Population pharmacokinetic modeling of dolutegravir/lamivudine to support a once-daily fixed-dose combination regimen in virologically suppressed adults living with HIV-1.

A fixed-dose combination (FDC) of 50 mg dolutegravir and 300 mg lamivudine is indicated for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. This analysis aimed to characterize the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of dolutegravir and lamivudine based on data from a phase 3 study (TANGO) in virologically suppressed adults living with HIV-1 switching to dolutegravir/lamivudine FDC. These analyses included 362 participants who contributed 2,629 dolutegravir and 2,611 lamivudine samples collected over 48 weeks. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination parameterized by apparent oral clearance (CL/F), apparent volume of distribution (V/F), and absorption rate constant (Ka) described dolutegravir PK. Covariate search yielded body weight, bilirubin, and ethnicity as predictors of CL/F, and weight was predictive for V/F. The estimates of CL/F, V/F, and Ka were 0.858 L/h, 16.7 L, and 2.15 h-1, respectively. A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination parameterized by CL/F, apparent intercompartmental clearance (Q/F), apparent central volume of distribution (V2/F), apparent peripheral volume of distribution (V3/F), and Ka described lamivudine PK. Covariate search yielded eGFR and race as predictors of CL/F, and weight was predictive for V2/F. The estimated parameter values were CL/F = 19.6 L/h, Q/F = 2.97 L/h, V2/F = V3/F = 105 L, and Ka = 2.30 h-1. The steady-state prediction suggested that the effect of covariates dolutegravir and lamivudine exposures was small (<20%) and not clinically relevant. Therefore, no dose adjustments are recommended based on these analyses. The results support the use of dolutegravir/lamivudine FDC in the treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults.CLINICAL TRIALSThis study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03446573.

Relative Bioavailability and Food Effect of GSK3640254 Tablet and Capsule Formulations in Healthy Participants.

GSK3640254 is a next-generation maturation inhibitor with demonstrated potency across HIV-1 subtypes and a high barrier to emergent resistance. This phase I, 2-part, randomized, open-label study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04263142) in healthy participants assessed the relative bioavailability of a single dose of GSK3640254 200 mg in tablet and capsule formulations (part 1) and the effect of food on the pharmacokinetic profile of the tablet formulation (part 2). Overall, 39 participants were randomized to treatment (part 1, n = 18; part 2, n = 21). All participants in part 1 completed the study; 2 participants in part 2 withdrew before study completion (adverse event, n = 1; physician decision, n = 1). In part 1, plasma exposures of the GSK3640254 tablet formulation were not meaningfully different from those of the capsule formulation when administered in the presence of a moderate-fat meal. In part 2, GSK3640254 plasma exposures increased by ≈3- to 4-fold under high- and moderate-fat conditions, respectively, compared with fasted conditions. No major safety or tolerability findings were observed. The highest incidence of adverse events (24%) was reported under high-fat conditions. Taken together, these data support the use of the tablet formulation coadministered with food in the clinical development of GSK3640254 for treatment of HIV-1.

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between the HIV-1 maturation inhibitor GSK3640254 and combination oral contraceptives in healthy women.

AIMS: GSK3640254 is a next-generation maturation inhibitor likely to be coadministered with combined oral contraceptives in HIV-positive women. METHODS: This phase I, open-label, 1-way study assessed pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions of GSK3640254 200 mg and ethinyl oestradiol 0.03 mg/levonorgestrel 0.15 mg once daily in healthy female participants who received ethinyl oestradiol/levonorgestrel for 10 days with a moderate-fat meal after which GSK3640254 was added from Days 11 to 21. Primary endpoints were area under the plasma concentration-time curve to the end of the dosing interval (AUC0-t ), maximum observed concentration (Cmax ) and plasma concentration at the end of the dosing interval (Cτ ) for ethinyl oestradiol and levonorgestrel. Serum follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone and progesterone concentrations were determined. Adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: Among 23 enrolled participants, 17 completed the study. Geometric least squares mean ratios (with vs. without GSK3640254) of AUC0-t , Cmax and Cτ were 0.974, 0.970 and 1.050 for ethinyl oestradiol and 1.069, 1.032 and 1.083 for levonorgestrel, respectively. Three participants had elevated progesterone levels, which occurred before GSK3640254 administration in 2 participants. No participants had elevated follicle-stimulating hormone or luteinizing hormone values. Fourteen participants (61%) reported adverse events. Four participants reported asymptomatic elevated transaminase levels meeting liver-stopping criteria; of these, 3 events occurred before GSK3640254 administration and led to study withdrawal. CONCLUSION: Ethinyl oestradiol/levonorgestrel plus GSK3640254 coadministration did not affect steady-state pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of ethinyl oestradiol and levonorgestrel in healthy female participants. No major tolerability findings were reported. Elevated liver transaminase levels were probably due to ethinyl oestradiol/levonorgestrel.

A Phase I Evaluation of the Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of the HIV-1 Maturation Inhibitor GSK3640254 and Tenofovir Alafenamide/Emtricitabine in Healthy Participants.

GSK3640254 is a next-generation maturation inhibitor that would likely be combined with standard antiretroviral agents to form a regimen of ≥2 fully active classes. This phase I, open-label, 2-period, 1-way study assessed potential pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between GSK3640254 and tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine (TAF/FTC; including the metabolite tenofovir [TFV]) in healthy volunteers. Eligible participants received TAF/FTC 25/200 mg once daily (QD) on days 1 through 21 with a moderate-fat meal; GSK3640254 200 mg QD was added on days 15 through 21. Geometric least-squares mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived using linear mixed-effect models. Adverse events (AEs) and laboratory, electrocardiogram, and vital sign parameters were monitored. Sixteen participants, all male, received treatment; one withdrew because of treatment-related grade 1 urticaria. After TAF/FTC + GSK3640254 coadministration, TAF steady-state area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the end of the dosing interval and maximum observed concentration were 11% and 13% lower than when TAF/FTC was administered alone, with GMRs (90% CI) of 0.886 (0.75 to 1.04) and 0.874 (0.68 to 1.12), respectively. Steady-state PK of TFV and FTC was similar when TAF/FTC was administered alone or with GSK3640254. No clinically significant trends in tolerability or safety were observed. GSK3640254 200 mg QD did not meaningfully affect the steady-state PK of TAF, TFV, or FTC in healthy participants under fed conditions and was not associated with major tolerability or safety findings. These data support the further investigation of GSK3640254 for coadministration with TAF/FTC for the treatment of HIV. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT03836729.).

Phase I evaluation of pharmacokinetics and tolerability of the HIV-1 maturation inhibitor GSK3640254 and dolutegravir in healthy adults.

AIMS: GSK3640254, a novel, next-generation maturation inhibitor effective against a range of HIV polymorphisms with no cross-resistance to current antiretroviral therapy, could potentially be coadministered with dolutegravir as a 2-drug regimen. In this phase I study, pharmacokinetics and tolerability of GSK3640254 plus dolutegravir were assessed. METHODS: Healthy participants received dolutegravir 50 mg once daily (QD) on Days 1-5 in period 1, GSK3640254 200 mg QD on Days 1-7 in period 2, and dolutegravir 50 mg plus GSK3640254 200 mg QD on Days 1-7 in period 3. All treatments were administered with a moderate-fat meal 30 minutes prior to dosing. Pharmacokinetics parameters were derived by noncompartmental methods, and geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived using linear mixed effects models. Adverse events, laboratory measurements, electrocardiography and vital signs were monitored. RESULTS: Sixteen participants completed the study. GMRs (90% CIs) for dolutegravir area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the end of the dosing interval at steady state, maximum observed concentration and plasma concentration at the end of the dosing interval were 1.17 (1.118-1.233), 1.09 (1.044-1.138) and 1.24 (1.160-1.315), respectively. The GMRs (90% CIs) for GSK3640254 were 1.04 (0.992-1.094), 0.99 (0.923-1.065) and 0.10 (0.939-1.056), respectively. Dolutegravir plus GSK3640254 coadministration did not meaningfully alter steady-state exposure to dolutegravir or GSK3640254. No clinically significant trends in tolerability or safety were observed. CONCLUSION: Coadministration of GSK3640254 with dolutegravir did not result in clinically significant drug interaction and was well tolerated.

Phase I Study of the Novel Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 (EZH2) Inhibitor GSK2816126 in Patients with Advanced Hematologic and Solid Tumors.

PURPOSE: Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) activity is dysregulated in many cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase I study determined the safety, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the intravenously administered, highly selective EZH2 inhibitor, GSK2816126, (NCT02082977). Doses of GSK2816126 ranged from 50 to 3,000 mg twice weekly, and GSK2816126 was given 3-weeks-on/1-week-off in 28-day cycles. Eligible patients had solid tumors or B-cell lymphomas with no available standard treatment regimen. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (21 solid tumors, 20 lymphoma) received treatment. All patients experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE). Fatigue [22 of 41 (53.7%)] and nausea [20 of 41 (48.8%)] were the most common toxicity. Twelve (32%) patients experienced a serious AE. Dose-limiting elevated liver transaminases occurred in 2 of 7 patients receiving 3,000 mg of GSK2816126; 2,400 mg was therefore established as the MTD. Following intravenous administration of 50 to 3,000 mg twice weekly, plasma GSK2816126 levels decreased biexponentially, with a mean terminal elimination half-life of approximately 27 hours. GSK2816126 exposure (maximum observed plasma concentration and area under the plasma-time curve) increased in a dose-proportional manner. No change from baseline in H3K27me3 was seen in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Fourteen of 41 (34%) patients had radiological best response of stable disease, 1 patient with lymphoma achieved a partial response, 21 of 41 (51%) patients had progressive disease, and 5 patients were unevaluable for antitumor response. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD of GSK2816126 was established at 2,400 mg, but the dosing method and relatively short half-life limited effective exposure, and modest anticancer activity was observed at tolerable doses.

Safety, efficacy, and dose response of the maturation inhibitor GSK3532795 (formerly known as BMS-955176) plus tenofovir/emtricitabine once daily in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected adults: Week 24 primary analysis from a randomized Phase IIb trial.

GSK3532795 (formerly known as BMS-955176) is a second-generation maturation inhibitor targeting a specific Gag cleavage site between capsid p24 and spacer peptide 1 of HIV-1. Study 205891 (previously AI468038) investigated the efficacy, safety, and dose response of GSK3532795 in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected participants. Study 205891 (NCT02415595) was a Phase IIb, randomized, active-controlled, double-blind, international trial. Participants were randomized 1:1:1:1 to one of three GSK3532795 arms at doses 60 mg, 120 mg or 180 mg once daily (QD), or to efavirenz (EFV) at 600 mg QD, each in combination with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) (300/200 mg QD). Primary endpoint was proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at Week 24. Between May 2015 and May 2016, 206 participants received treatment. At Week 24, 76-83% participants receiving GSK3532795 and 77% receiving EFV achieved HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL. Fifteen participants receiving GSK3532795 and one receiving EFV met resistance testing criteria; 10/15 receiving GSK3532795 had emergent substitutions at reverse transcriptase positions M184, and one at position K65, while the participant receiving EFV did not have any nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)/non-NRTI mutations. EFV, relative to GSK3532795, had more serious adverse events (9% versus 5%) and adverse events leading to discontinuation (17% versus 5%). However, 3-4-fold higher rates of gastrointestinal adverse events were observed with GSK3532795 relative to EFV. GSK3532795 combined with TDF/FTC is efficacious with 24 weeks of therapy. However, GSK3532795 showed a higher rate of gastrointestinal intolerability and treatment-emergent resistance to the NRTI backbone relative to EFV. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02415595.

HIV-1 Nef interaction influences the ATP-binding site of the Src-family kinase, Hck.

BACKGROUND: Nef is an HIV-1 accessory protein essential for viral replication and AIDS progression. Nef interacts with a multitude of host cell signaling partners, including members of the Src kinase family. Nef preferentially activates Hck, a Src-family kinase (SFK) strongly expressed in macrophages and other HIV target cells, by binding to its regulatory SH3 domain. Recently, we identified a series of kinase inhibitors that preferentially inhibit Hck in the presence of Nef. These compounds also block Nef-dependent HIV replication, validating the Nef-SFK signaling pathway as an antiretroviral drug target. Our findings also suggested that by binding to the Hck SH3 domain, Nef indirectly affects the conformation of the kinase active site to favor inhibitor association. RESULTS: To test this hypothesis, we engineered a "gatekeeper" mutant of Hck with enhanced sensitivity to the pyrazolopyrimidine tyrosine kinase inhibitor, NaPP1. We also modified the RT loop of the Hck SH3 domain to enhance interaction of the kinase with Nef. This modification stabilized Nef:Hck interaction in solution-based kinase assays, as a way to mimic the more stable association that likely occurs at cellular membranes. Introduction of the modified RT loop rendered Hck remarkably more sensitive to activation by Nef, and led to a significant decrease in the Km for ATP as well as enhanced inhibitor potency. CONCLUSIONS: These observations suggest that stable interaction with Nef may induce Src-family kinase active site conformations amenable to selective inhibitor targeting.

Expression of a Src family kinase in chronic myelogenous leukemia cells induces resistance to imatinib in a kinase-dependent manner.

The Bcr-Abl kinase inhibitor imatinib is remarkably effective in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), although drug resistance is an emerging problem. Myeloid Src family kinases such as Hck and Lyn are often overexpressed in imatinib-resistant CML cells that lack Bcr-Abl mutations. Here we tested whether Hck overexpression is sufficient to induce imatinib resistance using both wild-type Hck and a mutant (Hck-T338A) that is uniquely sensitive to the pyrazolo-pyrimidine inhibitor, NaPP1. Expression of either kinase in K562 CML cells caused resistance to imatinib-induced apoptosis and inhibition of soft-agar colony formation. Treatment with NaPP1 restored sensitivity to imatinib in cells expressing T338A but not wild-type Hck, demonstrating that resistance requires Hck kinase activity. NaPP1 also reduced Hck-mediated phosphorylation of Bcr-Abl at sites that may affect imatinib sensitivity exclusively in cells expressing Hck-T338A. These data show that elevated Src family kinase activity is sufficient to induce imatinib resistance through a mechanism that may involve phosphorylation of Bcr-Abl.

Conformational disturbance in Abl kinase upon mutation and deregulation.

Protein dynamics are inextricably linked to protein function but there are few techniques that allow protein dynamics to be conveniently interrogated. For example, mutations and translocations give rise to aberrant proteins such as Bcr-Abl where changes in protein conformation and dynamics are believed to result in deregulated kinase activity that provides the oncogenic signal in chronic myelogeous leukemia. Although crystal structures of the down-regulated c-Abl kinase core have been reported, the conformational impact of mutations that render Abl resistant to small-molecule kinase inhibitors are largely unknown as is the allosteric interplay of the various regulatory elements of the protein. Hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry (HX MS) was used to compare the conformations of wild-type Abl with a nonmyristoylated form and with 3 clinically relevant imatinib resistance mutants (T315I, Y253H and E255V). A HX-resistant core localized to the interface between the SH2 and kinase domains, a region known to be important for maintaining the down-regulated state. Conformational differences upon demyristoylation were consistent with the SH2 domain moving to the top of the small lobe of the kinase domain as a function of activation. There were conformational changes in the T315I mutant but, surprisingly, no major changes in conformation were detected in either the Y253H or the E255V mutants. Taken together, these results provide evidence that allosteric interactions and conformational changes play a major role in Abl kinase regulation in solution. Similar analyses could be performed on any protein to provide mechanistic details about conformational changes and protein function.