Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
Perit Dial Int ; 36(4): 459-61, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27385808

RESUMO

Successful performance of peritoneal dialysis (PD) depends on a properly functioning PD catheter. Catheter malfunction remains a significant cause of technique failure, especially early in the course of therapy. Common causes of catheter malfunction include catheter displacement, omental or bowel wrapping, and fibrin clots. Less commonly, various intraperitoneal structures have been reported to lead to obstruction, including appendices epiploicae of sigmoid colon and the fallopian tube. Peritoneal dialysis catheter blockage due to fimbriae of the fallopian tube is being recognized as an important cause of catheter malfunction in females due to the increasing availability of diagnostic laparoscopy. We report 5 episodes of catheter malfunction in 4 patients on PD from a single center as a result of obstruction by the fallopian tube.


Assuntos
Falha de Equipamento , Tubas Uterinas/patologia , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Laparoscopia , Diálise Peritoneal/instrumentação , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
2.
Perit Dial Int ; 36(5): 540-6, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26475842

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: ♦ BACKGROUND: Implantation of the peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC), usually an elective procedure, may necessitate unexpected hospitalization and even transfer to intensive care due to the multiple comorbidities and inherent instability of the end-stage renal disease patient. Information on hospitalization after PDC implantation is limited and details about the reason for hospitalization are lacking. ♦ METHODS: We performed a cohort study in consecutive patients who underwent PDC implantation at a single institution from September 2007 to September 2013. Clinical characteristics of enrolled patients, technique of the implantation procedure, and all-cause unexpected hospitalization and morbidity within 14 days after implantation were analyzed. ♦ RESULTS: Excluding the patients with pre-arranged admission, a total of 246 patients receiving 252 PDC implantations during the 6 years were studied. After 39 procedures (15.5%), patients had an unexpected hospital stay or re-admission due to operative complications (33.3%), worsening of disease (35.9%), or a single-night hospital stay for observation (30.8%). Compared with discharged patients, the patients with unexpected hospitalization were older (p = 0.001), experienced higher rates of previous episodes of heart failure (p = 0.006) and heart disease (p < 0.001), had more use of general anesthesia (GA) (p = 0.046), underwent more added procedures during the implantation (p = 0.02), and had more episodes of flow obstruction and peritonitis after implantation (p = 0.012 and p < 0.001, respectively). Using a multivariable logistic regression, we showed that age, cardiac morbidity, use of general anesthesia, PDC flow problems and peritonitis after implantation were independent predictors of all-cause unexpected hospitalization. ♦ CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, our study analyzed the predictors of unplanned hospitalization after PDC implantation and identified the salient risk factors. Increased focus to identify patients at greatest risk for hospitalization, evaluation of processes of care, and implementation of preventive strategies may be helpful to reduce unplanned hospitalization after catheter insertion.


Assuntos
Cateterismo/efeitos adversos , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Diálise Peritoneal/efeitos adversos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Canadá , Cateterismo/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Falência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Diálise Peritoneal/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo
3.
Perit Dial Int ; 36(2): 177-81, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26374837

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: ♦ BACKGROUND: A functioning catheter is vital to the success of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Catheter complications related to the insertion procedure remain a major hindrance to PD utilization. Most catheters are placed by surgeons. Suboptimal catheter outcomes appear to be related to inadequate training and experience during surgical residency and the absence of educational opportunities to remedy this deficit once the surgeon is in practice. ♦ OBJECTIVE: The aim of this report is to describe a 1-day comprehensive surgeon training program in PD access surgery and to convey the results of the first 7 courses. ♦ METHODS: Needs assessment data served as the foundation for formulating course objectives and content. A disease-based approach to PD was taken to provide both didactic instruction and laboratory exercises. Surgical simulators permitted skills development for each key task in catheter placement. Educational outcomes were measured with pre- and post-tests, course evaluation, and follow-up survey. ♦ RESULTS: Seven courses were attended by 134 surgeons with an average faculty to participant ratio of 1:4 during hands-on laboratory sessions. Pre- and post-testing demonstrated a class-average normalized educational gain of 50%. On a 5-point Likert scale, the course was scored highly on 14 areas of evaluation with average responses ranging from 4.4 to 4.9. A follow-up survey conducted a mean of 28 months after the programs revealed significantly increased utilization of all 10 course-targeted PD access skills. Participants gave mean scores of 4.6 for improved confidence in case management and 4.4 for better catheter outcomes. ♦ CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive 1-day peritoneal access training course can produce long-term self-assessed improvement in surgical management and PD catheter outcomes.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Periférico , Competência Clínica , Educação Médica Continuada/métodos , Nefrologistas/educação , Diálise Peritoneal , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Avaliação Educacional , Humanos , Manequins , Nefrologia/educação , Diálise Peritoneal/métodos , Universidades
4.
World J Surg ; 39(1): 128-32, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25189449

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter (LPDC) implantation using nitrous oxide (N2O) pneumoperitoneum under procedural sedation is a technique that has many advantages over conventional insertion methods. The purpose of this study was to review the LPDC insertion results at our center. METHODS: Data from 87 consecutive patients who underwent LPDC insertion was retrospectively reviewed. All procedures were attempted under procedural sedation. After patients received intravenous and local anesthesia, a N2O pneumoperitoneum was established. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters were advanced using rectus sheath tunneling. The position of the catheter was confirmed by laparoscope, and adjunct procedures such as omentopexy and adhesiolysis were performed on select patients to prevent catheter flow problems. RESULTS: Nitrous oxide was well tolerated by 94 % of the patients. Only five patients required conversion to general anesthesia. After a mean follow-up of 18.2 months, mechanical complications included pericatheter/incision leakage (12.62 %), flow obstruction (4.60 %), incision/exit site hernia (3.45 %), hemoperitoneum (2.30 %), pleuroperitoneal fistula (1.15 %), scrotal leak (1.15 %), and migration (1.15 %). Infectious complications included exit site infection (1 episode per 312.95 patient-months) and peritonitis (1 episode per 31.93 patient-months). Revision-free catheter survival was 97.6 % after 1 year. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic implantation of a PD catheter with N2O pneumoperitoneum and local anesthesia is safe and effective in patients with severe renal failure. N2O is an inert gas and better tolerated as an insufflation agent, enabling awake procedures. Our results show that catheter-related functional outcomes are comparable to those in the existing literature. This approach can be recommended as a good option for catheter implantation in patients needing dialysis.


Assuntos
Cateterismo/métodos , Cateteres de Demora , Sedação Consciente/métodos , Diálise Peritoneal/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/uso terapêutico , Catéteres , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Óxido Nitroso/uso terapêutico , Pneumoperitônio Artificial , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
JSLS ; 18(4)2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25392677

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the total hospital costs associated with elective laparoscopic and open inguinal herniorrhaphy. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was used to identify patients who underwent elective inguinal herniorrhaphy from April 2009 to March 2011. A retrospective review of electronic patient records was performed along with a standardized case-costing analysis using data from the Ontario Case Costing Initiative. The main outcomes were operating room (OR) and total hospital costs. RESULTS: Two hundred eleven patients underwent elective unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy (117 open and 94 laparoscopic), and 33 patients underwent elective bilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy (9 open and 24 laparoscopic). OR and total hospital costs for open unilateral inguinal hernia repair were significantly lower than for the laparoscopic approach (median total cost, $3207.15 vs $3723.66; P < .001). OR and total hospital costs for repair of elective bilateral inguinal hernias were similar between the open and laparoscopic approaches (median total cost, $4574.02 vs $4662.89; P = .827). CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of a Canadian academic hospital, when considering the repair of an elective unilateral inguinal hernia, the OR and total hospital costs of open surgery were significantly lower than for the laparoscopic techniques. There was no statistical difference between OR and total hospital costs when comparing open surgery and laparoscopic techniques for the repair of bilateral inguinal hernias. Given the perioperative benefits of laparoscopy, further studies incorporating hernia-specific outcomes are necessary to determine the cost-effectiveness of each approach and to define the optimal treatment strategy.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/economia , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/economia , Custos Hospitalares , Laparoscopia/economia , Laparotomia/economia , Idoso , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Hérnia Inguinal/economia , Herniorrafia/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparotomia/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
7.
Obes Surg ; 23(8): 1309-14, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23591549

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the laparoscopic approach, patients can suffer moderate to severe pain following bariatric surgery. This randomized controlled double-blinded trial investigated the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for laparoscopic gastric-bypass surgery. METHODS: Seventy patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric-bypass surgery were randomized to receive either bilateral ultrasound-guided subcostal TAP block injections after induction of general anesthesia or none. All patients received trocar insertion site local anesthetic infiltration and systemic analgesia. The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption (IV morphine equivalent) during the first 24 h postoperatively. Interval opioid consumption, pain severity scores, rates of nausea or vomiting, and rates of pruritus were measured during phase I recovery, and at 24 and 48 h postoperatively. RESULTS: There was no difference in cumulative opioid consumption during the first 24 h postoperatively between the TAP (32.2 mg [95% CI, 27.6-36.7]) and control (35.6 mg [95% CI, 28.6-42.5]; P = 0.41) groups. Postoperative opioid consumptions during phase I recovery and the 24-48-h interval were similar between groups, as were pain scores at rest and with movement during all measured intervals. The rates of nausea or vomiting and pruritus were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral TAP blocks do not provide additional analgesic benefit when added to trocar insertion site local anesthetic infiltration and systemic analgesia for laparoscopic gastric-bypass surgery.


Assuntos
Músculos Abdominais , Anestesia Geral/métodos , Derivação Gástrica , Bloqueio Nervoso , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Dor Pós-Operatória , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Músculos Abdominais/inervação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Analgésicos Opioides , Canadá/epidemiologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Derivação Gástrica/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Obesidade Mórbida/fisiopatologia , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Satisfação do Paciente , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios , Estudos Prospectivos , Prurido , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Obes Surg ; 23(8): 1302-8, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23526084

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gastrojejunostomy (GJ) stricture is a common complication after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for morbid obesity, and the optimal anastomotic technique remains uncertain. The objective of this study was to use cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis to compare rates of gastrojejunostomy strictures after linear stapling with longitudinal versus transverse enterotomy closure in gastric bypass patients. METHODS: Charts of all consecutive patients with at least 60 days of post-operative follow-up after laparoscopic RYGB (LRYGB) at our tertiary care institution from Nov 2009 to Dec, 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Gastrojejunostomy stricture was diagnosed by history and upper endoscopy. CUSUM method of quality control analysis was used to determine sequential improvement in stricture rates with the change in technique. RESULTS: A total of 197 patients were included (97 longitudinal closure, median age 44 (21-67), median BMI 47 (35-80), 85.8 % female). Gastrojejunostomy strictures occurred in 16 % of longitudinal and 0 % of transverse patients (p = <0.0001). CUSUM analysis demonstrated sequential statistically significant improvement in stricture rates after the change in technique was applied. The longitudinal group had a statistically significant increased rate of surgery-related readmissions (15.5 vs 6.0 %, p = 0.038), with 43.7 % of those readmissions related to GJ strictures. There were no other significant outcome differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Linear-stapled anastomosis with a transverse enterotomy closure significantly reduces the rate of gastrojejunostomy stricture for LRYGB, considerably reducing procedural morbidity.


Assuntos
Derivação Gástrica/efeitos adversos , Derivação Gástrica/métodos , Doenças do Jejuno/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Técnicas de Sutura , Adulto , Idoso , Canadá/epidemiologia , Constrição Patológica/epidemiologia , Constrição Patológica/prevenção & controle , Enterostomia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Doenças do Jejuno/epidemiologia , Doenças do Jejuno/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Teóricos , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Obesidade Mórbida/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Grampeamento Cirúrgico , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Eur J Intern Med ; 17(3): 211-2, 2006 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16618458

RESUMO

Oral anticoagulant therapy with warfarin is commonly used to prevent thromboembolic events in patients at risk. The degree of anticoagulation is variable among individuals and is influenced by many factors; therefore, patients must be monitored frequently to assess potential adverse effects related to treatment. There is a direct relationship between excessive anticoagulation and the risk of bleeding. We present a patient who came in with an acute abdomen, anemia, and increased international normalized ratio. Gastroscopy revealed a large amount of blood in the stomach. Hemodynamic instability necessitated urgent laparotomy. The small bowel was found to be ischemic due to increased intraluminal pressure. Upon enterotomy, liters of old hematoma were evacuated and the intestine resumed its blood supply. To our knowledge, we describe the first reported case of intraluminal hematoma as a rare cause of obstructive mechanical ileus during warfarin treatment. This case highlights an unknown, but potentially lethal, manifestation of warfarin therapy.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA