Influence of regression, its extent and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes on sentinel node status, relapse, and survival in a 10-year retrospective study of melanoma patients.

This case-control study seeks to investigate the influence of histological findings, specifically regression, its extent and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TILs), on result of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy, 5-year melanoma-specific survival (MSS), and relapse-free survival (RFS). We included all patients with cutaneous melanoma who underwent SLN biopsy at the Melanoma Center of the University of Brescia, following the Italian Association of Medical Oncology National guidelines from January 2008 to August 2018. Regression and its extent (<75 or ≥75%) and the presence of TILs were reevaluated by a trained dermatopathologist, adhering to the 2017 College of American Pathologists Cancer Protocol for Skin Melanoma. These patients were followed up for 5 years. Our study uncovered significant associations between regression and male sex ( P  < 0.05), melanoma location on the trunk, upper limbs, and back ( P  = 0.001), ulceration ( P  < 0.05), lower Breslow thickness ( P  = 0.001), and the presence of lymphocytic infiltration (both brisk and nonbrisk) ( P  < 0.001). Regression and its extent, however, did not appear to affect SLN positivity ( P  = 0.315). Similarly, our data did not reveal a correlation between TILs and result of SLN biopsy ( P  = 0.256). When analyzing MSS and RFS in relation to the presence or absence of regression and TILs, no statistically significant differences were observed, thus precluding the need for logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier curve analysis. This study's findings underscore that regression and TILs do not appear to exert an influence on sentinel lymph node status, MSS, or RFS in our cohort of patients.

Surgical margin mapping for lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma: traditional technique (visual inspection with dermoscopy) versus combined paper tape and reflectance confocal microscopy technique.

BACKGROUND: The detection of subclinical margin in lentigo maligna/lentigo maligna melanoma (LM/LMM) can be challenging for the dermatologist. Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) enables to observe in vivo atypical melanocytes beyond the clinical margins. The aim of this study is to establish which of these methods (clinical examination and dermoscopy versus "Paper tape - RCM") is more precise to define the lesion margin and to reduce the number of re-intervention and overtreatments in cosmetically sensitive areas. METHODS: Fifty-seven cases of LM/LMM were analyzed during 2016-2022. Pre-surgical mapping procedures in 32 lesions were effectuated with dermatoscopy. Furthermore, pre-surgical mapping procedures in 25 lesions were effectuated with RCM and paper tape. RESULTS: RCM method's accuracy to detect subclinical margins was 92.0%. In 24 of 25 cases, the lesions were excised completely during the first intervention. In 20 of 32 cases analyzed with dermoscopy, a second surgical intervention was effectuated. CONCLUSION: The RCM paper method allows us to delineate subclinical margin more accurately and reduce overtreatment, especially in sensitive areas, such as the face and neck.