Pharmacy practice and policy research in Türkiye: a systematic review of literature.

Background: In recent decades, there has been an interest in clinical pharmacy practice in Türkiye with emerging studies in this area. Despite the recent emergence of diverse pharmacy practice studies in Türkiye, a comprehensive assessment of overall typology of studies and impact has not been conducted thus far. Objectives: This systematic review aims to document and assess pharmaceutical policy and practice literature published within the last 5 years in Türkiye. The other aim is to summarise the expected impact of published studies on policy and practice research. Methods: The systematic review was conducted according to the guidelines described in the PRISMA Statement. A comprehensive search approach, incorporating Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) queries and free-text terms was employed to locate pertinent literature related to pharmacy practice and policy in Türkiye. The search covered the period from January 1, 2019, to January 1, 2024, and involved electronic databases including PubMed, Medline Ovid, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Springer Link, PlosOne, and BMC. Results: In the final grouping, 73 articles met the inclusion criteria and were selected for this review. Among the quantitative studies, majority studies were cross-sectional survey studies. Through the rigorous thematic content analysis seven research domains were developed from the selected literature: drug utilisation and rational drug use, the emerging role of pharmacist, access to medicines and generic medicines, community pharmacy practice, pharmacovigilance/adverse drug reactions, and pharmacoeconomic studies. Conclusions: The pharmacist role is evolving; however, several challenges remain in fully realising the potential of pharmacists. These include regulatory barriers, limited public awareness of pharmacists' expanded roles, workforce capacity issues, and the need for ongoing professional development and training. Research studies are needed in the areas of generic prescribing, medicine adherence, intervention studies in community and hospital pharmacy practice, and on pharmacoeconomics and pharmacovigilance.

An essential component of antimicrobial stewardship during the COVID-19 pandemic in the intensive care unit: de-escalation.

BACKGROUND: The antimicrobial de-escalation strategy (ADE) plays a crucial role in antimicrobial stewardship, reducing the likelihood of bacterial resistance. This study aims to evaluate how often the intensive care unit (ICU) used ADE for empirical treatment during COVID-19. MATERIALS: Adult ICU patients receiving empirical antimicrobial therapy for bacterial infections were retrospectively studied from September 2020 to December 2021. ADE was defined as (1) discontinuation of an antimicrobial in case of empirical combination therapy or (2) replacement of the antimicrobial to narrow the antimicrobial spectrum within the first 3 days of therapy, according to the test results and clinical picture. RESULTS: A total of 99 patients were included in the study. The number of patients who received empirical combined therapy (38.4%) was lower than those who received monotherapy (61.6%). The most preferred monotherapy (45.9%) was piperacillin-tazobactam, while the most preferred in combination treatment (22.7%) was meropenem. Within the first 3 days of admittance to the ICU, 3% of patients underwent ADE for their empirical antimicrobial therapy, 61.6% underwent no change, and 35.4% underwent change other than ADE. Procalcitonin levels were below 2 µg/L on the third day of treatment in 69.7% of the patients. Culture or culture-antibiogram results of 50.5% of the patients were obtained within the first 3 days of empirical therapy. There was no growth in the culture results of 21 patients (21.2%) during their ICU stay. CONCLUSION: In this study, ADE practice was much lower than expected. In order to reduce the significant differences between theory and reality, clinical, laboratory, and organisational conditions must be objectively assessed along with patient characteristics.

Determination of drug-related problems according to PAIR criteria in dialysis patients: a cross-sectional study in tertiary care hospital.

BACKGROUND: Dialysis patients are at high risk for drug-related problems (DRPs), which have significant consequences for their morbidity, mortality, and quality of life. Improved clinical outcomes can be achieved by preventing, identifying, and resolving these problems. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study. In this study, the PAIR instrument (Pharmacotherapy Assessment in Chronic Renal Disease) was validated for use in Turkish. Validation consisted of three stages: translation back-translation with expert panel evaluation, reliability analysis using the test-retest method, and conceptual validity with both Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) and PAIR used to determine DRPs prevalence. RESULTS: In total, 104 patients (mean ± SD age, 54.1 ± 15.8 years; 53.8% male) were included in the study. An expert panel evaluated the items in the criterion based on their intelligibility, service of purpose, differentiation, and cultural suitability during the translation stage. Content validity index (CVI) score was found to be 0.95. The reliability analysis was performed by applying the test-retest method and calculating correlation coefficient on 30 randomly selected patients one month later. Correlation coefficient (p) was found to be 0.8. To evaluate conceptual validity, 104 patients' pharmacotherapy plans were assessed using both the PAIR and PCNE criteria. The prevalence of DRPs according to PAIR criteria (100.0%) and PCNE (73.1%) were statistically significantly different (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: As a result, PAIR criteria can identify clinically relevant DRPs in patients with CKD and is a new, validated tool to be used in Turkey, but may not be adequate for patients receiving dialysis. Therefore, it needs to be reviewed and updated for dialysis patients.

Antimicrobial dosing recommendations during continuous renal replacement therapy: different databases, different doses.

Meticulous antimicrobial management is essential among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury, particularly if renal replacement therapy is needed. Many factors affect drug removal in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy CRRT. In this study, we aimed to compare current databases that are frequently used to adjust CRRT dosages of antimicrobial drugs with the gold standard. The dosage recommendations from various databases for antimicrobial drugs eliminated by CRRT were investigated. The book 'Renal Pharmacotherapy: Dosage Adjustment of Medications Eliminated by the Kidneys' was chosen as the gold standard. There were variations in the databases. Micromedex, UpToDate, and Sanford had similar rates to the gold standard of 45%, 35%, and 30%, respectively. The Micromedex database shows the most similar results to the gold standard source. In addition, a consensus was reached as a result of the expert panel meetings established to discuss the different antimicrobial dose recommendations of the databases.

Impact of a multidisciplinary approach involving clinical pharmacist on resolving drug related problems in chronic kidney patients: a prospective interventional study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major public health concern due to its high mortality risk, high hospitalization rates and cost, and low life expectancy. Thus, CKD patients are among patient group that may benefit from clinical pharmacy services the most. METHODS: This was a prospective interventional study conducted between October 1, 2019, and March 18, 2020, in the nephrology ward of Ankara University School of the Medicine, Ibn-i Sina Hospital. DRPs were classified according to PCNE v8.03. The main outcomes were interventions proposed and the rate of acceptance by the physicians. RESULTS: 269 pre-dialysis patients were included to determine DRPs during the treatment process of the patients. 205 DRPs were found in 131 (48.7%) patients. Treatment efficacy was found to be the main type of DRPs (56.2%) followed by treatment safety (39.6%). When patients with and without DRPs were compared, it was found that the number of female patients (55.0%) was higher in the group with DRPs (p < 0.05). The length of hospital stays (11.3 ± 7.7) and the mean number of drugs used (9.6 ± 3.6) in the group with DRPs were significantly higher than those without DRPs (9.3 ± 5.9; 8.1 ± 3.5, respectively) (p < 0.05). 91.7% of the interventions were accepted by the physicians, and patients and found clinically beneficial. 71.7% of DRPs were fully resolved, 1.9% partially resolved and 23.4% could not be resolved. CONCLUSIONS: A high prevalence of DRPs in patients with chronic kidney disease was determined during therapy. Clinical pharmacist interventions were highly accepted by the physicians and patients. This may indicate implementation of clinical pharmacy services in the nephrology ward has a great impact on optimized therapy and prevention DRPs.

Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults with Chronic Kidney Disease.

Objectives: This study aimed to identify the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication use (PIMU) in adults above the age of 65 with chronic kidney disease (CKD) according to the American Geriatric Society Beers Criteria (Beers), Screening Tool of Older People's Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions Criteria (STOPP) and medication appropriateness index (MAI) 30 criteria and to compare them to justify their use in this specific patient group. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective and descriptive study conducted between October 1st, 2019 and March 18th, 2020 at Ibni Sina Hospital, Nephrology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University. Results: Among 269 patients discharged from the hospital during the study period, 100 of them were eligible for the study. The mean age was 73.3 ± 6.9 years and 51.9% of them were male. The prevalence of 35 PIMU was 91%, 42%, and 70% according to the Beers, STOPP, and MAI criteria, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in terms of prevalence among 3 criteria (p<0.001). Beer detected more PIMU (11.3% vs. 6.4%) and had higher sensitivity among older adults with CKD (0.97 vs. 0.56) compared to the STOPP criteria. Most patients had at least one drug-drug interaction (DDIs) in their discharge prescription (93%) and DDI was one of the main contributors of PIMU. Proton pump inhibitors were the most common medication associated with PIMU in all 3 criteria. Conclusion: The prevalence of PIMU was high among older adults with CKD at discharge according to these criteria. To improve the prescriptions after hospital discharge, it is considered appropriate to use Beers criteria under guidance of a clinical pharmacist.

Potential drug-drug interactions of immunosuppressants in kidney transplant recipients: comparison of drug interaction resources.

Background Drug-drug interactions are frequently observed in kidney transplant recipients due to polypharmacy and use of immunosuppressants. However, there is only one study evaluating clinically relevant potential drug-drug interactions of immunosuppressants specially in kidney transplant recipients by means of online databases and Stockleys Drug Interactions, as a gold standard. Aim This study aimed to compare four online databases used frequently to determined clinically relevant potential drug-drug interactions of immunosuppressants in kidney transplant recipients according to the Renal Drug Handbook. Method This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted between October 1, 2019, and March 18, 2020, in the nephrology ward of Ankara University School of the Medicine, Ibn-i Sina Hospital. In total, 52 adult patients' discharge prescriptions were retrieved from their medical records and analyzed retrospectively. Micromedex®, Lexicomp®, Medscape, and Drugs.com databases were used to evaluate drug interactions. The Renal Drug Handbook was used as a gold standard to do specificity and sensitivity analysis. Results A total of 127 potential drug-drug interactions between the immunosuppressants and co-medications were detected by at least one online database. 32 (25.2%) of these were approved as clinically relevant potential drug-drug interactions by the Renal Drug Handbook. Lexicomp® and Drugs.com have exhibited the highest sensitivity (0.72 and 0.75) while Micromedex® has shown the highest specifity (0.83). Furthermore, the highest positive predictive value has been observed in Micromedex® (0.53). Micromedex® and Medscape had the highest negative predictive value (0.83 and 0.82). However, the kappa value of all was low. The values of inter-rater agreement (Kappa index) between online databases and the Renal Drug Handbook were weak (range 0.05-0.36). In addition, only 11 (8.7%) of potential drug-drug interactions were identified by all online databases. Conclusion This study showed that there was a weak compatibility between each database examined and the Renal Drug Handbook to detect clinically relevant potential drug-drug interactions for immunosuppressants in kidney transplant recipients. Therefore, we suggest that although databases might be practical to take a quick glance in detection of potential drug-drug interactions between immunosuppressants and co-medications, the data should be evaluated in detail and interpreted with caution in combination with a reference book like Renal Drug Handbook.

Pattern of systemic antibiotic use and potential drug interactions: Evaluations through a point prevalence study in Ankara University Hospitals.

Background/aim: Most of the hospitalized patients are on a number of drugs for comorbidities and/or to prevent nosocomial infections. This necessitates a careful consideration of drug interactions not only to avoid possible toxicities but also to reach the highest efficiency with drug treatment. We aimed to investigate drug interactions related to systemic antibiotic use and compare three different databases to check for drug interactions while characterizing the main differences between medical and surgical departments. Materials and methods: This point prevalence study covered data on 927 orders for patients hospitalized between June 3 and 10, 2018 in Ankara University Hospitals. Systemic antibiotic use and related drug interactions were documented using UptoDate, Drugs, and Medscape and comparisons between the departments of medical and surgical sciences were made. Results: The number of orders, or the number of drugs or antibiotics per order were not different between the medical and surgical sciences departments. A total of 1335 antibiotic-related drug interactions of all levels were reported by one, two, or all three databases. UptoDate reported all common and major interactions. Pantoprazole was the most commonly prescribed drug and appeared in 63% of all orders. Among 75 different molecules, ceftriaxone and meropenem were the two most prescribed antibiotics by the surgical and medical departments, respectively. Conclusion: A dramatic variance existed amongst antibiotics prescribed by different departments. This indicated the requirement for a centralized role of an infectious diseases specialist. Especially for the hospitalized patient, prophylactic coverage with at least one antibiotic brought about a number of drug interactions. A precise evaluation of orders in terms of drug interactions by a clinical pharmacist (currently none on duty) will reduce possible drug-related hazards.