary of information. Most patients preferred receiving as much information as possible about the diagnosis. However, only 35% reported that they had obtained sufficient information. Patients who were aware of cancer diagnostic suspicion had better communication experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Protocols may be useful to guide health professionals to support patient-centered strategies to disclose oral cancer diagnoses.

Dosimetric parameters and radiotherapy simulation methods used in preclinical studies of radiation damage to the dentition: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review investigated the dosimetric parameters used in preclinical studies. STUDY DESIGN: Searches were performed in 3 databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Embase) and gray literature to identify studies for review. In vitro and ex vivo studies that examined the effect of radiation on human permanent teeth were included. The modified Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials checklist of items for reporting preclinical in vitro studies was used to assess the risk of bias. RESULTS: In total, 32 studies met the inclusion criteria. The average radiation dose of in vitro studies was 53 (±22) Gy and in ex vivo studies was 69 (±1) Gy. Twenty-two studies used 5 different fractionation schemes. Twenty-two of the included studies did not report the radiotherapy modality of those reporting. Twenty studies used linear accelerators, and 7 used Cobalt-60 with the source-surface-distance of radiation ranging from 1.5 to 100 cm. Distilled water was the storage solution for the dental structure used most commonly. Biases were observed, including small sample sizes, lack of randomization, and blinding processes. CONCLUSION: The dosimetric parameters used in the preclinical studies, including radiation dose, radiotherapy modality, fractionation regime, and the storage solutions used did not support the hypothesis of direct effects of radiation on the dental structure.

Over 300 Radiation Caries Papers: Reflections From the Rearview Mirror.

Radiation caries (RC) is an aggressive oral toxicity in head and neck cancer survivors, which develops 6 to 12 months after head and neck radiotherapy. It initially affects the tooth cervical/incisal surfaces, and if not promptly diagnosed/managed, progresses to dental crown amputation and risk of osteoradionecrosis. It results from a multidimensional cluster of treatment-induced oral symptoms, including hyposalivation, dietary changes, and oral hygiene impairment. Although recognized as a frequent complication of radiotherapy and extensively assessed by a myriad of retrospective, in vitro, and in situ studies, RC patients are still orphans of clinically validated methods for risk prediction, prevention, and treatment of early lesions. This review provides a historical overview of science-based concepts regarding RC pathogenesis and treatment, emphasizing the growing demand for interventional clinical studies (randomized trials).

Oral medicine (stomatology) in Brazil: the first 50 years and counting.

This review outlines the historical perspective, status, and future challenges of oral medicine (stomatology) in Brazil based on the records of the Brazilian Society of Stomatology and Oral Pathology (SOBEP) and the Brazilian Federal Dental Council as well as expert evidence input from academic leaders from 3 different generations of Brazilian oral medicine specialists. The beginning of oral medicine in Brazil dates to 1969, followed by the organization of SOBEP in 1974; however, official recognition as an independent specialty was achieved more recently within the Brazilian Federal Dental Council in 1992. After a 50-year maturation period of oral medicine in Brazil in terms of specialty crystallization across dentistry, medicine, and research, it is now time to follow the historical trends of the specialty internationally and establish a standard curriculum at a post-graduate level that will lead to uniformity of training for oral medicine in Brazil.

Prevalência das posições e grau de dificuldade cirúrgica de terceiros molares inferiores: um estudo radiográfico retrospectivo / Prevalence of positions and degree of surgical difficulty in lower third molars: a retrospective radiographic study

Objetivo: Os objetivos deste estudo foram avaliar a prevalência do posicionamento dos terceiros molares inferiores seguindo a classificação de Winter e Pell & Gregory, e determinar os níveis de dificuldade para a exodontia através do índice de Pederson. Materiais e Métodos: Estudo radiográfico, transversal e retrospectivo avaliou 100 radiografias panorâmicas provenientes dos prontuários odontológicos atendidos nos ambulatórios de Cirurgia bucal, de pacientes entre 15 e 61 anos de idade, no período de 2015 a 2017. As radiografias panorâmicas foram avaliadas por meio do software ImageJquanto aos posicionamentos dos terceiros molares inferiores pela classificação de Winter e Pell & Gregory, enquanto o nível de dificuldade foi avaliado pelo índice de Pederson. Os resultados obtidos foram submetidos à análise estatística descritiva. Resultados: A maior prevalência de terceiros molares inclusos foi observada em mulheres, com idade média de 26 anos. Quanto a posição dos dentes inclusos, a posições vertical (44,0%), nível A (74,7%) e classe III (69,9%) foram as mais prevalentes. Na escala de Pederson, a dificuldade cirúrgica "muito difícil" foi a mais encontrada. Discussão: nossos resultados sugerem estabelecer um melhor planejamento cirúrgico e prognóstico aos pacientes, minimizando a possibilidade de complicações durante e após as extrações de terceiros molares inferiores. Conclusão: Ambas classificações auxiliam o cirurgião-dentista a estabelecer um melhor planejamento e prognóstico aos pacientes. A aplicabilidade das radiografias panorâmicas, associados a avaliação clínica, justificam menores possibilidades de complicações pós-cirúrgicas em terceiro molar inferior.

Aim: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of the mandibular third molars position in according to the Winter and Pell & Gregory classification, and to determine the levels of difficulty for exodontia through the Pederson index. Materials and Methods: Radiographic, cross-sectional and retrospective study evaluated 100 panoramic radiographs of patients between 15 and 61 years old, from dental records seen at the Oral Surgery department in the period from 2015 to 2017. The panoramic radiographs were evaluated using ImageJ software regarding the positioning of the lower third molars by the Winter and Pell & Gregory classification, while the level of difficulty was evaluated by the Pederson index. The results obtained were submitted to descriptive statistical analysis.Results: The highest prevalence of included third molars was observed in women, with an age average of 26 years. Regarding the position of the included teeth, the vertical position (44.0%), level A (74.7%), and class III (69.9%) were the most prevalent. In the Pederson scale, the "very difficult" surgical difficulty was the most found. Discussion: results suggest establishing better surgical planning and prognosis for patients, minimizing the possibility of complications during and after extractions of mandibular third molars.Conclusion: Both classifications help the dental surgeon to establish better planning and prognosis for patients. The applicability of panoramic radiographs, associated with clinical evaluation, justifies a fewer possibility of complications in the lower third molar post-extraction

Small Dysplastic Oral Leucoplakia in a Smoking Woman: a Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Oral leucoplakia is clinical term used to describe white plaques, and that is part of the group of oral potentially malignant disorders. Leucoplakia may show epithelial dysplasia, mainly in harder smoking patient. This case report discusses a small leucoplakia with dysplasia on the tongue's lateral border in a woman, diagnosed early after a routine clinical consultation. METHODS: A 57-year-old female patient consulted to the Oral Diagnosis and Surgery Service of the State University of Ponta Grossa, Brazil. First, the patient was referred for the extraction of her lower incisors due to periodontal disease. During clinical examination, was identified a sessile white plaque, of small size, and located on the tongue's left lateral border. Thus, the lesion's diagnostic hypothesis was oral leucoplakia due to patient be chronic smoker for 40 years. The incisional biopsy was performed, with the epithelial tissue and part of the connective tissue removed. RESULTS: The histopathological examination revealed a stratified and keratinized pavement epithelium, with cellular atypia, and presence of hyperchromatism and nuclear pleomorphism. However, the alterations were restricted to the epithelium's basal, characterizing a mild dysplasia. The proposed treatment was surgical removal of the lesion, and the patient was also instructed to quit smoking, as well as she continues to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The presented case emphasizes the importance of early diagnosis and the orientation of risk factors to smoking patients, even in small lesions that can clinically appear harmless.

A atuação do residente em Odontologia Hospitalar neonatal na abordagem multidisciplinar do SUS: relato de experiência / The multidisciplinary work of the resident in neonatal hospital dentistry in the Brazilian Healthcare System: an experience report

A reorganização dos serviços de saúde vinculada ao programa Humaniza SUS possibilita o cuidado multiprofissional do indivíduo. Neste sentido, a inclusão do cirurgião-dentista nas equipes visa somar esforços para o alcance da integralidade da atenção, a qual abrange as diversas alterações que podem acometer o sistema estomatognático de sujeitos em cuidados hospitalares. A residência em odontologia hospitalar neonatal, como parte integradora da abordagem multiprofissional, é extremamente importante para garantir a abordagem adequada de gestantes, puérperas e recémnascidos (RN) em sua plenitude. As frentes de atuação do residente em odontologia neonatal envolvem, principalmente, o pré-natal odontológico, o puerpério imediato e mediato, a abordagem ambulatorial e as unidades de terapia intensiva neonatal e pediátrica. Este artigo objetiva relatar a experiência de atuação de residentes em odontologia hospitalar neonatal em um hospital escola pertencente ao Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) do Paraná (AU).

The restructuring of the national healthcare system in line with the HumanizaSUS program has enabled a multidisciplinary care of the individual. Consistent with this, the incorporation of dental professionals into healthcare teams aims to aggregate efforts to provide a comprehensive care, which includes the conditions affecting the stomatognathic system of hospitalized patients. The residency in neonatal hospital dentistry, as an integral part of the multidisciplinary approach, is extremely important to ensure a comprehensive care of pregnant and puerperal women and newborns. The activities of neonatal dental residents are focused on dental prenatal care, early and late puerperium, outpatient clinical care, and neonatal and pediatric intensive care units. This study aims to report the experience of residents in neonatal hospital dentistry in a school hospital of the Brazilian Healthcare System (SUS) in the state of Paraná (AU).