Current evidence regarding alternative techniques for enterocystoplasty using regenerative medicine methods: a systematic review.

Enterocystoplasty is the most commonly used treatment for bladder reconstruction. However, it has some major complications. In this study, we systematically reviewed the alternative techniques for enterocystoplasty using different scaffolds. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, and a total of 10 studies were included in this study. Five different scaffolds were evaluated, including small intestinal submucosa (SIS), biodegradable scaffolds seeded with autologous bladder muscle and urothelial cells, dura mater, human cadaveric bladder acellular matrix graft, and bovine pericardium. The overall results revealed that bladder reconstruction using regenerative medicine is an excellent alternative method to enterocystoplasty regarding the improvement of bladder capacity, bladder compliance, and maximum detrusor pressure; however, more large-scale studies are required.

Anosmia or Ageusia Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review.

Aim: To systematically review the cases of anosmia or ageusia after receiving the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in electronic databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and PubMed, to identify any published study that evaluated the anosmia or ageusia after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, including case reports, case series, letter to editor articles with reported cases regarding our topic, or observational studies with at least 1 eligible patient consisted with our criteria. We excluded the studies that reported anosmia or ageusia due to COVID-19 infection and non-COVID-19 vaccines. Results: Five studies consisting of 11 patients were included in this systematic review. Of the 11 patients, 5 patients had received the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine and 6 patients received the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, of which 6 patients developed symptoms after the first dose of vaccination and 5 patients were symptomatic after the second vaccine dose. Most of the patients developed symptoms within 1 week after the vaccination. The disorders of the patients included partial or total anosmia, parosmia, phantosmia, hyposmia, ageusia, and dysgeusia. Also, the patients had symptoms other than smell or taste disorders, including arthralgia, fever, chills, rhinorrhea, myalgia, abdominal pain, fatigue, muscle weakness, altered bowel pattern, aural fullness, tinnitus, and headache. Most of the evaluated patients did not receive any treatment as for their disorders. However, in some cases, treatment with oral corticosteroids or dietary supplementation was required. Conclusion: Anosmia and ageusia are important symptoms of COVID-19 vaccination. These symptoms will resolve without any treatment in most cases, although some interventions may be needed in some patients.

Endocan as a marker of endothelial dysfunction in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hypertension is one of the foremost risk factors for cardiovascular disease and a significant cause of death worldwide. Importantly, endothelial dysfunction (ED) is one of the primary manifestations that may precede the development of hypertension. Endocan is a novel endothelial dysfunction and inflammation biomarker secreted from endothelial cells. Whether endocan may serve as a biomarker of hypertension is currently debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at linking endocan to ED in hypertensive patients. International databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science, were systematically searched for studies investigating Endocan serum or plasma levels in hypertensive patients and healthy controls. Random effect meta-analysis was performed to calculate the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 20 studies assessing the association between endocan levels and hypertension were included in which 3130 individuals with a mean age of 50.48 ± 8.45 years were assessed. Hypertensive patients presented with higher circulating endocan levels (SMD 0.91, 95% CI 0.44-1.38, p-value < 0.01) compared with healthy controls. Interestingly, our data demonstrated that removing three studies assessing endocan levels in hypertensive patients with different comorbidities or special populations resulted in the same statistically higher endocan levels (SMD 1.16, 95% CI 0.66-1.65, p-value < 0.01). Overall, this systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that in hypertensive patients circulating endocan levels are significantly elevated. Thus, suggesting endocan as an easy-to-use biomarker to detect ED in hypertension. Despite this, more research is warranted to address this potential ability specifically.