A Phase 2 Trial of Sibeprenlimab in Patients with IgA Nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: A proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) is implicated in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy. Sibeprenlimab is a humanized IgG2 monoclonal antibody that binds to and neutralizes APRIL. METHODS: In this phase 2, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial, we randomly assigned adults with biopsy-confirmed IgA nephropathy who were at high risk for disease progression, despite having received standard-care treatment, in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive intravenous sibeprenlimab at a dose of 2, 4, or 8 mg per kilogram of body weight or placebo once monthly for 12 months. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the log-transformed 24-hour urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio at month 12. Secondary end points included the change from baseline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at month 12. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: Among 155 patients who underwent randomization, 38 received sibeprenlimab at a dose of 2 mg per kilogram, 41 received sibeprenlimab at a dose of 4 mg per kilogram, 38 received sibeprenlimab at a dose of 8 mg per kilogram, and 38 received placebo. At 12 months, the geometric mean ratio reduction (±SE) from baseline in the 24-hour urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio was 47.2±8.2%, 58.8±6.1%, 62.0±5.7%, and 20.0±12.6% in the sibeprenlimab 2-mg, 4-mg, and 8-mg groups and the placebo group, respectively. At 12 months, the least-squares mean (±SE) change from baseline in eGFR was -2.7±1.8, 0.2±1.7, -1.5±1.8, and -7.4±1.8 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 in the sibeprenlimab 2-mg, 4-mg, and 8-mg groups and the placebo group, respectively. The incidence of adverse events that occurred after the start of administration of sibeprenlimab or placebo was 78.6% in the pooled sibeprenlimab groups and 71.1% in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with IgA nephropathy, 12 months of treatment with sibeprenlimab resulted in a significantly greater decrease in proteinuria than placebo. (Funded by Visterra; ENVISION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04287985; EudraCT number, 2019-002531-29.).

A Proliferation Inducing Ligand (APRIL) targeted antibody is a safe and effective treatment of murine IgA nephropathy.

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most prevalent primary chronic glomerular disease for which no safe disease-specific therapies currently exist. IgAN is an autoimmune disease involving the production of autoantigenic, aberrantly O-glycosylated IgA1 and ensuing deposition of nephritogenic immune complexes in the kidney. A Proliferation Inducing Ligand (APRIL) has emerged as a key B-cell-modulating factor in this pathogenesis. Using a mouse anti-APRIL monoclonal antibody (4540), we confirm both the pathogenic role of APRIL in IgAN and the therapeutic efficacy of antibody-directed neutralization of APRIL in the grouped mouse ddY disease model. Treatment with 4540 directly translated to a reduction in relevant pathogenic mechanisms including suppressed serum IgA levels, reduced circulating immune complexes, significantly lower kidney deposits of IgA, IgG and C3, and suppression of proteinuria compared to mice receiving vehicle or isotype control antibodies. Furthermore, we translated these findings to the pharmacological characterization of VIS649, a highly potent, humanized IgG2κ antibody targeting and neutralizing human APRIL through unique epitope engagement, leading to inhibition of APRIL-mediated B-cell activities. VIS649 treatment of non-human primates showed dose-dependent reduction of serum IgA levels of up to 70%. A reduction of IgA+, IgM+, and IgG+ B cells was noted in the gut-associated mucosa of VIS649-treated animals. Population-based modeling predicted a favorable therapeutic dosing profile for subcutaneous administration of VIS649 in the clinical setting. Thus, our data highlight the potential therapeutic benefit of VIS649 for the treatment of IgAN.

Factors affecting response and tolerability to ferumoxytol in nondialysis chronic kidney disease patients.

BACKGROUND: Ferumoxytol is a unique intravenous (i.v.) iron therapy. This report examines factors affecting hemoglobin response to i.v. ferumoxytol, and the relationship between hematologic parameters, concomitant erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA), and adverse events (AEs) in nondialysis CKD patients. METHODS: A series of post-hoc efficacy and safety analyses were performed using pooled data from two identically designed Phase III studies in 608 nondialysis CKD patients randomized to receive two 510 mg i.v. injections of ferumoxytol within 5 ± 3 days versus oral iron. RESULTS: Ferumoxytol resulted in a significant increase in hemoglobin in the presence and absence of ESA, and across a range of baseline hemoglobin, transferrin saturation, ferritin, and reticulocyte hemoglobin content levels. Adverse event rates with ferumoxytol were similar across quartiles of change in hemoglobin; there were no trends suggesting an increased rate of cardiovascular AEs with higher maximum achieved hemoglobin or faster rate of hemoglobin rise. There was no meaningful difference in the rate of AEs, serious AEs, and cardiovascular AEs between patients receiving or not receiving ESA. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses add to the knowledge of predictors of response and safety outcomes associated with i.v. iron therapy in nondialysis CKD patients.

Ferumoxytol as an intravenous iron replacement therapy in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Intravenous iron is a key component of anemia management for chronic kidney disease (CKD). Ferumoxytol is a unique intravenous iron product that can be administered as a rapid injection in doses up to 510 mg. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This was a randomized, open-label, controlled, multicenter Phase 3 trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous ferumoxytol compared with oral iron. Anemic patients with CKD stage 5D on hemodialysis and on a stable erythropoiesis-stimulating agent regimen received either two injections of 510 mg of ferumoxytol within 7 d (n = 114) or 200 mg elemental oral iron daily for 21 d (n = 116). The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in hemoglobin from baseline to day 35. Safety was closely monitored. RESULTS: Ferumoxytol resulted in a mean increase in hemoglobin of 1.02 +/- 1.13 g/dl at day 35 compared with 0.46 +/- 1.06 g/dl with oral iron (P = 0.0002). Twice as many ferumoxytol-treated patients than oral iron-treated patients achieved a > or =1 g/dl hemoglobin increase at day 35 (P = 0.0002). There was a greater mean increase in transferrin saturation (TSAT) with ferumoxytol compared with oral iron at day 35 (P < 0.0001). The larger hemoglobin increase after ferumoxytol compared with oral iron at day 35 persisted after adjustment for baseline hemoglobin, TSAT, and serum ferritin. Overall adverse event rates were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients on hemodialysis, rapid intravenous injection of 510 mg of ferumoxytol led to significantly greater hemoglobin increases compared with oral iron, with comparable tolerability.

Mitochondrial DNA injury and mortality in hemodialysis patients.

The role of mitochondrial injury in the pathogenesis of complications of uremia is incompletely defined, although diminished bioenergetic capacity and the accumulation of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations have been reported. This study was undertaken to evaluate the prevalence of mtDNA injury in 180 patients who had ESRD and were enrolled into the baseline phase of the HEMO study and to relate these markers to all-cause mortality. The mitochondrial injury markers studied in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were the mtDNA copy number per cell, measured by quantitative PCR, and the presence of the mtDNA(4977) mutation. After frequency-matching healthy control subjects for age, mtDNA copy number was lower among older dialysis patients compared with older healthy subjects (P = 0.01). A one-log increase in mtDNA copy number was independently associated with a decreased hazard for mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 0.64; 95% confidence interval 0.46 to 0.89). The mtDNA(4977) deletion was present in 48 (31%) patients and was independently associated with a decreased hazard for mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 0.33; 95% confidence interval 0.19 to 0.56). In summary, the mtDNA(4977) seems to predict survival in ESRD, but a reduced mitochondrial copy number seems to predict a poor outcome. Although further exploration of these associations is needed, evaluation of mitochondrial DNA copy number and somatic mtDNA mutations may provide simple genomic biomarkers to predict clinical outcomes among patients with ESRD.

KDOQI US commentary on the KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the prevention, diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hepatitis C in CKD.

KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) is an international initiative with a key mission of developing clinical practice guidelines in the area of chronic kidney disease (CKD). KDIGO recently published evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in individuals with CKD. The process of adaptation of international guidelines is an important task that, although guided by general principles, needs to be individualized for each region and country. Therefore, the National Kidney Foundation-Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) convened a multidisciplinary group to comment on the application and implementation of the KDIGO guidelines for patients with CKD in the United States. This commentary summarizes the process undertaken by this group in considering the guidelines in the context of health care delivery in the United States. Guideline statements are presented, followed by a succinct discussion and annotation of the rationale for the statements. Research recommendations that are of particular interest to the United States are then summarized to highlight future areas of inquiry that would enable updating of the guidelines.

Ferumoxytol for treating iron deficiency anemia in CKD.

Iron deficiency is an important cause of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), but intravenous iron is infrequently used among patients who are not on dialysis. Ferumoxytol is a novel intravenous iron product that can be administered as a rapid injection. This Phase III trial randomly assigned 304 patients with CKD in a 3:1 ratio to two 510-mg doses of intravenous ferumoxytol within 5 +/- 3 d or 200 mg of elemental oral iron daily for 21 d. The increase in hemoglobin at day 35, the primary efficacy end point, was 0.82 +/- 1.24 g/dl with ferumoxytol and 0.16 +/- 1.02 g/dl with oral iron (P < 0.0001). Among patients who were not receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, hemoglobin increased 0.62 +/- 1.02 g/dl with ferumoxytol and 0.13 +/- 0.93 g/dl with oral iron. Among patients who were receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, hemoglobin increased 1.16 +/- 1.49 g/dl with ferumoxytol and 0.19 +/- 1.14 g/dl with oral iron. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 10.6% of patients who were treated with ferumoxytol and 24.0% of those who were treated with oral iron; none was serious. In summary, a regimen of two doses of 510 mg of intravenous ferumoxytol administered rapidly within 5 +/- 3 d was well tolerated and had the intended therapeutic effect. This regimen may offer a new, efficient option to treat iron deficiency anemia in patients with CKD.

Role of prohepcidin, inflammatory markers and iron status in resistance to rhEPO therapy in hemodialysis patients.

The aim of our study was to assess possible relations between prohepcidin, iron status and inflammatory markers in hemodialysis (HD) patients, as well as its association with resistance to recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) therapy. Fifty HD patients and 25 healthy controls were enrolled in the study. Among HD patients, 25 were non-responders and 25 were responders to rhEPO therapy. Complete blood cell count, reticulocyte count, and circulating levels of ferritin, iron, transferrin saturation, C-reactive protein (CRP), soluble interleukin (IL)-2 receptor (s-IL2R), soluble transferrin receptor (s-TfR), IL-6 and prohepcidin were measured in all patients and controls. HD patients showed higher circulating levels of ferritin, s-TfR, CRP, IL-6, s-IL2R and prohepcidin, and lower levels of transferrin compared to healthy controls. Higher levels of s-TfR, CRP and lower levels prohepcidin were observed among non-responders compared to responders. Prohepcidin levels correlated negatively with s-TfR and reticulocyte count. The weekly rhEPO/kg dose was found to be positively correlated with CRP, hemoglobin and s-TfR. In conclusion, our data show that a close interaction exists between inflammation, iron status and prohepcidin serum levels that ultimately regulate intracellular iron availability. Prohepcidin and s-TfR, together with CRP, may prove to be good markers of resistance to rhEPO therapy in HD patients.

Plasma adiponectin levels and clinical outcomes among haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Adiponectin (ADPN) levels are consistently elevated among patients with advanced chronic kidney disease, but its relationship with cardiovascular outcomes in this population remains controversial. METHODS: We measured baseline and yearly plasma ADPN in 182 prevalent haemodialysis patients recruited to the Haemodialysis (HEMO) Study from two Boston centres. Plasma ADPN at baseline and during follow-up was studied in relation to prevalent cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Baseline plasma ADPN levels were found to be approximately twofold higher than in the general population and correlated inversely with (log-transformed) CRP levels and (log-transformed) body mass index (BMI). Levels measured over time showed a gradual increase (0.95 microg/mL, 95% CI = 0.12-1.78 microg/mL; P = 0.03) by year, although this difference became non-significant after adjustment for covariates. Baseline ADPN levels were lower among patients with pre-existing CVD (adjusted OR of 0.67; P = 0.03). They also predicted all-cause mortality (P < 0.01) and the composite outcome of 'cardiovascular events/cardiovascular mortality' (P < 0.01); levels measured over time predicted the composite outcome of 'cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality' (P < 0.01). These relationships were non-linear (quadratic) with the hazard for each outcome increasing in the lower and upper ranges of the distribution of ADPN, and strengthened after adjustment for baseline covariates including serum albumin, CVD and the flux and dialysis dose categorization of the HEMO study. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, low plasma levels of ADPN were associated with inflammation and pre-existing CVD; ADPN levels predicted cardiovascular and mortality outcomes, the relationship being extensively confounded by multiple patient-related factors.

Protective effect of intravenous levocarnitine on subsequent-month hospitalization among prevalent hemodialysis patients, 1998 to 2003.

BACKGROUND: Levocarnitine deficiency in hemodialysis patients is common. Although the effect of intravenous levocarnitine therapy was studied in small trials, the effect on global outcomes in larger populations is unclear. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services data; prevalent hemodialysis patients, 1998 to 2003. PREDICTOR: Intravenous levocarnitine use, clinical characteristics, comorbid conditions. OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: Effect of 1 g or greater per dialysis session of levocarnitine for 10 or more sessions during a month on subsequent hospitalization days. Repeated-measures and marginal structural models were fit, the latter to account for time-dependent confounding. RESULTS: Of the study population, 3% to 7% received levocarnitine for 1 month per year or more. Treated patients were older with more severe comorbidity and larger erythropoietin doses than untreated patients. In repeated-measures model analysis adjusted for demographic characteristics and disease severity, 1 g or greater per dialysis session of levocarnitine for 10 or more sessions during a month was associated with a 10.8% (95% confidence interval, 9.7 to 11.9; P < 0.01) subsequent-month decrease in hospitalization days. In marginal structural model analysis, levocarnitine therapy was associated with a 21.7% (95% confidence interval, 18.4 to 24.9; P < 0.01) decrease in hospitalization days. LIMITATIONS: Algorithm for identifying comorbid conditions from claims validated only for diabetes; biochemical marker levels unavailable in Medicare claims; levocarnitine therapy quantified only while patients were not hospitalized. CONCLUSION: Because hemodialysis patients are hospitalized about 15 days yearly, the association of monthly levocarnitine regimen with lower hospitalization rate is clinically significant. The causality of this association must be confirmed by randomized clinical trials.

Dose requirements among hemodialysis patients treated with darbepoetin-alpha or epoetin-beta.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In a cohort of hemodialysis patients, we evaluated the hypothesis that weekly administration of intravenous (IV) darbepoetin-alpha (DA) was associated with lower total erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) requirements as compared to a regimen of multiple subcutaneous (SC) doses per week of epoetin-beta (EB). METHODS: We studied 1,159 hemodialysis patients who were treated exclusively with either IV DA or SC EB across a network of Portuguese clinics during 2004. Linear regression was used to assess the adjusted relationship between the ESA regimen and weekly ESA requirements over the period of observation. Generalized estimating equations were applied in order to model the population average effects of the correlated mean weekly ESA dose for each individual. We also calculated propensity scores for the receipt of DA and assessed the relationship between ESA type and dose requirement within each quintile of the score. RESULTS: The adjusted dose of IV DA, when expressed as a proportion of the dose used in EB-treated patients, did not differ from the dose administered to EB recipients (0.961, 95% CI 0.904, 1.021). A similar relationship was observed within each propensity score quintile. CONCLUSIONS: Hemodialysis patients who received IV DA had dose requirements that were similar to their counterparts who were treated with SC EB. A once-weekly dosing regimen and avoidance of SC administration enhance the attractiveness of DA as an alternative to traditional ESAs. The potential for unmeasured confounding, restriction to a population that was treated with a single ESA preparation and application of a 200 IU:1 mug EB:DA dose conversion are important limitations of this study.

Urinary N-acetyl-beta-(D)-glucosaminidase activity and kidney injury molecule-1 level are associated with adverse outcomes in acute renal failure.

The role of urinary biomarkers of kidney injury in the prediction of adverse clinical outcomes in acute renal failure (ARF) has not been well described. The relationship between urinary N-acetyl-beta-(D)-glucosaminidase activity (NAG) and kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) level and adverse clinical outcomes was evaluated prospectively in a cohort of 201 hospitalized patients with ARF. NAG was measured by spectrophotometry, and KIM-1 was measured by a microsphere-based Luminex technology. Mean Acute Physiology, Age, Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score was 16, 43% had sepsis, 39% required dialysis, and hospital mortality was 24%. Urinary NAG and KIM-1 increased in tandem with APACHE II and Multiple Organ Failure scores. Compared with patients in the lowest quartile of NAG, the second, third, and fourth quartile groups had 3.0-fold (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3 to 7.2), 3.7-fold (95% CI 1.6 to 8.8), and 9.1-fold (95% CI 3.7 to 22.7) higher odds, respectively, for dialysis requirement or hospital death (P < 0.001). This association persisted after adjustment for APACHE II, Multiple Organ Failure score, or the combined covariates cirrhosis, sepsis, oliguria, and mechanical ventilation. Compared with patients in the lowest quartile of KIM-1, the second, third, and fourth quartile groups had 1.4-fold (95% CI 0.6 to 3.0), 1.4-fold (95% CI 0.6 to 3.0), and 3.2-fold (95% CI 1.4 to 7.4) higher odds, respectively, for dialysis requirement or hospital death (P = 0.034). NAG or KIM-1 in combination with the covariates cirrhosis, sepsis, oliguria, and mechanical ventilation yielded an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.78 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.84) in predicting the composite outcome. Urinary markers of kidney injury such as NAG and KIM-1 can predict adverse clinical outcomes in patients with ARF.

A systematic review of the effect of the Excebrane dialyser on biomarkers of lipid peroxidation.

BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress is prevalent in dialysis patients and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease and anaemia. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the effect of Excebrane, a vitamin E-coated cellulose-based dialyser, on circulating biomarkers of lipid peroxidation, as surrogate markers of oxidative stress. METHODS: The primary sources used to identify candidate studies included PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, a bibliography provided by the dialyser manufacturer, and a manual search of abstracts from proceedings of scientific meetings and review articles. Studies were selected for analysis if their design included a comparator group (primarily within patient comparison, i.e. pre- and post-study evaluations). For the meta-analysis, we computed the overall change of the outcome from baseline using a random-effects model. A supplemental analysis was performed in which the absolute levels of these biomarkers of lipid peroxidation were converted to a common unit by calculating standardized effect sizes. RESULTS: Fourteen peer-reviewed articles met the criteria. The studies consisted of 11 single arm, one randomized crossover and two randomized controlled trials, with a total of 37 to 158 evaluable patients, according to the outcome of interest analysed. Due to the paucity of randomized trials, the meta-analysis was limited to the Excebrane arm of each study. When the studies were combined according to similar measurement units, the overall mean decrease in malondialdehyde (MDA) level was -0.3 mM (95% CI, -0.5 to -0.1 mM; seven studies) and -0.8 nmol/mg low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (95% CI, -1.3 to -0.4 nmol/mg LDL; three studies), respectively. The summary estimate revealed a non-significant decrease in pre-dialysis thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) level of 0.4 microM (95% CI, -1.2 to 0.4 microM; three studies). When the MDA and TBARS studies were combined using the standardized effect size, the mean decrease in these biomarkers of lipid peroxidation was statistically significant at -1.7 units (95% CI, -2.7, -0.7 units; 13 studies). A meta-analysis on the effect of Excebrane on pre-dialysis levels of oxidized-LDL could not be performed due to study heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: The conversion of dialysis patients to a vitamin E-coated dialyser is associated with an improvement in circulating biomarkers of lipid peroxidation, which is of potential clinical benefit.

Acute renal failure after endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is an increasingly used alternative to open surgical repair of unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). The effect of EVAR on postprocedure acute renal failure has not been determined. We hypothesized that EVAR would be associated with a lower risk of acute renal failure and acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of the 2002 Nationwide Inpatient Sample, the largest all-payer inpatient care database in the United States, reflecting discharges from a representative sample of United States hospitals. We identified 6614 discharges with a primary diagnosis of unruptured AAA and a primary procedure code for open AAA repair or EVAR. We excluded 56 patients with end-stage renal disease and 42 patients who underwent concomitant aortorenal bypass. We compared EVAR vs open repair in this cohort. The main outcome measures were acute renal failure and acute renal failure requiring dialysis. RESULTS: A total of 6516 patient discharges met the inclusion criteria for the study, and postprocedure acute renal failure developed in 439 (6.7%). EVAR was associated with lower odds of acute renal failure (adjusted odds ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.33 to 0.53) and acute renal failure requiring dialysis (adjusted odds ratio, 0.30, 95% confidence interval, 0.15 to 0.63). Results were similar when EVAR and open AAA repair were compared within quintiles of the propensity score for the receipt of EVAR. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with open AAA repair, EVAR is associated with a lower risk of postprocedure acute renal failure.

Effect of comorbidity on the increased mortality associated with early initiation of dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Current recommendations for initiating dialysis therapy are based on level of kidney function and clinical evidence of uremia. Several studies reported no benefit in patient survival from initiating dialysis therapy with a greater glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Whether this is explained by a greater comorbidity burden or detrimental effect of early initiation remains unclear. We thus undertook an evaluation of the impact of comorbidity on the association between GFR at initiation and death. METHODS: Data from the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services were used to derive 3 incident dialysis populations: (1) general population aged 18+ years, (2) older patients aged 67+ years, and (3) a "low-risk" subgroup without diabetes, heart failure, or atherosclerotic heart disease. A Cox proportional hazard regression technique was used. RESULTS: Greater GFR at initiation of dialysis therapy was associated with a greater risk for death in all populations, and sequential adjustment for additional covariates attenuated the effect. Patients in the general dialysis population who initiated dialysis therapy at a GFR greater than 10 mL/min/1.73 m2 (>0.17 mL/s) had a 42% increased risk for death compared with patients with a GFR less than 5 mL/min/1.73 m2 (<0.08 mL/s) at initiation of dialysis therapy after adjusting for all covariates. In the older and healthier populations, adjusted increased risks were 25% and 39%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients initiating dialysis therapy at greater GFRs have an increased risk for death not fully explained by comorbidity. Additional research is required to determine the reasons for poor survival in patients who start dialysis therapy with significant residual renal function.

The impact of waiting time and comorbid conditions on the survival benefit of kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Longer waiting times may limit the survival benefit of kidney transplantation in older patients or those with a high burden of comorbid disease. METHODS: We performed a longitudinal study of mortality among 63,783 transplant candidates who started dialysis between April 1995 and December 2000. We determined the relative risk (RR) of death and increase in life expectancy among subjects who received a first deceased donor transplant after different waiting times compared to subjects who had equivalent waiting times but remained on dialysis. RESULTS: Transplant recipients had a lower long-term RR of death and the risk reduction was greatest in recipients with longer waiting times (RR of death 12 months after transplantation for recipients with waiting times of 0, 1, 2, 3 years was 0.49, 0.43, 0.38, 0.34, P = 0.0006). The average increase in life expectancy in transplant recipients was 9.8 years and was lower in older recipients and recipients with comorbid conditions. Increased waiting times from 1 to 3 years only moderately decreased the overall survival benefit of transplantation from 7.1 to 5.6 years, and all subjects derived a survival benefit from transplantation with waiting times up to 3 years. CONCLUSION: These findings do not support limiting access to transplantation for otherwise suitable candidates on the basis of longer anticipated waiting times.

General medical care among patients with chronic kidney disease: opportunities for improving outcomes.

Suboptimal health care during advancing chronic kidney disease (CKD) may result in greater morbidity and cost once dialysis is started and may preclude future transplantation. Medicare data were examined for the prevalence of selected general health, diabetes, and CKD interventions in a national cohort of patients in the 2 yr before dialysis initiation and compared with a contemporaneous non-CKD cohort. A total of 24,778 individuals who were aged > or =67 yr composed the CKD cohort, and 1,046,136 individuals who were aged > or =67 yr did not have CKD. Among patients with diabetes and CKD, fewer than two thirds had claims for eye examinations, 75% for HbA(1C) testing, and 68% for lipid testing, with similar proportions in the non-CKD cohort. Among those without diabetes, 47 and 54% of the CKD and non-CKD cohorts, respectively, had claims for lipid testing. Fewer than 50 and 15% had claims for influenza and pneumococcal vaccination, respectively, with slightly lower proportions among patients with CKD. Claims for cancer tests were found for 14 to 41% and 29 to 52% of individuals with and without CKD, respectively, depending on the type of cancer. A greater proportion of patients with diabetes tended to have claims for tests in both cohorts. In the CKD cohort, claims for anemia testing and parathyroid hormone levels were available in fewer than 50 and 15%, respectively, and claims for permanent vascular access were found for only 30% of hemodialysis patients. This study provides further evidence that patients with CKD may not be receiving general health and CKD care according to current recommendations.

The advanced age deceased kidney donor: current outcomes and future opportunities.

BACKGROUND: Due to the aging general population, deceased donors > or =55 years will form an increasingly larger proportion of the deceased kidney donor pool. METHODS: Using data from the United States Renal Data System, we determined the change in graft survival between 1996 and 2000 among 32,557 recipients of donors aged <55 years and > or =55 years in univariate and multivariate survival analyses. We identified donor risk factors for graft loss that might influence the decision to accept or reject donors <55 and > or =55 years. The initial glomerular filtration rate established 6 months after transplantation (initial GFR), and the stability of GFR in the first post-transplant year (GFR at 12 months post-transplantation-GFR at six months post-transplantation) were compared between recipients of donors <55 and > or =55 years and the association of these factors with graft survival was determined. RESULTS: In 2000, one-year graft survival in donors > or =55 years was 86.7%. Between 1996 and 1999 the projected graft half life improved from 11.4 to 14.5 years for recipients of donors <55 years (P < 0.01); however, there was no improvement for recipients of donors > or =55 years (8.2 to 9.2 year, P= 0.46). Among donor factors studied, only cold ischemic time >24 hours identified recipients of donors > or =55 years at risk for graft loss. Compared to recipients of donors <55 years, recipients of donors > or =55 years established a lower initial GFR (42 vs. 56 mL/min/1.73 m(2), P < 0.0001), and had less stable GFR in the first post-transplant year (-1.5 vs. -0.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2), P <.0001). Recipients from donors > or =55 years with initial GFR > or =50 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and no drop GFR during the first post-transplant year had graft survival that was superior to that of donors <55 years with either initial GFR <50 mL/min/1.73 m(2) or a drop in GFR during the first post-transplant year. CONCLUSION: Donors > or =55 years are a valuable resource. Despite improvements in immunosuppression, rejection, and delayed graft function, the projected increase in long-term graft survival among recipients of donors <55 years was not shared among recipients of donors > or =55 years. Recipients of donors > or =55 years had lower initial GFR, and less stable GFR during the first post-transplant year. Limiting cold ischemic time to <24 hours may improve outcomes among recipients of donors > or =55 years. Future studies to maximize initial GFR and minimize early loss of GFR in recipients of donors > or =55 years may lead to improved outcomes from deceased donors > or =55 years.