Ophthalmic involvement in PHACES syndrome: prevalence, spectrum of anomalies, and outcomes.

PURPOSE: To highlight prevalence, spectrum of anomalies, and outcome of ophthalmic involvement in PHACES syndrome (posterior fossa malformations, infantile hemangiomas, arterial, cardiac, eye, and sternal anomalies). METHODS: A retrospective, noncomparative, single-institution observational case series of children with PHACES was conducted from 2000 to 2019. Data on ocular presentations, interventions and visual outcomes were collected. Primary outcome measures were the frequency and spectrum of ocular involvement. Secondary outcomes were final visual acuity, long-term ocular sequelae, and frequency of surgical interventions. RESULTS: A total of 43 infants had PHACES, of whom 29 (67%) had periocular infantile facial hemangiomas (IFH) and 6 (14%) had primary ocular anomalies that were always ipsilateral to the IFH. Five patients (12%) met ocular PHACES-specific diagnostic criteria, including optic nerve (3), retinal vascular (1) and lenticular (2) anomalies. Non-PHACES-specific abnormalities were Peters anomaly (1), persistent pupillary membranes (2), dysmorphic optic nerves (1), and iris/choroidal hemangiomas (2). IFH-related periocular abnormalities were frequent: ptosis (29), proptosis (9), strabismus (6). Surgery was required in 8 of the 29 children: (strabismus [6], entropion [2], ptosis [2], and optical iridectomy [1]), all of whom had orbital/conjunctival hemangioma (P = 0.03). Final visual acuity (follow-up, 8.7 years) ranged between 20/20 and 20/80 in 26 of 29 patients. All patients with visual acuity worse than 20/200 (3/29 [10%]) had structural anomalies. CONCLUSIONS: Two-thirds of infants with PHACES have periocular IFH causing vision compromising complications of amblyopia and strabismus. Structural ocular anomalies exist in 1 of 7 patients and are always ipsilateral to the IFH. Long-term ophthalmic monitoring and management is required, and the majority of patients obtain good visual outcomes.

Value of a café-au-lait macules screening clinic: Experience from The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Café-au-lait macules (CALMs) are a characteristic feature of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), but also occur in other genetic disorders. Differential diagnosis of CALMs remains challenging and can be stressful for families. We sought to examine the role of an established CALMs screening clinic in diagnosing CALMs-related disorders. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed patients seen between July 2012 and January 2019 in a CALMs screening clinic at The Hospital for Sick Children, a tertiary pediatric hospital in Toronto, Canada. Pediatric patients were referred because of multiple CALMs or suspected NF1. Selection was based on a chronological referral sample with no exclusions. A pediatric dermatologist examined all patients for CALMs and NF1 manifestations. Genetic testing was offered to confirm a clinical diagnosis or when clinical findings were inconclusive. RESULTS: Three hundred patients, of which 152 (50.7%) were female and had a mean age of 5.6 ± 4.8 years were seen during the study period. NF1 was diagnosed in 76 (25.3%) patients, mosaic NF1 in 38 (12.7%) patients, and 8 (2.7%) patients received other genetic diagnoses. One hundred and twelve (37.3%) patients were diagnosed with isolated CALMs not associated with an underlying genetic disease. Furthermore, 36 (12%) of our patients did not have CALMs. CONCLUSIONS: The CALMs screening clinic aided in the early diagnosis of genetic disorders such as NF1 and distinguished CALMs from other hyperpigmented lesions. We encourage the adoption of this clinic model in referral centers to streamline and optimize care of patients with presumptive diagnosis of CALMs.

A 12-year-old girl with eczema not responding to treatment.

A 12-year-old girl, who has had a history of intermittent skin rashes since infancy, presents for the sixth time in four months for exacerbation of eczema that is not responding to recommended treatment (daily baths, frequent moisturization and twice-daily application of medium-potency topical corticosteroids). Her parents express concern about the effect of her skin disease on the child's life. They are worried about her sleeping difficulties and decreased involvement in her regular activities; for example, she has stopped playing sports and attending school. During the interview, the patient makes minimal eye contact and appears agitated. Her medical history includes allergic rhinitis. She looks systemically well, with normal temperature and vital signs. Skin examination shows generalized xerotic skin and erythematous patches, with predominantly flexural and facial excoriations affecting about half of the body. There is no evidence of burrows, track marks, vesicular or pustular lesions, or honey-coloured crusts. The rest of the exam is unremarkable.