Readmissions in Sepsis Survivors: Discharge Setting Risks.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a complex condition with high morbidity and mortality. Prompt treatment can improve survival, but for survivors the risk of deterioration and readmission remains high. Little is known about the association between discharge setting and readmission among sepsis survivors. OBJECTIVE: To examine 30-day hospital readmission rates in adult sepsis survivors by the type of setting to which patients were discharged. METHODS: The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care database was used to identify adult sepsis survivors and evaluate 30-day readmission by discharge setting. A χ2 contingency analysis was used with each factor and presence/absence of readmission. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare readmissions across discharge settings. RESULTS: From our sample (N = 7107; mean age 66.5 years; 46.2% women), 23.6% (n = 1674) were readmitted within 30 days and of those readmitted, 30% were readmitted between 1 and 3 times. Discharge setting (P < .001) and age (P = .02) were significantly associated with readmission, but sex, ethnicity, and insurance type were not. High numbers of readmissions were seen in patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities (29.6%), home health care (26.9%), and home (15.0%). Similar high comorbidity burden and acuteness of illness were seen in patients discharged to these settings. CONCLUSIONS: Sepsis survivors discharged to skilled nursing facilities, home health care, and home are at high risk for 30-day readmission. The rates of readmission from home health care and home settings were alarming. Often patients are discharged to inappropriate settings, placing them at risk for residual sepsis and readmission. Future research should focus on appropriate timing of hospital discharge and transition to the most appropriate discharge setting.

Factors related to cognitive performance among black caregivers of persons living with a chronic illness: An exploratory study.

This study investigated factors associated with cognitive performance among Black caregivers of persons living with two chronic conditions: dementia or cancer. Fifty-six Black caregivers of people living with dementia or cancer were recruited from clinic and community sources. Variables measured included: depression, anxiety, stress, sleep, fatigue, and caregiver burden. Cognitive performance was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Descriptive statistics and non-parametric analyses were conducted to identify factors related to MoCA scores. Caregivers were 58.3 years of age and predominantly female. The average MoCA score was 25.23. Gender and education, along with positive appraisal of caregiving were significantly associated with cognitive performance. Several other factors approached significance including cohabitation with the care recipient, fatigue, and stress due to perceived individual and institutional racism. Our findings suggest several factors that warrant further investigation for understanding the relationship between caregiving and cognitive performance in Black caregivers of people living with cancer or dementia.

Pandemic Effects on Stability of End-of-Life Preferences and Patient-Surrogate Dyad Congruence.

CONTEXT: Whether a largescale disaster alters people's previous decisions about their end-of-life care is unknown. OBJECTIVES: We examined the effects of a disaster, the COVID-19 pandemic, on stability of end-of-life care preferences among dialysis patients and on patient-surrogate goals-of-care congruence. METHODS: We used a natural experimental design to examine goals-of-care preferences pre- and postexposure to the pandemic during a pragmatic trial testing SPIRIT (sharing patient's illness representations to increase trust), an evidence-based advance care planning (ACP) intervention. There were 151 patient-surrogate dyads who prior to the pandemic lockdown had completed baseline (T1) and postintervention assessments (T2) regarding their goals-of-care preferences in two end-of-life scenarios. Of those 151 dyads, 59 intervention, and 51 usual care dyads consented to be in the present study and completed the goals-of-care tool two additional times, at enrollment (T3) and six months later (T4), along with the COVID stress scale (CSS). Dyad congruence was ascertained by comparing patient and surrogate responses to the goals-of-care tool. RESULTS: There were no changes over time in the proportions of patients who chose comfort-care-only in the goals-of-care tool. The proportion of patients who chose comfort-care-only and dyad congruence were higher in SPIRIT compared to usual care, but there was no interaction between that treatment effect and exposure to the pandemic. CSS was associated with neither patients' preferences nor dyad congruence. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic alone did not appear to influence patients' goals-of-care preferences or dyad congruence. This finding supports the stability of value-based end-of-life preferences in general, even during a disaster.

Performance of PROMIS Measures to Assess Fatigue and Sleep Symptom Severity Among African American Patients Newly Diagnosed With Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

This pilot study examined the concurrent validity of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Short Form, measures with the longer Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory among patients living with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A total of 26 African American patients living with prediabetes and newly diagnosed with OSA completed the six-item short form versions of PROMIS Fatigue and PROMIS Sleep Disturbance, and the longer 20-item Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory. Both PROMIS Fatigue and Sleep Disturbance scales demonstrated high reliability with Cronbach's α of .91 and .92, respectively. PROMIS Fatigue scores were significantly correlated with Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory scores (rs = .53; p = .006) and demonstrated concurrent validity. However, PROMIS Sleep Disturbance scores and Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory scores were not associated with one another. The brief PROMIS Fatigue scale is a useful, succinct approach to assess fatigue severity among diverse patient populations living with OSA. This study is among the first to evaluate the performance of PROMIS Fatigue in a sample living with OSA.

Demonstration of caring and motivational interviewing in online simulation: A cross-sectional observational study.

AIM: The purpose of this paper is to describe an innovative educational approach for pre-licensure nursing students to learn and practice motivational interviewing skills in a telehealth simulation with standardized patients portraying pregnant women with substance use disorder. BACKGROUND: Given the ongoing need for online delivery of both nursing education and clinical practice, providers must continue to find approaches to facilitate the provision of empathetic and personalized care to achieve optimal patient outcomes. Motivational interviewing integrates a person-centered approach with specific communication strategies to encourage and support patients' commitment to change. Motivational interviewing skills can be implemented across a wide variety of patient situations, including mental health and primary nursing care. DESIGN: The study followed a pre-/post-test cross-sectional observational design. METHODS: After completing an online training course to learn motivational interviewing skills, students participated in an online simulation with a standardized patient portraying a woman with substance use disorder during pregnancy. Prior to the simulation, students completed the Caring Behaviors Inventory-24 and the Opening Minds Scale for Health Care Providers. After the simulation, students and standardized patients completed the Simulated Clinical Interview Rating Scale and a 5-item version of the Caring Behaviors Inventory-6. RESULTS: Of the 252 students in the course, 85 (34%) participated in the study. Twenty-six student participants completed both pre- and post-simulation questionnaires; 40 completed only pre-simulation questionnaires; and 19 completed only post-simulation questionnaires. Prior to the simulated patient encounter, students rated themselves most favorably on ability to demonstrate assurance behaviors. After the training and simulation, students and standardized patients reported successful student demonstration of motivational interviewing skills and caring behaviors consistent with fundamental therapeutic communication and motivational interviewing knowledge. There was no statistically significant difference between self-reported student performance and the standardized patients' observations. CONCLUSIONS: Students attained and applied motivational skills and demonstrated caring behaviors in a virtual setting with standardized patients.